This Week's Box Office Results: Who Won The Comedy Three Way This Weekend?

Glad to see Pixar still raking in the dough. I saw Up in theaters last night. So good.

GabuEx

To Nerd_man(STUPID HTML ERROR!)

Wow....and people worried that the fact that Up's main character was an old man would keep kids away....yeah right. Just sad that Transformers 2 is probably going to make Up's sales go down.

Why don't date movies ever appeal to males in the slightest? They could at least make it watchable like most kid's films aiming jokes at the parents.clembo1990

_my thoughts

1 The Proposal$34,114,000 $34,114,000_looks bad

2 The Hangover$26,855,000 $152,919,000_looks really funny

3 Up$21,336,000 $224,113,000_was amazing

4 Year One$20,200,000 $20,200,000_looks ok

5 The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3$11,300,000 $43,332,000_ the original was great

6 Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian$7,300,000 $155,953,000_pretty good

7 Star Trek$4,700,000 $239,444,000_looks good

8 Land of the Lost$3,976,000 $43,672,000_skip

9 Imagine That$3,100,000 $11,351,000_skip

10 Terminator Salvation$3,070,000 $119,513,000_skip

Hallenbeck77

People went to see The Proposal, intentionally?

duxup

yea, and the movie was pretty good:|

[QUOTE="duxup"]

People went to see The Proposal, intentionally?

yea, and the movie was pretty good:|

[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"][QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]

Why are you guys arguing over which crappy film will be better?... :P

chessmaster1989

The first two Harry Potter movies were much worse than Armageddon.

People went to see The Proposal, intentionally?

duxup

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"] Because any crap is better than a Michael Bay film, with a few exceptions.sammyjenkis898

The first two Harry Potter movies were much worse than Armageddon.

:lol: you joking, those movies were awful. The first Harry Potter book was alright, but they butchered the movie. The second Harry Potter book wasn't any good, and it showed in the movie.

Like I said, at least Armageddon was entertaining. The first two Harry Potter movies were bad and were not entertaining.

Look, I'm not saying Armageddon was good. It was, all in all, a bad movie. It was still better than the first two piece-of-crap Harry Potter movies. Not that that's a very high standard...

Besides, I hardly think saying Armageddon was better than the first two Harry Potter movies is worthy of "losing all credibility." You must admit those two movies were utter crap. Now, if I'd said it was better than something like The Godfather, then you'd be completely right :P. Good thing I don't think that :P.

:lol: you joking, those movies were awful. The first Harry Potter book was alright, but they butchered the movie. The second Harry Potter book wasn't any good, and it showed in the movie.

Like I said, at least Armageddon was entertaining. The first two Harry Potter movies were bad and were not entertaining.

Look, I'm not saying Armageddon was good. It was, all in all, a bad movie. It was still better than the first two piece-of-crap Harry Potter movies. Not that that's a very high standard...

chessmaster1989

I always thought you would have to have an IQ of a 9 year old in order to find a Michael Bay film entertaining. I guess I was wrong..

Oh well, to each their own..

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

:lol: you joking, those movies were awful. The first Harry Potter book was alright, but they butchered the movie. The second Harry Potter book wasn't any good, and it showed in the movie.

Like I said, at least Armageddon was entertaining. The first two Harry Potter movies were bad and were not entertaining.

Look, I'm not saying Armageddon was good. It was, all in all, a bad movie. It was still better than the first two piece-of-crap Harry Potter movies. Not that that's a very high standard...

sammyjenkis898

I always thought you would have to have an IQ of a 9 year old in order to find a Michael Bay film entertaining. I guess I was wrong..

Oh well, to each their own..

It was stupid, but it had one or two decent moments. Besides, it's fun to watch a bad, cheesy action movie from time to time. If you can't admit that, I've lost a lot of respect for you.

And, no, they were definitely worse than Armageddon, particularly the second. Only good thing about Harry Potter was Alan Rickman.

[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

:lol: you joking, those movies were awful. The first Harry Potter book was alright, but they butchered the movie. The second Harry Potter book wasn't any good, and it showed in the movie.

Like I said, at least Armageddon was entertaining. The first two Harry Potter movies were bad and were not entertaining.

Look, I'm not saying Armageddon was good. It was, all in all, a bad movie. It was still better than the first two piece-of-crap Harry Potter movies. Not that that's a very high standard...

chessmaster1989

I always thought you would have to have an IQ of a 9 year old in order to find a Michael Bay film entertaining. I guess I was wrong..

Oh well, to each their own..

It was stupid, but it had one or two decent moments. Besides, it's fun to watch a bad, cheesy action movie from time to time. If you can't admit that, I've lost a lot of respect for you.

And, no, they were definitely worse than Armageddon, particularly the second.

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"] They weren't very good, but they were certainly better than Armageddon. It's a good thing I know you, or I would think you were a troll.

I always thought you would have to have an IQ of a 9 year old in order to find a Michael Bay film entertaining. I guess I was wrong..

Oh well, to each their own..

sammyjenkis898

It was stupid, but it had one or two decent moments. Besides, it's fun to watch a bad, cheesy action movie from time to time. If you can't admit that, I've lost a lot of respect for you.

And, no, they were definitely worse than Armageddon, particularly the second.

Not saying that, but your criticism of Bay could apply to most action movies. Are you telling me you don't enjoy watching dumb Schwarzenegger films (not talking about T2, which was decent)?

[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

It was stupid, but it had one or two decent moments. Besides, it's fun to watch a bad, cheesy action movie from time to time. If you can't admit that, I've lost a lot of respect for you.

And, no, they were definitely worse than Armageddon, particularly the second.

chessmaster1989

Not saying that, but your criticism of Bay could apply to most action movies. Are you telling me you don't enjoy watching dumb Schwarzenegger films (not talking about T2, which was decent)?

I finally saw Up yesterday and I gotta say it was really good. It was quite sad at times but hilarious at others, a nice mix.