Spiderman 3 wasn't that bad :Spiderman Reboot :?

I mean they should not have made Topher venom (though he would be a great Carnage) and Sandman was amazing. People said they messed up venom and that he was the most iconic villian or something when he really isn't that great imo.

Vulture is a interesting choice for a villian and I am sure with the Vulture/Vulturess Raimi had something planned. Also the cast of the Spiderman movies was great. Wasn't their supposed to be 5 spiderman villians with the lizard being the last spiderman villian?

This is not saying the Reboot will be bad but I do not understand why Sony would not continue Spiderman 4... considering Spiderman rakes in so much dough. I mean atleast Raimi does the WoW movie but they could have even had another director do 4.

I mean spiderman 3 isn't even that badly recieved by critics with a 59 on metacritic... I mean Starwars prequels got mixed scores but continued and did well at the box office.

No, Spiderman 3 was THAT bad.

It's not so much of Sony not wanting to do a Spider-Man 4, it's more Sam Raimi not wanting to make another one.Nerd_Man

I agree that Spider-Man doesn't really need a reboot....at least, it certainly doesn't need one as badly as the X-Men franchise. That said, the last Spider-Man movie was pretty bad, especially compared to the first two movies. Not X-Men 3 bad, but bad. The dance/evil Peter musical sequence still haunts my dreams.Paladin_King

What is this? I don't even....

No, Spiderman 3 was THAT bad.Dylan_11

I hope they get a hotter and better Mary Jane. Didn't really like Kirsten Dunst that much.

[QUOTE="Dylan_11"]No, Spiderman 3 was THAT bad.scorch-62

[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]It's not so much of Sony not wanting to do a Spider-Man 4, it's more Sam Raimi not wanting to make another one.Raiden004

[QUOTE="Raiden004"]

[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]It's not so much of Sony not wanting to do a Spider-Man 4, it's more Sam Raimi not wanting to make another one.Nerd_Man

I think they should have just focused on Venom as a villain instead of juggling around 3 different villains. And Emo-Peter should have just been removed all together.

[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="Dylan_11"]No, Spiderman 3 was THAT bad.Dylan_11

[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"][QUOTE="Raiden004"] That doesn't mean you have to reboot it, just get a different director.

ohthemanatee

[QUOTE="Paladin_King"]I agree that Spider-Man doesn't really need a reboot....at least, it certainly doesn't need one as badly as the X-Men franchise. That said, the last Spider-Man movie was pretty bad, especially compared to the first two movies. Not X-Men 3 bad, but bad. The dance/evil Peter musical sequence still haunts my dreams.Dylan_11

What is this? I don't even....

[QUOTE="Dylan_11"][QUOTE="scorch-62"] Hell, just look at how they butchered the villains.bruinfan617

[QUOTE="bruinfan617"][QUOTE="Dylan_11"]Butchered the villains, the protagonist ect. Mary Jane was always miscast in my mind as well. Kirsten Dunst is not attractive.Dylan_11

[QUOTE="bruinfan617"][QUOTE="Dylan_11"]Butchered the villains, the protagonist ect. Mary Jane was always miscast in my mind as well. Kirsten Dunst is not attractive.Dylan_11

venom was good but the sandman was weak.... they should of made spiderman 3 with just venom as the villian oh yeah the videogame SUCKED!!

[QUOTE="Dylan_11"][QUOTE="bruinfan617"] She did a great job though.bruinfan617

I love Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane. She fits the role perfectly to me. She isn't the overly-attractive damsel in distress but she's pretty cute.

The only problem I had with the film was some scenes with Venom and Peter with his emotional issues. >_>

[QUOTE="Paladin_King"]I agree that Spider-Man doesn't really need a reboot....at least, it certainly doesn't need one as badly as the X-Men franchise. That said, the last Spider-Man movie was pretty bad, especially compared to the first two movies. Not X-Men 3 bad, but bad. The dance/evil Peter musical sequence still haunts my dreams.Dylan_11

What is this? I don't even....

It was a good movie it just didn't have the best ending

It's not so much of Sony not wanting to do a Spider-Man 4, it's more Sam Raimi not wanting to make another one.Nerd_Man

I liked it, kind of, but it's the worst in the trilogy and a reboot all depends on the directors, writers, cast, etc. to be good or not.

I want ultimate alliance vs justice league movie, thats what we need. SM3 was that bad and the series needs a reboot.

[QUOTE="Dylan_11"]

[QUOTE="Paladin_King"]I agree that Spider-Man doesn't really need a reboot....at least, it certainly doesn't need one as badly as the X-Men franchise. That said, the last Spider-Man movie was pretty bad, especially compared to the first two movies. Not X-Men 3 bad, but bad. The dance/evil Peter musical sequence still haunts my dreams.Banjo_Kongfooie

What is this? I don't even....

It was a good movie it just didn't have the best ending

I agree; the dancing part was enjoyable. It brought a comedic flare to the movie that succeeded in making me laugh. I mean this in a good way, in case that wasn't clear.

I find it ironic that they went for the emo hairstyle. It was at that point when Peter was acting the least emo (ie: confident and extroverted).

Spider-Man 3 was mediocre. Some part of me wanted to like the movie, but in the end I just couldn't bare to. They seriously screwed up Venom and the whole scene with Peter Parker dancing around was just idiotic. Sandman was excellent though, I just wish the movie was more centered around him. And I agree that a reboot is the only appropriate action at this point, however, I have no reason to expect the same level of quality as the first two films. For all we know, it could be ten times worse than Spider-Man 3, but we'll see.

We talked about this in the FAU, and it makes no sense to me. From what I understood Raimi and TM were on board, but Sony wanted to go in another direction. Bad idea IMO, even if my info is wrong.btaylor2404

[QUOTE="btaylor2404"]We talked about this in the FAU, and it makes no sense to me. From what I understood Raimi and TM were on board, but Sony wanted to go in another direction. Bad idea IMO, even if my info is wrong.Animatronic64

[QUOTE="Dylan_11"]

[QUOTE="Paladin_King"]I agree that Spider-Man doesn't really need a reboot....at least, it certainly doesn't need one as badly as the X-Men franchise. That said, the last Spider-Man movie was pretty bad, especially compared to the first two movies. Not X-Men 3 bad, but bad. The dance/evil Peter musical sequence still haunts my dreams.bobaban

What is this? I don't even....

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"][QUOTE="btaylor2404"]We talked about this in the FAU, and it makes no sense to me. From what I understood Raimi and TM were on board, but Sony wanted to go in another direction. Bad idea IMO, even if my info is wrong.btaylor2404

No, Spiderman 3 was THAT bad.

Dylan_11

I mean they should not have made Topher venom (though he would be a great Carnage) and Sandman was amazing. People said they messed up venom and that he was the most iconic villian or something when he really isn't that great imo.

Vulture is a interesting choice for a villian and I am sure with the Vulture/Vulturess Raimi had something planned. Also the cast of the Spiderman movies was great. Wasn't their supposed to be 5 spiderman villians with the lizard being the last spiderman villian?

This is not saying the Reboot will be bad but I do not understand why Sony would not continue Spiderman 4... considering Spiderman rakes in so much dough. I mean atleast Raimi does the WoW movie but they could have even had another director do 4.

I mean spiderman 3 isn't even that badly recieved by critics with a 59 on metacritic... I mean Starwars prequels got mixed scores but continued and did well at the box office.

Banjo_Kongfooie

1) Yes, Spider-Man 3 WAS that bad. It was ****ing god-awful.

2) Here's why Raimi refused to do Spider-Man 4...because he was forced into making Spider-Man 3 into ****, and all indications were leading to the idea that Sony was taking the exact same attitude with the development of Spider-Man 4. The studio wasn't interested in quality or allowing Sam Raimi to make the movie that he wanted to make, so Sam Raimi walked. Then, almost as soon as it was confirmed that Raimi left, it was announced that there would be a "gritty reboot" with a younger and more teen-relatable cast. Make no mistake...that's likely the direction that Sony was pushing Sam Raimi into in the first place. Then when he walked, they just went with that idea with the intention of getting a new director who hasn't earned enough respect or clout to tell the studio to **** off.

3) Write this down, quote me on it, and then bring it up when Spider-Man 4 is released: I'm predicting right now that Spider-Man 4 (or Spider-Man reboot) is going to be ****ing garbage.

[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]It's not so much of Sony not wanting to do a Spider-Man 4, it's more Sam Raimi not wanting to make another one.Raiden004

The problem is that once Raimi left, Maguire and Dunst left as well.

Apparently they were sick of that **** too, and the only thing getting them to consider coming back was the possibility of working with Sam Raimi again. Once he left, they left.

And then, how do you get that to work? The director is gone, freaking Spider-Man himself is gone, and Mary Jane is gone. "Reboot" is pretty much the only option left, at that point.