Social conservatives overwhelmingly supports a serial adulterer for President

[QUOTE="Shadow4020"]

I don't care about someone's personal life as long as it doesn't affect their ability to lead.

I think dumping your wife in an ungracious manner is irrelevant when deciding who you should vote for.

worlock77

Normally I would agree. But when a politician pushes a "family values" agenda as a huge part of his platform, yet has never lived up to these values in his own life it becomes an issue.

[QUOTE="EsYuGee"]

[QUOTE="monkeytoes61"]

Because we know there is a direct correlation between a politician's personal life, and his ability to lead a country :roll:

KC_Hokie

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

The sad thing is, the main reason why they don't want to support Mitt Romney is because he's a Mormon.

JML897

I don't really think that's true for most of the voters. Most don't want to support Romney because he hasn't been as solidly conservative throughout his career like Gingrich etc have been.

Life's full of hypocrites. Get over it. Also, people can change, which is why I pose the question: Why jump on Gingrinch for his formerly adulterous ways?

moneymatterz

I believe people when they say "I can change" and their past indicates otherwise.

Is cheating on women with other women considered liberal?

There's a lot more valid reasons to vote against Gingrich than whether he committed adulterey.

I have never seen a good argument for supporting Gingrich and I don't know how anyone can support this scumbag. Literally the most positive thing I've heard anyone say about Gingrich is that "he doesn't cheat anymore". Even though, if history repeats itself he'll almost surely cheat on his third once she's not "pretty" enough for this disgusting person both on the inside and outside.

And his whole campaign is just a flawed tax plan and christian morals, even though he has no morals, christian or not.

2012: Ron Paul > Obama > Mitt Romney > Everyone else > Santorum > Newt Gingrich.

There's a lot more valid reasons to vote against Gingrich than whether he committed adulterey.

sonicare

The fact that his name is Newt is one surely.

You can't be serious. Seriously America... WTF? (again) :?

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

There's a lot more valid reasons to vote against Gingrich than whether he committed adulterey.

Ilovegames1992

The fact that his name is Newt is one surely.

[QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

There's a lot more valid reasons to vote against Gingrich than whether he committed adulterey.

DevilMightCry

The fact that his name is Newt is one surely.

I don't care for either. They're politicians they're the same to me.

But i must say, Newt is way more ridiculous than Barack Obama :lol:

Newton Leroy Gingrich. Sounds fine by me. DevilMightCry

Leroy :lol:

:lol:

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"]Newton Leroy Gingrich. Sounds fine by me. Ilovegames1992

Leroy :lol:

:lol:

Meaningful discussion about names? Hm...

And if you found my posts incoherent then you need to stop drinking.

[QUOTE="RandoIph"]In fact Newt was cheating on his first wife, and lying about it, at the exact time he was trying to impeach Clinton for cheating on his wife, and lying about it. FAMILY VALUES.moneymatterz

Clinton was impeached because he lied under oath. Next.

social conservatives overwhelmingly support a marshmallow man for president.

seriously how is this not newt gingrich? he's white, he's angry, he's plump and he hates new york..

What bothers me isn't that Newt won the primary. What peeves me is that I'm willing to bet that a majority of those who voted for him oppose same sex marriage because it hurts the"sanctity" of mariage.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He isn't a gay atheist... so there isn't a problem.Dark_Knight6

He is staunchly opposed to gay marriage, so you could probably just wait for him to get caught walking into a hotel with some rent boy.