This guy is right, and further more, CHARLES DARWIN ADMITTED that the eye is so complex, that it would seem EXTRAORDINARILY unlikely that evolution to create it. Further more, If evolution exists (which i dont doubt it does, im just giving another point of view) its an overkill. Man doesnt need to be able to... i dont know... be able to conduct an orchestra and remember all of mozarts symphonies in order to survive... Another point is, if you place some chocolate infront of a child and FIRMLY TELL HIM 'dont you eat that' most likely, the boy will NOT eat it... This defeats the object of evolution, because evolution says that we WOULD take the chocolate, no matter how firmly the child is told... Further more, if you use the theory of chaos, it makes no sence that atoms would form together in order to make the big bang, this makes no sense, AND FURTHER MORE, Engergy is never created or destroyed, just transfered. How does NOTHING CREATE enough energy to cause a giagantic explosion? just somethign to think aboutStumpt25
1. Who cares about Darwin? He's credited for starting the theory of evolution, not refining it. He didn't even believe in sexual selection, a process which we now know occurs often in many species.
2. Man's intelligence is a direct evolutionary trait. He has to be able to memorize skills and information in order to know where the best food is and how to get it with only a stick. Music is just one way we have applied these traits to other things.
3. If the boy is hungry, he will take it. Unless he has been specifically taught NOT to take it, in which case the evolutionary advantage of advanced intelligence comes into play again.
4. I'm not going to bother with the rest, read up on the Big Bang Theory.
Log in to comment