Should there be a limit on the free market?

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="htekemerald"]

The idea of an unregulated free market is, to say the least, laughable.

themajormayor
why?

Because it relies on the good will of the greediest people on Earth basically.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="htekemerald"]

The idea of an unregulated free market is, to say the least, laughable.

why?

Because it relies on the good will of the greediest people on Earth basically.

Not really. It's not relying on the greediest people. It's just that a system without any rules is not a good system. Inevitably, people will act in less than fair manners which will result in a loss of fair competition.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="htekemerald"]

The idea of an unregulated free market is, to say the least, laughable.

kuraimen
why?

Because it relies on the good will of the greediest people on Earth basically.

lol no hahah
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="rastotm"]

Because it's a concept made up by economists who decided that applying basic social sciences was not necessary.

rastotm

This doesn't explain anything.

Because when one stands on a high position of social power, in a unregulated market, it is easy to use or even abuse your power to create a unfair competitive advantage. Which is completely against the aspect of a free market.

like how?

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
it's only ever done good
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts
There is no free market in the US. Government has their mitts on everything.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] why?sonicare
Because it relies on the good will of the greediest people on Earth basically.

Not really. It's not relying on the greediest people. It's just that a system without any rules is not a good system. Inevitably, people will act in less than fair manners which will result in a loss of fair competition.

But that's an unavoidable consequence of free trade. If you have no regulations then the people that will do anything for money stomp on everyone else. Then with money comes power and with power comes influence. In the end you have those people who are the most willing to do anything for money and care only about making money dictating how things work. Complete free trade is absurd and laughable, there should always be regulations. That was my point.
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
Yes because without regulation the market will cease to be free once monopolies kick in. Just like communism, a perfect free market is practically impossible to achieve.
Avatar image for chandlerr_360
chandlerr_360

5078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: -2

#60 chandlerr_360
Member since 2006 • 5078 Posts

There will be plenty of people who say "no" or disagree, but the modern 'free market' is not free...at least not for everyone. At no point in history had there ever been a non taxed and zero tariff international trading system until Reagan and the US led "globalization" process. When you eliminate the tariff tax you are essentially pulling the rug out from under the people who do not have the means of investment and capital to invest in global trade...and that is exactly what happened.

The big corporate conglomerates we see today that had the capital to engage in a global market before tariff elimination and NAFTA have been soaring out of control being able to freely engage in trade across the entire world with NO governmental restraints. This has done two things. Absolutely, 100%, destroyed the 'free' market because any business wanting to get a foothold into the market automatically has a disadvantage and inevitable death sentence not being able to compete on the global level. Secondly, it has elevated the merchant class and wealthy elite above the ruling class (government).

For the first time in history, the merchant class is running the show. This is why we see the huge division of labor and wealth that is rapidly growing and the slow inevitable death of sovereign nations, it is also what Reagan was referring to when he made his 'new world order' speech about how free, unregulated markets were the "future". Try to ignore the simple minded nationalists and entrepeneurs.

Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

Hell no.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
It is all about balance, that's it.magicalclick
That a choice is in between two extremes does not necessarily make it the correct choice.