This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why would you expect contemporary accounts about a guy who was only known to the poor of Jerueselum? He wasn't important enough untill generations later when his followers started congregating, thus recquiring them to give an account for the origins of the christian beleifs. The bible is evidence for the simple reason that it is an anceint document, actually, it's many anceint documents written by many different people. Just because it has supernatural references in it, doesn't disclude an event of such happening (the death of christ is largely testified by everyone in the bible and actual historians). What you mean to say is that the bible is unrealiable evidence, as it is evidence as is any historical document. If Jesus did not exist, how do you explain the spread of christianity and jesus literature and historical testaments to him and his death?How did christianity spread so much if he had died on the cross and that there were only a handful of followers at that time?[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]How is it evidence? It postulates tons of supernatural and miraculous occurrences that cannot be verified by another source. Which severely undermines its reliability as a historical source.
My point is that the contemporary historical sources don't reference a lot about the guy. Most of the stuff recorded about him was written down long after his death, mostly by people who didn't even know him when he was alive. Which as a result, increases the probability that he didn't exist, from a historical perspective. But I've already stated that Christianity probably wouldn't exist had he not. Its just the evidence supporting his existence is thin and vague at best.123625
How did christianity spread so much if he had died on the cross and that there were only a handful of followers at that time?Arguably because of Paul, without him I doubt christianitiy's spread would have been much more slow. (He preached that the Gospel was to be taught to everyone, not just the jews).Stranger_4
And I also beleive the desciples were responsible for spreading the faith as well. But no Doubt Paul was the most influential.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="123625"]Vague ? :?123625
[QUOTE="harashawn"]It's no question that Jesus was real. But whether or not he was the son of God is debatable. foxhound_fox
Does someone remember the moon in a gaming magazine that supposedly contained hidden hints about a future announcement? People found all kinds of wacky images in those lines of the moon.
So this proves little to me. But i think certain elements of Christianity are rationally speaking very likely. And some things like the great vibe that fills You when being in a church, shouldn't just be ignored.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment