The bible is not the only book of religion duh!

  • 107 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

Avatar image for ConManWithGun
ConManWithGun

6272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ConManWithGun
Member since 2005 • 6272 Posts
All those books are liars, Science FTW!!
Avatar image for Recycleation
Recycleation

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Recycleation
Member since 2007 • 2758 Posts

So,then...what religion are you?

...and this doesn't make sense,where are your facts that support that the bible isn't a religion book . to some people it is.

Avatar image for DragonTamer80
DragonTamer80

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DragonTamer80
Member since 2005 • 1912 Posts
Maybe they don't have time or intrest to read the others, it's not there breaking any law.
Avatar image for PC_JOE_9
PC_JOE_9

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 PC_JOE_9
Member since 2006 • 431 Posts
that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

So,then...what religion are you?

...and this doesn't make sense,where are your facts that support that the bible isn't a religion book . to some people it is.

Recycleation

i am agnostic but i mostly believe in what the vedas teach..

i said that the bible isn't the only religious book around not that it wasn't a religous book.

Avatar image for ConManWithGun
ConManWithGun

6272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ConManWithGun
Member since 2005 • 6272 Posts

that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?PC_JOE_9

He did since he claims he has read to many threads on religon :|

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

Avatar image for DragonTamer80
DragonTamer80

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DragonTamer80
Member since 2005 • 1912 Posts

that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?PC_JOE_9

Yes it does I think its that guy who makes topics like this alot but is embaressed since ppl get anoyed by him. :lol:

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?PC_JOE_9
Yes, i like to lurk around here and read topics, i finnaly decided to post something :P
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="PC_JOE_9"]that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?MeriMorganov

Yes it does I think its that guy who makes topics like this alot but is embaressed since ppl get anoyed by him. :lol:

no :P i usually post on other sites, but this is my first post here.
Avatar image for ConManWithGun
ConManWithGun

6272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 ConManWithGun
Member since 2005 • 6272 Posts
[QUOTE="MeriMorganov"]

[QUOTE="PC_JOE_9"]that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?Yongying

Yes it does I think its that guy who makes topics like this alot but is embaressed since ppl get anoyed by him. :lol:

no :P i usually post on other sites, but this is my first post here.

You don't have to be ashamed, you have the same ip adress as that guy

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

FragStains
I'm just saying that people should have an open mind, there is alot more than the bible.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="MeriMorganov"]

[QUOTE="PC_JOE_9"]that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?ConManWithGun

Yes it does I think its that guy who makes topics like this alot but is embaressed since ppl get anoyed by him. :lol:

no :P i usually post on other sites, but this is my first post here.

You don't have to be ashamed, you have the same ip adress as that guy

Don't be so interested in me, this topic isn't about me :|
Avatar image for DragonTamer80
DragonTamer80

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 DragonTamer80
Member since 2005 • 1912 Posts
[QUOTE="FragStains"]

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

Yongying

I'm just saying that people should have an open mind, there is alot more than the bible.

Well you can't force all of those who don't have an open mind to do something they dont want.

Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
[QUOTE="FragStains"]

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

Yongying

I'm just saying that people should have an open mind, there is alot more than the bible.

That still does not answer his question, if some one chooses to be a Christan more then likely there is no reason for them to read other texts.

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="FragStains"]

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

SAURON221

I'm just saying that people should have an open mind, there is alot more than the bible.

That still does not answer his question, if some one chooses to be a Christan more then likely there is no reason for them to read other texts.

Actually this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
[QUOTE="SAURON221"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="FragStains"]

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

Yongying

I'm just saying that people should have an open mind, there is alot more than the bible.

That still does not answer his question, if some one chooses to be a Christan more then likely there is no reason for them to read other texts.

Actually this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

Think that you should have said that in the topic?

Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
This calls for dianetics.
Avatar image for ConManWithGun
ConManWithGun

6272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ConManWithGun
Member since 2005 • 6272 Posts
[QUOTE="ConManWithGun"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="MeriMorganov"]

[QUOTE="PC_JOE_9"]that was that guys first post , makes you wonder, did you create an account just so you could write that?Yongying

Yes it does I think its that guy who makes topics like this alot but is embaressed since ppl get anoyed by him. :lol:

no :P i usually post on other sites, but this is my first post here.

You don't have to be ashamed, you have the same ip adress as that guy

Don't be so interested in me, this topic isn't about me :|

It is now :P

Avatar image for agilefalcon16
agilefalcon16

1021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 agilefalcon16
Member since 2007 • 1021 Posts

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

Yongying

It's ironic that you claim evolution has "too many flaws", while you believe in God despite the fact that there is absolutely NO evidence that proves his existence at all. It looks like your logic is what has too many flaws.

Avatar image for diz360
diz360

1504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 diz360
Member since 2007 • 1504 Posts

Actually this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.Yongying

Science is about positive proof. Prooving something does not exist is futile. Can you prove that a pink teapot does not spin round the earth?

The bible comes from the same roots as the khoran - aramaic script. Roughly 55% of the worlds population subscribes to either one of these religions. I think about 7% of the worlds population are buddhist. I thought that buddhists did not belive in a god anyway!

Science does not refer to the bible or khoran for reference; it uses first principles for its method. But once scientific dicovery has been confirmed with enough evidence to support it., any previous theories used (i.e. faith based belief) can be disounted due to the stonger and proovable published scientific evidence.

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="SAURON221"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="FragStains"]

Why would a Christian look at any other religions' books in regards to their faith?

Same goes for any other religion. I wouldn't expect a Muslim to quote Bible passages in a debate.

SAURON221

I'm just saying that people should have an open mind, there is alot more than the bible.

That still does not answer his question, if some one chooses to be a Christan more then likely there is no reason for them to read other texts.

Actually this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

Think that you should have said that in the topic?

yes sorry, i edited my first post, gonna debate on it?
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

agilefalcon16

It's ironic that you claim evolution has "too many flaws", while you believe in God despite the fact that there is absolutely NO evidence that proves his existence at all. It looks like your logic is what has too many flaws.

Every person has their own kind of logic, maybee you believe in only what you see. There IS no evidence that disproves the existence of god either. Just because you can't see it, it doesn't mean it isn't there..vice versa.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="Yongying"]Actually this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.diz360

Science is about positive proof. Prooving something does not exist is futile. Can you prove that a pink teapot does not spin round the earth?

The bible comes from the same roots as the khoran - aramaic script. Roughly 55% of the worlds population subscribes to either one of these religions. I think about 7% of the worlds population are buddhist. I thought that buddhists did not belive in a god anyway!

Science does not refer to the bible or khoran for reference; it uses first principles for its method. But once scientific dicovery has been confirmed with enough evidence to support it., any previous theories used (i.e. faith based belief) can be disounted due to the stonger and proovable published scientific evidence.

Science doesn't proove everything. Alot of it is based on theories.

I for one believe in the infinite, there is never an end so there was never a beggining. Existence didn't just poof out of nowhere, it was always there.

Avatar image for diz360
diz360

1504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 diz360
Member since 2007 • 1504 Posts

Science doesn't proove everything. Alot of it is based on theories.

I for one believe in the infinite, there is never and end so there was never a beggining. Existence didn't just poof out of nowhere, it was always there.

Yongying

SCientific method has a structure whereby it can evolve as new disoveries are made. Scientific theories soon become scientific fact, where enough contributaory evidence is collected. For example evolution is wrongly described by theists as a theory.

Why do you believe that stuff? Where is your proof? How does beleiveing in the infinate relate to real life? How do you know there will never be an end? If you are looking for god, why look at buddhism - an atheist religion?

Avatar image for brownthrilla
brownthrilla

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#27 brownthrilla
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

Yongying
The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.
Avatar image for diz360
diz360

1504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 diz360
Member since 2007 • 1504 Posts

The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.
brownthrilla

PROOVE IT! Give me some links, at least!

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"]

Science doesn't proove everything. Alot of it is based on theories.

I for one believe in the infinite, there is never and end so there was never a beggining. Existence didn't just poof out of nowhere, it was always there.

diz360

SCientific method has a structure whereby it can evolve as new disoveries are made. Scientific theories soon become scientific fact, where enough contributaory evidence is collected. For example evolution is wrongly described by theists as a theory.

Why do you believe that stuff? Where is your proof? How does beleiveing in the infinate relate to real life? How do you know there will never be an end? If you are looking for god, why look at buddhism - an atheist religion?

Don't ask me for proof when i get none in return. Buddhism has alot of spiritual meaning not just materialistic. I believe in that "stuff" because i choose to and find it more logical. I'm not like neo who believes that everything that has a beggining has an end. To proove how life begun, shouldn't you first ask how existence and matter begun?
Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts

[QUOTE="brownthrilla"]The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.
diz360

PROOVE IT! Give me some links, at least!

Before he gives you a link, you could claim that of any religion, and it would still be very vague.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

brownthrilla
The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.

Buddah (what i read in the bhagavad gita) is an incarnation of Krishna isn't it?
Avatar image for huladog123
huladog123

4212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#32 huladog123
Member since 2005 • 4212 Posts

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

Yongying
man, I feel really sorry for you. You have it ALL wrong. If you're not a Christian, then you wouldn't ever understand the bible until you read it for yourself.
Avatar image for agilefalcon16
agilefalcon16

1021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 agilefalcon16
Member since 2007 • 1021 Posts
[QUOTE="agilefalcon16"][QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

Yongying

It's ironic that you claim evolution has "too many flaws", while you believe in God despite the fact that there is absolutely NO evidence that proves his existence at all. It looks like your logic is what has too many flaws.

Just because you can't see it, it doesn't mean it isn't there..vice versa.

If one can't see it, or hear it, or taste it, or smell it, or feel it, then HOW does one know it exists at all? Furthermore, if people are unable to believe that God exists by using any of those means, then HOW were primitive people able to find about God in the first place? This kind of stuff is what confuses me. :?

Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

huladog123
man, I feel really sorry for you. You have it ALL wrong. If you're not a Christian, then you wouldn't ever understand the bible until you read it for yourself.

That makes no sense at all. That's like saying if you're not a wizard you'd never get Hary Potter until you read it for yourself.
Avatar image for brownthrilla
brownthrilla

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#35 brownthrilla
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts
How about you just go look it up on Wikipedia. You're sitting in front of a computer for god's sake! Just type in Vegas or somthing and research. DOn't be simpleminded and expect someone to give you all the answers. If you want to fully understand the Vedas you must read into it deeply multiple time. Oh, and don't doubt another religons when you don know a thing about it except some stereo typical things you see on T.V.

[QUOTE="brownthrilla"]The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.
diz360

PROOVE IT! Give me some links, at least!

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

huladog123
man, I feel really sorry for you. You have it ALL wrong. If you're not a Christian, then you wouldn't ever understand the bible until you read it for yourself.

I have read it and i'm not christian.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
There is no "proof" of God or creationism. Ever consider that maybe, just maybe, the evolutionists go at the bible because faithheads of the Christian variety are the main group opposing science in the United States and Germany?
Avatar image for brownthrilla
brownthrilla

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#38 brownthrilla
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts
[QUOTE="brownthrilla"][QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

Yongying
The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.

Buddah (what i read in the bhagavad gita) is an incarnation of Krishna isn't it?

I believe he was thought to be a reincarnation of Krishna, but The Vedas is what Hinduism is built on(like Christianity and the Bible). Just recently Buddhism has been considered as it's own reliogn. Before(100+ years ago), Buddhism was just a branch of Hindusim.
Avatar image for DeeJayInphinity
DeeJayInphinity

13415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 DeeJayInphinity
Member since 2004 • 13415 Posts
People stop at the bible because it's the most common around here and it's silly to go through every single religion in the world just to satisfy you.
Avatar image for brownthrilla
brownthrilla

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#40 brownthrilla
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="brownthrilla"][QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

You guys ever looked past your damn noses and read the teachings of buddah? the Vedas (a 5000 year old book)?

i see all these threads on religion and it gets on my nerves when most of you stop at the bible.. :roll:

this isn't about Christians..it is about Evolutionists using the bible as their only source to debate against the proof of god and the beggining of life.

brownthrilla
The Vedas are Hindu not Buddhist, and I must agree. I am Hindu and have read some of the scriptures in the Vedas. Many things scientists are just now figuring out have been in the ancient Vedas. Things like the simple idea of multi target missles and microchips are in the Vedas. Many people, unfortunantly, deny this and don't keep an open mind on other religons.

Buddah (what i read in the bhagavad gita) is an incarnation of Krishna isn't it?

I believe he was thought to be a reincarnation of Krishna, but The Vedas is what Hinduism is built on(like Christianity and the Bible). Just recently Buddhism has been considered as it's own reliogn. Before(100+ years ago), Buddhism was just a branch of Hindusim.

Sorry I miss spelled Religon lol.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
There is no "proof" of God or creationism. Ever consider that maybe, just maybe, the evolutionists go at the bible because faithheads of the Christian variety are the main group opposing science in the United States and Germany?CptJSparrow
There is no solid proof that we evolved from cells either. We need to have sex to create life, how can humans be humans if we evolved from a cell, without the need to mate to create life? it isn't logical.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
People stop at the bible because it's the most common around here and it's silly to go through every single religion in the world just to satisfy you.DeeJayInphinity
it is silly because? teh lazy?
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"]There is no "proof" of God or creationism. Ever consider that maybe, just maybe, the evolutionists go at the bible because faithheads of the Christian variety are the main group opposing science in the United States and Germany?Yongying
There is no solid proof that we evolved from cells either. We need to have sex to create life, how can humans be humans if we evolved from a cell, without the need to mate to create life? it isn't logical.

Sexual reproduction has more survival value than asexual. It also produces evolution. Please reconsider your education.
Avatar image for brownthrilla
brownthrilla

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#44 brownthrilla
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts
See this.... a simple Gamespot forum on religon, and people are arguing on for 2+ pages. See, this is why we have wars, people just can't agree on one thing. This is why you hear there's a large debate on Religon vs. Science or Religon vs. Religon. We have just become a part of this internation debate with this simple forum. So if you ever wonder why we have wars or something like that, think of this simple forum.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
See this.... a simple Gamespot forum on religon, and people are arguing on for 2+ pages. See, this is why we have wars, people just can't agree on one thing. This is why you hear there's a large debate on Religon vs. Science or Religon vs. Religon. We have just become a part of this internation debate with this simple forum. So if you ever wonder why we have wars or something like that, think of this simple forum.brownthrilla
People don't have to be violent about it, i'd say that you are the one trying to provoke not me or anyone else here.
Avatar image for Stealth-Gunner
Stealth-Gunner

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Stealth-Gunner
Member since 2004 • 4166 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="agilefalcon16"][QUOTE="Yongying"]

I personally don't follow any religion but i do believe in god because the theory of evolution has too many flaws. that for another topic.

agilefalcon16

It's ironic that you claim evolution has "too many flaws", while you believe in God despite the fact that there is absolutely NO evidence that proves his existence at all. It looks like your logic is what has too many flaws.

Just because you can't see it, it doesn't mean it isn't there..vice versa.

If one can't see it, or hear it, or taste it, or smell it, or feel it, then HOW does one know it exists at all? Furthermore, if people are unable to believe that God exists by using any of those means, then HOW were primitive people able to find about God in the first place? This kind of stuff is what confuses me. :?

Because they made it up obviously... They thought Something must be making the rain or making hurricanes etc. because they didn't know how everything worked, plus they wanted a nice afterlife because their life was probably s***.

Avatar image for diz360
diz360

1504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 diz360
Member since 2007 • 1504 Posts

Don't ask me for proof when i get none in return. Buddhism has alot of spiritual meaning not just materialistic. I believe in that "stuff" because i choose to and find it more logical. I'm not like neo who believes that everything that has a beginning has an end. To prove how life begun, shouldn't you first ask how existence and matter begun?
Yongying

Neo was a character in a film... I can't see how anyone can choose their belief system based on a complete fiction - although millions do.

Science endeavours to search for definitive answers about existence and the origins of the universe. Theistic teachings always tend to ignore the age and scale of the universe and the myriad other stellar objects in it.

The origins of life and the origin of matter are really separate questions. In the stellar time-line, matter existed long before life started. There is plenty of astronomical and geological evidence for this.

Existence only is a precept in cognisant minds. People endulge in religion often for egotistical reasons regarding their own self-importance, to devolve their own responsibilities to their faiths and in trying to overcome the fear of their limited lifespans.

If you want scientific proof, there is plenty out there. That's the beauty of science - its traceable, repeatable, unambiguous, open to criticism and debate. It doesn't offer false answers or hope where it has no evidence.

Avatar image for DeeJayInphinity
DeeJayInphinity

13415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 DeeJayInphinity
Member since 2004 • 13415 Posts

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"]There is no "proof" of God or creationism. Ever consider that maybe, just maybe, the evolutionists go at the bible because faithheads of the Christian variety are the main group opposing science in the United States and Germany?Yongying
There is no solid proof that we evolved from cells either. We need to have sex to create life, how can humans be humans if we evolved from a cell, without the need to mate to create life? it isn't logical.

You do know that the human starts out as a small cell, don't you? God doesn't create the baby exactly 9 months after the partners have sex, it grows from a cell into a small baby.

Humans didn't evolve from nothing, we came from a common ancestor. Sex is necessary to recreate life but it's not like one human suddenly came out and it was unable to reproduce with the previous species.

Actually, only minute changes happened, and the process took a long time; each mutated offspring was able to reproduce with others and that passed the mutated gene down to the new generation etc..

Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"]There is no "proof" of God or creationism. Ever consider that maybe, just maybe, the evolutionists go at the bible because faithheads of the Christian variety are the main group opposing science in the United States and Germany?CptJSparrow
There is no solid proof that we evolved from cells either. We need to have sex to create life, how can humans be humans if we evolved from a cell, without the need to mate to create life? it isn't logical.

Sexual reproduction has more survival value than asexual. It also produces evolution. Please reconsider your education.

Please back up your statements with logical proof.
Avatar image for brownthrilla
brownthrilla

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#50 brownthrilla
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts
[QUOTE="brownthrilla"]See this.... a simple Gamespot forum on religon, and people are arguing on for 2+ pages. See, this is why we have wars, people just can't agree on one thing. This is why you hear there's a large debate on Religon vs. Science or Religon vs. Religon. We have just become a part of this internation debate with this simple forum. So if you ever wonder why we have wars or something like that, think of this simple forum.Yongying
People don't have to be violent about it, i'd say that you are the one trying to provoke not me or anyone else here.

I'm not pointing fingers, but this is a small, simpl debate. I didn't mean to say argument. But people take this real seriously in society. This leades to more serious action. I say one statement(not pointing fingers at anyone), and you point a finger at me. You're just proving my point by doing so. Also, I'm not really trying to be provacative if you read ALL my posts, notjust one.