So, what happens if an unstoppable force hits an immovable object?

  • 107 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

What happens?

Avatar image for IustitiaMaximus
IustitiaMaximus

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 IustitiaMaximus
Member since 2012 • 895 Posts

Your mind will be blown right in front of your FACE! And a powerful mistake ensues.

Avatar image for Lebbin
Lebbin

2049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 120

User Lists: 0

#3 Lebbin
Member since 2007 • 2049 Posts

ummm good question :?

Avatar image for CRS98
CRS98

9036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 CRS98
Member since 2004 • 9036 Posts
The unstoppable force will move around the immovable object.
Avatar image for SirWander
SirWander

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 SirWander
Member since 2009 • 5176 Posts

the same thing that happens to everything else.

Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts
Sounds like a problem for Garry's Mod.
Avatar image for CRS98
CRS98

9036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 CRS98
Member since 2004 • 9036 Posts

[QUOTE="CRS98"]The unstoppable force will move around the immovable object.SirWander

Then it wouldn't be an immovable object.

Maybe I should rephrase that: The unstoppable force will go in a direction that is not central to the immovable object. Then again, you should damn well know what I'm saying.
Avatar image for Charazani
Charazani

2919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Charazani
Member since 2011 • 2919 Posts
Oh , xaos would know.
Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
We will find out which one of them is actually unstoppable or immovable.
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
complete annihilation, a tie, zero, nothing, wormhole, or something else.
Avatar image for SirWander
SirWander

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 SirWander
Member since 2009 • 5176 Posts

[QUOTE="SirWander"]

[QUOTE="CRS98"]The unstoppable force will move around the immovable object.CRS98

Then it wouldn't be an immovable object.

Maybe I should rephrase that: The unstoppable force will go in a direction that is not central to the immovable object. Then again, you should damn well know what I'm saying.

Yeah, I gave it a second read and understood what you meant.

Avatar image for halokillerz
halokillerz

3406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 halokillerz
Member since 2004 • 3406 Posts

same thing that happens when you divide zero by zero

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

same thing that happens when you divide zero by zero

halokillerz
what? if you have nothing and then do nothing to it, you have nothing... 0/0 =0
Avatar image for Lotus-Edge
Lotus-Edge

50513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Lotus-Edge
Member since 2008 • 50513 Posts
The unstoppable force goes and creates Two-Face....
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

0/0 =0ZumaJones07

NO

Avatar image for TheWZRD
TheWZRD

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 TheWZRD
Member since 2012 • 605 Posts

Then the impossible is possible because it's possible for it to be impossible.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] 0/0 =0coolbeans90

NO

makes sense to me
Avatar image for Charazani
Charazani

2919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Charazani
Member since 2011 • 2919 Posts
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] 0/0 =0ZumaJones07

NO

makes sense to me

Yep. Have nothing and divide by nothing. Get nothing. Coolbeans is Foolbeans..
Avatar image for super_mario_128
super_mario_128

23884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 super_mario_128
Member since 2006 • 23884 Posts
a worthless thread gets made
Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] 0/0 =0ZumaJones07

NO

makes sense to me

How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.
Avatar image for punkpunker
punkpunker

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 punkpunker
Member since 2006 • 3383 Posts

probabilities are

1. the objects weld together and holds massive energy like a sun

2. they move away from each other

3. they just pass through?

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

It changes direction

/thread.

Avatar image for halokillerz
halokillerz

3406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 halokillerz
Member since 2004 • 3406 Posts

A possible answer is: it has happened before, and thats how chuck norris was born

:P

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
The devil and I dance together in the pale moonlight.
Avatar image for Hatiko
Hatiko

4669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Hatiko
Member since 2006 • 4669 Posts

The immovable object breaks. It isn't indestructable right?

What about this. When a wave in the ocean hit a big rock. The rock isn't going to move but the ocan doesn't stop. It gust breaks up and goes around it to become whole again on the other side.

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

The unstoppable force would stop, and the immovable object would move.

Avatar image for DrKillByDeath84
DrKillByDeath84

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 DrKillByDeath84
Member since 2011 • 357 Posts

Chuck Norris happens

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#31 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

A possible answer is: it has happened before, and thats how chuck norris was born

:P

halokillerz

As a representative of the internet, We don't support Chuck Norris anymore because he turned out to be a crazy radical christian fundamentalist.

Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts
Immovable != indestructible... The unstoppable force will destroy the object and keep going while the object while broken will have not shifted from its orginal position...
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I hate infinities. Fortunately, there are no objects of infinite mass or infinite forces being thrown around.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Immovable != indestructible... The unstoppable force will destroy the object and keep going while the object while broken will have not shifted from its orginal position...jeremiah06

Displacing the mass would, by definition, be movement.

Avatar image for Charazani
Charazani

2919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Charazani
Member since 2011 • 2919 Posts
[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

NO

PS2_ROCKS
makes sense to me

How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.

0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="Hatiko"]

The immovable object breaks. It isn't indestructable right?

What about this. When a wave in the ocean hit a big rock. The rock isn't going to move but the ocan doesn't stop. It gust breaks up and goes around it to become whole again on the other side.

Frame_Dragger

The wave, which is energy propogating through the medium of water, is partially reflected from the surface of the rock, and partially absorbed, becoming a wave of phonons through the crystalline lattice of the rock. The key here is that a wave in water is not an unstoppable force, and a rock is not an immovable object. The physics of the universe we live in reject such notions outright... you might as well ask what truth divided by beauty equals... it would be no less absurd.

Wrong, I am unstoppable and I go around.

Truth/Beauty = Girl Scout Cookies

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] makes sense to meCharazani
How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.

0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero.

x*0 = 0 => 0/0=x

Insert any value for x. X is undefined.

Avatar image for TheWZRD
TheWZRD

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 TheWZRD
Member since 2012 • 605 Posts
[QUOTE="Charazani"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] makes sense to me

How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.

0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero.

Ahem.. Inconsistent
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] The wave, which is energy propogating through the medium of water, is partially reflected from the surface of the rock, and partially absorbed, becoming a wave of phonons through the crystalline lattice of the rock. The key here is that a wave in water is not an unstoppable force, and a rock is not an immovable object. The physics of the universe we live in reject such notions outright... you might as well ask what truth divided by beauty equals... it would be no less absurd.Frame_Dragger

Wrong, I am unstoppable and I go around.

Truth/Beauty = Girl Scout Cookies

Mmmm... Thin Mints...

I just ate Tagalongs.... they... are... so... good!!!!

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] makes sense to meCharazani
How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.

0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero.

0 is not nothing, it's simply undefined.

Avatar image for Charazani
Charazani

2919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Charazani
Member since 2011 • 2919 Posts

[QUOTE="Charazani"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.coolbeans90

0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero.

x*0 = 0 => 0/0=x

Insert any value for x. X is undefined.

On then change my answer to all real numbers.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
Neither exist... you might as well ask what a perfectly rigid rod would be like... there is no such thing.Frame_Dragger
Yeay you're back!!!! WOOOOO Welcome back!
Avatar image for deactivated-60e799a72eb68
deactivated-60e799a72eb68

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-60e799a72eb68
Member since 2008 • 1678 Posts

Time stops.

/thread

Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts

[QUOTE="jeremiah06"]Immovable != indestructible... The unstoppable force will destroy the object and keep going while the object while broken will have not shifted from its orginal position...coolbeans90

Displacing the mass would, by definition, be movement.

suspend disbelief or gtfo!!!
Avatar image for Charazani
Charazani

2919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Charazani
Member since 2011 • 2919 Posts

[QUOTE="Charazani"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] How many times can 0 go into 0? 1? 42? Infinite times??? The answer is undefined.Blue-Sky

0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero.

0 is not nothing, it's simply undefined.

Then how come when I multiply a number with it it equals 0. Or when I add a number to 0 it is not undefined . Or vise versa?
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="Charazani"] 0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero. Charazani

x*0 = 0 => 0/0=x

Insert any value for x. X is undefined.

On then change my answer to all real numbers.

lim(a->0) b/a=∞ You understand now?
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="jeremiah06"]Immovable != indestructible... The unstoppable force will destroy the object and keep going while the object while broken will have not shifted from its orginal position...jeremiah06

Displacing the mass would, by definition, be movement.

suspend disbelief or gtfo!!!

Unless you are talking about actually destroying the matter itself. MY GOD, Newton would be proud, son!

Avatar image for TheWZRD
TheWZRD

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 TheWZRD
Member since 2012 • 605 Posts
[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

[QUOTE="Charazani"] 0 is nothing. Nothing cannot be more or less then nothing. So would not be more then 1 since the top zero would have to be larger then the bottom. Which is not right. or less then one . So 1 is my guess. Or zero. Charazani

0 is not nothing, it's simply undefined.

Then how come when I multiply a number with it it equals 0. Or when I add a number to 0 it is not undefined . Or vise versa?

That's the way intermediate algebra works bruh.