This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
[QUOTE="SaudiFury"] mm i mentioned Egypt because i know they get aid from the USA, as far as i understand both for helping maintain the Egyptian military and it's government's balance sheet. As for Iraq, politics and war make for strange bed fellows. I don't quite understand it either, i guess it just render Iraq neutered for the time being. It lives on US and Iran's money and support, they can't exactly bite either hand or make any brash moves in support of one or the other. I don't know if there is any truth it (got this news from my dad) but apparently the F-16's that USA is selling to Iraq (at a price that sounds it's like 4 times what it should be...) apparently the US is insistent that ONLY Sunni and Kurdish pilots fly them. My dad likes to play the sectarian game, at the same time i can't be naive enough to believe in an ideal egalitarian PC way that Shia pilots might fly them off into Iran. I didn't make the rules of this stupid sectarian game of thrones. SaudiFury
that's pretty interesting about the Sunni and Kurdish pilots (would Turkey get mad if they knew Kurds were flying Iraq's F-16s?). I also found it kind of weird that during the 1991 Gulf War Saddam sent some of his planes to Iran in order to prevent them from getting bombed by the U.S. Once the war was over Saddam asked for the planes back and of course the Iranian government kept them for their own air force.
If i recall correctly.
Saddam didn't send some of his best planes to hide in his enemies country. I've read the book "Arabs At War" by Kenneth Pollack, very good if you want Arab military history analysis from 1946 to 1991. If memory serves me right he sent those plans to attack the US naval fleet in the Persian Gulf. the pilots instead of going to their intended target - of which they had not the faintest fvcking clue where the fleet was - said fvck this and scrammed for Iran. Seeing as Jordan (who allied with Iraq in it) was too far, and everyone else aside from Iran was at war with them at the time.
of course i'm being dramatic, but you see my point.
Ah I see. They didn't no where the fleet was, but if they did know where it was they probably would've just gotten themselves shot down if they tried to attack it.[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]Lesser of two evils? What are you talking about? I-Sun_Tzu-Iran-Iraq war.... And it was the cold war...both us and the Soviets were fighting for power...it was necessary. The Iran-Iraq war was necessary? Out of all the things I've seen you say, this might be the most absurd of the lot. Saddam started the Iran-Iraq war (certainly it wasn't necessary and was just a waste of lives) on his own initiative, the U.S. intervened by arming and funding Saddam when it looked like Iran may have been able to overthrow him and the U.S. didn't want Iran to get more powerful. Also I think the U.S. blocked the UN from investigating Saddam's use of WMD against Iran and Iranian-allied Kurds. Although the U.S. also sold Iran some weapons in exchange for Iran getting Hezbollah to release some hostages (and so the CIA could fund the Contras in order to overthrow the Sandinistas).
The key point here is that Group A blames Group B for their problems. Nobody ever blames themselves.
[QUOTE="SaudiFury"]
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
that's pretty interesting about the Sunni and Kurdish pilots (would Turkey get mad if they knew Kurds were flying Iraq's F-16s?). I also found it kind of weird that during the 1991 Gulf War Saddam sent some of his planes to Iran in order to prevent them from getting bombed by the U.S. Once the war was over Saddam asked for the planes back and of course the Iranian government kept them for their own air force.
whipassmt
If i recall correctly.
Saddam didn't send some of his best planes to hide in his enemies country. I've read the book "Arabs At War" by Kenneth Pollack, very good if you want Arab military history analysis from 1946 to 1991. If memory serves me right he sent those plans to attack the US naval fleet in the Persian Gulf. the pilots instead of going to their intended target - of which they had not the faintest fvcking clue where the fleet was - said fvck this and scrammed for Iran. Seeing as Jordan (who allied with Iraq in it) was too far, and everyone else aside from Iran was at war with them at the time.
of course i'm being dramatic, but you see my point.
