Supreme Court approves strip searches for any offense

  • 115 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Which is why smuggling weapons into such facilities is so rampant, right?

I'm not saying there aren't instances where strip-searches are warranted, I'm saying that making a blanket policy that they are allowed for any arrest and not subject at all to Constitutional rights is ridiculous.

theone86

I could be picked up for simple posession, be pated down and still be hiding a discreet blade taped to my skin under my underware (yes, I've known people who've done such things).

For one, patdowns can include around the thighs and crotch. Two, because some person MIGHT do that now EVERYONE who is picked up for something as minor as possession has their right to object forfeited? No, doesn't fly, this is giving far too much authority to local law enforcement and stripping the rights of citizens to object in any form to questionable procedures.

Patdows will not necessarily catch everything. Let's say a person is placed in jail and manages to smuggle in a knife that was missed on a simple patdown. While in jail he uses this knife the slit the throat of another inmate. What would your reaction be then? You'd probably chastize the department for not being careful enough.

Avatar image for soulless4now
soulless4now

41388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#102 soulless4now
Member since 2003 • 41388 Posts

Gotta love this country.

Avatar image for Big_Pecks
Big_Pecks

5973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#103 Big_Pecks
Member since 2010 • 5973 Posts

Police state much?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Police state much?

Big_Pecks

Not really. No more so than being stripped of freedom (for however long), confined to a cell and being made to wear ugly orange jumpsuits in the first place.

Avatar image for Wilfred_Owen
Wilfred_Owen

20964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#106 Wilfred_Owen
Member since 2005 • 20964 Posts
When they look down the crack of my ass I'll be sure not to wipe that day.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#107 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
So, can I get strip searched for jaywalking?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

So, can I get strip searched for jaywalking?BranKetra

If jaywalking is a jailable offense in your jurisdiction then maybe. If not then no.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

So, can I get strip searched for jaywalking?BranKetra

Probably not. In the NY penal code jaywalking is only a citable offense. I believe. I haven't brushed up on the NYC codes.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#111 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
[QUOTE="thegerg"] You didn't bother to read the article, huh?

Of course not.

If jaywalking is a jailable offense in your jurisdiction then maybe. If not then no.

worlock77
Better get to work on that.

Probably not. In the NY penal code jaywalking is only a citable offense. I believe. I haven't brushed up on the NYC codes.

airshocker
Me neither.
Avatar image for DaJuicyMan
DaJuicyMan

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 DaJuicyMan
Member since 2010 • 3557 Posts

[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]You didn't answer the question. If someone gets a bench warrent for not paying parking tickets they get arrested, there is no reason to force them to show off their privates. If this happened to me I would be infuriated.airshocker

You'd learn your fvcking lesson, though. I guarantee that much.

Seriously, though, that's not what the supreme court is saying. They're giving departments the option. That doesn't mean a strip search will be used for every single instance.

So they have the power to do it when they want, but they won't always.. So that is supposed to alleviate feelings? Uh no.
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

If you don't commit a crime, then there's no problem.

Avatar image for 22Toothpicks
22Toothpicks

12546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 22Toothpicks
Member since 2005 • 12546 Posts

This isn't really anything new. I have a friend who works in a county jail and he said it's standard procedure to strip search inmates (and you wouldn't believe the things they find in the places they find them). And people generally don't go to jail for minor traffic offenses. They go to jail for not paying/failing to appear in court for said traffic offenses which usually results in a warrant/summons to appear in court.