Straight Pride Parade Fail

  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ace_of_Spades90
Ace_of_Spades90

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Ace_of_Spades90
Member since 2012 • 815 Posts

Blogger Anthony Rebello, known for calling gay marriage a “cry for attention,” was the sole participant in a straight pride parade he created and held at Seattle’s Capitol Hill on Saturday.

Rebello wrote a blog post on June 27, a day after nationwide marriage equality passed, for his website Smile Me A River calling same-sex marriage a distraction and money ploy:

"I think it’s a trend. A cry for attention. From your government, a distraction. For $. I have previously stated how I feel about marriage in this post: MARRIAGE I have also created an event: Heterosexual Parade Gay Mafia? Maybe animals should be allowed to get married? Would they govern and tax them too? While they’re at it, how about equal rights for insects? In my opinion, there is a difference between a man and a woman. If you can’t appreciate those differences, you can’t enjoy those differences. I don’t agree with boys turning into girls, and I don’t agree with girls turning into boys. The word/meaning of ‘Pride’ doesn’t belong to the gay/lgbt community, it belongs to everyone. That includes us good old fashioned straight people. The way I see it, in my opinion, some boys never turn into men, and some girls never turn into women. What a shitshow. ‘Welcome to the other side of the rainbow’ Really? No thanks.”

Although Rebello managed to get 169 participants to say yes to an initial Facebook invite of the event, Rebello was the only one marching on Saturday, holding black and white balloons along with a straight pride sign.

Poor bigot…

Link: http://www.towleroad.com/2015/07/straight-pride/

Thoughts?

Avatar image for megane
Megane

685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Megane
Member since 2015 • 685 Posts

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

Avatar image for Ace_of_Spades90
Ace_of_Spades90

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Ace_of_Spades90
Member since 2012 • 815 Posts

@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

LOL straight pride parade. Reads like something from The Onion

Avatar image for megane
Megane

685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Megane
Member since 2015 • 685 Posts

@Ace_of_Spades90:

Well they aren't all rapists.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

Odd how straight pride is entirely about homosexuals.

Avatar image for Ace_of_Spades90
Ace_of_Spades90

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Ace_of_Spades90
Member since 2012 • 815 Posts

@toast_burner said:

Odd how straight pride is entirely about homosexuals.

My thoughts exactly. We all know people like him are only doing this to try and counter the progress made.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46852 Posts

lol So much ridiculous nonsense from a bigot. Animals getting married? Equal rights for insects? Straight pride parade? This guy needs to find another job because his comedy is terrible.

Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts

It really must be tough being straight this day in age.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts

i'll never understand the rage of person A at person B finally being granted something person A has had all their life

Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts

@comp_atkins said:

i'll never understand the rage of person A at person B finally being granted something person A has had all their life

Obviously because person B getting something A has diminishes its value. It's like, science, or something.

Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#13 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts

:| Covering up what he says by claiming its a money ploy.

@Aljosa23 said:

LOL straight pride parade. Reads like something from The Onion

hahaha I thought it was going to be an article from The Onion.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts

What an asshat.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts

@Ring_of_fire said:
@comp_atkins said:

i'll never understand the rage of person A at person B finally being granted something person A has had all their life

Obviously because person B getting something A has diminishes its value. It's like, science, or something.

or something

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#16 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

And this is why we fail.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@Ace_of_Spades90 said:
@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

I don't think we require consent to slaughter animals for food, nor do I think they consent to pharmaceuticals using them as guinea pigs. In fact, we don't require animals to consent to whatever we choose to subject them to. So please, let's retire the consent inanity when it comes to bestiality.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

Technically we are all animals.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Technically we are all animals.

I take it you have no problem getting it on with a mutt?

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@Ace_of_Spades90 said:
@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

I don't think we require consent to slaughter animals for food, nor do I think they consent to pharmaceuticals using them as guinea pigs. In fact, we don't require animals to consent to whatever we choose to subject them to. So please, let's retire the consent inanity when it comes to bestiality.

Slaughtering an animal doesn't require signing a legal contract. Marriage on the other hand is nothing but a legal contract.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@Ace_of_Spades90 said:
@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

I don't think we require consent to slaughter animals for food, nor do I think they consent to pharmaceuticals using them as guinea pigs. In fact, we don't require animals to consent to whatever we choose to subject them to. So please, let's retire the consent inanity when it comes to bestiality.

Slaughtering an animal doesn't require signing a legal contract. Marriage on the other hand is nothing but a legal contract.

Oh I see. So this is about the legality of marrying a horse, not about bestiality, got it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@Ace_of_Spades90 said:
@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

I don't think we require consent to slaughter animals for food, nor do I think they consent to pharmaceuticals using them as guinea pigs. In fact, we don't require animals to consent to whatever we choose to subject them to. So please, let's retire the consent inanity when it comes to bestiality.

Slaughtering an animal doesn't require signing a legal contract. Marriage on the other hand is nothing but a legal contract.

Oh I see. So this is about the legality of marrying a horse, not about bestiality, got it.

Well yes, it's the first post in this quote chain. Look, I'll even bold and underline it for you.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#24 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@Ace_of_Spades90 said:
@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

I don't think we require consent to slaughter animals for food, nor do I think they consent to pharmaceuticals using them as guinea pigs. In fact, we don't require animals to consent to whatever we choose to subject them to. So please, let's retire the consent inanity when it comes to bestiality.

Slaughtering an animal doesn't require signing a legal contract.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

Best quote I've seen on the idea of "Straight Pride"

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

-Byshop

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

Guess he did'nt want to lose face by backing down ;)

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46852 Posts

@Byshop said:

Best quote I've seen on the idea of "Straight Pride"

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

-Byshop

Exactly.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#28 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14490 Posts

Heard about this on the radio this morning. It's hilarious.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
@GazaAli said:

Oh I see. So this is about the legality of marrying a horse, not about bestiality, got it.

Which would be considered animal abuse.. IN which the person could be charged and/or have the animal taken away from him..

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@Ace_of_Spades90 said:
@megane said:

Maybe animals should be allowed to get married?

Well, why not?

I wasn't aware animals could give consent =0

I don't think we require consent to slaughter animals for food, nor do I think they consent to pharmaceuticals using them as guinea pigs. In fact, we don't require animals to consent to whatever we choose to subject them to. So please, let's retire the consent inanity when it comes to bestiality.

Slaughtering an animal doesn't require signing a legal contract. Marriage on the other hand is nothing but a legal contract.

Oh I see. So this is about the legality of marrying a horse, not about bestiality, got it.

Well yes, it's the first post in this quote chain. Look, I'll even bold and underline it for you.

Lol

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#31 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

So either his girlfriend didn't show up or he doesn't have one. Hmmm...

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Technically we are all animals.

I take it you have no problem getting it on with a mutt?

Loading Video...

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#33 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

@Master_Live said:

And this is why we fail.

Nah. This is why he fails.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#34 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

@Byshop said:

Best quote I've seen on the idea of "Straight Pride"

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

-Byshop

Very wise response to straight pride.

Avatar image for battlespectre
BattleSpectre

7989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 BattleSpectre
Member since 2009 • 7989 Posts

So is being straight viewed as an abnormality now in this day and age? Bruh....

Avatar image for Buckhannah
Buckhannah

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Buckhannah
Member since 2013 • 715 Posts

@Ring_of_fire said:

It really must be tough being straight this day in age.

Especially if you are a straight white Christian. Then you are super oppressed in the United Nazi Gay Socialist States of Soviet America.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

Why would I need to be thankful for being straight and therefore not needing a "pride" movement? This isn't the first time Byshop adduces this quote, nor is it the first time it receives the kind of approbation that suggests it has a profound meaning while being in fact a flat quote.

I'm straight, therefore, I'm in harmony; I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence. I need not be thankful for having been allowed to exist. I understand how from the homosexual point of view I'm supposed to be thankful for the privilege, but I'm not.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

What's amusing is how the progressive pundits of this forum rationalize the distinction between marrying an animal and bestiality. Instead of rejecting both as one, they stoop to discussing the legality of marrying a dog, which in a way opens the door for a discussion on whether fucking your pet is an acceptable practice so long as you don't attempt to marry it.

I never bought the conservative argument of "if we allow gays to marry, next thing we know we'll be allowing people to marry their dogs" - I always thought it's barren and banal. But this sort of rationalization unfortunately legitimates an otherwise bankrupt and moronic argument and view.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@sSubZerOo said:
@GazaAli said:

Oh I see. So this is about the legality of marrying a horse, not about bestiality, got it.

Which would be considered animal abuse.. IN which the person could be charged and/or have the animal taken away from him..

Which one, marrying a horse or fucking it? Either way, we can always regulate it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

Why would I need to be thankful for being straight and therefore not needing a "pride" movement? This isn't the first time Byshop adduces this quote, nor is it the first time it receives the kind of approbation that suggests it has a profound meaning while being in fact a flat quote.

I'm straight, therefore, I'm in harmony; I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence. I need not be thankful for having been allowed to exist. I understand how from the homosexual point of view I'm supposed to be thankful for the privilege, but I'm not.

Are you intentionally trying to twist it's meaning or do you seriously not understand it?

Gay pride parades exists because gays are an oppressed group of people. Straights are not oppressed so they don't have straight pride parade. It's pretty simple.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

Why would I need to be thankful for being straight and therefore not needing a "pride" movement? This isn't the first time Byshop adduces this quote, nor is it the first time it receives the kind of approbation that suggests it has a profound meaning while being in fact a flat quote.

I'm straight, therefore, I'm in harmony; I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence. I need not be thankful for having been allowed to exist. I understand how from the homosexual point of view I'm supposed to be thankful for the privilege, but I'm not.

Are you intentionally trying to twist it's meaning or do you seriously not understand it?

Gay pride parades exists because gays are an oppressed group of people. Straights are not oppressed so they don't have straight pride parade. It's pretty simple.

It's neither actually; I'm simply illustrating the flaw in a flat quote gratuitously celebrated as the pinnacle of epigrams.

What's pretty simple is how straights don't have to be thankful for not being an oppressed group.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:

Are you intentionally trying to twist it's meaning or do you seriously not understand it?

Gay pride parades exists because gays are an oppressed group of people. Straights are not oppressed so they don't have straight pride parade. It's pretty simple.

It's neither actually; I'm simply illustrating the flaw in a flat quote gratuitously celebrated as the pinnacle of epigrams.

What's pretty simple is how straights don't have to be thankful for not being an oppressed group.

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed? Nobody is saying your life must be perfect, but it sure as hell could be worse.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:

"Gay Pride was not born of a need to celebrate being gay, but our right to exist without persecution. So instead of wondering why there isn't a 'Straight Pride' movement, be thankful you don't need one."

Why would I need to be thankful for being straight and therefore not needing a "pride" movement? This isn't the first time Byshop adduces this quote, nor is it the first time it receives the kind of approbation that suggests it has a profound meaning while being in fact a flat quote.

I'm straight, therefore, I'm in harmony; I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence. I need not be thankful for having been allowed to exist. I understand how from the homosexual point of view I'm supposed to be thankful for the privilege, but I'm not.

Are you intentionally trying to twist it's meaning or do you seriously not understand it?

Gay pride parades exists because gays are an oppressed group of people. Straights are not oppressed so they don't have straight pride parade. It's pretty simple.

It's neither actually; I'm simply illustrating the flaw in a flat quote gratuitously celebrated as the pinnacle of epigrams.

What's pretty simple is how straights don't have to be thankful for not being an oppressed group.

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed?

One ought to be thankful for not being oppressed only when there's ground for such oppression to begin with. There is no ground for oppressing a straight person, hence the absence of gratitude. It's no privilege for a straight person not to be oppressed, it's his only mode of existence.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:

It's neither actually; I'm simply illustrating the flaw in a flat quote gratuitously celebrated as the pinnacle of epigrams.

What's pretty simple is how straights don't have to be thankful for not being an oppressed group.

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed?

One ought to be thankful for not being oppressed only when there's ground for such oppression to begin with. There is no ground for oppressing a straight person, hence the absence of gratitude. It's no privilege for a straight person not to be oppressed, it's his only mode of existence.

And being gay is the only mode of a gays persons existence. Nobody should face oppression, unfortunately some people do.

You seem to think being thankful means actively expressing gratitude. In this context it doesn't, it simply means stop being a bitter arsehole and move on with your life.

Avatar image for gwynnblade
Gwynnblade

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Gwynnblade
Member since 2015 • 931 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed?

One ought to be thankful for not being oppressed only when there's ground for such oppression to begin with. There is no ground for oppressing a straight person, hence the absence of gratitude. It's no privilege for a straight person not to be oppressed, it's his only mode of existence.

And being gay is the only mode of a gays persons existence. Nobody should face oppression, unfortunately some people do.

You seem to think being thankful means actively expressing gratitude. In this context it doesn't, it simply means stop being a bitter arsehole and move on with your life.

And that brings back the point :

I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence.

When you have a majority, the minority will be oppressed. One way or the other.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#46 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed?

One ought to be thankful for not being oppressed only when there's ground for such oppression to begin with. There is no ground for oppressing a straight person, hence the absence of gratitude. It's no privilege for a straight person not to be oppressed, it's his only mode of existence.

The attitude you are describing is "privilege". "Why should I be thankful for something I'm supposed to have?" is the assumption that you are supposed to have/deserve something by virtue of just who you are.

But even if we buy that logic, there are no grounds for oppressing homosexuals yet it happens (and even things much worse than just "oppression") all the time.

-Byshop

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25275 Posts
@gwynnblade said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed?

One ought to be thankful for not being oppressed only when there's ground for such oppression to begin with. There is no ground for oppressing a straight person, hence the absence of gratitude. It's no privilege for a straight person not to be oppressed, it's his only mode of existence.

And being gay is the only mode of a gays persons existence. Nobody should face oppression, unfortunately some people do.

You seem to think being thankful means actively expressing gratitude. In this context it doesn't, it simply means stop being a bitter arsehole and move on with your life.

And that brings back the point :

I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence.

When you have a majority, the minority will be oppressed. One way or the other.

Doesnt change the fact that homosexuals are not oppressed on a serious scale in the west. At least they have the right to exist without being thrown in jail, or worse, killed.

And such a thing is worthy of celebration, the right to be yourself.

Avatar image for gwynnblade
Gwynnblade

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Gwynnblade
Member since 2015 • 931 Posts

@Maroxad said:
@gwynnblade said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:

It's not a flaw. Why would anyone not be thankful for not being oppressed? Do you want to be oppressed?

One ought to be thankful for not being oppressed only when there's ground for such oppression to begin with. There is no ground for oppressing a straight person, hence the absence of gratitude. It's no privilege for a straight person not to be oppressed, it's his only mode of existence.

And being gay is the only mode of a gays persons existence. Nobody should face oppression, unfortunately some people do.

You seem to think being thankful means actively expressing gratitude. In this context it doesn't, it simply means stop being a bitter arsehole and move on with your life.

And that brings back the point :

I'm the status quo and I'm statistical prevalence.

When you have a majority, the minority will be oppressed. One way or the other.

Doesnt change the fact that homosexuals are not oppressed on a serious scale in the west. At least they have the right to exist without being thrown in jail, or worse, killed.

And such a thing is worthy of celebration, the right to be yourself.

And why are we arguing this again?

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#49 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

Pride parades are a silly thing anyway. I don't really see why people should be proud of their sexual preference/orientation. It's not really an accomplishment. Some guys like other guys, some guys like women with big feet and small boobs, it's not exactly something to be proud of, supposedly it's just a trait that people are born with. Now I understand the whole idea behind these things being that "well gay people have been discriminated against for a long time and straight people haven't blah blah blah, so there's no reason for a straight pride parade", but then maybe they should call them "dignity parades" or "rights parades" not pride parades.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25275 Posts

@gwynnblade said:
@Maroxad said:

Doesnt change the fact that homosexuals are not oppressed on a serious scale in the west. At least they have the right to exist without being thrown in jail, or worse, killed.

And such a thing is worthy of celebration, the right to be yourself.

And why are we arguing this again?

Because that is the point of gay pride parades. To celebrate how they arent being oppressed. Gays are, under the law, equal to those of straight men.

The lack of oppresssion is why this straight pride parade was so redundant and unneccessary. What exactly was he parading about? There was no need for it.