XXXXXX

Syria: The Rebels were behind the chemical attacks!

GOGOGOGURT · 2013-09-07 03:08:53

Everyone now knows of the controversy that might get the US (and possibly allies) involved in Syria. Everyone was quick to blame the regime for the chemical attack that killed over a thousand people, but I think this is false. I think everyone has been looking at this situation very one-dimensionally. First, why would the Syrian government use chemical weapons when they know the eye of the UN (especially the US) is upon them? They knew that the US would get involved if they cross this 'red line'. Also it would be pure folly if they tried to call our bluff, since they know our intervention is sure to bring about the swift destruction of the regime. Basically, they are terrified of making foriegn enemies, and they wouldn't do something so stupid as to blatantly spit in the US face an use chemical weapons. They have nothing to gain, except a few dead rebels. On the other hand, the rebels have everything to gain from this. If they can get the US involved, they have a powerful ally, and their victory is secured. Plus, the only plant in Syria that can make chlorine gas was captured by rebels sometime around December of 2012. But the rebels are the good guys, right? They wouldn't throw innocents under the bus to get the pity of the US, right? I think they would. I know they would. For some reason, the common person thinks 'good guy' everytime they hear the word rebels. This is not true. These rebels are as heartless as the government and have members of hezbollah, al qaeda, and other questionable goups within their ranks. They don't even have to be terrorists to be so calloused. There are no 'good guys'. Don't be fooled. The rebels want power just as bad as the government doesn't want to give it up. Power lust is known to be an evil thing, as history shows. I think people need to stop assuming the regime is the only evil here, because we have no idea of the situation over there. We need to look at this more thoughtfully, and think laterally. It would be foolish to launch an attack with so little evidence. What do you think?

51 results
1
2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

omho88

3967

Forum Posts

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 omho88

Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"][QUOTE="Person0"] Probably because we did nothing for 2 years while they got machine gunned and bombed and jihadists start coming in mass to fight.GOGOGOGURT

This this and this.

Oh yeah it's all our fault. You're pathetic.

Then Don't talk abt being the world leader all the time and yeah that pathetic organization that's called the UN, you should probably close it, never solved a thing that mattered.

11 years ago