Ah I see. They didn't no where the fleet was, but if they did know where it was they probably would've just gotten themselves shot down if they tried to attack it. Also the US naval air pilots were most concerned were Iraq's Mig-29's, they were rest assured when the French passed the intel that their trainers (they were training Iraqi pilots) hadn't gotten very far in training and Iraqi's were not fully ready to go with their very best planes. Also when it became abundandtly clear that Iraqi air force could not fend off the Allied forces (getting shot down by USA, UK, France, Saudi and others) they began burying some of their planes. Talk aobut counter productive. I still remember laughing upon reading the passage talking with retired Iraqi generals from the war, when the US announced Desert Shield and would commence air bombardments on Iraq, they thought it would be like Iran-Iraq war, where Iran would send maybe 1 or 2 a day, and they'd drop a bomb here and there and they could manage. I can bear witness as a child growing up in Saudi Arabia, that that was NOT the case, the sounds of jets flying roar'd all the time day and night. If i could convert VHS into DVD and put it up, i'd show it. I lived near the Persian Gulf's coast line and you could see like C-130's coming in, a group of Apache's going out, then back in Saudi you might see a Saudi squadran roar over the city of Al-Khobar heading north (they were during defensive perimeters, if and whenever the Iraqi's intruded Saudi airspace, the Saudi's would fight back), but it was constant. so I laugh at the assumptions the Iraqi generals had, it got so bad that they had to commence the Battle of Khafji (which if your interested i'll let you look that up). whats worse/funnier is that the Iraqi air force did it AGAIN during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, by burying their planes in the sand. wtf did they think that was going to achieve? the stuff they were burying were Mig-21's and 23's, nothing at all effective against F-15's and F-16's. in the book, they follow the military histories of Libya (the most bat$hit insane stories), Egypt (the army that learns from it's mistakes), Jordan (impressive history all things considered), Saudi (easily see a young unseasoned army that is slow as fvck to move but has a good air force and strong national guard). Iraq and Syria, easily the two worst military's in terms of effectiveness and tactics (with few exceptions) from reading their histories it appears they've never learned from their mistakes in the past, and continue to use one tactic (massive force).[QUOTE="whipassmt"]Ah I see. They didn't no where the fleet was, but if they did know where it was they probably would've just gotten themselves shot down if they tried to attack it. Also the US naval air pilots were most concerned were Iraq's Mig-29's, they were rest assured when the French passed the intel that their trainers (they were training Iraqi pilots) hadn't gotten very far in training and Iraqi's were not fully ready to go with their very best planes. Also when it became abundandtly clear that Iraqi air force could not fend off the Allied forces (getting shot down by USA, UK, France, Saudi and others) they began burying some of their planes. Talk aobut counter productive. I still remember laughing upon reading the passage talking with retired Iraqi generals from the war, when the US announced Desert Shield and would commence air bombardments on Iraq, they thought it would be like Iran-Iraq war, where Iran would send maybe 1 or 2 a day, and they'd drop a bomb here and there and they could manage. I can bear witness as a child growing up in Saudi Arabia, that that was NOT the case, the sounds of jets flying roar'd all the time day and night. If i could convert VHS into DVD and put it up, i'd show it. I lived near the Persian Gulf's coast line and you could see like C-130's coming in, a group of Apache's going out, then back in Saudi you might see a Saudi squadran roar over the city of Al-Khobar heading north (they were during defensive perimeters, if and whenever the Iraqi's intruded Saudi airspace, the Saudi's would fight back), but it was constant. so I laugh at the assumptions the Iraqi generals had, it got so bad that they had to commence the Battle of Khafji (which if your interested i'll let you look that up). whats worse/funnier is that the Iraqi air force did it AGAIN during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, by burying their planes in the sand. wtf did they think that was going to achieve? the stuff they were burying were Mig-21's and 23's, nothing at all effective against F-15's and F-16's. in the book, they follow the military histories of Libya (the most bat$hit insane stories), Egypt (the army that learns from it's mistakes), Jordan (impressive history all things considered), Saudi (easily see a young unseasoned army that is slow as fvck to move but has a good air force and strong national guard). Iraq and Syria, easily the two worst military's in terms of effectiveness and tactics (with few exceptions) from reading their histories it appears they've never learned from their mistakes in the past, and continue to use one tactic (massive force).[QUOTE="SaudiFury"]
If i recall correctly.
Saddam didn't send some of his best planes to hide in his enemies country. I've read the book "Arabs At War" by Kenneth Pollack, very good if you want Arab military history analysis from 1946 to 1991. If memory serves me right he sent those plans to attack the US naval fleet in the Persian Gulf. the pilots instead of going to their intended target - of which they had not the faintest fvcking clue where the fleet was - said fvck this and scrammed for Iran. Seeing as Jordan (who allied with Iraq in it) was too far, and everyone else aside from Iran was at war with them at the time.
of course i'm being dramatic, but you see my point.
SaudiFury
I've read that Iraq buried their planes in order to prevent them from being destroyed because Saddam wanted to have the planes in case for the the future in case he needed to put down any insurrections against his rule.
The Iran-Iraq war was necessary? Out of all the things I've seen you say, this might be the most absurd of the lot. Saddam started the Iran-Iraq war (certainly it wasn't necessary and was just a waste of lives) on his own initiative, the U.S. intervened by arming and funding Saddam when it looked like Iran may have been able to overthrow him and the U.S. didn't want Iran to get more powerful. Also I think the U.S. blocked the UN from investigating Saddam's use of WMD against Iran and Iranian-allied Kurds. Although the U.S. also sold Iran some weapons in exchange for Iran getting Hezbollah to release some hostages (and so the CIA could fund the Contras in order to overthrow the Sandinistas). Saddam certainly wanted to invade Iran on his own initiative, but the US knew perfectly well about Saddam's intention to invade and they gave him the US seal of approval to do so. It's important to understand why Saddam attacked when he did; it was right after the Iranian revolution that brought the mullahs into power, but most importantly the mullahs were having issues maintaining control of the government. They weren't that popular with the general public, and because of that Saddam saw an opening to begin his path towards world domination (at least in his mind). But what happened as a result of the war (which the US supported even before it officially began) was that it threw the support of the Iranian public onto the side of the mullahs. The Islamic Republic of Iran might not exist today if not for that war which rallied the nation behind the newly formed government.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Iran-Iraq war.... And it was the cold war...both us and the Soviets were fighting for power...it was necessary. whipassmt
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]Saddam started the Iran-Iraq war (certainly it wasn't necessary and was just a waste of lives) on his own initiative, the U.S. intervened by arming and funding Saddam when it looked like Iran may have been able to overthrow him and the U.S. didn't want Iran to get more powerful. Also I think the U.S. blocked the UN from investigating Saddam's use of WMD against Iran and Iranian-allied Kurds. Although the U.S. also sold Iran some weapons in exchange for Iran getting Hezbollah to release some hostages (and so the CIA could fund the Contras in order to overthrow the Sandinistas). Saddam certainly wanted to invade Iran on his own initiative, but the US knew perfectly well about Saddam's intention to invade and they gave him the US seal of approval to do so. It's important to understand why Saddam attacked when he did; it was right after the Iranian revolution that brought the mullahs into power, but most importantly the mullahs were having issues maintaining control of the government. They weren't that popular with the general public, and because of that Saddam saw an opening to begin his path towards world domination (at least in his mind). But what happened as a result of the war (which the US supported even before it officially began) was that it threw the support of the Iranian public onto the side of the mullahs. The Islamic Republic of Iran might not exist today if not for that war which rallied the nation behind the newly formed government. From what I've read Saddam thought that the Arabs living in a certain part of Iran would side with Iraq because they were Arabs not Persians. Also didn't Saddam borrow a lot of money from Kuwait to finance the Iran-Iraq War and then told Kuwait to forgive his debt?[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] The Iran-Iraq war was necessary? Out of all the things I've seen you say, this might be the most absurd of the lot. -Sun_Tzu-
[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] Have you read up on history? l4dak47
Yes. But your view on history is skewed. I'm willing to bet you got yours from people like Howard Zinn.
Also, look up the amount the U.S. gives in foreign aid.
I don't know who Howard Zinn is. Furthermore, my view isn't skewed. The U.S. are one of the main reasons why the ME is the way it is. They funded and gave weapons to groups In Afghanistan who eventually became the Taliban, they overthrew the leader of Iran and installed a brutal dictator, they continue to fund nations like Saudi Arabia who are one of the worst when it comes to human rights, they funded Hussein and overthrew him when he became useless leading to a destabilized Iraq, and they continue to interfere in Afghanistan.lol
[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] How about instead of attacking my character, you attack my arguments? Oh wait, you can't because I'm right and you're wrong. BossPerson
They had to fund the Taliban..Iran was necessary, Saudi Arabi is to maintain our oil relationshops, Hussein was brutal and a threat to all innocents in the region, Afghanistian is necessary especially considered it's in such a volatile region...each of those had specific reasons dude. And doesn't change the fact that liberals love to play the blame game..just saying.
Iran was necessary.........yes, because oil was going to get too expensive. Saddam was a threat? Maybe thats why the US supported him during his killing of the kurds and his war with Iran? Ahh "conservatives"....."everything is perfect and my country is just"yet the US actually supported the Kurdish uprising in 91, also not to mention said chemical weapons were bought by a Dutch fellow called Van Anraat who actually sold raw materials to the iraqi's.
Not anywhere does it say America was involved in supporting Iraq in this, strangely this incident actually made Regan shift them off the supported states list and not to mention it was US companies not the government themselves that the raw materials came from aswell as other sources like India and W.Germany so really they should shoulder some of the blame for this aswell?
Not to mention, the fact you think its bad that the US have support for regimes in the middle east, if they didnt it would be a cesspool of war and probably world war 3 would be well underway not to mention it keeps Isreal and its inhabitants safe aswell.Theres a matter of balance most of them hate Isreal with a passion and blame them for their own short comings sometimes.
Also Obama on the whole being against the Iran attacks is actually smart, it could honestly cause massive amounts of destabilization in the region in a place where its already unstable and a massive clusterfvck apart from Saudi,Kuwait and the UAE.
Do you guys think thiS is true, does the Muslim civilization actually envy the West and would most Middle-Easterners secretly prefer to be more like the West, or even live there?
whipassmt
I've heard that quite a few times before, wouldn't surprise me if it was true but only in regards of the fundamentalist islam and terrorists.
If the west left the ME alone in the past and today,I think it would've been better,even if they still don't know what a car is.FMAB_GTOu have never been to the middle east have u or seen pictures of it...
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"]If the west left the ME alone in the past and today,I think it would've been better,even if they still don't know what a car is.Allthishateu have never been to the middle east have u or seen pictures of it... lol she's Lebanese, dimwit.
[QUOTE="Allthishate"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"]If the west left the ME alone in the past and today,I think it would've been better,even if they still don't know what a car is.ShadowsDemonu have never been to the middle east have u or seen pictures of it... lol she's Lebanese, dimwit. then she should know the middle east is crazy about cars so that statement is kinda stupid..
[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] Have you read up on history? l4dak47
Yes. But your view on history is skewed. I'm willing to bet you got yours from people like Howard Zinn.
Also, look up the amount the U.S. gives in foreign aid.
I don't know who Howard Zinn is. Furthermore, my view isn't skewed. The U.S. are one of the main reasons why the ME is the way it is. They funded and gave weapons to groups In Afghanistan who eventually became the Taliban, they overthrew the leader of Iran and installed a brutal dictator, they continue to fund nations like Saudi Arabia who are one of the worst when it comes to human rights, they funded Hussein and overthrew him when he became useless leading to a destabilized Iraq, and they continue to interfere in Afghanistan.Eh I don't think it's one of the main reasons. What a group turns into over time is not the fault of those trying to help. There was a reason for the funding. Kind of a simplistic argument if you don't blame those with the agenda for said agenda. Naive as well. But then again you do love to spew anti American ideas so please...don't let reality stop you.If the west left the ME alone in the past and today,I think it would've been better,even if they still don't know what a car is.FMAB_GTOI agree. Stop the foreign aid. Invest that money in the US and let the ME on it's own.
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"]If the west left the ME alone in the past and today,I think it would've been better,even if they still don't know what a car is.LJS9502_basicI agree. Stop the foreign aid. Invest that money in the US and let the ME on it's own. if only they could take the billions we pay to isreal for little or no reason /sigh
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"]If the west left the ME alone in the past and today,I think it would've been better,even if they still don't know what a car is.AllthishateI agree. Stop the foreign aid. Invest that money in the US and let the ME on it's own. if only they could take the billions we pay to isreal for little or no reason /sigh They give foreign aid to a lot more countries in the ME than Israel. Seriously do some research.
[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"][QUOTE="Allthishate"] u have never been to the middle east have u or seen pictures of it...Allthishatelol she's Lebanese, dimwit. then she should know the middle east is crazy about cars so that statement is kinda stupid.. i dun think you know what she meant by that statement...
[QUOTE="Allthishate"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]They give foreign aid to a lot more countries in the ME than Israel. Seriously do some research.LJS9502_basicThey pay billions in aid for the cessation of violence with isreal i think u should do some research... lol the irony My mistake. I see the conversation is over your head. I'll leave you to your ignorance. How much does the U.S. spend on Egypt? Egypt gets the most U.S. foreign aid of any country except for Israel. (This doesn't include the money spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.) The amount varies each year and there are many different funding streams, but U.S. foreign assistance to Egypt has averaged just over $2 billion every year since 1979, when Egypt struck a peace treaty with Israel following the Camp David Peace Accords, according to a Congressional Research Service report from 2009. again plseas do some research before u start typing @%@^ . i bring proof u bring random @%@^ get your facts straight before u make false accusations. i guess u have no idea abut the 6 day war.. How about do some research... but knowing u. you will probably dismissive this fact and say some other @%@% lie to deflect attention or just ignore it overall..
The Muslim world suffers from political amnesia, we now have learned, and so has forgotten not only Arafats resurrection but also American help to beleaguered Afghanis, terrified Kuwaitis, helpless Kurds and Shiites, starving Somalis, and defenseless Bosniansdirect intervention that has cost the United States much more treasure and lives than mere economic aid for Israel ever did.linkI'm a little concerned someone read this and thought it was okay.
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"]I don't know who Howard Zinn is. Furthermore, my view isn't skewed. The U.S. are one of the main reasons why the ME is the way it is. They funded and gave weapons to groups In Afghanistan who eventually became the Taliban, they overthrew the leader of Iran and installed a brutal dictator, they continue to fund nations like Saudi Arabia who are one of the worst when it comes to human rights, they funded Hussein and overthrew him when he became useless leading to a destabilized Iraq, and they continue to interfere in Afghanistan.Eh I don't think it's one of the main reasons. What a group turns into over time is not the fault of those trying to help. There was a reason for the funding. Kind of a simplistic argument if you don't blame those with the agenda for said agenda. Naive as well. But then again you do love to spew anti American ideas so please...don't let reality stop you. Yes, it is if we directly led to it happening. Don't be dense and assume that the American government didn't know just how radical these groups were back then. They knew and they didn't care if it meant attacking the U.S.S.R. It was our way of getting back at them for what they did to us in Vietnam. But, please continue to spew your pedantic bullsh*t.Yes. But your view on history is skewed. I'm willing to bet you got yours from people like Howard Zinn.
Also, look up the amount the U.S. gives in foreign aid.
LJS9502_basic
It's hard to say, you can't generalise people like that. And by the Muslim world do you mean all Muslims or just those from the Middle East? There are Muslims from all over the world you know.
Though I'm sure some of the more hardcore Muslims dislike Western culture.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] I don't know who Howard Zinn is. Furthermore, my view isn't skewed. The U.S. are one of the main reasons why the ME is the way it is. They funded and gave weapons to groups In Afghanistan who eventually became the Taliban, they overthrew the leader of Iran and installed a brutal dictator, they continue to fund nations like Saudi Arabia who are one of the worst when it comes to human rights, they funded Hussein and overthrew him when he became useless leading to a destabilized Iraq, and they continue to interfere in Afghanistan.l4dak47Eh I don't think it's one of the main reasons. What a group turns into over time is not the fault of those trying to help. There was a reason for the funding. Kind of a simplistic argument if you don't blame those with the agenda for said agenda. Naive as well. But then again you do love to spew anti American ideas so please...don't let reality stop you. Yes, it is if we directly led to it happening. Don't be dense and assume that the American government didn't know just how radical these groups were back then. They knew and they didn't care if it meant attacking the U.S.S.R. It was our way of getting back at them for what they did to us in Vietnam. But, please continue to spew your pedantic bullsh*t. That isn't what I said but spew your pedantic straw man bull ****
and even a hardcore atheist are afraid to comment about themhardcore muslims(extremists)
are the world most dangerous idiots.
quebec946
It is true that European and in recent times, American involvement in the Middle East is a major factor in why they and most of Africa and Asia are so f*cked up today, but the fact remains that pointing to these factors as the cause of their problem will solve nothing.
Yes, it is if we directly led to it happening. Don't be dense and assume that the American government didn't know just how radical these groups were back then. They knew and they didn't care if it meant attacking the U.S.S.R. It was our way of getting back at them for what they did to us in Vietnam. But, please continue to spew your pedantic bullsh*t. That isn't what I said but spew your pedantic straw man bull ****[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Eh I don't think it's one of the main reasons. What a group turns into over time is not the fault of those trying to help. There was a reason for the funding. Kind of a simplistic argument if you don't blame those with the agenda for said agenda. Naive as well. But then again you do love to spew anti American ideas so please...don't let reality stop you.LJS9502_basic
I don't know as much as you guys, but is that really a strawman?
The U.S. has a well documented history of interfering with foreign governments for its financial/political interests, often this is detrimental to the countries population.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment