Teens dead after drinking Mountain Dew with racing fuel

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rippa125
rippa125

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 rippa125
Member since 2003 • 26 Posts

smh @ the stupidity

Avatar image for plageus900
plageus900

3065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#52  Edited By plageus900
Member since 2013 • 3065 Posts

Just be thankful these troglodytes never bred.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@lamprey263: Again, just stop. If you really don't see how tasteless and trashy what you're doing here is, let's bring up an analogy. Imagine that I'm a die-hard anti-smoking advocate. Now imagine that I see the horrible news that your house burned down, killing you and your entire family. Now imagine that the first ****ing thing I do is say something along the lines of "see everyone, this is why you shouldn't smoke."

Then someone points out to me that there's no indication that anyone in your household ever smoked, and no indication that the fire had anything to do with smoking. At which point I say, "but it COULD have been because Lamprey was a smoker." And then I continue to turn the entire tragedy into a ****ing anti-smoking lesson, even though there's zero indication that smoking had the slightest ****ing thing to do with the tragedy.

If you seriously honestly don't see how that kind of shit is trashy as hell, then we've got nothing left to talk about here dude.

Avatar image for mark1974
mark1974

4261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 mark1974
Member since 2015 • 4261 Posts

rural Tennessee

That explains some things. Really, in those places there is nothing to do with yourself and things can get weird. I feel terrible for them. It's very sad.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts
@MrGeezer said:

@lamprey263: Again, just stop. If you really don't see how tasteless and trashy what you're doing here is, let's bring up an analogy. Imagine that I'm a die-hard anti-smoking advocate. Now imagine that I see the horrible news that your house burned down, killing you and your entire family. Now imagine that the first ****ing thing I do is say something along the lines of "see everyone, this is why you shouldn't smoke."

Then someone points out to me that there's no indication that anyone in your household ever smoked, and no indication that the fire had anything to do with smoking. At which point I say, "but it COULD have been because Lamprey was a smoker." And then I continue to turn the entire tragedy into a ****ing anti-smoking lesson, even though there's zero indication that smoking had the slightest ****ing thing to do with the tragedy.

If you seriously honestly don't see how that kind of shit is trashy as hell, then we've got nothing left to talk about here dude.

get off your high horse there's plenty worse on here than what I said for heaven's sake, and again you go and put words in my mouth I've done nothing to attack the victims here

no, you're fixated on me for whatever reason, I'm calling out your lack of sincerity until you address every other person who's said worse, until then, I call bullshit on your sincerity

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@lamprey263: I notice that you didn't have a single defense there other than "well, other people are worse." That ain't how stuff works, dude. I don't get a pass to do something scummy just because someone else did something scummier.

BTW, the reason I focused on your posts in the first place is because you're at least pretending to be helpful. Which means that if you didn't know better before, you ought to know better once someone points out that what you're doing isn't helping. The people saying the REALLY bad stuff are clearly a lost cause, and I don't even bother wasting my time. There's nothing wrong with pot, but this story, as far as anyone can tell, doesn't have a single damn thing to do with pot. So stop trying to twist the story to be about pot.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#58  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts
@MrGeezer said:

@lamprey263: I notice that you didn't have a single defense there other than "well, other people are worse." That ain't how stuff works, dude. I don't get a pass to do something scummy just because someone else did something scummier.

BTW, the reason I focused on your posts in the first place is because you're at least pretending to be helpful. Which means that if you didn't know better before, you ought to know better once someone points out that what you're doing isn't helping. The people saying the REALLY bad stuff are clearly a lost cause, and I don't even bother wasting my time. There's nothing wrong with pot, but this story, as far as anyone can tell, doesn't have a single damn thing to do with pot. So stop trying to twist the story to be about pot.

What points? All you did in your last ramble was to say if something happened to me and you blamed me for my unfortunate situation that it'd be on me, like that's what I'm doing and how would that feel if the tables were turned. And I said exactly in my post above that I did not blame the victim, I've said this multiple times. So you say I didn't address your points in the last post; no, that was the only point you made and I addressed it. And I'm not twisting anything to this story but adding my two cents that marijuana as an alternative would go a long way to avoiding such situation; that's it. You somehow make everything I say out to be bigger that it is.

You have no ability to argue, all you've done is put words in my mouth by saying I'm saying what I'm not saying and act like you're above everyone by standing on your "I'm so serious " high horse. Get over yourself. Go back, read my original post, it wasn't that big of deal. You've got a problem man, I don't know what to say. Maybe you should deal with your own issues don't go take them out on other people. I didn't ask for you to save me, and you're being condescending. Seriously, get over yourself.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

@lamprey263 said:
@MrGeezer said:

@lamprey263: I notice that you didn't have a single defense there other than "well, other people are worse." That ain't how stuff works, dude. I don't get a pass to do something scummy just because someone else did something scummier.

BTW, the reason I focused on your posts in the first place is because you're at least pretending to be helpful. Which means that if you didn't know better before, you ought to know better once someone points out that what you're doing isn't helping. The people saying the REALLY bad stuff are clearly a lost cause, and I don't even bother wasting my time. There's nothing wrong with pot, but this story, as far as anyone can tell, doesn't have a single damn thing to do with pot. So stop trying to twist the story to be about pot.

What points? All you did in your last ramble was to say if something happened to me and you blamed me for my unfortunate situation that it'd be on me, like that's what I'm doing and how would that feel if the tables were turned. And I said exactly in my post above that I did not blame the victim, I've said this multiple times. So you say I didn't address your points in the last post; no, that was the only point you made and I addressed it. And I'm not twisting anything to this story but adding my two cents that marijuana as an alternative would go a long way to avoiding such situation; that's it. You somehow make everything I say out to be bigger that it is.

You have no ability to argue, all you've done is put words in my mouth by saying I'm saying what I'm not saying and act like you're above everyone by standing on your "I'm so serious " high horse. Get over yourself. Go back, read my original post, it wasn't that big of deal. You've got a problem man, I don't know what to say. Maybe you should deal with your own issues don't go take them out on other people.

You two need to take a break. I think the point Geezer was trying to make was you shouldn't say marijuana was involved since no evidence suggests it was. That was your bad considering your response to him that it could have been. Stick with the facts. Not assumptions.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

@lamprey263 No offense, but you sound like a pot head. :O

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#61 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

You two need to take a break. I think the point Geezer was trying to make was you shouldn't say marijuana was involved since no evidence suggests it was. That was your bad considering your response to him that it could have been. Stick with the facts. Not assumptions.

You're just as bad as him, I didn't say marijuana was involved.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#62 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts

@loco145: how's that?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

Then what did you mean below?

@lamprey263 said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

You two need to take a break. I think the point Geezer was trying to make was you shouldn't say marijuana was involved since no evidence suggests it was. That was your bad considering your response to him that it could have been. Stick with the facts. Not assumptions.

You're just as bad as him, I didn't say marijuana was involved.

@lamprey263 said:
@MrGeezer said:

Dude, just stop. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THIS HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH MARIJUANA.

There's no indication it didn't.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts

@LJS9502_basic: I never said it had anything to do with it though, I just said by being an available alternative that kids might avoid doing dumb make-shift mind altering substances like this, I will not apologize because someone has sand in their vagina.

Seriously, that's the extent of it. He was already on my nuts before I even said that, this is all on his dumb ass.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@lamprey263 said:

@LJS9502_basic: I never said it had anything to do with it though, I just said by being an available alternative that kids might avoid doing dumb make-shift mind altering substances like this, I will not apologize because someone has sand in their vagina.

Seriously, that's the extent of it. He was already on my nuts before I even said that, this is all on his dumb ass.

No it wasn't, otherwise you wouldn't have jumped on my ass when I pointed out that the natural implication here was that we should just let kids drink booze (after all, it was YOU who brought up the krokodil/heroin analogy, as if heroin doesn't kill people too).

Either we stick to our guns and advocate letting minors try out some really dangerous shit just because "freaking out" makes them try out WORSE shit, or we admit that this was an entirely pro-marijuana sentiment even though marijuana has nothing to do with the story.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#67 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45440 Posts

@MrGeezer: My opinion is giving kids access to safer alternatives would avoid this kind of shit. Of course it isn't part of the story, that's my take on the story in context to the subject matter at hand. That's my contribution to the discussion. You and your high and mighty need to get in other peoples shit made an issue of this. And yes, I made an analogy to strengthen the position that makeshift drugs are dangerous, and that they're often alternatives when people don't have conventional means of mind altering substances. So what? Why are you so fucking obsessed with me having a goddamn opinion?

Seriously, stop bugging me. Your goddamn annoying. Like supper goddamn annoying. Seriously, just shut up.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

@lamprey263

An easy solution to end a pointless argument like you two are having, is to simply ignore the other persons next response.

Avatar image for Andrew_is_basic
Andrew_is_basic

4140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 3

#69 Andrew_is_basic
Member since 2004 • 4140 Posts

@foxhound_fox: I like your sig.

Avatar image for LexLas
LexLas

7317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 LexLas
Member since 2005 • 7317 Posts

Kids these days, i don't get it. Whatever happen to just smoking some weed ? Is that to weak now a days ? I mean back in the day there was idiots who used to sniff up cans of some harsh chemicals, but it was only the insane. I dont' get it. I'm sure parents talk to their kids about not doing such stupid things. Peer pressure needs to be controlled. RIP to them youngsters

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@LexLas said:

Kids these days, i don't get it. Whatever happen to just smoking some weed ? Is that to weak now a days ? I mean back in the day there was idiots who used to sniff up cans of some harsh chemicals, but it was only the insane. I dont' get it. I'm sure parents talk to their kids about not doing such stupid things. Peer pressure needs to be controlled. RIP to them youngsters

Apparently all the kids wanted was some weed. But then the parents freaked out, forcing the kids to straight up drink racing fuel. It's not their fault, damnit, they were forced into this by the insidious anti-pot establishment.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

@MrGeezer: Pot is the solution to all medical and societal issues.

Avatar image for raugutcon
raugutcon

5576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#73 raugutcon
Member since 2014 • 5576 Posts

"FORCING" the kids to drink fuel -----> give me a break.

Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18981 Posts

wtf, mountain dew and Racing fuel?

Avatar image for sayyy-gaa
sayyy-gaa

5850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 sayyy-gaa
Member since 2002 • 5850 Posts

A friend of the family has set up a GoFundMe page with a $10,000 target, to be donated to Greenbrier High School for an alcohol and drug abuse program.

Really? Just read the article. It seems the kids ingested actual fuel(i.e. gasoline)? I thought racing fuel was a term uses for some off brand energy drink, but real gasoline? You need an education program for that?

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#78 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

To what end did they drink what I understand to be, at least, petrol?

Avatar image for deactivated-5e90a3763ea91
deactivated-5e90a3763ea91

9437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 13

#79 deactivated-5e90a3763ea91
Member since 2008 • 9437 Posts

IT'LL TICKLE YORE INNARDS!

LMAO!