Social conservatives overwhelmingly supports a serial adulterer for President

Lol so Newt, who has a proven track record of being a serial adulterer, liar, hypocrite, self-centered, uncommpassionate vile man is overwhelmingly supported by social conservatives and evangelicals to be President. Oh yea, they also know that Newt dumped his first two wives because they became sick and/or ugly and old, no joke. Here's what Newt said, in verbatim, when asked about why he cheated and dumped his first wive: "She's not young enough or pretty enough to be the wife of the President. And besides, she has cancer." Shortly after he divorced her he refused to provide any form of support at all despite having the wealth to do so, forcing her and their children to beg for food and shelter in their communties to survive. That's right, this is the kind of person social conservatives support.

Well either way I am not supporting Newt I am supporting Romney so don't worry this evil man won't get my vote. :P

Ron Paul is better than all of them.

What it says about republicans.

[spoiler] alot [/spoiler]

Well either way I am not supporting Newt I am supporting Romney so don't worry this evil man won't get my vote. :P

CHOASXIII

Just sayin'

[spoiler] Social conservatives constantly push backwards "family values" but constantly show they put less value on them than anybody. [/spoiler]

Just sayin'

Social conservatives constantly push backwards "family values" but constantly show they put less value on them than anybody.

CaveJohnson1

social conservatives are just biggoted a-holes.

its not a real classifiation.

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

because social conservatives govern from an admittedly illogical stance. God being the reasoning.

When you say " Social conservatives overwhelmingly supports. . ."

I think what you meant was: forty percent of voters in the primary of one state voted for Gingrich.

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

Those libs you're talking about don't preach to protect the sanctity of marriage.

The sad thing is, the main reason why they don't want to support Mitt Romney is because he's a Mormon.

The sad thing is, the main reason why they don't want to support Mitt Romney is because he's a Mormon.

Blue-Sky

I don't really think that's true for most of the voters. Most don't want to support Romney because he hasn't been as solidly conservative throughout his career like Gingrich etc have been.

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

Dark_Knight6

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering all throughout modern human history.

Not that shocking. Divorce rates are higher among more religious areas of the country. (so much for the sanctity of marriage.) Teen pregnancy and abortion rates (pretty much go hand in hand) are also higher in that demographic. (so much for the sanctity of life) Social conservatives get flak because they are massive hypocrites (one of the more recent popular definitions of a Christian is "one who believes the teachings and laws of the bible and Jesus are a great way for their NEIGHBORS to live their lives) who want to establish a theocracy. I will never vote for anyone who actively attempts to force Christian "morals" and biblical laws on the rest of the population through the law.

Protecting the minority from the whims and tyranny of the majority is one of the most important jobs of the government, and despite the Christian persecution complex saying otherwise, Christians are not an oppressed minority. They are an oppressive and tyrannical majority.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

SauceKing

because social conservatives govern from an admittedly illogical stance. God being the reasoning.

Illogical by whose admission?

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

No, I am saying that if you are a hypocritical piece of **** people will call you out for being a hypocritical piece of ****

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

SF_KiLLaMaN

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering all throughout modern human history.

Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

[QUOTE="SauceKing"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

You know, what's funny is that the vast majority of libs would jump at the chance to commit adultery with a woman who is:

• Hotter than what they already have
• Wealthier than what they already have

Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

because social conservatives govern from an admittedly illogical stance. God being the reasoning.

Illogical by whose admission?

government intervention being on behalf of god, or a god...

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

LJS9502_basic

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

LJS9502_basic

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

Ideally, leadership by example is the way to go. However, I say again that no one is perfect.

Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?moneymatterz

government intervention being on behalf of god, or a god...SauceKing

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="SauceKing"]

because social conservatives govern from an admittedly illogical stance. God being the reasoning.

SauceKing

Illogical by whose admission?

government intervention being on behalf of god, or a god...

....Yeah....Get back to me when you can string together something coherent. Then we'll focus on the substance of your responses.

Cry about it.

