This topic is locked from further discussion.
It's ironic, because Islamic countries don't allow freedom of other religions, it's either Islam or death.Well, several threads and posts have made me curious enough to ask this question out right. Do you believe Islam should be equal with all other religions in the US, and share the same freedoms other religions have? Or should Islam be restrained somewhat in comparison to other major religions in the US?
Pixel-Pirate
That depends on exactly what you mean by "freedom of religion". If it simply means that they're allowed to believe whatever they believe without repurcussions, then of course Muslims should be "protected by it". If you mean "makes things easier for followers of the religion" then of course not. Muslims shouldn't get it easier or better than anybody else in your nation.
Also, I'm reading some pretty silly comments in this thread about how Islam is apparently responsible for inciting violence among its followers. For those think said stupidity is actually true, please take some time to think about the effects of social conditions and politics on a population. There's a reason why most of the "violent Muslims" come out of the ass-end of the Middle East and not, say, Indonesia.
i think this is the first statement of yours i agree with purely on the bases that all men are created equal. i hate preferential treatment for anyone, it takes out any notion of equalityThat depends on exactly what you mean by "freedom of religion". If it simply means that they're allowed to believe whatever they believe without repurcussions, then of course Muslims should be "protected by it". If you mean "makes things easier for followers of the religion" then of course not. Muslims shouldn't get it easier or better than anybody else in your nation.
Barbariser
[QUOTE="Barbariser"]i think this is the first statement of yours i agree with purely on the bases that all men are created equal. i hate preferential treatment for anyone, it takes out any notion of equality Yeah, I agree with that part of his post too. :oThat depends on exactly what you mean by "freedom of religion". If it simply means that they're allowed to believe whatever they believe without repurcussions, then of course Muslims should be "protected by it". If you mean "makes things easier for followers of the religion" then of course not. Muslims shouldn't get it easier or better than anybody else in your nation.
surrealnumber5
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]It's ironic, because Islamic countries don't allow freedom of other religions, it's either Islam or death.Well, several threads and posts have made me curious enough to ask this question out right. Do you believe Islam should be equal with all other religions in the US, and share the same freedoms other religions have? Or should Islam be restrained somewhat in comparison to other major religions in the US?
p2250
Indonesia, one of the world's largest Muslim nations, guarantees the freedom to practice any religion within its constitution. Its citizens have the right to choose whatever religion they want.
Lebanon, a predominently Muslim nation, is governed by a coalition of Muslims, Christians, and Jews. There are practicing Christians and Jews in Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and other predominently Muslim nations.
In the past, the Ottoman Empire observed religios tolerance.
I cannot think of a Muslim nation which expressly forbids the practice of other religions or which stipulates that an individual must practice Islam in order to reside within its borders.
is christianity not hostile when chrisitans blow up abortion clinics, kill abortion doctors and openly preach hatred. just look at the westboro baptist church and the stuff they preachProduce an example of such "blowing up of abortion clinics"..Westboro Church is not Christian, it's a cult...Islam has shown itself repeatedly to be hostile towards Western civilization..killing thousands of innocents..[QUOTE="-Y2J-"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] How is that even relevant to the discussion?..This is a discussion about Islam not Christianity...and even then..Christianity preaches peace and has not shown itself to be a hostile religion..Xx_Hopeless_xX
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/51722.stm
"The blast occured a week after 25th anniversary of the US Supreme Court legalising abortion in 1973. But it has become a contentious issue in the US with Christian fundamentalists wanting to see abortions banned completely."
"Recent violence by anti-abortion demonstrators has included the killing of two doctors and a large number of bombings."
"A year ago, two bombs went off an hour apart at a clinic in Atlanta injuring six people. That case is unsolved"
i think that statement is hypocritical, but by all means disprove my thoughtAnyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
theone86
what if the person who said it was an atheistAnyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
theone86
[QUOTE="theone86"]i think that statement is hypocritical, but by all means disprove my thoughtAnyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
surrealnumber5
I think it's hypocritical to ask for freedom of religion when it's one's own religion, but then to act as if one is justified in denying the same rights to a religion other than one's own. If one cannot understand the principles behind freedom of religion and understand that it only works when it's granted to all religions then one should not be allowed to enjoy that freedom.
i think that statement is hypocritical, but by all means disprove my thought[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="theone86"]
Anyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
theone86
I think it's hypocritical to ask for freedom of religion when it's one's own religion, but then to act as if one is justified in denying the same rights to a religion other than one's own. If one cannot understand the principles behind freedom of religion and understand that it only works when it's granted to all religions then one should not be allowed to enjoy that freedom.
have you not read my stance in this thread? your post does not have anything to do with your last psti think that statement is hypocritical, but by all means disprove my thought[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="theone86"]
Anyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
theone86
I think it's hypocritical to ask for freedom of religion when it's one's own religion, but then to act as if one is justified in denying the same rights to a religion other than one's own. If one cannot understand the principles behind freedom of religion and understand that it only works when it's granted to all religions then one should not be allowed to enjoy that freedom.
He was correct....what if the person who said it was an atheist[QUOTE="NintendoNite"][QUOTE="theone86"]
Anyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
theone86
I consider freedom of religion to encompass all systems of belief.
but those against the Muslim faith, as you just wished their freedoms to be voided[QUOTE="theone86"][QUOTE="NintendoNite"] what if the person who said it was an atheistsurrealnumber5
I consider freedom of religion to encompass all systems of belief.
but those against the Muslim faith, as you just wished their freedoms to be voidedIf they think that Muslims shouldn't be included in freedom of religion then yes, but that's not a belief system that's simply an opinion.
[QUOTE="theone86"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] i think that statement is hypocritical, but by all means disprove my thought LJS9502_basic
I think it's hypocritical to ask for freedom of religion when it's one's own religion, but then to act as if one is justified in denying the same rights to a religion other than one's own. If one cannot understand the principles behind freedom of religion and understand that it only works when it's granted to all religions then one should not be allowed to enjoy that freedom.
He was correct....No he wasn't...
He was correct....[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="theone86"]
I think it's hypocritical to ask for freedom of religion when it's one's own religion, but then to act as if one is justified in denying the same rights to a religion other than one's own. If one cannot understand the principles behind freedom of religion and understand that it only works when it's granted to all religions then one should not be allowed to enjoy that freedom.
theone86
No he wasn't...
Yes he was. You can't advocate freedom of religion ONLY to who you wish.....[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Eh?..Xx_Hopeless_xXYou've equated the beliefs of 1% of the world Muslim population to the beliefs of the other 99%. Not at all..it even states in their Quran to destroy infidels..are we now saying they disregard the book they claim as holy?..Have you ever read Surah 9:5?..
hey why quote me just Surah 9:5 and never bring up 9:4?
=============================================
[9:4] (But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for Allah loveth the righteous. ---
[9.5] But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. ---
[9.6] If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge.
=============================================
Mind you these quotes are talking about the time when the Prophet (SAW) was fighting his war with the then-Pagan rulers of Mecca.
Don't gimme your BS.... no better then the Anti-American Polemics who've been harping on Islam. only to have their books fly off the shelves when 9/11 terrorist attacks.
There was a time when Christians were able to rationalize persecuting other religions in their realms. forced conversions and whatnot (and believe me other Muslims don't like me telling them this but it happened in our history too).
It is the same sort rationalization that some Jews give themselves to legitimize bull dozing and pushing out Palestinians off their land.
Yes he was. You can't advocate freedom of religion ONLY to who you wish.....[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="theone86"]
No he wasn't...
theone86
That's what I was saying.
No..you advocated taking it away from anyone that didn't agree with that premise....which is not quite the same thing.[QUOTE="theone86"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yes he was. You can't advocate freedom of religion ONLY to who you wish.....
LJS9502_basic
That's what I was saying.
No..you advocated taking it away from anyone that didn't agree with that premise....which is not quite the same thing.Nice strawman there, buddy, but I did no such thing. I never said anyone should have that freedom taken away in a practical sense, I said anyone who thinks that freedom of religion only applies to their religion doesn't deserve to have that protection.
hey why quote me just Surah 9:5 and never bring up 9:4? [9:4] (But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for Allah loveth the righteous. --- [9.5] But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. --- [9.6] If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge. Mind you these quotes are talking about the time when the Prophet (SAW) was fighting his war with the then-Pagan rulers of Mecca. Don't gimme your BS.... no better then the Anti-American Polemics who've been harping on Islam. only to have their books fly off the shelves when 9/11 terrorist attacks. There was a time when Christians were able to rationalize persecuting other religions in their realms. forced conversions and whatnot (and believe me other Muslims don't like me telling them this but it happened in our history too). It is the same sort rationalization that some Jews give themselves to legitimize bull dozing and pushing out Palestinians off their land. SaudiFuryUh.....I'm not saying I'm a scholar on the Islam religion...but those quotes seem to suggest killing anyone that doesn't convert.
No it's not a straw man...here's EXACTLY your words...Nice strawman there, buddy, but I did no such thing. I never said anyone should have that freedom taken away in a practical sense, I said anyone who thinks that freedom of religion only applies to their religion doesn't deserve to have that protection.
theone86
But nice attempt to say it without saying it.Anyone who says no shouldn't be alloed the luxury of freedom of religion.
theone86
Right...because I'm the ONLY one that got that interpretation from your post. Let's see...at least TWO other users did.....so it must have been the post lacking clarity.
Bad example on my part indeed. But who are these muslims demanding more rights than Christians? You can walk around with your face covered if you want, and there are independent schools for all religions.RavensmashWhy should they have things that is only beneficial to them? How can the British government justify letting in millions of Muslims when many don't have jobs as it is? Why are we the only country in the world that gives £25,000p.a benefits to Islam hate preachers? Why is the government so hell-bent on creating a multi-cultural society? Why are the government not realizing that there is a high possibility of another civil war? Why does the government allow UK businesses to dictate the amount of immigrants heading to UK?
I didn't know I could walk around the streets with a balaclava. Thanks for enlightening me.
The sooner I'm living in the ROI the better. The UK is a piece of ****.
Why should they have things that is only beneficial to them? How can the British government justify letting in millions of Muslims when many don't have jobs as it is? Why are we the only country in the world that gives £25,000p.a benefits to Islam hate preachers? Why is the government so hell-bent on creating a multi-cultural society? Why are the government not realizing that there is a high possibility of another civil war? Why does the government allow UK businesses to dictate the amount of immigrants heading to UK?[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] Bad example on my part indeed. But who are these muslims demanding more rights than Christians? You can walk around with your face covered if you want, and there are independent schools for all religions.CannedWorms
I didn't know I could walk around the streets with a balaclava. Thanks for enlightening me.
The sooner I'm living in the ROI the better. The UK is a piece of ****.
Well said. People do not seem to realize how messed up the UK has become for alot of people because of Islam being almost forced upon us. One MP (politician) said "the burker is British" So if that is true then we can say British people caused the july 11th bombings. Not Islamic militants ENGLISH PEOPLE DID IT. People do not see how forcing people to be friends just does not work. When you say he believes this you must respect it and not question it; it causes huge problems. Of course people who are not effected by this do not see it as a problem and think they are in the right lolUh.....I'm not saying I'm a scholar on the Islam religion...but those quotes seem to suggest killing anyone that doesn't convert.LJS9502_basic
I replied to this post earlier....
Realize also as some people tend to want to keep pushing considering people wanna bring up Islamic terrorism as = to Islam.
Abu Bakr the successor to the Prophet Muhammed said this as instructions to the army.
"Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy's flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone"
Considering what the 600 A.D's were like this was pretty revolutionary considering it makes the clear distinction between combatants and non-combatants (thought not formal but done at best possible in practice).
"If any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people" - Quran 5:32
similar to the Jewish quote of
a life is as though saving all mankind and taking a life is as though killing all of mankind.
" Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors" - Quran 2:190
one of my favorite quotes... but terrorists always transgress limits in war because they do not respect the protection of non-combatants.
a quote from the Hadith (report on the Prophet Muhammed) "You are neither hard-hearted nor of fierce character, nor one who shouts in the markets. You do not return evil for evil, but excuse and forgive." - Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 362
========================================
These points are reinforced by other sayings of Prophet Mohammed collected in The Book of Jihad and Expedition (Kitab Al-Jihad wa'l-Siyar)
It has been narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: Do not desire an encounter with the enemy; but when you encounter them, be firm. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4313
It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah . He disapproved of the killing of women and children. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4319
It is narrated by Ibn 'Umar that a woman was found killed in one of these battles; so the Messenger of Allah forbade the killing of women and children. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4320
----------------------
This attitude was also seen by Saladin (another Muslim). this quote is by Oliverus Scholasticus of the Frankish Army who was being fed by Saladin's army
"Who could doubt that such goodness, friendship and charity come from God? Men whose parents, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, had died in agony at our hands, whose lands we took, whom we drove naked from their homes, revived us with their own food when we were dying of hunger and showered us with kindness even when we were in their power."
pulled from wikipedia sourced from Judge Weeramantry, Christopher G. (1997). Justice Without Frontiers.
----------------------
The quotes i put up earlier from the Quran, the three of them are part of a surah that is talking about the battle between the people of Medina (led by the Muslims) and the then-pagans of Mecca. It is not a carte blanche call to kill all non-believers, it is telling history. What it is saying is during the war to not be afraid to kill the pagans (just like a US troops is told to not be afraid and kill the insurgent/terrorist) but it also states that if a pagan were to convert or ask for asylum that Muslims have to give to them and provide protection. we are also commanded to provide food and clothing for them. for enemy soldiers asylum amounted to being a POW.
however different Islamic scholars havecome along have had their own permutations on the religion.
Saudi Arabia vein of Islam is not from Abdul Waheb (commonly derogatorily called Wahabism) but from the Hanbali school of thought within Sunni Islam. However as a Muslim myself, i do not follow any school of thought but rather what i can interpret from the Quran and the Hadith's and reconcile them with living in the modern world as best as i can. About the best classification i can be called is i'm Sunni Muslim.
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]
[QUOTE="swamprat_basic"]
It is a stupid question, because it is advocating discrimination, which the laws of the United States are clearly against.
swamprat_basic
How is asking someones opinion on a hot topic advocating discrimination?
Please point out in any of my posts where I said Islam should have it's rights stripped away or where I, you know, advocated anything. :|
By asking the question you are stating that you believe the topic is worth discussion.
That still doesn't explain how it's advocating. I am not pleading in favor of on side, arguing in favor of removing Islam from freedom of religion or anything of the sort.
And yes, I do believe it's a topic worth discussing. People in America, some, think Islam SHOULDN'T be protected. A shocking amount going by this thread. I think such intolerance is worth discussing, not burying our heads in the sand.
So you assume everyone that replies negatively is from the US? Because I saw several from the UK.:|And yes, I do believe it's a topic worth discussing. People in America, some, think Islam SHOULDN'T be protected. A shocking amount going by this thread. I think such intolerance is worth discussing, not burying our heads in the sand.
Pixel-Pirate
So you assume everyone that replies negatively is from the US? Because I saw several from the UK.:|[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]
And yes, I do believe it's a topic worth discussing. People in America, some, think Islam SHOULDN'T be protected. A shocking amount going by this thread. I think such intolerance is worth discussing, not burying our heads in the sand.
LJS9502_basic
As I don't see a way that reveals who voted for what, I must assume the majority of No voters are American. I had directed it toward Americans. Maybe I wasn't clear enough.
I'd say 70+% who replied negatively were from the US.
So you assume everyone that replies negatively is from the US? Because I saw several from the UK.:|[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]
And yes, I do believe it's a topic worth discussing. People in America, some, think Islam SHOULDN'T be protected. A shocking amount going by this thread. I think such intolerance is worth discussing, not burying our heads in the sand.
Pixel-Pirate
As I don't see a way that reveals who voted for what, I must assume the majority of No voters are American. I had directed it toward Americans. Maybe I wasn't clear enough.
I'd say 70+% who replied negatively were from the US.
Maybe because the majority of users are American?[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Uh.....I'm not saying I'm a scholar on the Islam religion...but those quotes seem to suggest killing anyone that doesn't convert.
SaudiFury
I replied to this post earlier....
Realize also as some people tend to want to keep pushing considering people wanna bring up Islamic terrorism as = to Islam.
Abu Bakr the successor to the Prophet Muhammed said this as instructions to the army.
"Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy's flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone"
Considering what the 600 A.D's were like this was pretty revolutionary considering it makes the clear distinction between combatants and non-combatants (thought not formal but done at best possible in practice).
"If any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people" - Quran 5:32
similar to the Jewish quote of
a life is as though saving all mankind and taking a life is as though killing all of mankind.
" Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors" - Quran 2:190
one of my favorite quotes... but terrorists always transgress limits in war because they do not respect the protection of non-combatants.
a quote from the Hadith (report on the Prophet Muhammed) "You are neither hard-hearted nor of fierce character, nor one who shouts in the markets. You do not return evil for evil, but excuse and forgive." - Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 362
========================================
These points are reinforced by other sayings of Prophet Mohammed collected in The Book of Jihad and Expedition (Kitab Al-Jihad wa'l-Siyar)
It has been narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: Do not desire an encounter with the enemy; but when you encounter them, be firm. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4313
It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah . He disapproved of the killing of women and children. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4319
It is narrated by Ibn 'Umar that a woman was found killed in one of these battles; so the Messenger of Allah forbade the killing of women and children. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4320
----------------------
This attitude was also seen by Saladin (another Muslim). this quote is by Oliverus Scholasticus of the Frankish Army who was being fed by Saladin's army
"Who could doubt that such goodness, friendship and charity come from God? Men whose parents, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, had died in agony at our hands, whose lands we took, whom we drove naked from their homes, revived us with their own food when we were dying of hunger and showered us with kindness even when we were in their power."
pulled from wikipedia sourced from Judge Weeramantry, Christopher G. (1997). Justice Without Frontiers.
----------------------
The quotes i put up earlier from the Quran, the three of them are part of a surah that is talking about the battle between the people of Medina (led by the Muslims) and the then-pagans of Mecca. It is not a carte blanche call to kill all non-believers, it is telling history. What it is saying is during the war to not be afraid to kill the pagans (just like a US troops is told to not be afraid and kill the insurgent/terrorist) but it also states that if a pagan were to convert or ask for asylum that Muslims have to give to them and provide protection. we are also commanded to provide food and clothing for them. for enemy soldiers asylum amounted to being a POW.
however different Islamic scholars havecome along have had their own permutations on the religion.
Saudi Arabia vein of Islam is not from Abdul Waheb (commonly derogatorily called Wahabism) but from the Hanbali school of thought within Sunni Islam. However as a Muslim myself, i do not follow any school of thought but rather what i can interpret from the Quran and the Hadith's and reconcile them with living in the modern world as best as i can. About the best classification i can be called is i'm Sunni Muslim.
Please continue to post. I am genuinely intrigued by your religion the more I learn about it.
I had once thought it to be barbaric until I came across this VH1 video on Cat Stevens (now known as Yusuf Islam)... his story touched me so much that it shook my predispositions, and I have since been trying to learn more.
Unfortunately Islam is attacked 24/7 in our country, so it's very very very very difficult to make a clear picture about it without actively going out of your way. The good thing is that youtube is filled with American-Muslim converts who make videos that are very easy to digest since they kind of translate in a very relateable way. Plus there are also American Muslim who've grown up here who do an excellent job as well.
Anyways, please continue posting. This was the most informative post i've read in OT ... ever.
Salaam :)
So you assume everyone that replies negatively is from the US? Because I saw several from the UK.:|[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]
And yes, I do believe it's a topic worth discussing. People in America, some, think Islam SHOULDN'T be protected. A shocking amount going by this thread. I think such intolerance is worth discussing, not burying our heads in the sand.
Pixel-Pirate
As I don't see a way that reveals who voted for what, I must assume the majority of No voters are American. I had directed it toward Americans. Maybe I wasn't clear enough.
I'd say 70+% who replied negatively were from the US.
But that is still an assumption you are making....[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Uh.....I'm not saying I'm a scholar on the Islam religion...but those quotes seem to suggest killing anyone that doesn't convert.
SaudiFury
I replied to this post earlier....
Realize also as some people tend to want to keep pushing considering people wanna bring up Islamic terrorism as = to Islam.
Abu Bakr the successor to the Prophet Muhammed said this as instructions to the army.
"Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy's flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone"
Considering what the 600 A.D's were like this was pretty revolutionary considering it makes the clear distinction between combatants and non-combatants (thought not formal but done at best possible in practice).
"If any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people" - Quran 5:32
similar to the Jewish quote of
a life is as though saving all mankind and taking a life is as though killing all of mankind.
" Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors" - Quran 2:190
one of my favorite quotes... but terrorists always transgress limits in war because they do not respect the protection of non-combatants.
a quote from the Hadith (report on the Prophet Muhammed) "You are neither hard-hearted nor of fierce character, nor one who shouts in the markets. You do not return evil for evil, but excuse and forgive." - Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 362
========================================
These points are reinforced by other sayings of Prophet Mohammed collected in The Book of Jihad and Expedition (Kitab Al-Jihad wa'l-Siyar)
It has been narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: Do not desire an encounter with the enemy; but when you encounter them, be firm. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4313
It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah . He disapproved of the killing of women and children. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4319
It is narrated by Ibn 'Umar that a woman was found killed in one of these battles; so the Messenger of Allah forbade the killing of women and children. - Muslim Book 019, Number 4320
----------------------
This attitude was also seen by Saladin (another Muslim). this quote is by Oliverus Scholasticus of the Frankish Army who was being fed by Saladin's army
"Who could doubt that such goodness, friendship and charity come from God? Men whose parents, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, had died in agony at our hands, whose lands we took, whom we drove naked from their homes, revived us with their own food when we were dying of hunger and showered us with kindness even when we were in their power."
pulled from wikipedia sourced from Judge Weeramantry, Christopher G. (1997). Justice Without Frontiers.
----------------------
The quotes i put up earlier from the Quran, the three of them are part of a surah that is talking about the battle between the people of Medina (led by the Muslims) and the then-pagans of Mecca. It is not a carte blanche call to kill all non-believers, it is telling history. What it is saying is during the war to not be afraid to kill the pagans (just like a US troops is told to not be afraid and kill the insurgent/terrorist) but it also states that if a pagan were to convert or ask for asylum that Muslims have to give to them and provide protection. we are also commanded to provide food and clothing for them. for enemy soldiers asylum amounted to being a POW.
however different Islamic scholars havecome along have had their own permutations on the religion.
Saudi Arabia vein of Islam is not from Abdul Waheb (commonly derogatorily called Wahabism) but from the Hanbali school of thought within Sunni Islam. However as a Muslim myself, i do not follow any school of thought but rather what i can interpret from the Quran and the Hadith's and reconcile them with living in the modern world as best as i can. About the best classification i can be called is i'm Sunni Muslim.
Please continue to post. I am genuinely intrigued by your religion the more I learn about it.
I had once thought it to be barbaric until I came across this VH1 video on Cat Stevens (now known as Yusuf Islam)... his story touched me so much that it shook my predispositions, and I have since been trying to learn more.
Unfortunately Islam is attacked 24/7 in our country, so it's very very very very difficult to make a clear picture about it without actively going out of your way. The good thing is that youtube is filled with American-Muslim converts who make videos that are very easy to digest since they kind of translate in a very relateable way. Plus there are also American Muslim who've grown up here who do an excellent job as well.
Anyways, please continue posting. This was the most informative post i've read in OT ... ever.
Salaam :)
You must not live in the US because most of the time the religion isn't mentioned.I had once thought it to be barbaric until I came across this VH1 video on Cat Stevens (now known as Yusuf Islam)... his story touched me so much that it shook my predispositions, and I have since been trying to learn more.
Unfortunately Islam is attacked 24/7 in our country, so it's very very very very difficult to make a clear picture about it without actively going out of your way. The good thing is that youtube is filled with American-Muslim converts who make videos that are very easy to digest since they kind of translate in a very relateable way. Plus there are also American Muslim who've grown up here who do an excellent job as well.
Anyways, please continue posting. This was the most informative post i've read in OT ... ever.
Salaam :)SquatsAreAwesom
I'm not going to say you are wrong....but the text shouldn't need extraneous information to get the meaning. Because then it IS open to interpretation. I'm only going by the three verses you quoted. Longer text more informative?SaudiFury
This was the most informative post i've read in OT ... ever.SquatsAreAwesomShame he lifted parts of it from elsewhere on the internet.
In fact I do, and I have no idea what you're ranting about this time.You must not live in the US because most of the time the religion isn't mentioned.
LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]In fact I do, and I have no idea what you're ranting about this time. Your post.:|You must not live in the US because most of the time the religion isn't mentioned.
SquatsAreAwesom
Unfortunately Islam is attacked 24/7 in our country,SquatsAreAwesom
Your post.:|[QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] In fact I do, and I have no idea what you're ranting about this time.LJS9502_basic
You must live under a rock if you believe Islam isn't actively attacked in this country. Look at the front page of OT. Turn on the news. Tune into a talk radio station. Listen to the rhetoric by many GOP members. Take a gander at the various religion based youtube section. Finally, look at how often Mosques and Muslims have been targeted in this country.Unfortunately Islam is attacked 24/7 in our country,SquatsAreAwesom
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment