Switzerland votes to ban Muslim minarets

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mochyc
Mochyc

4421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Mochyc
Member since 2007 • 4421 Posts

[QUOTE="Mochyc"][QUOTE="clyde46"] England is a Christan country.MetalGear_Ninty

The majority of the english are christian, the english government is secular. Therefore the english government should not favor or discriminate any religion.

The Queen is our head of state, and being the head of the Church of England, that faith in particular is strongly rooted within UK sovereignty. Not to mention the House of Lords in which unelected CoE bishops are members. So no, the UK is far from being completely secular.

My bad, I guess you learn something everyday. But just to set things straight, is their seperation between church and state? Meaning does the church have any say in the decisions taken by the government? Do you have to be christian in order to participate in politics?

I still beleive a government should not favor or discriminate a certain religions, but hey, I guess that's just me :P.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
[QUOTE="pis3rch"] It doesn't matter where it is imo, theyre just radical idiots akin to those westboro nuts here in USA. if you ever actually go to a muslim country the people are really nice and don't bother you if you don't bother them. If people stop treating muslims like some other species, the whole situation will get better.

QFT.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]

[QUOTE="Mochyc"] The majority of the english are christian, the english government is secular. Therefore the english government should not favor or discriminate any religion.Mochyc

The Queen is our head of state, and being the head of the Church of England, that faith in particular is strongly rooted within UK sovereignty. Not to mention the House of Lords in which unelected CoE bishops are members. So no, the UK is far from being completely secular.

My bad, I guess you learn something everyday. But just to set things straight, is their seperation between church and state? Meaning does the church have any say in the decisions taken by the government? Do you have to be christian in order to participate in politics?

No, the Church doesnt participate in politics so much but religion does play a part.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Mochyc"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] The Queen is our head of state, and being the head of the Church of England, that faith in particular is strongly rooted within UK sovereignty. Not to mention the House of Lords in which unelected CoE bishops are members. So no, the UK is far from being completely secular.

clyde46

My bad, I guess you learn something everyday. But just to set things straight, is their seperation between church and state? Meaning does the church have any say in the decisions taken by the government? Do you have to be christian in order to participate in politics?

No, the Church doesnt participate in politics so much but religion does play a part.

You mean religion can be successfully involved in government without it becoming a theocracy?! My whole world has collapsed.

Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts
[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="Mochyc"] The majority of the english are christian, the english government is secular. Therefore the english government should not favor or discriminate any religion.Mochyc
England has an established church. America is pretty much one of the only secular countries in the west

So you're telling me there is no seperation of church and state in England?

Well, there really isnt. The state supports the religion. The UK government is open minded about other religions though
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180092 Posts
I think the two cultures are going to clash.....and probably soon.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="Mochyc"][QUOTE="Democratik"] England has an established church. America is pretty much one of the only secular countries in the westDemocratik
So you're telling me there is no seperation of church and state in England?

Well, there really isnt. The state supports the religion. The UK government is open minded about other religions though

Yeah ironically enough the UK which is far more religious in its government is also more liberal compared to the United States.
Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts
[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="Mochyc"] So you're telling me there is no seperation of church and state in England?sSubZerOo
Well, there really isnt. The state supports the religion. The UK government is open minded about other religions though

Yeah ironically enough the UK which is far more religious in its government is also more liberal compared to the United States.

That always struck me as odd as well.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#109 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60701 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] No, what he means is, they were forced out because the area was turned into a Muslim domination area.DraugenCP

And it has nothing to do with what he was saying about the buildings being "intimidating."

Those buildings are a symbol of said islamic domination.

domination? how is it dominating?

its a sign of islamic presence, but thats about it

Avatar image for kaangonultas
kaangonultas

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 kaangonultas
Member since 2008 • 1647 Posts
Good for them. I dont want to be woken up at 6 AM buy some muslim shouting out from the minaret.
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

This is a weird story. In Switzerland they are voting on wheather to specificly ban the building of minarets in their country. Minarets are towers assoicated with islamic mosques. The folks supporting the ban say allowing them would be a sign of the Islamisation of Switzerland. There are currently all ... four minarets in Switzerland.

Ban an arecteicual feature of just a single religion's house of worship seems, way creepy and wrong.

duxup
Sounds like a fear legislation.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="Mochyc"]

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]

The majority of the english are christian, the english government is secular. Therefore the english government should not favor or discriminate any religion.Mochyc
The Queen is our head of state, and being the head of the Church of England, that faith in particular is strongly rooted within UK sovereignty. Not to mention the House of Lords in which unelected CoE bishops are members. So no, the UK is far from being completely secular.

My bad, I guess you learn something everyday. But just to set things straight, is their seperation between church and state? Meaning does the church have any say in the decisions taken by the government? Do you have to be christian in order to participate in politics?

I still beleive a government should not favor or discriminate a certain religions, but hey, I guess that's just me :P.

Well, The Queen is somewhat of a figurehead, but still possess great political powers which she can choose to use. As for the House of Lords (containing CofE bishiops), their main role is to evaluate legislation passed by the House of Commons, and also to set up various enquiries about public matters.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="Mochyc"] So you're telling me there is no seperation of church and state in England?sSubZerOo
Well, there really isnt. The state supports the religion. The UK government is open minded about other religions though

Yeah ironically enough the UK which is far more religious in its government is also more liberal compared to the United States.

Well strictly speaking, the UK is officialy more religious but this tells us nothing of the actuailty of the situation. The Queen is merely a figurehead when it comes to politics, in the sense she hardly interferes in any fashion. Meanwhile, most of our politicians expressly choose not to discuss God in any way whatsoever, and never invoke religion in any matter of policy. In fact, one of Tony Blair's most famous advisors once famously said: "We don't do God". The US however -- well just look at the support for Palin, and Dubya's exclamation that God 'told' him to invade Iraq.
Avatar image for Good-Apollo
Good-Apollo

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Good-Apollo
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts
I hate all religion, but Islam especially does NOT belong in the West.
Avatar image for Severed_Hand
Severed_Hand

3402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Severed_Hand
Member since 2007 • 3402 Posts
I think the two cultures are going to clash.....and probably soon.LJS9502_basic
as am i. and it will not be pretty.
Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

I am really glad and support Switzerland for standing up to the political onslaught of Islam. This has nothing to do with religion. All of Europe needs to adopt this attitude to protect their identity and way of life. If only the United States can be like Switzerland.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127729 Posts
I guess they don't like it because they are pretty secular I think.
Avatar image for --Thomas--
--Thomas--

920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#119 --Thomas--
Member since 2009 • 920 Posts

I think a ban would be in its place. Switzerland is not a muslim country and shall not become one either.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#120 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

It doesn't matter where it is imo, theyre just radical idiots akin to those westboro nuts here in USA. if you ever actually go to a muslim country the people are really nice and don't bother you if you don't bother them. If people stop treating muslims like some other species, the whole situation will get better. pis3rch

Well, that being said, I'd like to see you apply to raise a cross atop a christian church in, say, Saudi Arabia. Their first christian church there, St. Mary's Roman Catholic church in Doha, Qatar, isn't allowed to display religous symbols on the exterior.

It goes both ways. Let's not even get started about the Jizya.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#121 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

I think a ban would be in its place. Switzerland is not a muslim country and shall not become one either.

--Thomas--

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#122 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

It's a very difficult issue. Here in the Netherlands there are way to many problems with muslim immigrants (mainly moroccan) and especially their children (who were born here). The Dutch government has been way too soft and tolerant for the last couple of decades, so things got out of hand. There are suburbs full of immigrants that have become completely derailed. There are mosques that have imams who preach hatred towards the western society which resulted in moroccan youth that has a twisted view on their own religion and uses it as a sword to attack our society. I also read opinions on a dutch forum for moroccan youth, it's scary to see how discriminating and racist many of these people are. Just throw around the words jew, gay chinese or whatever that isn't moroccan and see what happens.

A growing number of Dutch people has had enough of it, there's a new political party called PVV (led by Geert Wilders) that wants to make radical changes to stop islamisation of The Netherlands. If there were elections now he would get the most votes. However, his views cause an outrage within the immigrant communities, which in their turn results in even more PVV voters. I foresee a giant clash, not only in The Netherlands but within Europe in the next 10 years. This is going completely wrong and it's gone already way too much out of hand to stop it. Prepare for an Israel-Palestina conflict part 2.

In short, that ban in Switzerland will do nothing about the problems that exist. I can however understand the outcome, it's a signal to the government.

Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#123 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts

I've got mixed feeling about this. People are scared of extremist idiologies taking hold in their countries, and that is most definitely understandable because it is spreading. Honor killings are on the rise for Muslim women who want to be westernised, you have terrorism, and you have groups of people insisting that society changes for them (i.e. Muslim women who refuse to take off their head scarfs for photo IDs and England allowing Muslim communities certain judicial rights to enforce Muslim [not English] law). Take that, and add in how the extremists say they will not rest until their religion dominates the world, and looking at govenrments in Iran and other countries, and the Taliban, etc. and I don't see how anybody can be surprised that there is backlash. Part of that can be blamed on the media though, which only shows the extremist side of Muslim society, but there is no shortage of extremists. Muslim countries ban all kinds of things that aren't Muslim, but nobody seems to get upset about that.

Is the banning right? No, but I think there's a clear message in it.

Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#124 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts
man, europe is quite scared of islam. I can see why. Turkey is not part of the EU, because if it was, a huge migration of muslim people would flood through europe.
Avatar image for SunofVich
SunofVich

4665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#125 SunofVich
Member since 2004 • 4665 Posts

Thats so stupid.

Ban church steeples, ban church bells, oh and ban domes too.

Avatar image for Desulated
Desulated

30952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#126 Desulated
Member since 2005 • 30952 Posts

I never expected something like this from Switzerland-they're a neutral country in terms of politics and the like, after all.

Avatar image for alnors
alnors

150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 alnors
Member since 2007 • 150 Posts

[QUOTE="pis3rch"] .

It goes both ways. Let's not even get started about the Jizya.

br0kenrabbit
did you ever herd of T A X ???
Avatar image for Good-Apollo
Good-Apollo

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Good-Apollo
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts

[QUOTE="--Thomas--"]

I think a ban would be in its place. Switzerland is not a muslim country and shall not become one either.

sSubZerOo

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

in couple of years they will probably ban islam lolololol

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#130 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

I personally am against the Islamisation of Europe, but this Statist, outright anti-Islamic backlash is taking them an entirely wrong direction.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

It depends on the reasoning behind it, There is always a view that because something is religion based that it should be immune to opposition and scrutiny and anyone who opposes it is seen as racist or intolerant.

mattisgod01

anyone who thinks that the State should oppose or scrutinize a religion that doesn't directly harm its citizens IS a racist and IS intolerant.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]That's pretty ridiculous. I don't see how people can care so much about these sorts of things. Mochyc
Well, I know in the UK there seems to be a good amount of violence associated with Islam immigrants. Many Muslims are directly opposed to any western thought, and when someone steps in (such as authorities) to stop what would be only acceptable in the middle east, a big out cry happens. im not saying this always happens. I cant confirm it to be true because I would never be able to find the source I heard this from again.

And those immigrants should be kicked out of the country. If they don't accept the values that are protected by the country and/or are violent against it's citizens, they deserve no place in that country. However, not all muslims are like that, and it seems to be caused by brainwashing and lack of education, rather than Islam itself. This can be applied to all religions, although most uneducated immigrants are muslim.

Not many immigrants are violent against natives. Further , why SHOULD immigrants "acce't" the values protected by the "country"? What right do you(or anyone else for that matter)have to exclude anyone from living in an arbitrarily defined plot of land?

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

I'm deeply saddened by the responses in this thread. I think its a product of our violent statist culture

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#134 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

It's a very difficult issue. Here in the Netherlands there are way to many problems with muslim immigrants (mainly moroccan) and especially their children (who were born here). The Dutch government has been way too soft and tolerant for the last couple of decades, so things got out of hand. There are suburbs full of immigrants that have become completely derailed. There are mosques that have imams who preach hatred towards the western society which resulted in moroccan youth that has a twisted view on their own religion and uses it as a sword to attack our society. I also read opinions on a dutch forum for moroccan youth, it's scary to see how discriminating and racist many of these people are. Just throw around the words jew, gay chinese or whatever that isn't moroccan and see what happens.

A growing number of Dutch people has had enough of it, there's a new political party called PVV (led by Geert Wilders) that wants to make radical changes to stop islamisation of The Netherlands. If there were elections now he would get the most votes. However, his views cause an outrage within the immigrant communities, which in their turn results in even more PVV voters. I foresee a giant clash, not only in The Netherlands but within Europe in the next 10 years. This is going completely wrong and it's gone already way too much out of hand to stop it. Prepare for an Israel-Palestina conflict part 2.

In short, that ban in Switzerland will do nothing about the problems that exist. I can however understand the outcome, it's a signal to the government.

TheFlush

Should just stop letting so many people in, then. Create a limit and a waiting list or something. You don't need border control with all the 'security' they are setting up right now. How can You live in a democracy if You let very different cultured people swarm in and kick You out? That is kind of weird. If the current populace does not agree with their standards, then keep them out. Otherwise You're just handing over Your country/culture.

To the americans surprised about how difficult the immigration goes in europe and how they are fearing islamisation: Please keep in mind america is made out of immigrants. It doesn't have such a big clash of cultures and morals.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#135 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="--Thomas--"]

I think a ban would be in its place. Switzerland is not a muslim country and shall not become one either.

Good-Apollo

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.

There is so much irony in this it's not even funny.

Avatar image for shinian
shinian

6871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#136 shinian
Member since 2005 • 6871 Posts

Thats so stupid.

Ban church steeples, ban church bells, oh and ban domes too.

SunofVich

They do that - in Saudi Arabia. If an Islamic country has the right to protect its culture integrity by baning Christian cult buildings, I say that it can be also applied in the other way.

edit: Oh and Switzerland isn't a secular nation.Guardia Svizzera Pontificia, the Pope's personal guard is being recruted from Swiss army soldiers. It's said that being chosen to join this formation is the biggest honor a Swiss male can obtain.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#137 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

It depends on the reasoning behind it, There is always a view that because something is religion based that it should be immune to opposition and scrutiny and anyone who opposes it is seen as racist or intolerant.

anyone who thinks that the State should oppose or scrutinize a religion that doesn't directly harm its citizens IS a racist and IS intolerant.

Racist? Huh?
Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#138 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="SunofVich"]

Thats so stupid.

Ban church steeples, ban church bells, oh and ban domes too.

shinian

They do that - in Saudi Arabia. If an Islamic country has the right to protect its culture integrity by baning Christian cult buildings, I say that it can be also applied in the other way.

NO NO AND NO! THAT IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE! THAT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT FOLLOW! You can't have domestic policy based upon these completely arbitrary groups of people. That comment is racist, nationalist, statist, and just plain bigoted and ignorant!
Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

It depends on the reasoning behind it, There is always a view that because something is religion based that it should be immune to opposition and scrutiny and anyone who opposes it is seen as racist or intolerant.

MetalGear_Ninty

anyone who thinks that the State should oppose or scrutinize a religion that doesn't directly harm its citizens IS a racist and IS intolerant.

Racist? Huh?

its all motivated by fear of "brown people".

Avatar image for 12345678ew
12345678ew

2353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#140 12345678ew
Member since 2008 • 2353 Posts
And what is wrong with the islamisation of Switzerland? Is it taking away rights from the citizens? Is it harming citizens? Is it dangerous? I doubt it, it's a religion like any other. In a country with supposed freedom of religion, there shouldn't even be a discussion about this. It's deplorable, all religions should be treated equally. So unless they ban the building of old school churches and sinagogues, I think the person who proposed this bill and the people voting for it are all idiots. Mochyc
simply put, they don't want switzerland to become iraq. sharia law is by far the worst system ever composed on the PLANET and switzerland wants no part. i agree with them.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

[QUOTE="Mochyc"][QUOTE="Democratik"] Well, I know in the UK there seems to be a good amount of violence associated with Islam immigrants. Many Muslims are directly opposed to any western thought, and when someone steps in (such as authorities) to stop what would be only acceptable in the middle east, a big out cry happens. im not saying this always happens. I cant confirm it to be true because I would never be able to find the source I heard this from again.danwallacefan

And those immigrants should be kicked out of the country. If they don't accept the values that are protected by the country and/or are violent against it's citizens, they deserve no place in that country. However, not all muslims are like that, and it seems to be caused by brainwashing and lack of education, rather than Islam itself. This can be applied to all religions, although most uneducated immigrants are muslim.

Not many immigrants are violent against natives. Further , why SHOULD immigrants "acce't" the values protected by the "country"? What right do you(or anyone else for that matter)have to exclude anyone from living in an arbitrarily defined plot of land?

A nation is defined as much more than a 'arbritrarily defined plot of land'. A nation brings with it a legal, historical and even cultural identity, and such no one should have an innate right to enter that country without abiding tocertain standards of integration eg learning the native lagnuage.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="danwallacefan"] anyone who thinks that the State should oppose or scrutinize a religion that doesn't directly harm its citizens IS a racist and IS intolerant.

Racist? Huh?

its all motivated by fear of "brown people".

That's a baseless claim.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

[QUOTE="Mochyc"][QUOTE="Democratik"] Well, I know in the UK there seems to be a good amount of violence associated with Islam immigrants. Many Muslims are directly opposed to any western thought, and when someone steps in (such as authorities) to stop what would be only acceptable in the middle east, a big out cry happens. im not saying this always happens. I cant confirm it to be true because I would never be able to find the source I heard this from again.danwallacefan

And those immigrants should be kicked out of the country. If they don't accept the values that are protected by the country and/or are violent against it's citizens, they deserve no place in that country. However, not all muslims are like that, and it seems to be caused by brainwashing and lack of education, rather than Islam itself. This can be applied to all religions, although most uneducated immigrants are muslim.

Not many immigrants are violent against natives. Further , why SHOULD immigrants "acce't" the values protected by the "country"? What right do you(or anyone else for that matter)have to exclude anyone from living in an arbitrarily defined plot of land?

when you immigrate to another country you become a part of it and youhave toaccept the values protected by the country. I am a muslim living in uk and couple of months ago during our friday prayer sermon in mosque (OMGWTFBBQ!) we were told that we are part of this country and should do everything to protect it (not that i aliready didnt know lulz) andrespect the law...the sermon was mainly towards the younger muslims.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#144 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="--Thomas--"]

I think a ban would be in its place. Switzerland is not a muslim country and shall not become one either.

Good-Apollo

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.

The Middle East has adopted rather alot of western culture.. To suggest that they will try to bring the country down is ridiculous.. Christainity and Islam are the same in effecting cultures, its just Middle East has developed much slower socially and economically for multiple reasons.. Which has lead to people thinking Islam a extremist religion is ridiuclous.. This is coming from a guy who despises extremes of any religion, especially Islam when its extremely conservative in nature on views such as the role of women being more property than person.. But not all Islamic followers are like that.

There is a line to be drawn.. They should only go after extreme Islamic followers with in the country.. And I don't see how banning Minarets does anything for that.

Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts
Kudos to Switzerland.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

[QUOTE="Good-Apollo"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

sSubZerOo

Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.

The Middle East has adopted rather alot of western culture.. To suggest that they will try to bring the country down is ridiculous.. Christainity and Islam are the same in effecting cultures, its just Middle East has developed much slower socially and economically for multiple reasons.. Which has lead to people thinking Islam a extremist religion is ridiuclous.. This is coming from a guy who despises extremes of any religion, especially Islam when its extremely conservative in nature on views such as the role of women being more property than person.. But not all Islamic followers are like that.

There is a line to be drawn.. They should only go after extreme Islamic followers with in the country.. And I don't see how banning Minarets does anything for that.

no islam doesnt treat women as propery...i dont know where you get that idea

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#147 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="Good-Apollo"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

sSubZerOo

Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.

The Middle East has adopted rather alot of western culture.. To suggest that they will try to bring the country down is ridiculous.. Christainity and Islam are the same in effecting cultures, its just Middle East has developed much slower socially and economically for multiple reasons.. Which has lead to people thinking Islam a extremist religion is ridiuclous.. This is coming from a guy who despises extremes of any religion, especially Islam when its extremely conservative in nature on views such as the role of women being more property than person.. But not all Islamic followers are like that.

There is a line to be drawn.. They should only go after extreme Islamic followers with in the country.. And I don't see how banning Minarets does anything for that.

Couldn't have said it better.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#148 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Good-Apollo"] Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.sikanderahmed

The Middle East has adopted rather alot of western culture.. To suggest that they will try to bring the country down is ridiculous.. Christainity and Islam are the same in effecting cultures, its just Middle East has developed much slower socially and economically for multiple reasons.. Which has lead to people thinking Islam a extremist religion is ridiuclous.. This is coming from a guy who despises extremes of any religion, especially Islam when its extremely conservative in nature on views such as the role of women being more property than person.. But not all Islamic followers are like that.

There is a line to be drawn.. They should only go after extreme Islamic followers with in the country.. And I don't see how banning Minarets does anything for that.

no islam doesnt treat women as propery...i dont know where you get that idea

He also said not all followers like that, and there are some pockets of Islam that are very far behind on women's rights.

Avatar image for shinian
shinian

6871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#149 shinian
Member since 2005 • 6871 Posts

[QUOTE="shinian"]

[QUOTE="SunofVich"]

Thats so stupid.

Ban church steeples, ban church bells, oh and ban domes too.

danwallacefan

They do that - in Saudi Arabia. If an Islamic country has the right to protect its culture integrity by baning Christian cult buildings, I say that it can be also applied in the other way.

NO NO AND NO! THAT IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE! THAT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT FOLLOW! You can't have domestic policy based upon these completely arbitrary groups of people. That comment is racist, nationalist, statist, and just plain bigoted and ignorant!

There's an old saying, "When in Rome, do as the Romans do "A couple years ago, when I still believed in God (Christian) I lived in Morocco for few weeks. When I was there I weared a chain with a cross on my neck only under a fully buttoned up collar shirt - only not to disturb the citizens. I didn't want to overstay my welcome or to endanger my host in any unpleasant situations.

The governments in all of the EU countries were too liberal with the imigration problem. Thanks to that the latest Muslim extremist's protests looked like that:

If governments will do everything to make Europe even a more cosy place the situation will worsen. In every ethnic group there are good people and bad people. I just think that the law obidient Muslim immigrants should have the right to stay and extremist should get deported.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#150 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="Good-Apollo"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Its a secular nation.. Religion shouldn't be bothered with that.. To me its no better than biggotry, there is no real logical purpose to make this rule outside of prejudice thought.. People need to grow up and understand that things change one way or the other.. Trying to stop those changes often are ineffectual or go against everything those said nations stand up for.. Who cares if Switzerland become a predominately islamic nation.. It would not change the fact that its a secular nation and numerous other things..

sSubZerOo

Do you really think it will stay secular once the Islamists take over? Naive thinking is naive.

The Middle East has adopted rather alot of western culture.. To suggest that they will try to bring the country down is ridiculous.. Christainity and Islam are the same in effecting cultures, its just Middle East has developed much slower socially and economically for multiple reasons.. Which has lead to people thinking Islam a extremist religion is ridiuclous.. This is coming from a guy who despises extremes of any religion, especially Islam when its extremely conservative in nature on views such as the role of women being more property than person.. But not all Islamic followers are like that.

There is a line to be drawn.. They should only go after extreme Islamic followers with in the country.. And I don't see how banning Minarets does anything for that.

yes i'm not sure how banning minarets would help either. And while i also agree that islam itself is not necessarily evil, i do believe that islamisation and the rapid import of middle eastern cultures are a serious threat to these countries.