The question is pretty straight forward. Who do you want to be the next President, but more importantly why do you want this person to be the next President?
i want hillary clinton to be are next prez because BIll clinton will get to throw his two cents in
plus times where wayyy more better and peaceful when clinton was president
GenTom
Hilary = Anti-gaming laws!
hillary is not has bad has al gores wife tho and she will not hamper on anything that makes money for this country which is game sells if anything she will just make sure the right age groups are getting the right games
Who knows? Americans are sort of crazy. Examples: Ronald Regan was president, Schwartzeneger is governor of California, and Jesse "The Body" Ventura was governer of Minnesota (or was it ND?). Based on that I think the next president will be either Sylvester Stalone, or Vince McMahnon, with Donald Duck most likely serving as vice president.
I pulling for Obama but if Hillary gets on the Ballet Ill go ahead and vote for her the last thing we need is another Republican behind that particular desk
The question is pretty straight forward. Who do you want to be the next President, but more importantly why do you want this person to be the next President?PancakesNBacon
Ron Paul. He's the only person running who I agree with completely...even though we don't agree on anything really. I agree with him on everything because he believes it is my right to live freely. I would never encroach on his freedom and he would never encroach on mine. That's how we agree. Mutual respect.
Obama is the only person with a chance of winning the primaries that I would vote for otherwise. Still...not a big fan of him but he's better than any republican besides Ron Paul.
i want hillary clinton to be are next prez because BIll clinton will get to throw his two cents in
plus times where wayyy more better and peaceful when clinton was president
NaiKoN9293
Bill Clinton ran a very neconservative agenda. He was bombing Iraq and putting sanctions on them he then signed the precursor to war in 1998. He signed nafta, telcom act of 96, wto, did nothing to end the war on drugs. he was a horrible president and hillary would be at least as bad.
Everybody else running is a shallow scumbag hungry for power.
B05T0N
Yawnnnn and you're being conned by people who seemingly dont care about the power...
Try again. The difference is the above candidates have consistent records to back up their positions. You are voting for the establishment candidates that are in the mold of what we have today, which is to say they suck.
All your beloved necons are spend happy corporate con jobs, the big money democrats are just the same but maybe a little lighter version of that con job.
Everybody else running is a shallow scumbag hungry for power.
PrimordialMeme
Yawnnnn and you're being conned by people who seemingly dont care about the power...
Try again. The difference is the above candidates have consistent records to back up their positions. You are voting for the establishment candidates that are in the mold of what we have today, which is to say they suck.
All your beloved necons are spend happy corporate con jobs, the big money democrats are just the same but maybe a little lighter version of that con job.
I have no problem with the 'mold' of today. As I said before, no matter who's in office, we're screwed. The people you want in office are nutjobs.Â
Don't really care. I just hope they get the same treatment that GW got.
Because we have to treat every president equally.
comp_atkins
the threatment they get should be based on how much they f--- up the country.... in bush's case, a lot
So when nothing really changes, which I believe it won't, they should get the same treatment. They better. I better see some hate in this forum in '09.
Ron Paul is a little extreme for me. I don't know who I will vote for though, considering this is my first election. (Going to be 18 next year in June)
Log in to comment