This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Androvinus"]I think everyone knows sodomy=bad for your healthfreshgman
how so?
Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. wslacker2
Why do you have a problem with that?
Read the Bible for an answer to that question. As to the previous post accusing me of being anti-freedom, not any more than you may be. Look at your views on many things. You may be "anti-freedom" as well.
i believe all gay people want are equal rights and i see nothing wrong with that.
[QUOTE="wslacker2"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. Serraph105
Why do you have a problem with that?
Read the Bible for an answer to that question. As to the previous post accusing me of being anti-freedom, not any more than you may be. Look at your views on many things. You may be "anti-freedom" as well.
i believe all gay people want are equal rights and i see nothing wrong with that.
yes, this is one issue that makes me almost ashamed to be called christian....Yes, it is stated in the bible that homosexuality is a sin, but so is lying, so is murdering, so is having sex before marriage...but it doesn't say that people that are homosexual should be de-humanized and not given the same rights under the government as someone else.
If anything to say that homosexuals shouldn't be given the same rights as anyone else is a sin as well. I believe that the golden rule is "Love thy neighbor as thyself", and do unto to others as you would have them do unto you....I'm pretty sure that I wan't rights like everyone else, so I wan't the same for homosexuals as well.
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="wslacker2"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. johnnyv2003
Why do you have a problem with that?
Read the Bible for an answer to that question. As to the previous post accusing me of being anti-freedom, not any more than you may be. Look at your views on many things. You may be "anti-freedom" as well.
i believe all gay people want are equal rights and i see nothing wrong with that.
yes, this is one issue that makes me almost ashamed to be called christian....Yes, it is stated in the bible that homosexuality is a sin, but so is lying, so is murdering, so is having sex before marriage...but it doesn't say that people that are homosexual should be de-humanized and not given the same rights under the government as someone else.
If anything to say that homosexuals shouldn't be given the same rights as anyone else is a sin as well. I believe that the golden rule is "Love thy neighbor as thyself", and do unto to others as you would have them do unto you....I'm pretty sure that I wan't rights like everyone else, so I wan't the same for homosexuals as well.
Gay couples are given all the same rights through civil unions. They're screaming for the word marriage. Marriage comes from the church. The church says a union between a man and woman.
[QUOTE="freshgman"][QUOTE="Androvinus"]I think everyone knows sodomy=bad for your healthredfield_137
how so?
Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.
I find that wildly unlikelyGay couples are given all the same rights through civil unions. They're screaming for the word marriage. Marriage comes from the church. The church says a union between a man and woman.
LikeHaterade
Actually, here in the USA, marriages have been secularized. As long as we DON'T need to go through a church in order to get officially married, the church's position on marriage shouldn't mean anything.
[QUOTE="johnnyv2003"][QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="wslacker2"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="wslacker2"]Here is my take: If you want to have a relationship with someone as the same sex? No problem. If you want me to vote into law a statute that allows you to get married to this partner, and giving you the right to raise children with your same sex partner? I do have a problem. LikeHaterade
Why do you have a problem with that?
Read the Bible for an answer to that question. As to the previous post accusing me of being anti-freedom, not any more than you may be. Look at your views on many things. You may be "anti-freedom" as well.
i believe all gay people want are equal rights and i see nothing wrong with that.
yes, this is one issue that makes me almost ashamed to be called christian....Yes, it is stated in the bible that homosexuality is a sin, but so is lying, so is murdering, so is having sex before marriage...but it doesn't say that people that are homosexual should be de-humanized and not given the same rights under the government as someone else.
If anything to say that homosexuals shouldn't be given the same rights as anyone else is a sin as well. I believe that the golden rule is "Love thy neighbor as thyself", and do unto to others as you would have them do unto you....I'm pretty sure that I wan't rights like everyone else, so I wan't the same for homosexuals as well.
Gay couples are given all the same rights through civil unions. They're screaming for the word marriage. Marriage comes from the church. The church says a union between a man and woman.
