WHAT THE FVCKKFDKGDKFGDFKGDKFGKDFKGDFKGDKF I don't get it. Fitzgerald's prose is pure art.[QUOTE="GeneralMufinMan"]
Great **** Gatsby, god I hated that book.
Aljosa23
This topic is locked from further discussion.
WHAT THE FVCKKFDKGDKFGDFKGDKFGKDFKGDFKGDKF I don't get it. Fitzgerald's prose is pure art.[QUOTE="GeneralMufinMan"]
Great **** Gatsby, god I hated that book.
Aljosa23
Someone gave me a copy of twilight before it got huge, and told me it was an awesome novel about vampires and wearwolves. Thinking it would be in the same vein as Underworld I dove right in. 200 pages later I wanted to burn the damn thing.
I got bribed to read them, so I atleast got something outta it:PSomeone gave me a copy of twilight before it got huge, and told me it was an awesome novel about vampires and wearwolves. Thinking it would be in the same vein as Underworld I dove right in. 200 pages later I wanted to burn the damn thing.
Guybrush_3
If Gamespot had an ignore list, you'd be on mine after this post. You know, I like the book, but I can see how some people could legitimately dislike it. That book goes into some very weird directions.[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Great Expectations. I argue against the inclusion of this book in our curriculum meetings every year. Aljosa23
It took me a while to think of a book I didn't like, but Lord Jim takes the cake.I don't care about your longitude/latitude coordinates, the direction of the air, speed of your boat, the slight undercurrent in the water, or that the sun is peeking through the hazy clouds on a day in which the temperature is precisely 72.35 degrees Fahrenheit. I just... don't... care.mattbbplI have yet to read a Conrad novel that I didn't find excruciatingly boring.
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]It took me a while to think of a book I didn't like, but Lord Jim takes the cake.I have yet to read a Conrad novel that I didn't find excruciatingly boring.Â
I don't care about your longitude/latitude coordinates, the direction of the air, speed of your boat, the slight undercurrent in the water, or that the sun is peeking through the hazy clouds on a day in which the temperature is precisely 72.35 degrees Fahrenheit. I just... don't... care.Makhaidos
I liked Heart of Darkness the second time I read it. (I thought it was terrible in high school. I gave it another shot after a few years of college on the recomendation of a friend and really enjoyed it)
I have yet to read a Conrad novel that I didn't find excruciatingly boring.[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"]It took me a while to think of a book I didn't like, but Lord Jim takes the cake.
Â
I don't care about your longitude/latitude coordinates, the direction of the air, speed of your boat, the slight undercurrent in the water, or that the sun is peeking through the hazy clouds on a day in which the temperature is precisely 72.35 degrees Fahrenheit. I just... don't... care.Guybrush_3
I liked Heart of Darkness the second time I read it. (I thought it was terrible in high school. I gave it another shot after a few years of college on the recomendation of a friend and really enjoyed it)
I never got assigned any reading in high school; everything I read, I read for fun or curiosity. I've read The Secret Sharer and the Heart of Darkness, and both killed my eyes by the end despite being really short. Maybe I just need to try them again, but I'm in no rush. . .Is it bad that I feel the need to explain before I say it? The second book in the Halo Trilogy written by William C. Dietz was atrocious. It was like he played 5 minutes of the game and then stopped and wrote it down, then 5 more minutes and stopped and wrote it down. Rinse and repeat. It was almost to the point you could use the novel as a strategy guide for the game as if you read it you knew exactly what was going to happen when playing the game, right down the the quantity and placement of the enemies. Anyway, so yeah... I feel kind bad mentioning a video game to novel as my choice but you since you asked.
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]It took me a while to think of a book I didn't like, but Lord Jim takes the cake.I don't care about your longitude/latitude coordinates, the direction of the air, speed of your boat, the slight undercurrent in the water, or that the sun is peeking through the hazy clouds on a day in which the temperature is precisely 72.35 degrees Fahrenheit. I just... don't... care.MakhaidosI have yet to read a Conrad novel that I didn't find excruciatingly boring. I tried really, really hard to like it, too. I was really digging the classic literature scene once I got introduced to it in a meaningful way, but I knew I was in trouble when I opened the jacket and saw that the publisher had routed the man's journey across the sea based on the coordinates and speeds presented in the text.The only good thing I can say about it is at least it prepared me for Jane Eyre.
[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"]It took me a while to think of a book I didn't like, but Lord Jim takes the cake.I don't care about your longitude/latitude coordinates, the direction of the air, speed of your boat, the slight undercurrent in the water, or that the sun is peeking through the hazy clouds on a day in which the temperature is precisely 72.35 degrees Fahrenheit. I just... don't... care.mattbbplI have yet to read a Conrad novel that I didn't find excruciatingly boring. I tried really, really hard to like it, too. I was really digging the classic literature scene once I got introduced to it in a meaningful way, but I knew I was in trouble when I opened the jacket and saw that the publisher had routed the man's journey across the sea based on the coordinates and speeds presented in the text.The only good thing I can say about it is at least it prepared me for Jane Eyre. See, Jane Eyre I LOVED. I read it in just a week. Conrad's stuff, though, I just can't seem to tackle.
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]WHAT THE FVCKKFDKGDKFGDFKGDKFGKDFKGDFKGDKF I don't get it. Fitzgerald's prose is pure art. F Scott Fitzgerald is an amazing writer. I don't think that can really be contested, if I'm to be honest. But I don't feel he is very good at writing interesting characters. It's like he has a wonderful way with words and describing concepts and weaving subtext, but I've never found his characters to be compelling in the slightest, nor have I ever found the relationships between them to be developed to a degree where I feel more invested. And without quality characters, the narrative tends to fall apart.[QUOTE="GeneralMufinMan"]
Great **** Gatsby, god I hated that book.
PannicAtack
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]"Eldest," from the Inheritance Cycle. Really, really annoying.Ricardomz
This. I really loved "Eragon" but I can't even get through the first chapter on "Eldest".
Oh god yeah. Eldest awful.
Couldn't say. If I'm not enthralled by a novel within the first 50 pages or so, I don't continue. Aint nobody got time fo that.
If Gamespot had an ignore list, you'd be on mine after this post.[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Great Expectations. I argue against the inclusion of this book in our curriculum meetings every year. Aljosa23
Do you not have adblock?
[QUOTE="Makhaidos"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I tried really, really hard to like it, too. I was really digging the classic literature scene once I got introduced to it in a meaningful way, but I knew I was in trouble when I opened the jacket and saw that the publisher had routed the man's journey across the sea based on the coordinates and speeds presented in the text.See, Jane Eyre I LOVED. I read it in just a week. Conrad's stuff, though, I just can't seem to tackle. There are a few others on this site that adore Jane Eyre quite a bit, too. Frankly, it's one of the more polarizing books I've read as it either seems to be your cup of tea or it flat out isn't.I remember hardly anything about the book, but I definitely enjoyed Jane Eyre.Â
The only good thing I can say about it is at least it prepared me for Jane Eyre.mattbbpl
[spoiler] That was the one where in the end the dude she was working for turned out to have a crazy wife living in the attic or some shit right? [/spoiler]
There are a few others on this site that adore Jane Eyre quite a bit, too. Frankly, it's one of the more polarizing books I've read as it either seems to be your cup of tea or it flat out isn't.I remember hardly anything about the book, but I definitely enjoyed Jane Eyre.[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="Makhaidos"] See, Jane Eyre I LOVED. I read it in just a week. Conrad's stuff, though, I just can't seem to tackle.cain006
[spoiler] That was the one where in the end the dude she was working for turned out to have a crazy wife living in the attic or some shit right? [/spoiler]
Yeah, that was a big plot point that [spoiler] came to light at the alter, I believe. And then there was some thing about an unrequitted love triangle with her cousin, an inherited fortune, that dude going blind, and then a marriage (not necessarily in that order). [/spoiler] It all seemed like such a relatively pointless mess at the time I read it - there had to be more to it that I missed. I keep meaning to pick it up again, but my stomach turns whenever I gaze in it's direction.
The fact that it captures in the form of metaphor the stark, cynical pain of growing old and becoming an unwitting burden to your family?MakhaidosSure, you can reap a bunch of hidden metaphors from the novel such as some Christ-complex surrounding the main character, but in all, it comes across as a story about a self-pitying person who no one ever appreciated, finally realizing that once he had nothing to offer to the world, the world didn't care about him anymore than it cares about a roach. EXACTLY!!! Kafka captured his own profound depression and encroaching sense of nihilism and put it into a beautifully written story. It's brilliant. How is it brilliant? It's basically fifty pages of self-aggrandizing and self-pity.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]"Eldest," from the Inheritance Cycle. Really, really annoying.Ricardomz
This. I really loved "Eragon" but I can't even get through the first chapter on "Eldest".
wtf, Eragon sucked and Eldest was good. Worst I've read is Twilight.[QUOTE="Ricardomz"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]"Eldest," from the Inheritance Cycle. Really, really annoying.Guppy507
This. I really loved "Eragon" but I can't even get through the first chapter on "Eldest".
wtf, Eragon sucked and Eldest was good. Worst I've read is Twilight. Personally I felt the first two were good, but three dragged it out, and four took so long, i felt like by that point it lost a lot of the heart from the first one.I've never read a flat-out "bad" novel, but the worst I've read was probably Forrest Gump. It's just so outlandish, which wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't trying to take itself seriously. The movie knew just what to take out, and there was quite a lot to take out.
[QUOTE="Ricardomz"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]"Eldest," from the Inheritance Cycle. Really, really annoying.Guppy507
This. I really loved "Eragon" but I can't even get through the first chapter on "Eldest".
wtf, Eragon sucked and Eldest was good. Worst I've read is Twilight.Eldest was terrible. The elves were massive unlikable mary sues, and the whole "oh you're instantly cured of your dehabilitation and given superpowers via this random, unexplained ritual" thing is completely pulled out of the author's ass. And then the author giving oh-so-deep treatises on religion and vegetarianism.Eldest was terrible. The elves were massive unlikable mary sues, and the whole "oh you're instantly cured of your dehabilitation and given superpowers via this random, unexplained ritual" thing is completely pulled out of the author's ass. And then the author giving oh-so-deep treatises on religion and vegetarianism.PannicAtack:D lmao i actually physically laughed reading that :D
Jane Eyre. 3/4 of the book is about a woman complaining about having 2 rich guys that love her, pay for all her needs/wants, and want to get married.
Although the Awakening was almost as bad. Its about an upper-middle class woman, who commits suicide because she is bored and blames society's role for rich white women for her boredom. But that was at least a faster read.
"Baudolino" by Umberto Eco
The only book i couldnt finish reading, read half of it and couldnt bear anymore, and i've read some really shitty books...
(But i LOVED "The Name of the Rose" written by him too)
Jane Eyre. 3/4 of the book is about a woman complaining about having 2 rich guys that love her, pay for all her needs/wants, and want to get married.
Although the Awakening was almost as bad. Its about an upper-middle class woman, who commits suicide because she is bored and blames society's role for rich white women for her boredom. But that was at least a faster read.
Diablo-B
Jane Austen is a lot like that :P
[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]
Jane Eyre. 3/4 of the book is about a woman complaining about having 2 rich guys that love her, pay for all her needs/wants, and want to get married.
Although the Awakening was almost as bad. Its about an upper-middle class woman, who commits suicide because she is bored and blames society's role for rich white women for her boredom. But that was at least a faster read.
applesxc47
Jane Austen is a lot like that :P
Neither of those books are by Jane Austen.I've broken my answer down
I cant remember the worst book ive ever read but i think it was just because it was a coming of age story of a teenage girl. It basically dealt with all the problems a teenage girl goes through, even her freaking out when she got her first period. I dont know why, but i read the entire thing only to realize it was a terrible book. for a guy to read anyway.
The book i hated reading the most was The Long Walk by Stephen King. I just hated the plot, the story, the way people die and above all the way it ends.
and finally the most boring book i've ever read was A Song of Ice and Fire by, you know who wrote it. The Game of Thrones bug must have not bit me because i bought the books to read while on vacation and found most of them to be boring and repetitive. The only reason i finished them was because there was nothing else for me to do.
[QUOTE="applesxc47"][QUOTE="Diablo-B"]
Jane Eyre. 3/4 of the book is about a woman complaining about having 2 rich guys that love her, pay for all her needs/wants, and want to get married.
Although the Awakening was almost as bad. Its about an upper-middle class woman, who commits suicide because she is bored and blames society's role for rich white women for her boredom. But that was at least a faster read.
PannicAtack
Jane Austen is a lot like that :P
Neither of those books are by Jane Austen.Goddamn it I mixed up my authors hahaha
[QUOTE="Guppy507"][QUOTE="Ricardomz"]wtf, Eragon sucked and Eldest was good. Worst I've read is Twilight.Eldest was terrible. The elves were massive unlikable mary sues, and the whole "oh you're instantly cured of your dehabilitation and given superpowers via this random, unexplained ritual" thing is completely pulled out of the author's ass. And then the author giving oh-so-deep treatises on religion and vegetarianism. And on the other hand, Eragon is just Star Wars episode 4. And, yeah, welcome to fantasy elves, they're all like that.This. I really loved "Eragon" but I can't even get through the first chapter on "Eldest".
PannicAtack
Did someone say Mary Sues?!
[spoiler]
Â
[/spoiler] Plot armor is the lamest thing ever. It's a shame that a lot of fantasy and science fiction authors (and background writers, in this spoiler's case - luckily most of his shit was retconned) tend to be so damn bad at crafting believable universes and ideas solely because they have to interject themself into some dumb, all-powerful character.
You should check out the Malazan Empire books. Characters don't die that often but he just stops using some after books.Did someone say Mary Sues?!
 Plot armor is the lamest thing ever. It's a shame that a lot of fantasy and science fiction authors (and background writers, in this spoiler's case - luckily most of his shit was retconned) tend to be so damn bad at crafting believable universes and ideas solely because they have to interject themself into some dumb, all-powerful character.Saturos3091
You should check out the Malazan Empire books. Characters don't die that often but he just stops using some after books. I don't think there are any characters that just disappear in that series. Some go away and return 5-6 books later (one character in book 1 is fairly extreme in that regard.. she doesn't return except in a passing conversation until book 8), and others return in Esslemont's companion series, Novels of the Malazan Empire. But the space in between characters can be pretty ridiculous. That series is a difficult read, largely because of that.[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]
Did someone say Mary Sues?!
 Plot armor is the lamest thing ever. It's a shame that a lot of fantasy and science fiction authors (and background writers, in this spoiler's case - luckily most of his shit was retconned) tend to be so damn bad at crafting believable universes and ideas solely because they have to interject themself into some dumb, all-powerful character.cain006
[QUOTE="cain006"]You should check out the Malazan Empire books. Characters don't die that often but he just stops using some after books. I don't think there are any characters that just disappear in that series. Some go away and return 5-6 books later (one character in book 1 is fairly extreme in that regard.. she doesn't return except in a passing conversation until book 8), and others return in Esslemont's companion series, Novels of the Malazan Empire. But the space in between characters can be pretty ridiculous. That series is a difficult read, largely because of that.Ah well I've only just finished the second one.[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]
Did someone say Mary Sues?!
 Plot armor is the lamest thing ever. It's a shame that a lot of fantasy and science fiction authors (and background writers, in this spoiler's case - luckily most of his shit was retconned) tend to be so damn bad at crafting believable universes and ideas solely because they have to interject themself into some dumb, all-powerful character.GamerForca
I don't think there are any characters that just disappear in that series. Some go away and return 5-6 books later (one character in book 1 is fairly extreme in that regard.. she doesn't return except in a passing conversation until book 8), and others return in Esslemont's companion series, Novels of the Malazan Empire. But the space in between characters can be pretty ridiculous. That series is a difficult read, largely because of that.Ah well I've only just finished the second one. That explains it. There are three man continents on which each book is set (typically only one continent per book), and the books follow a few groups of characters on each continent. So if a main character is on Genabackis, he won't appear in a book that takes place in Seven Cities (unless he travels over there, which happens at times lol), and you won't see him again until another book that takes place on Genabackis. But stick with it, and you're in for a very rewarding read. One of my favorite fantasy series.[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="cain006"]You should check out the Malazan Empire books. Characters don't die that often but he just stops using some after books.
cain006
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment