Did you... I don't know, besides making your post count higher... READ the post?Not another Moon landing consipiracy! why must these threads continue! can't we all accept the fact that we've been to the moon?
WiiMan21
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Thank you Theo for trying to make things nice and clear for those who hold on to the conspiracy theories.
Also, I think the greatest part of this thread is the amount of people who thought you were arguing FOR those theories :lol: read people, read...
Thank you Theo for trying to make things nice and clear for those who hold on to the conspiracy theories.
Also, I think the greatest part of this thread is the amount of people who thought you were arguing FOR those theories :lol: read people, read...
Lindsosaurus
The topic title is confusing and I went straight to the facts...
[QUOTE="Lindsosaurus"]
Thank you Theo for trying to make things nice and clear for those who hold on to the conspiracy theories.
Also, I think the greatest part of this thread is the amount of people who thought you were arguing FOR those theories :lol: read people, read...
LightR
The topic title is confusing and I went straight to the facts...
What's confusing about the topic title? It looks fine to me.But there is very little gravity to hold the flag down on both sides. So the slightest touch can cause movement.And the flag was blowing! :o No Wind on the Moon!
ps3wizard45
[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]
What's confusing about the topic title? It looks fine to me.
GabuEx
The word "false" is rather unfortunately cut off when you're in the thread.
Unless you look at the very top of your browser... :P[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]
What's confusing about the topic title? It looks fine to me.
GabuEx
The word "false" is rather unfortunately cut off when you're in the thread.
Eh, there's always this thing:[QUOTE="GabuEx"][QUOTE="-Chimera-"]
What's confusing about the topic title? It looks fine to me.
-Chimera-
The word "false" is rather unfortunately cut off when you're in the thread.
Eh, there's always this thing:The top bar in IE doesn't contain quite that much text - it stops right after 100%.
Not disagreeing that some people are a bit too hasty, though. :P
The only thing that casts doubt in my mind is why has no one landed man on the moon ever again? solidgamer
Interest in the moon dropped off drastically after we discovered it is not actually made out of cheese.
Eh, there's always this thing: I think people are just too hasty with thread titles and don't bother to read the OP in proper context before jumping the gun.[QUOTE="-Chimera-"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]
The word "false" is rather unfortunately cut off when you're in the thread.
GabuEx
The top bar in IE doesn't contain quite that much text - it stops right after 100%.
Not disagreeing that some people are a bit too hasty, though. :P
Well IE sucks anyway, so they deserve to be ridiculed for misinterpreting the topic title just for that.Mine contains it all. :PThe top bar in IE doesn't contain quite that much text - it stops right after 100%.
Not disagreeing that some people are a bit too hasty, though. :P
GabuEx
[QUOTE="solidgamer"]The only thing that casts doubt in my mind is why has no one landed man on the moon ever again? MetroidPrimePwn
Interest in the moon dropped off drastically after we discovered it is not actually made out of cheese.
Lol. mmm tasty moon cheeseThe only thing that casts doubt in my mind is why has no one landed man on the moon ever again? Surely if you can do it once you can do it again easily with better Tech? if any1 could answer this it would be much appreciated.solidgamer
We have been back to the moon. Several times.
I think people also have elucidated that since then, we haven't really cared as much and there has been no interest in returning.
Guys, the moon landing was fake. Just face it. All those theories, they mean nothing. There is no way it's real.Razor-Lazor
I think we're beyond sarcasm by now.
No it doesn't - check again, there is one very very important word missing.Holy ****. How did I miss that? Great, now I feel like an idiot. :shock: Thanks a lot, GabuEx. :PGabuEx
[QUOTE="MetallicaKings"]that doesnt disprove anything. If NASA faked the moon landing, why wouldnt they just make up the three points you stated.GabuEx
It is impossible to fake a parabolic dust trajectory in a studio with an atmosphere. If they had somehow weighted the dust, it would not have been kicked up as high as it was. The initial trajectory is consistent with what is seen on Earth, and the resulting trajectory thereafter is consistent with an environment with no atmosphere.
Thus, unless someone wants to claim that NASA edited in dust frame-by-frame in all of the video footage available - in the 1960s, no less -there is no other possible conclusion but that the footage is genuine.
They probably faked it with CGI. Really good CGI.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment