The Universe - Are people really this stupid?

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38926 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I think that to call people who don't believe in aliens "stupid" is rather insulting, as I don't believe there are any aliens out there.:|xaos

Do you have any reason to believe that? Or is it because you're Christian?

In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, isn't that as good a reason for his belief as any that an alien enthusiast could offer?

same thing can be said for god. :wink:

Avatar image for mimic-Denmark
mimic-Denmark

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 mimic-Denmark
Member since 2006 • 4382 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I think that to call people who don't believe in aliens "stupid" is rather insulting, as I don't believe there are any aliens out there.:|comp_atkins

Do you have any reason to believe that? Or is it because you're Christian?

In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, isn't that as good a reason for his belief as any that an alien enthusiast could offer?

same thing can be said for god. :wink:

Indeed, but god is not Logic, other life forms are.

Avatar image for hair001
hair001

1202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 hair001
Member since 2005 • 1202 Posts
It's highly proberbale that we are not the only intelgient life ein the Universe but it is possible that there may be no other inteligent life. As of now we can't say that alien life does exist, we have no evidence to suppor the claim
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#55 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
I think we are alone in this universe and there is nothing out there
Avatar image for GettingTired
GettingTired

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 GettingTired
Member since 2006 • 5994 Posts
[QUOTE="Conanfan1"][QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Life on Earth intelegent??

If people find this funny then all is lost for life on Earth

daqua_99

Seriously, that's the funniest thing I've ever seen.

Then all hope for any known intelegence in our universe is gone ...

Neither of you can even spell "intelligent" right, so I'd get basic grammar down first before insulting others.

Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#57 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Of course there are countless galaxies, stars and planets out there, but when you reduce that to the amount of habitable places in our Universe, Earth is the only one as far as we know. Even though Earth is perfect for harbouring life, there is still only one intelligent species among the billions that have ever existed here. Even if there are even millions of other civilizations out there, we may never even get to contact them.Buffalo_Soulja

Astronomers have been finding more and more suitable planets.. Infact they have put down to the point where they think every 1/20th they find is possibly suitable for life.

Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts

Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.jim_shorts
While that's true, conditions don't have to be absolutely perfect. Mars could've sustained life some millions of years ago, albeit probably only microorganisms.

I'm sure it's possible, but there's no real scientific evidence. Logically speaking, there should be, and in fact it's more than likely, but we have no proof. It's also more than likely we will never see an alien being in our lifetime and our children's lifetime and grandchildren's lifetime, so on and so forth.

And for people arguing for/against aliens existing, here is the Goldilock's phenomenon, which is the guidelines used to see if carbon-based lifeforms could live in an area. They are a set of guidelines, but they aren't perfect, so read at your own discretion (not very long read, either, just a paragraph or two).

Avatar image for coolcon2000
coolcon2000

9410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#60 coolcon2000
Member since 2005 • 9410 Posts
The lowest possible of intelltellence is right here on Gamespot....They are called fanboys.....and they are in the system wars thread...
Avatar image for jodamn
jodamn

893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#61 jodamn
Member since 2007 • 893 Posts
How can we be sure if we don't look? To the spaceships! :D
Avatar image for coolcon2000
coolcon2000

9410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#62 coolcon2000
Member since 2005 • 9410 Posts
:o Lets go! :D
Avatar image for tman93
tman93

7769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#63 tman93
Member since 2006 • 7769 Posts

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.Greatgone12

Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I think that to call people who don't believe in aliens "stupid" is rather insulting, as I don't believe there are any aliens out there.:|mimic-Denmark

Do you have any reason to believe that? Or is it because you're Christian?

