Star Trek is impressing the critics...

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="lucky326"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="lucky326"]The film is Star Trek by name only. This film has left only one series as Canon. I will watch it, but I doubt I will consider it Star Trek from that point onwards.

You can tell that just from the trailer it's far too much like one of a generic action film, it'll proberbly be this year's Transformers: a generic action film but done well

The problem is the plot of the film. They erase 40 years of Star Trek in 5 minutes.

Yeah, they should be able to do it more quickly than that Hmmm, Crisis on Infinite Trek? Don't worry, if DC Comics taught us anything, it's that continuity will be back. Fanboys will countenance nothing else.
Avatar image for martialbullet
martialbullet

10948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 martialbullet
Member since 2006 • 10948 Posts
Judging from the responses on this thread, I think they are going with a Wii-like strategy, attempting to appeal to non-fans.xaos
Those were my thoughts when I first saw the trailers. It's definitely aimed for the the non-fans.
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"]Judging from the responses on this thread, I think they are going with a Wii-like strategy, attempting to appeal to non-fans.martialbullet
Those were my thoughts when I first saw the trailers. It's definitely aimed for the the non-fans.

From some of my friends and co-workers who've seen it they said that it has a lot of things in it for the fans. Of course they are trying to do a mass appeal as well -- but fans will not be disappointed. I'm personally excited and counting down the hours. :D
Avatar image for dominer
dominer

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 dominer
Member since 2005 • 3316 Posts

Never seen a Star Trek episode in my life and I'm going to see it.

One more thing.Of course they're going to show action,sex, and CGI in the trailer becausethose things areinteresting.You think people will beinterested in this if the trailer just showed a bunch of talking?

Avatar image for martialbullet
martialbullet

10948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 martialbullet
Member since 2006 • 10948 Posts
[QUOTE="martialbullet"][QUOTE="xaos"]Judging from the responses on this thread, I think they are going with a Wii-like strategy, attempting to appeal to non-fans.Sajedene
Those were my thoughts when I first saw the trailers. It's definitely aimed for the the non-fans.

From some of my friends and co-workers who've seen it they said that it has a lot of things in it for the fans. Of course they are trying to do a mass appeal as well -- but fans will not be disappointed. I'm personally excited and counting down the hours. :D

Yeah, I don't think they would alienate the fans. Back at comic-con 07 when they previewed the whole thing at the panel, I couldn't be any less excited even with Leonard Nimoy at the table. Now I'm somewhat interested in watching it. Funny thing is the shirts they gave away said it would be out by December 2008.
Avatar image for deactivated-6016f2513d412
deactivated-6016f2513d412

20414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-6016f2513d412
Member since 2007 • 20414 Posts
It looks like a cool/good movie, but I don't think it'll be a very good Star Trek movie. Nevertheless, I'm planning on seeing it on opening night. :P
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
[QUOTE="martialbullet"][QUOTE="xaos"]Judging from the responses on this thread, I think they are going with a Wii-like strategy, attempting to appeal to non-fans.Sajedene
Those were my thoughts when I first saw the trailers. It's definitely aimed for the the non-fans.

From some of my friends and co-workers who've seen it they said that it has a lot of things in it for the fans. Of course they are trying to do a mass appeal as well -- but fans will not be disappointed. I'm personally excited and counting down the hours. :D

I don't agree at all. I know people refusing to watch it because of the alternations they have made, yes they threw a lot of things in but they have erased a lot more.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

I am a big TNG fan, but that one look like a random cgi with sex and non-stop action. While I don't care about sex, action and ton of CGI in movies, this is star trek... It might be a good movie for non-trek fan, but I dunno. I have the feeling they completly missed what made trek so interesting in the first place: strong characters with personality (Not a bunch of teen who come from stupid movies.) and a nice story.

Franko_3

This. I don't mind action movies, although I do have a threshold as far as mindlessness is concerned, but that is NOT what Trek is. This just looks like, "let's make it modern and sexy and risque and full of special effects." That's so cliched, and so against what Trek is.

Avatar image for Drizzt13
Drizzt13

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#60 Drizzt13
Member since 2005 • 1676 Posts

I am a big TNG fan, but that one look like a random cgi with sex and non-stop action. While I don't care about sex, action and ton of CGI in movies, this is star trek... It might be a good movie for non-trek fan, but I dunno. I have the feeling they completly missed what made trek so interesting in the first place: strong characters with personality (Not a bunch of teen who come from stupid movies.) and a nice story.

Franko_3

I have the same feeling. I think they are going to miss some of the subetly and themes that made Star Trek, Star Trek.

Avatar image for adv_tr00per
adv_tr00per

2605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 adv_tr00per
Member since 2006 • 2605 Posts

I've never watch star trek before

but this movie looks intense so i might check it out.

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="lucky326"][QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="martialbullet"] Those were my thoughts when I first saw the trailers. It's definitely aimed for the the non-fans.

From some of my friends and co-workers who've seen it they said that it has a lot of things in it for the fans. Of course they are trying to do a mass appeal as well -- but fans will not be disappointed. I'm personally excited and counting down the hours. :D

I don't agree at all. I know people refusing to watch it because of the alternations they have made, yes they threw a lot of things in but they have erased a lot more.

Well for now I think I will listen to the ones who have seen it over people who refuse to see it. Negative comments from those who have seen it are few and far between. This thread is getting me even more excited now :D 3 more hours!!!
Avatar image for AFraud
AFraud

1500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 AFraud
Member since 2004 • 1500 Posts

I've been a fan for nearly my whole life and I'm looking forward to this. :D I'm still kinda bummed about Enterprise though... in season 4 it finally became the show that it should have always been, then it got cut. Voyager still left a bad taste in my mouth... and hopefully the DS9 vibe that I'm feeling isn't misguided. That is still my favorite Star Trek show, period.MAILER_DAEMON

Finally someone who shares my opinion about Enterprise.It was actually quite good in its last season. They canned it just when it was getting some interesting story arcs, and the finale was a travesty. Voyager was pure cheese. Such a lame show that never would have lastedif Jeri Ryan didn't look so good in skin tight spandex. And I could never get into DS9. That show always put me to sleep. TNG is my favorite series, probably because it's what I grew up on. Really only watched TOS for its camp value (tribbles, remote controlled Spock), but I do enjoy the TOS movies.

Anyway, I'm not sure what to think of the new movie. Shatner and Leonard Nimoy are so iconic as Kirk and Spock, I originally thoughta reboot or prequel would be pretty misguided. Although thetrailers look decent enough.

Avatar image for Godly_Cure
Godly_Cure

4293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Godly_Cure
Member since 2007 • 4293 Posts

Maybe I'll check it out.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

I plan to see it. It looks great. :D

Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]I've been a fan for nearly my whole life and I'm looking forward to this. :D I'm still kinda bummed about Enterprise though... in season 4 it finally became the show that it should have always been, then it got cut. Voyager still left a bad taste in my mouth... and hopefully the DS9 vibe that I'm feeling isn't misguided. That is still my favorite Star Trek show, period.AFraud

Finally someone who shares my opinion about Enterprise.It was actually quite good in its last season. They canned it just when it was getting some interesting story arcs, and the finale was a travesty. Voyager was pure cheese. Such a lame show that never would have lastedif Jeri Ryan didn't look so good in skin tight spandex. And I could never get into DS9. That show always put me to sleep. TNG is my favorite series, probably because it's what I grew up on. Really only watched TOS for its camp value (tribbles, remote controlled Spock), but I do enjoy the TOS movies.

Anyway, I'm not sure what to think of the new movie. Shatner and Leonard Nimoy are so iconic as Kirk and Spock, I originally thoughta reboot or prequel would be pretty misguided. Although thetrailers look decent enough.

I was looking forward to the Romulan War arc. They also planned on continuing the Mirror Universe arc and that was excellent.
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
I've never really watched Star Trek (save for one episode with Alice and Wonderland characters :?) but this new movie is getting to much god reviews for me to ignore. Plus Simon Pegg, Zachary Quinto and John Cho are in it. Rock on.
Avatar image for Scieran
Scieran

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Scieran
Member since 2009 • 196 Posts

I personally find that this fictional imagination that is brought to life through books, games and movies horrible. I hate the idea I hate everything about it.

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#69 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"]Judging from the responses on this thread, I think they are going with a Wii-like strategy, attempting to appeal to non-fans. Pretty unsurprising, given the ever-dwindling fanbase for the series since TNG went off the air.lucky326
That's exactly what they have done. This film will completely annoy TOS fans and most TNG fans, especially the ending.

But I liked TNG :o
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="lucky326"][QUOTE="xaos"]Judging from the responses on this thread, I think they are going with a Wii-like strategy, attempting to appeal to non-fans. Pretty unsurprising, given the ever-dwindling fanbase for the series since TNG went off the air.Bourbons3
That's exactly what they have done. This film will completely annoy TOS fans and most TNG fans, especially the ending.

But I liked TNG :o

I love TNG. :o

Avatar image for HybridPhoenix
HybridPhoenix

3598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 HybridPhoenix
Member since 2007 • 3598 Posts
I hate Star Trek, (Star Wars fan myself) but the trailer seems so UN-Star Trek like that I want to see it.
Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
Looks like a typical hollywood film but put into hyperdrive. A definate watch.
Avatar image for Wilfred_Owen
Wilfred_Owen

20964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#73 Wilfred_Owen
Member since 2005 • 20964 Posts
I don't know who said it on here but they said that it'll be a good movie but not a good star trek movie. I'll go on that assumption.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="VoodooGamer"]

I just read in USA Today, J.J. Abrams said he didn't watch much Star Trek. It looks like it from what I can see. Star Trek isn't and has never been about action. It's about sometime more -- it's an optimistic vision of our future, and that's what I like about it.

No, it's about scoring with scantily clad green chicks from space.

Or fighting those commies... I mean Klingons!
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

The problem is the plot of the film. They erase 40 years of Star Trek in 5 minutes.lucky326

Star Trek did this alternate timeline thing before.

It's sad to see so many of you writing the movie off based on the trailer, and ignoring that those who've already seen it say it has a great plot, great characters AND great action scenes.

I'd like a sequel featuring the Borg. First Contact was awesome.

Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts

[QUOTE="lucky326"] The problem is the plot of the film. They erase 40 years of Star Trek in 5 minutes.Baranga

Star Trek did this alternate timeline thing before.

It's sad to see so many of you writing the movie off based on the trailer, and ignoring that those who've already seen it say it has a great plot, great characters AND great action scenes.

I'd like a sequel featuring the Borg. First Contact was awesome.

But the problem is this is permanent. The changes they made can't be undone.
Avatar image for iloverikku11
iloverikku11

11039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 iloverikku11
Member since 2005 • 11039 Posts

I will be seeing it this weekend and all I can hope is that it is not a mindless action movie, because that is not Trek is about.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

[QUOTE="lucky326"] The problem is the plot of the film. They erase 40 years of Star Trek in 5 minutes.lucky326

Star Trek did this alternate timeline thing before.

It's sad to see so many of you writing the movie off based on the trailer, and ignoring that those who've already seen it say it has a great plot, great characters AND great action scenes.

I'd like a sequel featuring the Borg. First Contact was awesome.

But the problem is this is permanent. The changes they made can't be undone.

And many Star Trek episodes randomly changed other details too. Have you followed the IMDB Star Trek board? Since Cloverfield, there were countless debates between hardcore trekkies that refuse any change and people that pointed out various timeline flaws over time. For example, the date of the Third World War and of the Eugenics War are always changing.

Since time travel and alternate timelines are allowed in Star Trek, I fail to see the problem. A reboot or remake of anything Star Trek-related is always a viable option. Nothing was changed in Shatner's original series, this is just "another version of the truth". And since multiple universes are allowed, I don't think you can point out a certain correct universe.

I'm very curious to see what this alternate crew does. The "originals" already had their share of adventures.

Avatar image for Rikardur
Rikardur

9290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Rikardur
Member since 2008 • 9290 Posts

I have not watched any other Star Trek before but I plan on seeing this film. I can't resist a good sci fi flick.

Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#80 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts

Don't care what anyone thinks, Kirk was the man better than Picard.

Avatar image for Rikardur
Rikardur

9290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Rikardur
Member since 2008 • 9290 Posts

Don't care what anyone thinks, Kurt was the man better than Picard.

greenprince
Kirk?
Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#82 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts

[QUOTE="greenprince"]

Don't care what anyone thinks, Kurt was the man better than Picard.

Rikardur

Kirk?

:P Yup sorry about that I always spelt his name that way since my brother introduced me to the show.

Avatar image for omfg_its_dally
omfg_its_dally

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 omfg_its_dally
Member since 2006 • 8068 Posts
My dad's name is James Kirk so they should let us see this for free.
Avatar image for Oyeoyeoye
Oyeoyeoye

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Oyeoyeoye
Member since 2007 • 479 Posts
Growing up I was a huge fan of TNG and watched DS0 and Voyager sparingly. That said, I'm glad they went in the direction they have. The franchise was starting to go flat as it currently was. I haven't seen a Star Trek movie I liked in a long time. Besides, the last film was more of an action film then any Trek movie that had preceded it and it was awful. Hopefully this one can get it right.
Avatar image for The_Sand_Man
The_Sand_Man

6788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 The_Sand_Man
Member since 2008 • 6788 Posts
I'm definitely going to see it over the weekend. It looks a lot better then Wolverine Origins.
Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
i loved the trailer. it makes it look amazing.
Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts
whats not to like about the trailer? Its freakin amazing.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
I want to watch it just to satisfy my curiosity. I really liked Star Trek when I was younger and I want to see if they capture enough of the Star Trek feel or if it's just a special effects CGI bonanza. Having said that, my friends are all watching it on Friday night, but I can't go with them because I'm working. :xmegagene
you can assume it will have loads of CGI effects but the question is will it do everything else well also
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

Don't care what anyone thinks, Kirk was the man better than Picard.

greenprince

Blaspheme! Please do not spread your falsehoods here.

Avatar image for XilePrincess
XilePrincess

13130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 XilePrincess
Member since 2008 • 13130 Posts
I'm watching it tonight. I'll let you know what I think.Sajedene
Where do you live :O it's only tuesday here, and it's not out til friday.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

I've been a fan for nearly my whole life and I'm looking forward to this. :D I'm still kinda bummed about Enterprise though... in season 4 it finally became the show that it should have always been, then it got cut. Voyager still left a bad taste in my mouth... and hopefully the DS9 vibe that I'm feeling isn't misguided. That is still my favorite Star Trek show, period.MAILER_DAEMON
Yeah, I was also pissed that Enterprise had to go. Contrary to what a lot of trek fans feel, I really liked it. I think they really started to make something good with season 3 and then season 4 was proof that they weren't stopping the increase in quality. At least one more season would have done the show justice.

Anyway, I'm going to see the new movie. It might not entertain me in the way that the shows did, but the special effects look really nice, so I guess I'll at least be pleased with something.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajedene"]I'm watching it tonight. I'll let you know what I think.XilePrincess
Where do you live :O it's only tuesday here, and it's not out til friday.

I think she works in the movie business err something, so she gets to see things early and know the ending of TV shows before all of us... lucky. :x

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts

[QUOTE="XilePrincess"][QUOTE="Sajedene"]I'm watching it tonight. I'll let you know what I think.smokeydabear076

Where do you live :O it's only tuesday here, and it's not out til friday.

I think she works in the movie business err something, so she gets to see things early and know the ending of TV shows before all of us... lucky. :x

Eh I wouldn't call it lucky at all. I already made a thread about it and my thoughts. In case you guys are interested.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]I've been a fan for nearly my whole life and I'm looking forward to this. :D I'm still kinda bummed about Enterprise though... in season 4 it finally became the show that it should have always been, then it got cut. Voyager still left a bad taste in my mouth... and hopefully the DS9 vibe that I'm feeling isn't misguided. That is still my favorite Star Trek show, period.smokeydabear076

Yeah, I was also pissed that Enterprise had to go. Contrary to what a lot of trek fans feel, I really liked it. I think they really started to make something good with season 3 and then season 4 was proof that they weren't stopping the increase in quality. At least one more season would have done the show justice.

Anyway, I'm going to see the new movie. It might not entertain me in the way that the shows did, but the special effects look really nice, so I guess I'll at least be pleased with something.

They finally got a good writing staff and decent producers in season 4, who realized that it was supposed to be a prequel show, not the battleground of 31st century Starfleet's Temporal Cold War. An interesting idea, but they should have saved that for a different show. Unfortunately, most of the fans (myself included) had already jumped ship when season one turned out to be such a bore... and ugh, I wish I could strangle whoever decided that the song from Patch Adams should be a Star Trek theme. I didn't discover season 4's greatness until the DVD releases. Then of course, Brannon and Braga wrote their "love letter to the fans" by suddenly thinking that every fan thought that The Next Generation was the best thing about Star Trek, and that Enterprise was a bad idea. "Dear fans, you suck."

I should probably get tickets soon... I'll be the IMAX is already sold out for the next few days.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#95 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]I've been a fan for nearly my whole life and I'm looking forward to this. :D I'm still kinda bummed about Enterprise though... in season 4 it finally became the show that it should have always been, then it got cut. Voyager still left a bad taste in my mouth... and hopefully the DS9 vibe that I'm feeling isn't misguided. That is still my favorite Star Trek show, period.MAILER_DAEMON

Yeah, I was also pissed that Enterprise had to go. Contrary to what a lot of trek fans feel, I really liked it. I think they really started to make something good with season 3 and then season 4 was proof that they weren't stopping the increase in quality. At least one more season would have done the show justice.

Anyway, I'm going to see the new movie. It might not entertain me in the way that the shows did, but the special effects look really nice, so I guess I'll at least be pleased with something.

They finally got a good writing staff and decent producers in season 4, who realized that it was supposed to be a prequel show, not the battleground of 31st century Starfleet's Temporal Cold War. An interesting idea, but they should have saved that for a different show. Unfortunately, most of the fans (myself included) had already jumped ship when season one turned out to be such a bore... and ugh, I wish I could strangle whoever decided that the song from Patch Adams should be a Star Trek theme. I didn't discover season 4's greatness until the DVD releases. I should probably get tickets soon... I'll be the IMAX is already sold out for the next few days.

It was probably for the best that they dumped it. Maybe they caught on toward the end but that series just didn't seem like it could be saved. When they went and played the terrorist card with a big event in the series (I don't know what season that was) I groaned out loud.

Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

Yeah, I was also pissed that Enterprise had to go. Contrary to what a lot of trek fans feel, I really liked it. I think they really started to make something good with season 3 and then season 4 was proof that they weren't stopping the increase in quality. At least one more season would have done the show justice.

Anyway, I'm going to see the new movie. It might not entertain me in the way that the shows did, but the special effects look really nice, so I guess I'll at least be pleased with something.

duxup

They finally got a good writing staff and decent producers in season 4, who realized that it was supposed to be a prequel show, not the battleground of 31st century Starfleet's Temporal Cold War. An interesting idea, but they should have saved that for a different show. Unfortunately, most of the fans (myself included) had already jumped ship when season one turned out to be such a bore... and ugh, I wish I could strangle whoever decided that the song from Patch Adams should be a Star Trek theme. I didn't discover season 4's greatness until the DVD releases. I should probably get tickets soon... I'll be the IMAX is already sold out for the next few days.

It was probably for the best that they dumped it. Maybe they caught on toward the end but that series just didn't seem like it could be saved. When they went and played the terrorist card with a big event in the series (I don't know what season that was) I groaned out loud.

Did you finish that story arc? It was in season 4, and it turned out to be a Romulan plot to frame a sect of Vulcans who were searching for the truth about Surak. T'Pol was the leader of the sect; the same T'Pol who oversaw Spock's wedding in Amok Time.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#97 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]They finally got a good writing staff and decent producers in season 4, who realized that it was supposed to be a prequel show, not the battleground of 31st century Starfleet's Temporal Cold War. An interesting idea, but they should have saved that for a different show. Unfortunately, most of the fans (myself included) had already jumped ship when season one turned out to be such a bore... and ugh, I wish I could strangle whoever decided that the song from Patch Adams should be a Star Trek theme. I didn't discover season 4's greatness until the DVD releases. I should probably get tickets soon... I'll be the IMAX is already sold out for the next few days.MAILER_DAEMON

It was probably for the best that they dumped it. Maybe they caught on toward the end but that series just didn't seem like it could be saved. When they went and played the terrorist card with a big event in the series (I don't know what season that was) I groaned out loud.

Did you finish that story arc? It was in season 4, and it turned out to be a Romulan plot to frame a sect of Vulcans who were searching for the truth about Surak. T'Pol was the leader of the sect; the same T'Pol who oversaw Spock's wedding in Amok Time.

Nope, that sounds cool, but that doesn't make playing the terrorism card any less sad. Star Trek always addressed issues in its own way, but the "OMG teh terrorists" stuff was way too blatant, and blunt.

Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"][QUOTE="duxup"] It was probably for the best that they dumped it. Maybe they caught on toward the end but that series just didn't seem like it could be saved. When they went and played the terrorist card with a big event in the series (I don't know what season that was) I groaned out loud.

duxup

Did you finish that story arc? It was in season 4, and it turned out to be a Romulan plot to frame a sect of Vulcans who were searching for the truth about Surak. T'Pol was the leader of the sect; the same T'Pol who oversaw Spock's wedding in Amok Time.

Nope, that sounds cool, but that doesn't make playing the terrorism card any less sad. Star Trek always addressed issues in its own way, but the "OMG teh terrorists" stuff was way too blatant, and blunt.

Star Trek has always been blunt about addressing current social issues though... even Star Trek IV was all about environmentalism and pollution, which was a hot topic in the mid-80's. "To boldly go where no man has gone before" was from a White House press booklet about space after Sputnik's launch. The original series itself came about in the midst of the space race, and the Klingons in many ways were a symbol of the Soviet Union (especially clear with Star Trek VI, which came out in 1991). Considering how blatant they've been in the past, I didn't see this as being any worse.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#99 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]Did you finish that story arc? It was in season 4, and it turned out to be a Romulan plot to frame a sect of Vulcans who were searching for the truth about Surak. T'Pol was the leader of the sect; the same T'Pol who oversaw Spock's wedding in Amok Time.MAILER_DAEMON

Nope, that sounds cool, but that doesn't make playing the terrorism card any less sad. Star Trek always addressed issues in its own way, but the "OMG teh terrorists" stuff was way too blatant, and blunt.

Star Trek has always been blunt about addressing current social issues though... even Star Trek IV was all about environmentalism and pollution, which was a hot topic in the mid-80's. "To boldly go where no man has gone before" was from a White House press booklet about space after Sputnik's launch. The original series itself came about in the midst of the space race, and the Klingons in many ways were a symbol of the Soviet Union (especially clear with Star Trek VI, which came out in 1991). Considering how blatant they've been in the past, I didn't see this as being any worse.

I don't think much about the movies past #3 so I don't count those. It just seemed like a cheap ploy.
Avatar image for OneShotHeadshot
OneShotHeadshot

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 OneShotHeadshot
Member since 2004 • 215 Posts

i have to say i don't understand why they chose john cho for his role; i personally don't think he'll be anywhere near as good as george takei was.