The Truth About The Economy

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GhostOfKosh1
GhostOfKosh1

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 GhostOfKosh1
Member since 2008 • 144 Posts

What needs to happen is a switch from fiat money, to a hard asset standard. Anything of value can be represented by paper. But paper its self shouldnt have value that exceeds its self. Thats the essence of our economic woes. Its really terrible, because its not just the United States thats effected by this.UNHOLY_basic
If a vase is cracked you can't just fix it by replacing some of the dirt inside the vase.


Ps: You do seem smarter than most on the subject though, out of curiosity do you study/teach it?

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#52 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

and how would you know.

honestly.

Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

This whole crisis is just about spending money you can't spend, and America tries to solve it by spending even more money they can't spend. If you'd look at the real wealth of all countries in the world, Asian countries are catching up, or have catched up the USA already. Soon they'll own a big part of it, and I wonder what will happen then. I don't think the dollar will be worth a lot at the end of this crisis.

These movies really fail with the dramatic music. Why not do without music, or barely any music. It isn't like Ron Paul is some sort of prophet.

Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts
75% of your BNP is based on consuming goods you only can afford by getting into debt, Americans its over. The dollar is the only thing that are kepping you from drowning, but if you have read the news lately the dollar is crashing.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts

Silly people in this thread are silly.

Your getting the facts thrown in your face and you go on to bash the music because its propoganda. Way to dodge the fricking point fools!

wake up and stop messing with our country you damn ignorants!

Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts

Silly people in this thread are silly.

Your getting the facts thrown in your face and you go on to bash the music because its propoganda. Way to dodge the fricking point fools!

wake up and stop messing with our country you damn ignorants!

Yongying
Beacuse it is much easier for people to do nothing and ignore it then actually do something. And for the people that think that they can just print money to save the economy. Its like saying to a obesed person that want to loose weight to eat more.
Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts

[QUOTE="Athene_Wins"]I smell gang violence and uprisings.... and I live in canada, and thank's to the U.S.A, we will feel the shockwaves of this **** hole the U.S. dug the world into.UnknownSniper65

yeah! Blame America for all our problems!

Closed the video as soon as I saw the Ron Paul quote

we can safely say that if we ever need advice on politics, we won't come to you.

Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts

Totally asinine? "Paul believes thatsecularismin America is a "war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation's Christian heritage."

Please, capitalism did not solve the problem of child labor, it created it. Government regulation solved that problem.

MCPresident

capitilsm (corporatism) creates poverty all around the world. goverment regulation solved nothing.

Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts

[quote="UNHOLY_basic"] What needs to happen is a switch from fiat money, to a hard asset standard. Anything of value can be represented by paper. But paper its self shouldnt have value that exceeds its self. Thats the essence of our economic woes. Its really terrible, because its not just the United States thats effected by this.GhostOfKosh1

If a vase is cracked you can't just fix it by replacing some of the dirt inside the vase.

Ps: You do seem smarter than most on the subject though, out of curiosity do you study/teach it?

dood thats pretty basic stuff. its no wonder were in this mess now.

Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts
[QUOTE="MCPresident"]

Totally asinine? "Paul believes thatsecularismin America is a "war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation's Christian heritage."

Please, capitalism did not solve the problem of child labor, it created it. Government regulation solved that problem.

x_Martyr_x

capitilsm (corporatism) creates poverty all around the world. goverment regulation solved nothing.

Wow if you really belive that why doesent you move to great countrys like Cuba ant North Korea. Capitalism is not perfect becuase Humans is not perfect. But its the best system we have today. And btw never before in history people have had it as good as they have today.
Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts
[QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"][QUOTE="MCPresident"]

Totally asinine? "Paul believes thatsecularismin America is a "war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation's Christian heritage."

Please, capitalism did not solve the problem of child labor, it created it. Government regulation solved that problem.

Rip870

capitilsm (corporatism) creates poverty all around the world. goverment regulation solved nothing.

Wow if you really belive that why doesent you move to great countrys like Cuba ant North Korea. Capitalism is not perfect becuase Humans is not perfect. But its the best system we have today. And btw never before in history people have had it as good as they have today.

good god you are sheltered. if you were born on the other side of the world you would be singing a different tune about how "good we have it today."

stop thinking about yourself and remember the is more to the world than your tiny bubble. all you have to do is drive to the ghetto to see the wonderfull effect corporatism is having on society.

Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts
So what are you saying? That i should starve becuse people in other parts in the world starve. And how would that help the people that are starving. Your just another spoiled brainwashed socialist that dont have a clue how good the capitalist system is.
Avatar image for Makemap
Makemap

3755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 Makemap
Member since 2007 • 3755 Posts

I smell gang violence and uprisings.... and I live in canada, and thank's to the U.S.A, we will feel the shockwaves of this **** hole the U.S. dug the world into.Athene_Wins

They tend to follow the money but, not the nature.

Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
So what are you saying? That i should starve becuse people in other parts in the world starve. And how would that help the people that are starving. Your just another spoiled brainwashed socialist that dont have a clue how good the capitalist system is.Rip870
to be honest, nobody knows how good the capitalist system is. Capitalism is a very very distant memory.
Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts
[QUOTE="Rip870"]So what are you saying? That i should starve becuse people in other parts in the world starve. And how would that help the people that are starving. Your just another spoiled brainwashed socialist that dont have a clue how good the capitalist system is.UNHOLY_basic
to be honest, nobody knows how good the capitalist system is. Capitalism is a very very distant memory.

No free market is. But even todays capitalism beat every other system. Just ask the 400 million chinese our the 300 million Indian that has come up from poverty.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="Rip870"]So what are you saying? That i should starve becuse people in other parts in the world starve. And how would that help the people that are starving. Your just another spoiled brainwashed socialist that dont have a clue how good the capitalist system is.Rip870
to be honest, nobody knows how good the capitalist system is. Capitalism is a very very distant memory.

No free market is. But even todays capitalism beat every other system. Just ask the 400 million chinese our the 300 million Indian that has come up from poverty.

its not capitalism, its called corporatism. anytime a state and a business work together it ceases to be capitalism. Yeah, more free trade is better for everyone however what were doing now is actually really bad if you look into what corporatism really is
Avatar image for SuperBallsBerg
SuperBallsBerg

150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 SuperBallsBerg
Member since 2008 • 150 Posts
Saying that the US is responsible for the worlds decline financially is the same as saying that it's US fault when it does well and the rest of the world does too. Eat it with a dork.
Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts
[QUOTE="Rip870"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_bUNHOLY_basic
its not capitalism, its called corporatism. anytime a state and a business work together it ceases to be capitalism. Yeah, more free trade is better for everyone however what were doing now is actually really bad if you look into what corporatism really is

Yeah free market capitalism its the best but you can not have capitalism without getting corporatism in the end their is to much power and money involved. Dont get me wrong im against corporatism but i think its impossible to prevent it from happening.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="Rip870"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_bRip870
its not capitalism, its called corporatism. anytime a state and a business work together it ceases to be capitalism. Yeah, more free trade is better for everyone however what were doing now is actually really bad if you look into what corporatism really is

Yeah free market capitalism its the best but you can not have capitalism without getting corporatism in the end their is to much power and money involved. Dont get me wrong im against corporatism but i think its impossible to prevent it from happening.

corpoatism happens when the state and corporations merg. keynesian "capitalism" started this mess. if the government stays out of the economy, we'll have it good. The problem with our democratic system (which is actually a republic ftr) is that lazy people vote themselves money by saying theyre looking out for the poor people (who end up becoming more poor because of it) and then they say well we cant have these corporations go under, our economy will enver recover (which is bs) protectionism = nationalism and nationalism is just one part to fascism. Mussolini described fascism to be more correctly named corporatism.
Avatar image for inyourface_12
inyourface_12

14757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 inyourface_12
Member since 2006 • 14757 Posts
the truth about the american economy is that the federal government forced banks and other financial institutions to give people money that they could never pay back and got us into this situation.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="MCPresident"]Yeah, and because of that free market over the late 18th and early 19th century, the US became the richest, and most powerful country in the world. Since the 80s China's economy has become more and more free, and as a result they have the fastest growing economy in the world right now, they are not far from becoming the most powerful nation in the world because of capitalism. I agree Ron Paul has some crazy ideas about some stuff (like trying to immediately become an isolationist nation again, and leaving a vacuum in the world), but most of his ideas on the economy are right.Jacobistheman
Uhh no it wasn't.. The United States was not the most powerful nation of the time.. Those goes to places like Germany pre WW1..
[QUOTE="MCPresident"]

All you Paulites recycling his pro gold standard rhetoric need to look at what some actual economists think about that idea. In short, its not the answer. Ron Paul is not the answer. Somehow he gained immense internet popularity, which is strange to me, based on what he supports. Ron Paul wants to get everything back to how it was when the Constitution was written, including ending the secularization of the country. Some of you need to stop watching Youtube videos about him and actually look at what he wants.

Also, what exactly does "allowing capitalism to do its job" entail? We had pure laissez faire capitalism in the late 19th century. We also had the top 10% of the country holding 75% of the country's wealth. Thats what "allowing capitalism to do its job" does.

UNHOLY_basic
You should probably take your own advice. Ron Paul dosent want to remove secularization of the country. thats completely asinine, or its a flat out lie on your behalf. Most economist are pro gold standard. Ron Paul is pro hard asset standard, which is similar. Im gonna bet you dont know the difference between the gold standard and the fiat system, nor do you know the pros and con of either. Capitalism ended child labor through creating actual wealth and making the standard of living higher. It does this by eradicating bad business practice and forcing responsibility upon people. Thats what capitalism doing its job means. First thing we gotta do is allow capitalism to exist in the first place.

Actually pro Union progressives ended child labor.. The people seen as "big government" not the pro business people.. If the pro business people had their way workers for much longer would have little safety and children would work for much longer through the 1900s. Perhapes you should look this up? Because the ending of child labor had nothing to do with the capitalism it was strictly the progressive movement backed by Teddy Roosevelt, Taft to Wilson.. Taft was the one that passed it.. Infact the progressive movement was in opostiion to complete capitalism because of worker abuse, low wages, etc etc.. This is not argueing the other poitns, but clearly you don't know your history.. The US was not economically booming in the 1901-1910. There were many problems.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"][QUOTE="MCPresident"] Uhh no it wasn't.. The United States was not the most powerful nation of the time.. Those goes to places like Germany pre WW1.. [QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="MCPresident"]

All you Paulites recycling his pro gold standard rhetoric need to look at what some actual economists think about that idea. In short, its not the answer. Ron Paul is not the answer. Somehow he gained immense internet popularity, which is strange to me, based on what he supports. Ron Paul wants to get everything back to how it was when the Constitution was written, including ending the secularization of the country. Some of you need to stop watching Youtube videos about him and actually look at what he wants.

Also, what exactly does "allowing capitalism to do its job" entail? We had pure laissez faire capitalism in the late 19th century. We also had the top 10% of the country holding 75% of the country's wealth. Thats what "allowing capitalism to do its job" does.

sSubZerOo
You should probably take your own advice. Ron Paul dosent want to remove secularization of the country. thats completely asinine, or its a flat out lie on your behalf. Most economist are pro gold standard. Ron Paul is pro hard asset standard, which is similar. Im gonna bet you dont know the difference between the gold standard and the fiat system, nor do you know the pros and con of either. Capitalism ended child labor through creating actual wealth and making the standard of living higher. It does this by eradicating bad business practice and forcing responsibility upon people. Thats what capitalism doing its job means. First thing we gotta do is allow capitalism to exist in the first place.

Actually pro Union progressives ended child labor.. The people seen as "big government" not the pro business people.. If the pro business people had their way workers for much longer would have little safety and children would work for much longer through the 1900s. Perhapes you should look this up? Because the ending of child labor had nothing to do with the capitalism it was strictly the progressive movement backed by Teddy Roosevelt, Taft to Wilson.. Taft was the one that passed it.. Infact the progressive movement was in opostiion to complete capitalism because of worker abuse, low wages, etc etc.. This is not argueing the other poitns, but clearly you don't know your history.. The US was not economically booming in the 1901-1910. There were many problems.

Real wages rose, and wealth did too. Once wealth started to rise it became easier to send your kids to school. Unions may have put the final nail in the coffin, however wealth was created. You make bold claims. I know from talking to you in the past that youre not interested in facts, but here you go anyway: http://mises.org/story/2858
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Jacobistheman"] You should probably take your own advice. Ron Paul dosent want to remove secularization of the country. thats completely asinine, or its a flat out lie on your behalf. Most economist are pro gold standard. Ron Paul is pro hard asset standard, which is similar. Im gonna bet you dont know the difference between the gold standard and the fiat system, nor do you know the pros and con of either. Capitalism ended child labor through creating actual wealth and making the standard of living higher. It does this by eradicating bad business practice and forcing responsibility upon people. Thats what capitalism doing its job means. First thing we gotta do is allow capitalism to exist in the first place.UNHOLY_basic
Actually pro Union progressives ended child labor.. The people seen as "big government" not the pro business people.. If the pro business people had their way workers for much longer would have little safety and children would work for much longer through the 1900s. Perhapes you should look this up? Because the ending of child labor had nothing to do with the capitalism it was strictly the progressive movement backed by Teddy Roosevelt, Taft to Wilson.. Taft was the one that passed it.. Infact the progressive movement was in opostiion to complete capitalism because of worker abuse, low wages, etc etc.. This is not argueing the other poitns, but clearly you don't know your history.. The US was not economically booming in the 1901-1910. There were many problems.

Real wages rose, and wealth did too. Once wealth started to rise it became easier to send your kids to school. Unions may have put the final nail in the coffin, however wealth was created. You make bold claims. I know from talking to you in the past that youre not interested in facts, but here you go anyway: http://mises.org/story/2858

How bout you read a history book of the 1880s to the 1920s? Racism was rampent not just in the stereotypical minorities.. But of "new immigrants" which were predominatlely italian and eastern european coutnries.. Sure child labor would have fell for the WHITES possibly there.. But the new immigrants and minorities had NONE such possibility.. They were seen as inferior and were given dangerous low paying jobs such as Steel Mill where there was no chance of moving on... Wages did not raise for them.. You know how people such as Caranagie steel became so big? It was because of Vertical Intergration, a practice of absolute contorl of the workings of your government.. So much that they forced most of these labor workers into slave labor.. You honestly think it was because of flat out capitalism that hings got better? this is a oversimplification if anything.. Infact soem of these monopolies forced down wages even further because they could.. And if they disareed they fired them and black listed.. Wages only predominately started raising with unions and the entire labor movmeent. And the ban on child labor WAS MADE BY THE PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT NOT BECAUSE OF CAPITALISM.. WHAT STARTED IT? Muck rakers, namely people such as the guy who wrote the Jungle, which was a ghastly true story on the practices of the chicago slaughter industry.. The progressive movement did not rise form capitalism iether, it rose form Populist movement which was crushe dabou tfarmers getting destroyed by the market.. THE UNION MOVEMENT IS WHAT ROSE THE WAGES for the working class.. These businesses had absolute control of these workers lives.. If you seriously think that because of capitalist development magically rose the worker wages, then you just don't have a grasp of history during that period of time.

Its precious too that youthink that complete capitalism is the solution of everything.. No it wasn't, its what lowered wages, crusehd workers rights etc etc.. Through the 1880s workers had no way of progressing in a certain point.. And befor ethe anti trust acts, monopolies were forming cartels iwth other businesses to further controlt he worker base.. Disagree with your employee and quit? Guess what you get black listed and may not be able to get a job in the entire state or region in the US.. Capitalism with out government intervention of any kind is just as bad as any other form in government.. Because what happens i you have a select few elite controling many, with the many have no way of moving up.. Businesses were curshed by monopolies.. and these workers were forced into stereotypes.. The 1880's to 1910's were not known for huge economic development compare dto eras such as the roaring 20s or the 1950s.. It was specifically with the progressive movement which was mainly anti big buisness, and pro union.. Taft passed the child labor act, its LAW, it was not stopped through development of capitalism.. IT was due to teh uprising concern of workers being abused.

Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#74 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="Athene_Wins"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"] it all starts with the banks, they wouldnt give people the opprotunity to live outside of their means if the banks werent living out side of their means in the first place. It seems like you have interest in economics, I think youll find this website interesting www.mises.org have fun.UNHOLY_basic

Im not interested all that much, i just know that spending money you dont have is bad and that the U.S government and high rolling bankers put us in this mess, then the bankers even asked for a bailout right after they mess up!

yep. merging corporations with the government is bad. Corporatism is merely another word for fascism. If we allowed capitalism to do its job, we wouldnt be in this mess. But we keep pushing buttons, and well you know what happens.

lmao, I don't think you understand what corporatism is. Simply merging coprporations with the goverment is not Corpratism.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Actually pro Union progressives ended child labor.. The people seen as "big government" not the pro business people.. If the pro business people had their way workers for much longer would have little safety and children would work for much longer through the 1900s. Perhapes you should look this up? Because the ending of child labor had nothing to do with the capitalism it was strictly the progressive movement backed by Teddy Roosevelt, Taft to Wilson.. Taft was the one that passed it.. Infact the progressive movement was in opostiion to complete capitalism because of worker abuse, low wages, etc etc.. This is not argueing the other poitns, but clearly you don't know your history.. The US was not economically booming in the 1901-1910. There were many problems.sSubZerOo
Real wages rose, and wealth did too. Once wealth started to rise it became easier to send your kids to school. Unions may have put the final nail in the coffin, however wealth was created. You make bold claims. I know from talking to you in the past that youre not interested in facts, but here you go anyway: http://mises.org/story/2858

How bout you read a history book of the 1880s to the 1920s? Racism was rampent not just in the stereotypical minorities.. But of "new immigrants" which were predominatlely italian and eastern european coutnries.. Sure child labor would have fell for the WHITES possibly there.. But the new immigrants and minorities had NONE such possibility.. They were seen as inferior and were given dangerous low paying jobs such as Steel Mill where there was no chance of moving on... Wages did not raise for them.. You know how people such as Caranagie steel became so big? It was because of Vertical Intergration, a practice of absolute contorl of the workings of your government.. So much that they forced most of these labor workers into slave labor.. You honestly think it was because of flat out capitalism that hings got better? this is a oversimplification if anything.. Infact soem of these monopolies forced down wages even further because they could.. And if they disareed they fired them and black listed.. Wages only predominately started raising with unions and the entire labor movmeent. And the ban on child labor WAS MADE BY THE PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT NOT BECAUSE OF CAPITALISM.. WHAT STARTED IT? Muck rakers, namely people such as the guy who wrote the Jungle, which was a ghastly true story on the practices of the chicago slaughter industry.. The progressive movement did not rise form capitalism iether, it rose form Populist movement which was crushe dabou tfarmers getting destroyed by the market.. THE UNION MOVEMENT IS WHAT ROSE THE WAGES for the working class.. These businesses had absolute control of these workers lives.. If you seriously think that because of capitalist development magically rose the worker wages, then you just don't have a grasp of history during that period of time.

http://mises.org/story/2858 theres some history for you. the free market is how racism eventually ends, trading with people etc. If I own a business, it makes more sense to try and get everyone to buy from me, including blacks and such. The problem with this is that the government brought in legistlation, such as minimum wage which often times made it too expensive to hire minorities and immigrants. These problems still exist today, which is why people hire undocumented workers. Is this a crime? Legally yes, morally no. Yeah, they would probably have to work a low paying job as they came here for a while to build up wealth, but thats how it works. The laws youre saying took credit for ending child labor (completely false as my article proved this) are things that kept people poor in the first place. You need to give people an opprotunity. If that means working for low wages while you save and get more educated thats fine. Child labor in and of its self isnt a bad concept, t he evil factory work youre thinking ended because of increases in wealth and it became easier to send kids to school after parents started making more money.... Because of capitalism. You're pinpointing exactly why the government should stay out of the economy. You're talking about how business abused government. This shouldnt happen, keep them seperate. Its not an oversimplification. You're simply making statements with no reason to back them up.. Being allowed to Unionize is completely ok. If an employer wants to fire the entire union, then thats okay too. It might hurt the employer in the long run, if everyone disagrees with it. So in short, yes, its because of capitalism things got better http://mises.org/story/2858 As we all know, you wont read anything that isnt preaching to the choir. I honestly find your "debating" skills to be quite laughable. "GRRR CAPITALISM DIDNT DO IT UNIONS DID". How? "CAPITALISM DIDNT DO IT, UNIONS DID!" Care to explain? "CAPITALISM DIDNT DO IT UNIONS DID GRRRRRRR." "WE NEED MORE GOVERNMENT IN THE ECONOMY, YOU KNOW HOW CARANAGIA ABUSED ITS WORKERS? GOVERNMENT!" Circles are my favorite shape.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Where is my dinner? I guess my six foreigners haven't made it yet.:x Any other Americans here have this problem?
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="Athene_Wins"]

Im not interested all that much, i just know that spending money you dont have is bad and that the U.S government and high rolling bankers put us in this mess, then the bankers even asked for a bailout right after they mess up!

swizz-the-gamer
yep. merging corporations with the government is bad. Corporatism is merely another word for fascism. If we allowed capitalism to do its job, we wouldnt be in this mess. But we keep pushing buttons, and well you know what happens.

lmao, I don't think you understand what corporatism is. Simply merging coprporations with the goverment is not Corpratism.

lmao, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism I didnt say what youre implying. You're fishing here. Corporatism is where unelected bodies(corporations) create legislation, in other words corporations and government become the same thing. Its a simplification, but its still right. Grow up, please. If youre going to try and debate me, try not acting like a 17 year old.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#78 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"] yep. merging corporations with the government is bad. Corporatism is merely another word for fascism. If we allowed capitalism to do its job, we wouldnt be in this mess. But we keep pushing buttons, and well you know what happens.UNHOLY_basic
lmao, I don't think you understand what corporatism is. Simply merging coprporations with the goverment is not Corpratism.

lmao, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism I didnt say what youre implying. You're fishing here. Corporatism is where unelected bodies(corporations) create legislation, in other words corporations and government become the same thing. Its a simplification, but its still right. Grow up, please. If youre going to try and debate me, try not acting like a 17 year old.

There is no need to explain to me what it is, I understand it and I am fully against it. What I am saying is that simply merging corporations with the government is not corporatism... I'm also firmly against capitalism.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] lmao, I don't think you understand what corporatism is. Simply merging coprporations with the goverment is not Corpratism.swizz-the-gamer
lmao, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism I didnt say what youre implying. You're fishing here. Corporatism is where unelected bodies(corporations) create legislation, in other words corporations and government become the same thing. Its a simplification, but its still right. Grow up, please. If youre going to try and debate me, try not acting like a 17 year old.

There is no need to explain to me what it is, I understand it and I am fully against it. What I am saying is that simply merging corporations with the government is not corporatism... I'm also firmly against capitalism.

I know youre firmly against capitalism. But having corporations run the government is a very simple explaination of corporatism. Which the current US economy resembles. as a very hardcore capitalist, I am also against corporatism.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#80 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"] lmao, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism I didnt say what youre implying. You're fishing here. Corporatism is where unelected bodies(corporations) create legislation, in other words corporations and government become the same thing. Its a simplification, but its still right. Grow up, please. If youre going to try and debate me, try not acting like a 17 year old.UNHOLY_basic
There is no need to explain to me what it is, I understand it and I am fully against it. What I am saying is that simply merging corporations with the government is not corporatism... I'm also firmly against capitalism.

I know youre firmly against capitalism. But having corporations run the government is a very simple explaination of corporatism. Which the current US economy resembles. as a very hardcore capitalist, I am also against corporatism.

How do you know i'm firmly against capitalism?
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] There is no need to explain to me what it is, I understand it and I am fully against it. What I am saying is that simply merging corporations with the government is not corporatism... I'm also firmly against capitalism. swizz-the-gamer
I know youre firmly against capitalism. But having corporations run the government is a very simple explaination of corporatism. Which the current US economy resembles. as a very hardcore capitalist, I am also against corporatism.

How do you know i'm firmly against capitalism?

your sig tipped me off.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"] I know youre firmly against capitalism. But having corporations run the government is a very simple explaination of corporatism. Which the current US economy resembles. as a very hardcore capitalist, I am also against corporatism.UNHOLY_basic
How do you know i'm firmly against capitalism?

your sig tipped me off.

Well, I do agree that the US economy does resemble corpatism, but to me the US has always looked corporatist. Corporations have a lot of power in your government, and it's all done while pretending to be a noble endevour in the interst of freedom. To be honest, US capitalism is a joke. Exploitation of the proletariat is more obvious and disgusting in the US than any other western country.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] How do you know i'm firmly against capitalism?swizz-the-gamer
your sig tipped me off.

Well, I do agree that the US economy does resemble corpatism, but to me the US has always looked corporatist. Corporations have a lot of power in your government, and it's all done while pretending to be a noble endevour in the interst of freedom. To be honest, US capitalism is a joke. Exploitation of the proletariat is more obvious and disgusting in the US than any other western country.

the us has been corporatist for a very long time. one thing im jealous about that the UK has is that many of your political parties actually have a chance. We arent a two party system by design, but our government is in bed with big business and the media wont put the libertarians, greens, or constitutionals in the debates or largely even mention them.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#84 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"] your sig tipped me off.UNHOLY_basic
Well, I do agree that the US economy does resemble corpatism, but to me the US has always looked corporatist. Corporations have a lot of power in your government, and it's all done while pretending to be a noble endevour in the interst of freedom. To be honest, US capitalism is a joke. Exploitation of the proletariat is more obvious and disgusting in the US than any other western country.

the us has been corporatist for a very long time. one thing im jealous about that the UK has is that many of your political parties actually have a chance. We arent a two party system by design, but our government is in bed with big business and the media wont put the libertarians, greens, or constitutionals in the debates or largely even mention them.

All a product of capitalism... How can you still support it?
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] Well, I do agree that the US economy does resemble corpatism, but to me the US has always looked corporatist. Corporations have a lot of power in your government, and it's all done while pretending to be a noble endevour in the interst of freedom. To be honest, US capitalism is a joke. Exploitation of the proletariat is more obvious and disgusting in the US than any other western country. swizz-the-gamer
the us has been corporatist for a very long time. one thing im jealous about that the UK has is that many of your political parties actually have a chance. We arent a two party system by design, but our government is in bed with big business and the media wont put the libertarians, greens, or constitutionals in the debates or largely even mention them.

All a product of capitalism... How can you still support it?

my idea of capitalism is far different than what most people see capitalism as. I believe government and the economy must stay away from each other. the "right wing" in our country says they are the capitalist, yet they are protectionist. Not that I think you're interested in becoming a capitalist yourself but if you'd like to get a more detailed explaination of what I believe (and other capitalists who arent republican) you can check out http://www.mises.org I dont necessarily believe in EVERYTHING they say, but its fairly close.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#86 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"] the us has been corporatist for a very long time. one thing im jealous about that the UK has is that many of your political parties actually have a chance. We arent a two party system by design, but our government is in bed with big business and the media wont put the libertarians, greens, or constitutionals in the debates or largely even mention them. UNHOLY_basic
All a product of capitalism... How can you still support it?

my idea of capitalism is far different than what most people see capitalism as. I believe government and the economy must stay away from each other. the "right wing" in our country says they are the capitalist, yet they are protectionist. Not that I think you're interested in becoming a capitalist yourself but if you'd like to get a more detailed explaination of what I believe (and other capitalists who arent republican) you can check out http://www.mises.org I dont necessarily believe in EVERYTHING they say, but its fairly close.

Sound like what we call 'one nation Conservatives here in England.
Avatar image for Frattracide
Frattracide

5395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 Frattracide
Member since 2005 • 5395 Posts

Silly people in this thread are silly.

Your getting the facts thrown in your face and you go on to bash the music because its propoganda. Way to dodge the fricking point fools!

wake up and stop messing with our country you damn ignorants!

Yongying
I think something should be said about sensationalism. The scary music thing and quote mining did bother me about the movie, regardless of my position on the subject. Even if you are convinced your position is right no matter how you arrived at that conclusion, you shouldn't try to manipulate emotions to get people on your side. In the words of Voltaire, "Anything to stupid too be said is sung"
Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts

So what are you saying? That i should starve becuse people in other parts in the world starve. And how would that help the people that are starving. Your just another spoiled brainwashed socialist that dont have a clue how good the capitalist system is.Rip870

i dont know where to start, other than telling you that everyone you said is wrong. you need to do some research, or just avoid threads like this. i did lol at you calling me spoiled though, how ironic.

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
the evil factory work you're thinking ended because of increases in wealth and it became easier to send kids to school after parents started making more money.... Because of capitalism.UNHOLY_basic
that's a lie. it took mandatory attendance at schools to make people send kids to school.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#90 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
I took that seriously until the Joker made an appearance at the end. Then it became too apparent that a college kid made this video in between watching michael moore movies.
Avatar image for kruesader
kruesader

6443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 kruesader
Member since 2006 • 6443 Posts
I think Colbert explains it best.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#92 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
All a product of capitalism... How can you still support it?swizz-the-gamer
Because socialism is hardly any better. America is an example of how fierce capitalism and a free market, maintained under the idea of "freedom", can ultimately get out of control and destroy the economy. But look at the UK. Here we have a government which, contrary to america letting the businesses and corporations do their thing, interferes with absolutely everything to the point where government has become so ridiculously huge that if Labour dont win the next election a significant chunk of the population will be out of work. How insane is that? They're allowed themselves to become so massive that being voted out will actually affect the employment rate. Capitalism has messed things up in America, and government intervention and interference has messed everything up here. Just wait until all those pensions Gordon Brown has thrown about start being collected. Then we'll really be in the ****.
Avatar image for TenP
TenP

3338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#93 TenP
Member since 2006 • 3338 Posts
All I have to say about that video is... RAWN PAWL!!!!!11!!1
Avatar image for Rip870
Rip870

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Rip870
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts

[QUOTE="Rip870"]So what are you saying? That i should starve becuse people in other parts in the world starve. And how would that help the people that are starving. Your just another spoiled brainwashed socialist that dont have a clue how good the capitalist system is.x_Martyr_x

i dont know where to start, other than telling you that everyone you said is wrong. you need to do some research, or just avoid threads like this. i did lol at you calling me spoiled though, how ironic.

Nice comeback but what can i expect from a socialist. Instead of answer my questions you attack my knowlege.But i guess that what you get by getting talking points by UCLA. Btw why dont you answer my first question.Second, name one system that have got so many people out of poverty as capitalism has? And if you against it what would you replace it with and why would it work better ?
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
Second, name one system that have got so many people out of poverty as capitalism has? Rip870
Anarchy, for the simple fact that poverty implies that some people are better off.
Avatar image for MCPresident
MCPresident

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 MCPresident
Member since 2005 • 426 Posts

[QUOTE="Rip870"]Second, name one system that have got so many people out of poverty as capitalism has? Hewkii
Anarchy, for the simple fact that poverty implies that some people are better off.

Anarchy? Anarchy has never done anything for anyone, that would be counterintuitive. Its also never been implemented on a wide scale, so its reallyirresponsible to judge its merits.

What some here are seeing as ideal capitalism, with no governmentinvolvementat all, would result inoligopolies, sort of like Standard Oil and United Steel, except extrapolated to an even greater degree, because the McKinley Act prohibited trusts before they could get too out of control. How does pure capitalism, or libertarianism for that matter, deal with oligopolies?

Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"]the evil factory work you're thinking ended because of increases in wealth and it became easier to send kids to school after parents started making more money.... Because of capitalism.Hewkii
that's a lie. it took mandatory attendance at schools to make people send kids to school.

thats a lie. I never said capitalism made their parents send them to school. "it became easier to send kids to school after parents started making more money" Yup. Readin is sweet.
Avatar image for Yongying
Yongying

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Yongying
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Yongying"]

Silly people in this thread are silly.

Your getting the facts thrown in your face and you go on to bash the music because its propoganda. Way to dodge the fricking point fools!

wake up and stop messing with our country you damn ignorants!

Frattracide
I think something should be said about sensationalism. The scary music thing and quote mining did bother me about the movie, regardless of my position on the subject. Even if you are convinced your position is right no matter how you arrived at that conclusion, you shouldn't try to manipulate emotions to get people on your side. In the words of Voltaire, "Anything to stupid too be said is sung"

The first problem is that you let the Music bother you...it bothers you because it tries to get the message across to people who, watch movie trailers then watch the movie, buy video games after seeing the awesome add, buy makeup after watching the model on tv use it, and many many other things. People are too quick to dismiss the real issues with the video because they live in denial. Instead of ignoring the music and how the video is constructed, people have ignored what the video is actually all about, which deserves a /facepalm