In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, isn't that as good a reason for his belief as any that an alien enthusiast could offer?

same thing can be said for god. :wink:

Indeed, but god is not Logic, other life forms are.

comp_atkins, sure; as I said, in the absence of other evidence :) mimic, to me, it's more logical to not make definitive statements without evidence. 120 years ago it was "logic" that light was waves; I'm not saying that I think God falls within the sphere of scientific study (because I definitelly don't), but claiming that "logic dictates that other life forms exist" is no more scientific without actual evidence.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Greatgone12"]

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.tman93

Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

Scientists are pretty careful to refer to "life as we know it", meaning cardon-based, highly dependent on water, etc, but I think also things like the culutural reach of Star Trek have made people think that its trivially easy for there to be a life form based on silicon or,that the universe is packed full of "energy beings" :)
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#66 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.tman93
Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about conditions in the surrounding galaxy.
Avatar image for TheStatusQuo
TheStatusQuo

4994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 TheStatusQuo
Member since 2004 • 4994 Posts

The question should not be posed "whether there exists intelligent life?" because intelligence has no barring on being smart. Intelligence refers to an organism's ability to interact with the environment bythe use of 5 senses that are equally developed which canhaveattributesto have limbs that can grasp things with precision, and sensory receptors that can tell its brain that there are three dimensional objects that have a close or far limit based on stereo-scopic layers. Fact remains that not all organisms can make use of the color spectrum by gaining the vast amount of hues our eyes can reflect by our optics.

If there is an idea of other worldsholding what you may refer as a civilization, then it only means that a group of beings have established a centralized form of government, and thereby being deemedcivil.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="tman93"][QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.jim_shorts
Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about conditions in the surrounding galaxy.

Specifically, the habitable zone, both within solar systems and within galaxies at large.
Avatar image for Bandit_Haze
Bandit_Haze

4950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 Bandit_Haze
Member since 2005 • 4950 Posts
There are millions of stars in each galaxy and billions upon billions (possibly trillions) of galaxies in the universe, so the question should not be "Is there intelligent life?"

It should really just be a statement. "We are not the only civilization, but we will never find the other civilizations that do exist."

What do you think?

Light_Destroyer

i think that its a little naive to think we are the only intelligent life form (though tbt, we're not really that intelligent) like you say there are billions if not trillions of galaxies, i think its very possible that for species exists on other planets

however, until it is proven (which may be never) it is always going to be a question of "is there, life on other planets?"

Avatar image for Light_Destroyer
Light_Destroyer

2013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 Light_Destroyer
Member since 2004 • 2013 Posts

I just don't like how the creatures on this planet believe we are the center of the universe. A lot of people contradict themselves when they say things like, "Yes the universe is very big and has billions of places, but it is virtually impossible that life exists because the 1/10^987557967558949th planets that we have found cannot sustain life.

It is very irrational (and unscientific) to just make a conclusion on a theory that should be left open until we either A) Find Life or B) Create the technology that scans the entire universe until we know everything that is on the surface of every planet.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

I just don't like how the creatures on this planet believe we are the center of the universe. A lot of people contradict themselves when they say things like, "Yes the universe is very big and has billions of places, but it is virtually impossible that life exists because the 1/10^987557967558949th planets that we have found cannot sustain life.

It is very irrational (and unscientific) to just make a conclusion on a theory that should be left open until we either A) Find Life or B) Create the technology that scans the entire universe until we know everything that is on the surface of every planet.

Light_Destroyer
Barring a change in the laws of physics, we will never have B), so it's likely to remain an open question. Given the age of our solar system and the rate at which life developed on it, even if there is other life in our galaxy, our planet's biosphere is likely to be one of the oldest, given the lush and life-friendly conditions here. That suggests if we find life, it will require us going out and finding it, and that, in my opinion, is centuries away. My main argument is with your absolute certainty that sentient life exists and your dismissal of people who don't agree as "stupid." It strikes me as a form of fundamentalism, an absolute conviction that your beliefs are right, in the absence of any evidence.
Avatar image for syorks
syorks

2399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#72 syorks
Member since 2006 • 2399 Posts
But it has to be completely perfect conditions for life and as far as we know our planet is the only one that has all of those perfect conditions.
Avatar image for Light_Destroyer
Light_Destroyer

2013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 Light_Destroyer
Member since 2004 • 2013 Posts
[QUOTE="Light_Destroyer"]

I just don't like how the creatures on this planet believe we are the center of the universe. A lot of people contradict themselves when they say things like, "Yes the universe is very big and has billions of places, but it is virtually impossible that life exists because the 1/10^987557967558949th planets that we have found cannot sustain life.

