Should schools administer corporal punishment?

[QUOTE="dave123321"] Careful branBranKetra

Indeed, children are demons. Beating them just makes them worse. They plot revenge then.Sunsha

Those are usually the less intelligent ones with the minimum wage jobs.

Capital Punishment is more like it !!!:twisted:

<3 you brandave123321

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] Sometimes. I've heard people being grateful that their parents beat their butts.TacticalDesire

Those are usually the less intelligent ones with the minimum wage jobs.

[QUOTE="dave123321"]<3 you branBranKetra

No, there are better ways to train behavior

Capital Punishment is more like it !!!:twisted:

_R34LiTY_

[QUOTE="BranKetra"]

[QUOTE="dave123321"]<3 you brandave123321

[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="BranKetra"]BranKetra

Capital punishment would be better.

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="dave123321"] Hmdave123321

They should just have the death penalty. Act like a little s---head, you die. Everybody wins.

this thread remind me of this

Absolutely! Bring it back and teach all those little sh*ts some respect!

No, children who are spanked have lower IQs and are more likely to be violent.

Pretty sure both qualities are things to be avoided.

No, children who are spanked have lower IQs and are more likely to be violent.

Pretty sure both qualities are things to be avoided.

TopTierHustler

I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.ad1x2

What are your thoughts on this? Should schools start doing it again or more? For what behaviors should this be valid for? Why do you support or not support it? Discuss.dave123321

Nope. The can of whoopass should come from the parents.

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.l4dak47

Actually, it's kind of low when you consider the brain develops until you're 25. But still, I wouldn't have a problem with it going to 18 if people are responsible. As for the felonies, it's not always zero tolerance. Most of the zero tolerance policies only result in a misdemeanor, such as fighting in school.

When I was a recruiter I talked to one guy who was 18 and he had a domestic violence charge against him for beating his then-girlfriend. Another guy who was trying to enlist got rejected for two felonies at 17 because he got a burglary charge at 14 and he molested his little sister while he was 12.

instead of punishing kids for bad behaviour, we should open a special section of the school called "delinquent land" where students would be able to bully, vandalize, make sexual advances, and all that other good stuff at their own leisure with no consequences because the knowledge that the only future they have is a job cleaning toilets or prison would eventually be enough to psychologically change their behaviour.

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="ad1x2"]I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.ad1x2

Actually, it's kind of low when you consider the brain develops until you're 25. But still, I wouldn't have a problem with it going to 18 if people are responsible. As for the felonies, it's not always zero tolerance. Most of the zero tolerance policies only result in a misdemeanor, such as fighting in school.

When I was a recruiter I talked to one guy who was 18 and he had a domestic violence charge against him for beating his then-girlfriend. Another guy who was trying to enlist got rejected for two felonies at 17 because he got a burglary charge at 14 and he molested his little sister while he was 12.

I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.ad1x2

You think that but that's not the case. From my experience with my parents, punishments that involve physical contact work only in the short term. It never works because instead of respecting authority, they're treated with resentment and malcontent from the person who received it. I'm not suggesting that children are angels nor should we do anything about them but there are better alternatives than actually using physical punishment.

Let's institute a battle royal system; how about that?Elraptor

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.leviathan91

You think that but that's not the case. From my experience with my parents, punishments that involve physical contact work only in the short term. It never works because instead of respecting authority, they're treated with resentment and malcontent from the person who received it. I'm not suggesting that children are angels nor should we do anything about them but there are better alternatives than actually using physical punishment.

Just like any other punishment it varies based on the person. I wouldn't cross my uncle because I knew what would happen if I did. When I was in the second grade I ran out of school and went home and he drove across town just to give me the spanking of a lifetime. On the other hand, not everybody takes a spanking and learns from it.

The main thing that is taught to parents who do spank their children is to not do it while angry. That's so you don't take your anger out on the kid and hurt them more than necessary or even go into the relm of child abuse. For children who it doesn't work on another method has to be made, just letting them get away with it is the wrong answer and why some people have a sense of entitlement.

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

No, children who are spanked have lower IQs and are more likely to be violent.

Pretty sure both qualities are things to be avoided.

BranKetra

The same disorder soilders get after seeing people die in combat.

F*cked up yes?

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.ad1x2

You think that but that's not the case. From my experience with my parents, punishments that involve physical contact work only in the short term. It never works because instead of respecting authority, they're treated with resentment and malcontent from the person who received it. I'm not suggesting that children are angels nor should we do anything about them but there are better alternatives than actually using physical punishment.

Just like any other punishment it varies based on the person. I wouldn't cross my uncle because I knew what would happen if I did. When I was in the second grade I ran out of school and went home and he drove across town just to give me the spanking of a lifetime. On the other hand, not everybody takes a spanking and learns from it.

The main thing that is taught to parents who do spank their children is to not do it while angry. That's so you don't take your anger out on the kid and hurt them more than necessary or even go into the relm of child abuse. For children who it doesn't work on another method has to be made, just letting them get away with it is the wrong answer and why some people have a sense of entitlement.

Perhaps you're right. When my parents (mainly my mother) gave me a spanking, they were angry even at the tiniest of things or even when I didn't do anything at all. Also, it wasn't on the buttocks but rather the face. I wasn't the best behaving child with but my parents's parenting were awful. They did provide a lot on a material level but getting emotional support from them was impossible. In fact, they always assumed the worst from me and my brothers.

Perhaps there's more to than just giving a spanking but I still wouldn't support it, advise it, or even use it. There are better ways.

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]I'm willing to bet money most of the nos are from people under 25 who grew up in the 90s and 2000s. I'm not saying that beating kids is the answer but working with high schools for the past three years has shown me it is ridiculous how many people already have felony convictions on their record nowadays before they're even old enough to legally drink a beer.ad1x2

You think that but that's not the case. From my experience with my parents, punishments that involve physical contact work only in the short term. It never works because instead of respecting authority, they're treated with resentment and malcontent from the person who received it. I'm not suggesting that children are angels nor should we do anything about them but there are better alternatives than actually using physical punishment.

Just like any other punishment it varies based on the person.

Maybe the people that weren't spanked can justifiably be entitled though, as they have higher IQs than their spanked piers lol.

no, school is there to teach kids not disicipline thats what the parents are for.

[QUOTE="APiranhaAteMyVa"][QUOTE="almasdeathchild"]ive known students to punch teachers just for telling them things. trust me as much as i support the paddle,kids these days are so rebellious and douche baggy that it might actually only make things worse

JasonDarksavior

Actually, we have the same problem with some of them being exaggerated.

What are your thoughts on this? Should schools start doing it again or more? For what behaviors should this be valid for? Why do you support or not support it? Discuss.dave123321

Provide better education, not better punishment

no, school is there to teach kids not disicipline thats what the parents are for.

Chris_Williams

What if some of them are unruly? Call the police?

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

no, school is there to teach kids not disicipline thats what the parents are for.

leviathan91

What if some of them are unruly? Call the police?

My high school had cops on duty there all day anyways :P

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

no, school is there to teach kids not disicipline thats what the parents are for.

wis3boi

What if some of them are unruly? Call the police?

My high school had cops on duty there all day anyways :P

Same here and I didn't mind. Do I think cops should be in public schools? Ideally no but to be realistic, might as well have them.

[QUOTE="JasonDarksavior"][QUOTE="APiranhaAteMyVa"] No, the reason they punch teachers is because they can get away with it. If the teacher even breathes on them the parents will sue the school and teacher. If they allow the teacher to give the kid a good spanking and the parent can't do nothing about it, the tables will turn and authority will be restored.leviathan91

Actually, we have the same problem with some of them being exaggerated.

instead of punishing kids for bad behaviour, we should open a special section of the school called "delinquent land" where students would be able to bully, vandalize, make sexual advances, and all that other good stuff at their own leisure with no consequences because the knowledge that the only future they have is a job cleaning toilets or prison would eventually be enough to psychologically change their behaviour.

TheFallenDemon

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="JasonDarksavior"] I'm not sure how they teach in America, but in Australia if that happened the police will be called in and they'll probably be charged ...JasonDarksavior

Actually, we have the same problem with some of them being exaggerated.

Well of course but I'm talking about very small things like kids splashing in a puddle and then the police arresting them.