I find myself constantly shocked by the US republican party. The kinds of candidates they have and the way they handle power in the US congress is really disturbing. The US is a developed country, not a third world developing sh!t hole, I have no idea how they exist in their current form.GazaAli

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

Because most of them don't have the audacity to make a public service announcement about the sanctity of marriage shortly before going home and sleeping with their third wife.

Dark_Knight6

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

No, I am saying that if you are a hypocritical piece of **** people will call you out for being a hypocritical piece of ****

Okay have at it! His formerly adulterous ways have no bearing on how he will perform as President.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering all throughout modern human history.

moneymatterz

Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

Okay have at it! His formerly adulterous ways have no bearing on how he will perform as President.moneymatterz

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Yeah....and? What's the problem? He's only a messenger for an idea that's been lingering throughout modern human history. No one is perfect, but you're implying that it is reprehensible to inspire others to strive for perfection.

moneymatterz

No, I am saying that if you are a hypocritical piece of **** people will call you out for being a hypocritical piece of ****

Okay have at it! His formerly adulterous ways have no bearing on how he will perform as President.

I did not say that it would. I gave you the reason, or a reason, for people calling him out on being a deplorable human being.

But the US, as I said, is a developed country. Also something interesting is that I view myself as a religious Muslim but would never vote to right-winged Islamic party. I generally feel that lefties are much easier to deal with/live along with.GazaAli

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?RandoIph

Careful, friend. I can see you frothing at the mouth. Anyay, his personal life has been held accountable for his formerly adulterous ways. Adultery has nothing to do with being President. In anticipation of your predictable response, I will remind you that Jefferson, JFK, Clinton, and others have all committed acts of adultery.

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="Dark_Knight6"]

No, I am saying that if you are a hypocritical piece of **** people will call you out for being a hypocritical piece of ****

Dark_Knight6

Okay have at it! His formerly adulterous ways have no bearing on how he will perform as President.

I did not say that it would. I gave you the reason, or a reason, for people calling him out on being a deplorable human being.

[QUOTE="RandoIph"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?moneymatterz

Careful, friend. I can see you frothing at the mouth. Anyay, his personal life has been held accountable for his formerly adulterous ways. Adultery has nothing to do with being President. In anticipation of your predictable response, I will remind you that Jefferson, JFK, Clinton, and others have all committed acts of adultery.

In anticipation of your predictable response, I will remind you that Jefferson, JFK, Clinton, and others have all committed acts of adulterymoneymatterz

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] lol. are you serious? He's a total hypocrite. You don't preach something and go against it yourself, what kind of message does that send to everyone else? "Yeah, you shouldn't do that, but it's OK for me to do it."SF_KiLLaMaN

Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

Seems like you're jumping to conclusions. Please direct me to the post in which I said, "He's probably changed." As I said in my previous post, his personal life has, in fact, been held accountable for his actions. These are non-issues that libs love to bring up to distract the public. No matter. I encourage you to take the bait and run with this story. CNN's John King tried this tactic at this past Thursday's Presidential Debate. It backfired, causing Gingrinch to further surge in the polls.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="moneymatterz"]

Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

Seems like you're jumping to conclusions. Please direct me to the post in which I said, "He's probably changed." As I said in my previous post, his personal life has, in fact, been held accountable for his actions. These are non-issues that libs love to bring up to distract the public. No matter. I encourage you to rake the bait and run with this story. CNN's John King tried this tactic at this past Thursday's Presidential Debate. It backfired, causing Gingrinch to further surge in the polls.

Not only that, but the guy has had ethics charges brought against him. I don't know why people don't look at his constant adultery and his ethics issue and still want to vote for him, those arn't things to be proud of people. Those are things he should be ashamed of. But there isn't much to worry about, Romeny will probably get the nominee, sure he's a flp flopper but at least he isn't crazy.

Either way though, next election is going to suck for everyone. It doesn't really matter who you vote for....

These are non-issues that libs love to bring up to distract the public. No matter. I encourage you to take the bait and run with this story. CNN's John King tried this tactic at this past Thursday's Presidential Debate. It backfired, causing Gingrinch to further surge in the polls.moneymatterz