It is very irrational (and unscientific) to just make a conclusion on a theory that should be left open until we either A) Find Life or B) Create the technology that scans the entire universe until we know everything that is on the surface of every planet.

xaos

Barring a change in the laws of physics, we will never have B), so it's likely to remain an open question. Given the age of our solar system and the rate at which life developed on it, even if there is other life in our galaxy, our planet's biosphere is likely to be one of the oldest, given the lush and life-friendly conditions here. That suggests if we find life, it will require us going out and finding it, and that, in my opinion, is centuries away. My main argument is with your absolute certainty that sentient life exists and your dismissal of people who don't agree as "stupid." It strikes me as a form of fundamentalism, an absolute conviction that your beliefs are right, in the absence of any evidence.

When I said stupid, I was really just trying to convey a sense that a lot of people don't consider all the factors of the universe and just dismiss it as an empty void with one tiny planet sustaining life.

Avatar image for Dethshoot
Dethshoot

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#74 Dethshoot
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts
[QUOTE="Greatgone12"]

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.tman93

Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

No. I think it's weird how some people think life can come out of no where :|

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#75 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts
Fermi Paradox If life were so easy to achieve, the galaxy would be teaming with it.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]Fermi Paradox If life were so easy to achieve, the galaxy would be teaming with it.

I responded to this the other day, and more or less in the same way that I did above, but life and radio frequency technology (which is the only way we could detect it) are far from equivalent. Life existed for hundreds of millions of years on Earth without it. Consider that, from the time Earth began emitting radio signals over a century ago, it would have reached less than 1% of our galaxy's so-called habitable zone. Ultimately, the question is just really hard to approach meaningfully given the vast scale of the universe and our uncertainty about the forms either life of sentience could take.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#77 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]Fermi Paradox If life were so easy to achieve, the galaxy would be teaming with it.

I responded to this the other day, and more or less in the same way that I did above, but life and radio frequency technology (which is the only way we could detect it) are far from equivalent. Life existed for hundreds of millions of years on Earth without it. Consider that, from the time Earth began emitting radio signals over a century ago, it would have reached less than 1% of our galaxy's so-called habitable zone. Ultimately, the question is just really hard to approach meaningfully given the vast scale of the universe and our uncertainty about the forms either life of sentience could take.

The idea is that if life is common, then intelligence has no more barrier to evolve than it did here on Earth. If even a very small percentage of life was intelligence, then our galaxy, given its age, should be fully colonized: we shouldn't have to rely on radio signals to detect other life. I believe the theory goes once space travel is achieved, galactic colonization takes ~50 million years. That's a blink of an eye compared to the age of the galaxy. So where is everybody? Even simple life should have spread through transpermia at this point if life were common. Unless all life is as young as it is here on Earth, which leads to a further question: are we the first?
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#78 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The odds of intelligent life not existing elsewhere in the universe are far lower than the odds that intelligent life does exist elsewhere. I would actually go as far as to say the odds of intelligent life existing elsewhere are 100%, we just haven't made contact yet.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]Fermi Paradox If life were so easy to achieve, the galaxy would be teaming with it.

I responded to this the other day, and more or less in the same way that I did above, but life and radio frequency technology (which is the only way we could detect it) are far from equivalent. Life existed for hundreds of millions of years on Earth without it. Consider that, from the time Earth began emitting radio signals over a century ago, it would have reached less than 1% of our galaxy's so-called habitable zone. Ultimately, the question is just really hard to approach meaningfully given the vast scale of the universe and our uncertainty about the forms either life of sentience could take.

The idea is that if life is common, then intelligence has no more barrier to evolve than it did here on Earth. If even a very small percentage of life was intelligence, then our galaxy, given its age, should be fully colonized: we shouldn't have to rely on radio signals to detect other life. I believe the theory goes once space travel is achieved, galactic colonization takes ~50 million years. That's a blink of an eye compared to the age of the galaxy. So where is everybody? Even simple life should have spread through transpermia at this point if life were common. Unless all life is as young as it is here on Earth, which leads to a further question: are we the first?

Transpermia is a very dubious method to me; viruses are about the only earth-based life forms (and their status as lifeforms is in question) that could survive hard vacuum, and I doubt many of those would survive an atmospheric re-entry. From my reading, it seems that estimates are that there are currently 20-200 million species on earth, Expanding that through the fossil record, I'll make an order of magnitude guess that 100 million to 1 billion species have ever existed on earth. Again, of those, only one has shown any capacity for leaving the earth or any activity whatsoever that would indicate life to a distant observer; that's 0.000001% based on the most conservative estimate. I don't know that I buy the colonization argument, though. Unless significantly superluminal travel ever became practical, or the life-forms were incredibly long-lived and had no need for things like food, I can't see galactic colonization as being as inevitable as presented there, nor do I see intelligence as inevitably emerging from any place where life might exist. I'm not trying to shoot down ideas here, just playing devil's advocate and trying to think critically about what is being proposed.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="jim_shorts"][QUOTE="tman93"][QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.xaos
Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about conditions in the surrounding galaxy.

Specifically, the habitable zone, both within solar systems and within galaxies at large.

The Hubble telescope has found around 350-500 million galaxies so far (thats just what we can see), each galaxy having a possible around 2 billion to a trillion stars in it. Each star could have dozens if not more planets around it, excluding the possibility of moons having life on it.. Lets not forget that this habitable zone can only be considered on a single star system, there are uncountable amounts of binary systems as well as other unique occurences in numbers we really can't fathom. And as I said earlier with the discovery of that one planet with water on it, it has lead to the idea and discovery due to our improving technology that every planet we look upon now that we originally couldn't its estimated that 1 out of every 20 planets may have conditions suitable for life.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#81 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

Transpermia is a very dubious method to me; viruses are about the only earth-based life forms (and their status as lifeforms is in question) that could survive hard vacuum,

Hard vacuums are used all the time in labs to PRESERVE bacteria samples. They take rather well to it. And as for re-entry, the interior of many meteorites survive relatively unscathed; depending upon composition and density, of course. And then there's extremophiles...
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="jim_shorts"][QUOTE="tman93"][QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.sSubZerOo

Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about conditions in the surrounding galaxy.

Specifically, the habitable zone, both within solar systems and within galaxies at large.

The Hubble telescope has found around 350-500 million galaxies so far (thats just what we can see), each galaxy having a possible around 2 billion to a trillion stars in it. Each star could have dozens if not more planets around it, excluding the possibility of moons having life on it.. Lets not forget that this habitable zone can only be considered on a single star system, there are uncountable amounts of binary systems as well as other unique occurences in numbers we really can't fathom. And as I said earlier with the discovery of that one planet with water on it, it has lead to the idea and discovery due to our improving technology that every planet we look upon now that we originally couldn't its estimated that 1 out of every 20 planets may have conditions suitable for life.

Sure, but until we detect life, I think it's unscientific and basically a matter of faith to assume that it is or is not there; that's all I'm saying.
Avatar image for d_eM_s
d_eM_s

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 d_eM_s
Member since 2005 • 533 Posts

After watching a few videos on youtube and looking at new pictures I know have a new understanding of the vastness of the universe.

I mean, I know people always say we are the only intelligent life in the universe, but how is that possible.

There are millions of stars in each galaxy and billions upon billions (possibly trillions) of galaxies in the universe, so the question should not be "Is there intelligent life?"

It should really just be a statement. "We are not the only civilization, but we will never find the other civilizations that do exist."

What do you think?

Light_Destroyer

I pretty much agree with you. To think that we are alone in the universe is just pretty stupid. By the way, the title of the thread is a bit misleading.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="jim_shorts"][QUOTE="tman93"][QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Conditions have to be so absolutely perfect for life to be sustained, that it is likely that we are the only intelligent life.xaos

Or, the alieans could not need oxygen, or not burn when its 2000 degrees. Its weirdhow people think alieans could exist, but say they have to be just like humans.

I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about conditions in the surrounding galaxy.

Specifically, the habitable zone, both within solar systems and within galaxies at large.

The Hubble telescope has found around 350-500 million galaxies so far (thats just what we can see), each galaxy having a possible around 2 billion to a trillion stars in it. Each star could have dozens if not more planets around it, excluding the possibility of moons having life on it.. Lets not forget that this habitable zone can only be considered on a single star system, there are uncountable amounts of binary systems as well as other unique occurences in numbers we really can't fathom. And as I said earlier with the discovery of that one planet with water on it, it has lead to the idea and discovery due to our improving technology that every planet we look upon now that we originally couldn't its estimated that 1 out of every 20 planets may have conditions suitable for life.

Sure, but until we detect life, I think it's unscientific and basically a matter of faith to assume that it is or is not there; that's all I'm saying.

I think the bigger question is when we will be able to even detect if there is life dozens of light years away for the "close" areas near us.

Avatar image for AquaMantor
AquaMantor

7571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#85 AquaMantor
Member since 2004 • 7571 Posts
If there is life on other planets, we'll never come into contact with it. Taking that into consideration, it doesn't really matter to us, anyway.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

Transpermia is a very dubious method to me; viruses are about the only earth-based life forms (and their status as lifeforms is in question) that could survive hard vacuum,

Hard vacuums are used all the time in labs to PRESERVE bacteria samples. They take rather well to it. And as for re-entry, the interior of many meteorites survive relatively unscathed; depending upon composition and density, of course. And then there's extremophiles...

I learned something new (re: vaccum-packed bacteria), so thanks for that; and yeah, extremophiles are quite amazing. The ones at ocean vents that metabolize sulphur compounds and are the only ones known to live completely independent of solar energy directly or indirectly just amaze me; they could survive nuclear winter O_O. I definitely agree that they have forced a broadening of "conceivable" biological processes.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I think that to call people who don't believe in aliens "stupid" is rather insulting, as I don't believe there are any aliens out there.:|jointed

Do you have any reason to believe that? Or is it because you're Christian?

What does Christianity have anything to do with it?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I think that to call people who don't believe in aliens "stupid" is rather insulting, as I don't believe there are any aliens out there.:|Silver_Dragon17

Do you have any reason to believe that? Or is it because you're Christian?

What does Christianity have anything to do with it?

Because its a bias? Your part of the creationist union, of course your gonna full out disagree with it regardless of any logical deductions.. Because life outside of earth would undermine the ideas of Adam and Eve, as well as other ideas. Religion for the most part has always shown man to be the most superior race to have existed.. I wonder what that would mean for religions if we infact came incontact with another sentient being.

Not saying its wrong but there is a reason why to question it.. For me I think its a very very high possibility, from teh vastness we have seen not to mention the astronomy discussion on how our solar system was created.. It seems very likely it has happened, but till there is facts this is just a idea.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#89 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"] I learned something new (re: vaccum-packed bacteria), so thanks for that; and yeah, extremophiles are quite amazing. The ones at ocean vents that metabolize sulphur compounds and are the only ones known to live completely independent of solar energy directly or indirectly just amaze me; they could survive nuclear winter O_O. I definitely agree that they have forced a broadening of "conceivable" biological processes.

There's been several high-profile discussions in scientific circles about whether or not life is destructible once it reaches planetary threshold. The current thinking is that if Earth were smacked by a large astro-body, bacteria would remain viable even in the resulting debris cloud. If life in the universe is much older than it is here on Earth, we'd see it all around us. It really doesn't have anything to do with intelligence. I'm not saying there isn't life out there, I just doubt it. If there is just life on Earth and nowhere else, I can accept that. If there is life on Earth and even one other place in the universe, I cannot accept that life isn't everywhere. So by reasoning, if life isn't everywhere, I cannot accept with confidence that life exists anywhere else but here. But I do believe that life from Earth will continue indefinitely, even after the demise of our planet, and whether or not we are still around.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"] I learned something new (re: vaccum-packed bacteria), so thanks for that; and yeah, extremophiles are quite amazing. The ones at ocean vents that metabolize sulphur compounds and are the only ones known to live completely independent of solar energy directly or indirectly just amaze me; they could survive nuclear winter O_O. I definitely agree that they have forced a broadening of "conceivable" biological processes.br0kenrabbit
There's been several high-profile discussions in scientific circles about whether or not life is destructible once it reaches planetary threshold. The current thinking is that if Earth were smacked by a large astro-body, bacteria would remain viable even in the resulting debris cloud. If life in the universe is much older than it is here on Earth, we'd see it all around us. It really doesn't have anything to do with intelligence. I'm not saying there isn't life out there, I just doubt it. If there is just life on Earth and nowhere else, I can accept that. If there is life on Earth and even one other place in the universe, I cannot accept that life isn't everywhere. So by reasoning, if life isn't everywhere, I cannot accept with confidence that life exists anywhere else but here. But I do believe that life from Earth will continue indefinitely, even after the demise of our planet, and whether or not we are still around.

Intill our sun goes red giant and burns us alive at least.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#91 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I think that to call people who don't believe in aliens "stupid" is rather insulting, as I don't believe there are any aliens out there.:|sSubZerOo

Do you have any reason to believe that? Or is it because you're Christian?

What does Christianity have anything to do with it?

Because its a bias? Your part of the creationist union, of course your gonna full out disagree with it regardless of any logical deductions.. Because life outside of earth would undermine the ideas of Adam and Eve, as well as other ideas. Religion for the most part has always shown man to be the most superior race to have existed.. I wonder what that would mean for religions if we infact came incontact with another sentient being.

Not saying its wrong but there is a reason why to question it.. For me I think its a very very high possibility, from teh vastness we have seen not to mention the astronomy discussion on how our solar system was created.. It seems very likely it has happened, but till there is facts this is just a idea.

:lol:

Seriously, WTF is up with that? My being a creationist OR a Christian has NOTHING to do with it!:lol: Because I don't assume there is life out there?

Aliens wouldn't contradict ANYTHING in the Bible. . .hell, some verses appear to describe aliens! No, finding alien life has a better chance of proving a religion CORRECT than disproving it altogether.;)

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#92 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

Intill our sun goes red giant and burns us alive at least.

sSubZerOo
In the process of becoming a red giant, the sun will first shrink and expel much of its outer layer (the Chromosphere). These will in turn blow away our atmosphere long before the sun balloons into a red giant. The possibility exists of bacteria being ejected into space along with our atmosphere.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#93 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

Aliens wouldn't contradict ANYTHING in the Bible. . .hell, some verses appear to describe aliens! No, finding alien life has a better chance of proving a religion CORRECT than disproving it altogether.;)

Silver_Dragon17
Yup, what with the 'War in Heaven' and beings "Falling to the Earth', vehicles that hover in a cloud (of exhaust?) by day and land and have flashing lights at night. All in the Bible.
Avatar image for andyb1205
andyb1205

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 andyb1205
Member since 2007 • 612 Posts

By the year 3000, we would have expanded life over the solar system, with populations throughout the solar system. Space conolization will be a BIG thing within a few hundred years. There's ways of making Mars a habitable place by warming up the temperature, and also living on Jupiter's moons (which have ice),etc.

I recommend looking here, I spent an hour reading around and it was damn worth it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_colonization

Current NASA chief Michael Griffin has identified space colonization as the ultimate goal of current spaceflight programs, saying:

...the goal isn't just scientific exploration... it's also about extending the range of human habitat out from Earth into the solar system as we go forward in time. . . . In the long run a single-planet species will not survive... If we humans want to survive for hundreds of thousands or millions of years, we must ultimately populate other planets. Now, today the technology is such that this is barely conceivable. We're in the infancy of it... I'm talking about that one day, I don't know when that day is, but there will be more human beings who live off the Earth than on it. We may well have people living on the moon. We may have people living on the moons of Jupiter and other planets. We may have people making habitats on asteroids... I know that humans will colonize the solar system and one day go beyond.

Avatar image for agturboninja
agturboninja

670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#95 agturboninja
Member since 2006 • 670 Posts
There is no absolute zero on stupidity. There is no limits.
Avatar image for andyb1205
andyb1205

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 andyb1205
Member since 2007 • 612 Posts
So..what you guys think about space colonization? :)