[QUOTE="Ace6301"]If you assume they had this planned, and given how successful it was and how much preparation would have gone into this we must assume it was planned for some time, then it's clear the plan was to maximize the profile of the attack and not to maximize casualties. It's just a simple fact that they could have killed many more people. Could they have caused more impact though?PWSteal_Ldpinch
They could have attacked the statue of liberty which would have been a more symbolic blow to the image of the United States and would have resulted fewer casualties. In any case I'm done with this argument since it has devolved to pure conjecture without you or Worlock providing any statement from Al Qaeda that supports your argument.
Assuming these guys think America actually represents liberty rather than economic and military authority over their homeland. Yeah no, what these guys targeted was spot on and given that one plane went down we can't be sure what their other intended target was. Given their lack of trying to maximize civilian deaths though it's obvious they weren't trying to maximize civilian deaths. They weren't trying to minimize civilian deaths either. What they were trying to do was hit landmarks of value. The statue of liberty is, frankly, useless beyond a monument. The WTC and Pentagon were/are both symbols of America and actually served a practical use. I'm not sure if you comprehend that there are levels between minimizing and maximizing though, based on what I'm seeing I don't think you do.
Log in to comment