No, the church does not define modern marriage; otherwise, marriages would not be licensed by the government and could not be performed in any secular venue, which they can...[QUOTE="freshgman"][QUOTE="Androvinus"]I think everyone knows sodomy=bad for your healthredfield_137
how so?
Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.
Omg. :lol: That is so ridiculous.. and funny. :lol:No duh. Also, while I don't agree with everything he said, surely he should be allowed to express his opinion in his own blog.redfield_137
Many priests are downright hypocrites that rape LITTLE BOYS. Who the hell are they to give an opinion on the matter?stevenk4k5
If I am a thief and say stealing is wrong, does that make me any less correct about the fact that stealing is wrong?
[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"]Many priests are downright hypocrites that rape LITTLE BOYS. Who the hell are they to give an opinion on the matter?Theokhoth
Because "many" does not equal "all?":|
That's true but I think that is one topic priests just shouldn't touch.
[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"]Many priests are downright hypocrites that rape LITTLE BOYS. Who the hell are they to give an opinion on the matter?superheromonkey
If I am a thief and say stealing is wrong, does that make me any less correct about the fact that stealing is wrong?
No, but you're a hypocrite for it.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="stevenk4k5"]Many priests are downright hypocrites that rape LITTLE BOYS. Who the hell are they to give an opinion on the matter?stevenk4k5
Because "many" does not equal "all?":|
That's true but I think that is one topic priests just shouldn't touch.
I think they may touch whatever topic they damn well please.:|
[QUOTE="redfield_137"][QUOTE="freshgman"][QUOTE="Androvinus"]I think everyone knows sodomy=bad for your healthDeeJayInphinity
how so?
Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.
Omg. :lol: That is so ridiculous.. and funny. :lol:That's just sad. :lol: His boyfriend must have been a complete whore.
[QUOTE="redfield_137"]Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.xaosI find that wildly unlikely
There may be some substance to redfield's story. The anal sphincter does in fact have a layer of muscle that we can control to help hold it in. Shove a large enough object in there repeatedly and over time, you might (I emphasize MIGHT) damage a few fibers.
I find that wildly unlikely[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="redfield_137"]Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.kingdre
There may be some substance to redfield's story. The anal sphincter does in fact have a layer of muscle that we can control to help hold it in. Shove a large enough object in there repeatedly and over time, you might (I emphasize MIGHT) damage a few fibers.
Oh goodness... :|
I find that wildly unlikely[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="redfield_137"]Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.kingdre
There may be some substance to redfield's story. The anal sphincter does in fact have a layer of muscle that we can control to help hold it in. Shove a large enough object in there repeatedly and over time, you might (I emphasize MIGHT) damage a few fibers.
Muscles regenerate themselves. They're not like underwear whose elasticity might degrade over time. :?[QUOTE="kingdre"]I find that wildly unlikely[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="redfield_137"]Because it loosens your anoos. I have a gay friend who dated a guy and this guy had previously had surgery to tighten his anus because he was having trouble holding it in when he needed to go to the toilet. Apparently the muscles had been damaged over time.DeeJayInphinity
There may be some substance to redfield's story. The anal sphincter does in fact have a layer of muscle that we can control to help hold it in. Shove a large enough object in there repeatedly and over time, you might (I emphasize MIGHT) damage a few fibers.
Muscles regenerate themselves. They're not like underwear whose elasticity might degrade over time. :?Yeah. But for all I know, the guy must have been having anal sex everyday if he needed surgery to fix it. Assuming the story true.
Ehh I honestly don't know. I never thought about studying that part of the body. :PYeah. But for all I know, the guy must have been having anal sex everyday if he needed surgery to fix it. Assuming the story true.
kingdre
[QUOTE="kingdre"]Yeah. But for all I know, the guy must have been having anal sex everyday if he needed surgery to fix it. Assuming the story true.
Theokhoth
Don't underestimate the anus's ability to accommodate large objects. . . .
I don't know anything about that. I'm just saying redfield's story isn't as farfetched as it sounds.
Gay couples are given all the same rights through civil unions. They're screaming for the word marriage. Marriage comes from the church. The church says a union between a man and woman.
LikeHaterade
ITs complete semantics.. Will it make you "feel better" if it called something else.. When gays say they want marriage, its by the state.. Civil union is a stupid PC term for people who still can't handle homosexuals.. People still call it marriage even if they don't have it by the church but by the court house.. Serioulsy all you guys are dwelling on is on the word, who cares.
[QUOTE="kingdre"]Ehh I honestly don't know. I never thought about studying that part of the body. :PYeah. But for all I know, the guy must have been having anal sex everyday if he needed surgery to fix it. Assuming the story true.
DeeJayInphinity
I don't blame you. But seeing it in cadavers is pretty cool. :P
[QUOTE="pianist"]Lots of things can damage your health - including 'normal' sex, too.MrGeezer
I once saw an article about a man who went to a strip club. And then one of the strippers rubbed her breasts in his face, and she actually suffocated him to death.
It's true, even strip clubs can kill you.
That's the way I want to go out.
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="kingdre"]Yeah. But for all I know, the guy must have been having anal sex everyday if he needed surgery to fix it. Assuming the story true.
kingdre
Don't underestimate the anus's ability to accommodate large objects. . . .
I don't know anything about that. I'm just saying redfield's story isn't as farfetched as it sounds.
Yeah, it really is; hell your argument would suggest a stronger ring of muscle would form due to, more or less, exercise. But we are probably getting more graphic than is really appropriate for GS.Yeah. Real funny. Like when they gave Jews tattoos it was funny. This man is in a position of authority and a person that many people listen very closely to. He should choose his words with much greater care. His "some of my best friends are gay defense doesn't fly with me. I think that the remark, particularly from someone who claims to be a Christian, is offensive and disgusting. "It's the kind of remark you might expect from a drunk on a Saturday night, not someone in a supposedly responsible position." - this about covers it.nocoolnamejim
The guy made a dumb joke.
Your comparisons to the holocaust aint valid. The two scenarios aren't even comparable.
[QUOTE="redfield_137"]No duh. Also, while I don't agree with everything he said, surely he should be allowed to express his opinion in his own blog.foxhound_fox
The two aren't mutually exclusive.
Somehow, because you don't like what somebody says, it aint longer an opinion anymore...
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="redfield_137"]No duh. Also, while I don't agree with everything he said, surely he should be allowed to express his opinion in his own blog.mentalabc123
The two aren't mutually exclusive.
Somehow, because you don't like what somebody says, it aint longer an opinion anymore...
I can't believe you're justifying him.
Somehow, logic ceases to exist when that logic goes against your argument...[QUOTE="mentalabc123"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="redfield_137"]No duh. Also, while I don't agree with everything he said, surely he should be allowed to express his opinion in his own blog.MetalGear_Ninty
The two aren't mutually exclusive.
Somehow, because you don't like what somebody says, it aint longer an opinion anymore...
I can't believe you're justifying him.
Somehow, logic ceases to exist when that logic goes against your argument... And non sequitirs are totally valid as forms of argument?[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Somehow, logic ceases to exist when that logic goes against your argument...xaosAnd non sequitirs are totally valid as forms of argument?
Point out the non-sequitur.
Somehow, logic ceases to exist when that logic goes against your argument... And non sequitirs are totally valid as forms of argument?[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]MetalGear_Ninty
Point out the non-sequitur.
Your "logic ceases to exist" claim has zero context, hence it is a non sequitir...[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]And non sequitirs are totally valid as forms of argument?[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Somehow, logic ceases to exist when that logic goes against your argument...xaos
Point out the non-sequitur.
Your "logic ceases to exist" claim has zero context, hence it is a non sequitir... Never said that. I was saying that mb123 ignored logic just because it didn't agree with his argument/viewpoint etc.I was being ironic/sarcastic.
"God can seriously damage your health" would be better.Bourbons3
"Outrageous superstitious beliefs can seriously damage your health" *fixed*
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment