At least that's what we should tattoo gay people with, according to Rev. Peter Mullen.
What's your take on this? I think it was just a bit of a joke that backfired, in particular because of the church's already tainted history with homosexuality.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
At least that's what we should tattoo gay people with, according to Rev. Peter Mullen.
What's your take on this? I think it was just a bit of a joke that backfired, in particular because of the church's already tainted history with homosexuality.
At least that's what we should tattoo gay people with, according to Rev. Peter Mullen.
What's your take on this? I think it was just a bit of a joke that backfired, in particular because of the church's already tainted history with homosexuality.
AirGuitarist87
We should tatoo his arms to say: "think twice before opening the garbage"
Was that pink tank real??
That was teh awesome!!
Can you imagine walking down the street and seeing a giant pink tank invading your town. complete with gay infantry??
Was that pink tank real??
That was teh awesome!!
Can you imagine walking down the street and seeing a giant pink tank invading your town. complete with gay infantry??
marcus4hire
That just reminds me of Chris Rocks hilarious rant about gay people in the military :lol:
[QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =Dbungie93
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
[QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =D-TheSecondSign-
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
I was thinking the exact same thing.
[QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =D-TheSecondSign-
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
Obviously! If he was gay that would mean he was gay If he isn't gay then he isn't be gay Don't be a hater.
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =Dmfacek
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
I was thinking the exact same thing.
Same here, is there a problem with that bungie? :|
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =DGIJames248
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
Obviously! If he was gay that would mean he was gay If he isn't gay then he isn't be gay Don't be a hater.
lol wut?
If I saw a gay rights parade with a pink tank I'd probably say the same thing.GIJames248
I'm not picky about the colour. If I see any tank going down the street, I'm running.
A Diocese of London spokeswoman said the remarks did not reflect its views.Yeah, right...Mr Mullen said: "I certainly have nothing against homosexuals. Many of my dear friends have been and are of that persuasion. LOL right...
"What I have got against them is the militant preaching of homosexuality."Like you militantly preach your morals and religion to others, you mean? Here's a good example:
In the same blog, Mr Mullen called for all gay pride parades, which he branded "obscene", to be outlawed.
I was fine until I got to the "militant preaching" part. As if he doesn't do it, he's a god damned priest. And anal sex isn't exclusive to same-sex couples, heterosexual couples do it too. Why not tattoo them? And it really can't "seriously damage your health" unless you do it wrong. In which case, it would be that person's fault.
I was fine until I got to the "militant preaching" part. As if he doesn't do it, he's a god damned priest. And anal sex isn't exclusive to same-sex couples, heterosexual couples do it too. Why not tattoo them? And it really can't "seriously damage your health" unless you do it wrong. In which case, it would be that person's fault.
Dark_Knight6
I think it was a seriously distasteful joke, played on the cigarrette packets that're sold nowadays with "Smoking can seriously damage your health" on them. But I agree that it isn't just limited to same-sex couples.
I was fine until I got to the "militant preaching" part. As if he doesn't do it, he's a god damned priest. And anal sex isn't exclusive to same-sex couples, heterosexual couples do it too. Why not tattoo them? And it really can't "seriously damage your health" unless you do it wrong. In which case, it would be that person's fault.
Dark_Knight6
I think it was a seriously distasteful joke, played on the cigarrette packets that're sold nowadays with "Smoking can seriously damage your health" on them. But I agree that it isn't just limited to same-sex couples.
Someone said something stupid. It's nothing new. Why this makes national headline is beyond me.GettingTired
I'm convinced that people say these comments for the attention that we give them.
[QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =Dblack_cat19
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
I was thinking the exact same thing.
Same here, is there a problem with that bungie? :|
I have a problem with people wanting to have anal sex, regardless of their preferences...be them homo or hetero. The anus is designed to excrete bodily wastes and toxins. Not to get your rocks off. It's very unclean.
[QUOTE="black_cat19"][QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="xaos"]Meh, most gay people I know already have several tattoos, and we've all paid damn well for them; is this priest suggesting we gety free subsidies for our tattoos? =DStrawberryHill
We? I hope that doesn't mean you're...
I was thinking the exact same thing.
Same here, is there a problem with that bungie? :|
I have a problem with people wanting to have anal sex, regardless of their preferences...be them homo or hetero. The anus is designed to excrete bodily wastes and toxins. Not to get your rocks off. It's very unclean.
It doesn't matter. It isn't any of our business. If they want to go up each other's backside that's their business.
Lots of things can damage your health - including 'normal' sex, too.pianist
And smoking. And drinking alcohol, which is considered by some to actually be a poison.
"Mr Mullen said: "I certainly have nothing against homosexuals. Many of my dear friends have been and are of that persuasion.
In the same blog, Mr Mullen called for all gay pride parades, which he branded "obscene", to be outlawed.
He also criticised the blessing of two gay priests at a "wedding" performed earlier this year in a City of London church."
Is it just me, or does something not quite add up?
"Mr Mullen said: "I certainly have nothing against homosexuals. Many of my dear friends have been and are of that persuasion.
In the same blog, Mr Mullen called for all gay pride parades, which he branded "obscene", to be outlawed.
He also criticised the blessing of two gay priests at a "wedding" performed earlier this year in a City of London church."
Is it just me, or does something not quite add up?
TAKE_IT_BACK
Gay priests, ordained in the church set up and influenced bu God, the Father, God the Holy Spirit, and God the Son (Jesus). That is an abomination. Don't even go there.
Lots of things can damage your health - including 'normal' sex, too.pianist
I once saw an article about a man who went to a strip club. And then one of the strippers rubbed her breasts in his face, and she actually suffocated him to death.
It's true, even strip clubs can kill you.
Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. wslacker2
Why do you have a problem with that?
[QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. MrGeezer
Why do you have a problem with that?
Because he/she is anti-freedom.
[QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. MrGeezer
Why do you have a problem with that?
Read the Bible for an answer to that question. As to the previous post accusing me of being anti-freedom, not any more than you may be. Look at your views on many things. You may be "anti-freedom" as well.
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. wslacker2
Why do you have a problem with that?
Read the Bible for an answer to that question. As to the previous post accusing me of being anti-freedom, not any more than you may be. Look at your views on many things. You may be "anti-freedom" as well.
I wasn't aware there was a law preventing same-sex partners from raising kids to begin with.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment