Toys R Us to drop "boys" and "girls" labels/marketing

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#51 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts
eh. kids will probably end up still gravitating to certain types of toys.. despite this group of "concerned parents" meddling... comp_atkins
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

this was an actual issue?

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#53 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="Makhaidos"] I work in retail. Little boys go after the Barbies all the time. Also Easy Bake Ovens, My Little Pony, etc., etc.MrGeezer
Which sort of reinforces my point. People are gonna want what they want regardless. Toys R Us's marketing and product labelling has little to nothing to do with it. If some little boy leans towards Barbie dolls, then the fact that it's in the girls section isn't gonna turn him off from it. Boys who want manly stuff are gonna be drawn to manly stuff regardless, and boys who want girly stuff are gonna be drawn to girly stuff regardless. No one's buying this $hit just because of how Toys R Us presents. Oh, the way that culture presents it has an effect, but Toys R Us's marketing is such a small part of culture that it's negligible. Kids go for stuff because they just like it, or because it's popular with their friends, or because their parents are saying that's the kind of toy they should like.

I think that's pretty naive.

But anyway, I fail to see the problem with what Toys R Us is doing, but some people will be up in arms for cultural reasons.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

This isn't about pressuring kids one way or another. It's the opposite, by giving kids the choice without obvious bias. For the longest time, my nephew's favorite color was pink, but he also played with traditionally boy's toys as well.

I'm not going to yank a doll out of my son's hand if he chooses it. Hell, I had a Cabbage Patch Kid when I was growing up and I had several male friends who did too. 

Not that I have anything against giving kids choices, it's that Toys R Us' role here is pretty insignificant. If anyone was pressuring kids to fit into certain perceived gender roles, it was never Toys R Us. It's the parents who won't let their little boys buy a girly toy. Or it's the kid's classmates who set the standard for what kinds of toys a little boy should like. Or it's movies and TV that set the message for what they should be playing with. I'm not even saying that kids aren't pressured to like certain things, they just aren't really pressured by Toys R Us. Getting rid of "boys" and "girls" labels isn't going to actually change anything. Of course...if nothing changes, then it's hard to be against this. And I'm not for this or against this. All I'm saying that it's not going to actually accomplish anything.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

This isn't about pressuring kids one way or another. It's the opposite, by giving kids the choice without obvious bias. For the longest time, my nephew's favorite color was pink, but he also played with traditionally boy's toys as well.

I'm not going to yank a doll out of my son's hand if he chooses it. Hell, I had a Cabbage Patch Kid when I was growing up and I had several male friends who did too. 

MrGeezer

Not that I have anything against giving kids choices, it's that Toys R Us' role here is pretty insignificant. If anyone was pressuring kids to fit into certain perceived gender roles, it was never Toys R Us. It's the parents who won't let their little boys buy a girly toy. Or it's the kid's classmates who set the standard for what kinds of toys a little boy should like. Or it's movies and TV that set the message for what they should be playing with. I'm not even saying that kids aren't pressured to like certain things, they just aren't really pressured by Toys R Us. Getting rid of "boys" and "girls" labels isn't going to actually change anything. Of course...if nothing changes, then it's hard to be against this. And I'm not for this or against this. All I'm saying that it's not going to actually accomplish anything.

It will appease about a dozen activists, probably. No one else will give a fvck.

Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#56 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
Now they just need to stop marketing to giraffes.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="JustBeYourself"] You're an idiot if you fully believe that. Even at a young age children can feel the stigma of playing with "girly toys". I remember when I was very very young, I used to play with my sister's barbies before anyone got up on a Saturday morning because I knew it was somehow wrong and would be embarrassed (yes even at the age of 6) if anyone found out and that was reinforced by the concept of "this is a girl's toy" and "this is a boy's" toy. SOOO many absurd kneejerk reactions going on here that fail to see the sound psychological and developmental argument for what this group has done and instead we have posters whining about how the world is going mad or some crap. Blugh, sometimes gamespot can be really anti-intellectual.

That stigma isn't coming from Toys R Us and it never was. It's coming from your friends and your parents and your peers, etc. And they don't need Toys R Us to tell them what is a girl's toy and what is a boy's toy. If you're getting bullied on the schoolyard for playing with Barbies, and then you tell your tormentors that your Barbies didn't come from the girl's section, are your tormentors going to give a flying f*** about that? No, you're STILL gonna get bullied, because Toys R Us doesn't decide what is for boys and what is for girls. SOCIETY decides what is for boys and what is for girls.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Now they just need to stop marketing to giraffes.Allicrombie

Racist

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180067 Posts

[QUOTE="Allicrombie"]Now they just need to stop marketing to giraffes.lostrib

Racist

Animalist....
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Makhaidos"] I work in retail. Little boys go after the Barbies all the time. Also Easy Bake Ovens, My Little Pony, etc., etc.GreySeal9

Which sort of reinforces my point. People are gonna want what they want regardless. Toys R Us's marketing and product labelling has little to nothing to do with it. If some little boy leans towards Barbie dolls, then the fact that it's in the girls section isn't gonna turn him off from it. Boys who want manly stuff are gonna be drawn to manly stuff regardless, and boys who want girly stuff are gonna be drawn to girly stuff regardless. No one's buying this $hit just because of how Toys R Us presents. Oh, the way that culture presents it has an effect, but Toys R Us's marketing is such a small part of culture that it's negligible. Kids go for stuff because they just like it, or because it's popular with their friends, or because their parents are saying that's the kind of toy they should like.

I think that's pretty naive.

But anyway, I fail to see the problem with what Toys R Us is doing, but some people will be up in arms for cultural reasons.

If Toys R Us decided to stock Barbie in the boys section instead of the girl's section, are you telling me that people would suddenly see Barbie as a boy's toy just because Toys R Us labels it as such? No. People don't need Toys R Us to tell them what toys are for who. For the most part, people know a "boys toy" and a "girls toy" and a "gender neutral toy" when they see one. And that's why this is a complete non-issue. Leave the boys/girls labels or take them away, it really doesn't matter one bit. If people saw it as a girl's toy before, then it's still gonna be considered a girl's toy.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

This seems exactly like the kind of non-issue that people will get really upset over.

TacticalDesire

Faux outrage is the best outrage!

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#62 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"] Which sort of reinforces my point. People are gonna want what they want regardless. Toys R Us's marketing and product labelling has little to nothing to do with it. If some little boy leans towards Barbie dolls, then the fact that it's in the girls section isn't gonna turn him off from it. Boys who want manly stuff are gonna be drawn to manly stuff regardless, and boys who want girly stuff are gonna be drawn to girly stuff regardless. No one's buying this $hit just because of how Toys R Us presents. Oh, the way that culture presents it has an effect, but Toys R Us's marketing is such a small part of culture that it's negligible. Kids go for stuff because they just like it, or because it's popular with their friends, or because their parents are saying that's the kind of toy they should like.MrGeezer

I think that's pretty naive.

But anyway, I fail to see the problem with what Toys R Us is doing, but some people will be up in arms for cultural reasons.

If Toys R Us decided to stock Barbie in the boys section instead of the girl's section, are you telling me that people would suddenly see Barbie as a boy's toy just because Toys R Us labels it as such? No. People don't need Toys R Us to tell them what toys are for who. For the most part, people know a "boys toy" and a "girls toy" and a "gender neutral toy" when they see one. And that's why this is a complete non-issue. Leave the boys/girls labels or take them away, it really doesn't matter one bit. If people saw it as a girl's toy before, then it's still gonna be considered a girl's toy.

No because those toys are all ready gendered. Also, those are extreme examples.

If there was some new, more gender ambiguous toy, Toys R Us could absolutely influence buyers by marketing it to a certain gender.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

No because those toys are all ready gendered. Also, those are extreme examples.

If there was some new, more gender ambiguous toy, Toys R Us could absolutely influence buyers by marketing it to a certain gender.

GreySeal9
If it were heavily gender ambiguous, then there's a lot less chances of family and peers giving the kid $hit for playing it. Like I was saying, the biggest thing influencing people's actions is gonna be how SOCIETY looks at it. How parents treat a kid when he's playing with a toy, how his friends treat him when he's playing with a toy, that sort of thing. If the toy is really that gender ambiguous, then most people aren't even gonna have any basis for treating the kid like a weirdo. You could label Jenga as a girl's toy, and it wouldn't make much of a difference. Toys R Us can spend all day saying that it's for girls, everyone else is gonna look at it and just see a stack of wooden blocks.
Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts
Good. I've done sociological studies at Toys-R-Us looking at their products and there's an obscene amount of outdated gender roles portrayed in their lineup. Toys depicting firefighters, military, doctors, and heroes in general are all exclusively male, whereas the women are given dolls and Justin Bieber crap. Makhaidos
So what? We don't wont girls thinking they can be any of those things. The aren't physically or mentally equipped for those roles. They're best to stay home and look after the kids.
Avatar image for NationProtector
NationProtector

1609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#65 NationProtector
Member since 2013 • 1609 Posts
Is this because of a Gay/Trans issues about that last barbie from Mattel?
Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

The toy store has bowed to pressure from campaign group Let Toys Be Toys to stop promoting toys as gender specific over concerns about the impact this has on children when they are growing up and developing their personalities.

Toys R Us will now draw up plans for how to make its marketing more inclusive, and remove explicit references to gender in store. Adverts will eventually show boys and girls playing with the same toys, such as kitchens, toy guns and lego.

Let Toys Be Toys, a campaign group run by parents, has called for the removal of gender bias, saying it restricts childrens choices.

Megan Perryman, Let Toys Be Toys campaigner, said: "Even in 2013, boys and girls are still growing up being told that certain toys are for them, while others are not. This is not only confusing but extremely limiting as it strongly shapes their ideas about who they are."

Toys R Us announced the move after meetings with the campaign group. Roger McLaughlan, managing director of the toy store, told the Independent: "We will work to ensure we develop the best plan for our customers."

Tesco, Sainsbury's, The Entertainer and TK Maxx have all agreed to remove 'girls' and 'boys' signs from the aisles following pressure from Let Toys Be Toys.

Harrods also launched its toy collection last summer based on theme rather than gender.

Last year the Swedish branch of Toys R Us launched a gender neutral advertising campaign at Christmas, showing girls shooting a toy gun and boys and girls playing together in a kitchen.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/10288057/Toys-R-Us-to-stop-gender-biased-marketing.html

fvck yeah, bring on the genderless dystopia

MrGeezer

Not that it really matters. You can remove the boys and girls labels, but everyone's still gonna know that G.I. Joes are a "boys" thing and Barbie is a "girls" thing. Little boys don't avoid Barbie because Barbie is in the girls section at Toys R Us. Little boys avoid Barbie because it's obviously some girly $hit and they wouldn't be caught dead playing with one (unless "playing" involves setting it on fire).

ROFL, setting barbie dolls on fire sounds like fun.

Also, a .44 Magnum is good against a barbie too aparently. :P

LOL @ girly laugh and stupid top comment. 

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

Lol political correctness.

N30F3N1X
I find political correctness lame, but this doesn't really bother me. The boys will still go to the boys section and the girls to the girls section. The girls section is nothing but pink anyway, so it's easy for everyone to distinguish what's what. :P
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
No all we need is to get rid of the forced stereotype that girls must like pink. And that they are deserving of more care and attention especially when down, compared to a guy.
Avatar image for Transfer_Point
Transfer_Point

95

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Transfer_Point
Member since 2013 • 95 Posts

No all we need is to get rid of the forced stereotype that girls must like pink. And that they are deserving of more care and attention especially when down, compared to a guy.dramaybaz
What's ironic about that is pink use to be the "boy's color," and blue was the "girl's color."

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

[QUOTE="dramaybaz"]No all we need is to get rid of the forced stereotype that girls must like pink. And that they are deserving of more care and attention especially when down, compared to a guy.Transfer_Point

What's ironic about that is pink use to be the "boy's color," and blue was the "girl's color."

Yeah, I think it switched to blue = boys and pink = girls around the 1940s or something.
Avatar image for m25105
m25105

3135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 m25105
Member since 2010 • 3135 Posts
Lol political correctness. Soon everyone has to share a public bathroom as well.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

Lol political correctness.

gamerguru100

I find political correctness lame, but this doesn't really bother me. The boys will still go to the boys section and the girls to the girls section. The girls section is nothing but pink anyway, so it's easy for everyone to distinguish what's what. :P

It's not a matter of being bothered or not, it's a matter of wondering what will people b!tch about next.

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if someone came up with the idea that books are homophobic because they're black and white and have no color inbetween or racist because they represent black invading a formerly all white area.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#73 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
I think it's wrong to recognize gender at all.
Avatar image for m25105
m25105

3135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 m25105
Member since 2010 • 3135 Posts
I think it's wrong to recognize gender at all.SolidSnake35
Thankfully not everyone thinks like that. Men and women are different for crying out loud. Last I checked it wasn't a man who spent 5 minutes rummaging through his handbag to find something.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#75 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]I think it's wrong to recognize gender at all.m25105
Thankfully not everyone thinks like that. Men and women are different for crying out loud. Last I checked it wasn't a man who spent 5 minutes rummaging through his handbag to find something.

No, men have every right to use a handbag and invert their penis
Avatar image for m25105
m25105

3135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 m25105
Member since 2010 • 3135 Posts
[QUOTE="m25105"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]I think it's wrong to recognize gender at all.SolidSnake35
Thankfully not everyone thinks like that. Men and women are different for crying out loud. Last I checked it wasn't a man who spent 5 minutes rummaging through his handbag to find something.

No, men have every right to use a handbag and invert their penis

Either you're a troll or you're so political correct it's borderline brain washing.
Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

I'll never understand how people could take issue with Toys R Us doing this.

Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
PC BS strikes again. :roll: Can't these people get a life and stop overreacting?
Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#79 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
I think it's wrong to recognize gender at all.SolidSnake35
Gender exists, deal with it.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#80 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
Political correctness gone mad
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#81 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="m25105"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]I think it's wrong to recognize gender at all.SolidSnake35
Thankfully not everyone thinks like that. Men and women are different for crying out loud. Last I checked it wasn't a man who spent 5 minutes rummaging through his handbag to find something.

No, men have every right to use a handbag and invert their penis

men? I find that highly offensive Please call us earthlings or homo sapiens ...never mind that last one, I don't like the connotations its making
Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

Political correctness gone madchaoscougar1

How is it political correctness gone mad to acknowledge that toys don't need to be gender specific. Boys can cook and girls can use guns and tools. Literally nothing bad can come from this.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180067 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]Political correctness gone madPffrbt

How is it political correctness gone mad to acknowledge that toys don't need to be gender specific. Boys can cook and girls can use guns and tools. Literally nothing bad can come from this.

Again...why should guns be treated as a toy?
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#84 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]Political correctness gone madPffrbt

How is it political correctness gone mad to acknowledge that toys don't need to be gender specific. Boys can cook and girls can use guns and tools. Literally nothing bad can come from this.

How many boys do you see in a Barbie ad? Toys are marketed towards a specific gender, simple as that Its just a way of categorizing toys as those sections contain products that are best suited towards that gender Its been like this for decades if not centuries Its like these mothers have nothing better to do than complain and b*tch And I would hazard a guess that these are the same parents that petition to have play equipment removed from schools because tiny Tim is made of glass /rant
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#85 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
k Can't edit that post for some reason Anyway Yes, that was a poor argument But this sh*t annoys me
Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

[QUOTE="Pffrbt"]

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]Political correctness gone madLJS9502_basic

How is it political correctness gone mad to acknowledge that toys don't need to be gender specific. Boys can cook and girls can use guns and tools. Literally nothing bad can come from this.

Again...why should guns be treated as a toy?

Don't ask me, I'm not the one making toy guns. I'm guessing because it's fun to aim and shoot and pretend.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
Disgusting
Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

Toys are marketed towards a specific gender, simple as that chaoscougar1

The entire point of this is to attempt to move away from that. Nothing good comes from limiting people to arbitrary gender roles.

Its just a way of categorizing toys as those sections contain products that are best suited towards that gender


Why should something be more suited to one gender over another. Why can't things simply be for whoever wants them, without arbitrarily defining who it is and isn't for.

Its been like this for decades if not centuries


Well that's solid reasoning to not attempt progress, isn't it?

"It's been this way so it should stay this way because."

Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

But this sh*t annoys mechaoscougar1

Why would you even care.

Avatar image for ashtontheguru
ashtontheguru

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 ashtontheguru
Member since 2004 • 166 Posts


Its just a way of categorizing toys as those sections contain products that are best suited towards that genderPffrbt


Why should something be more suited to one gender over another. Why can't things simply be for whoever wants them, without arbitrarily defining who it is and isn't for.

 

 

I guess we shouldn't have a mens and womens section in clothes stores either, as something shouldn't be more suited to one gender over another??

Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#91 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]Political correctness gone madPffrbt

How is it political correctness gone mad to acknowledge that toys don't need to be gender specific. Boys can cook and girls can use guns and tools. Literally nothing bad can come from this.

And what is wrong with companies doing research and creating products based off of said research? That is what they are doing and why boys and girls have different toys. We are not the same and toy companies don't go into this blind. There is nothing wrong with doing research and creating products/services geared towards certain groups based on that research. Nothing good will come from denying this.
Avatar image for JustBeYourself
JustBeYourself

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 JustBeYourself
Member since 2012 • 686 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]Political correctness gone madPffrbt

How is it political correctness gone mad to acknowledge that toys don't need to be gender specific. Boys can cook and girls can use guns and tools. Literally nothing bad can come from this.

I know, reading some of the kneejerk reactions on this thread made me lose 20 IQ points
Avatar image for RavenousBengal
RavenousBengal

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 RavenousBengal
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
This should be interesting.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]But this sh*t annoys mePffrbt

Why would you even care.

Could ask you and the people who started this the same thing.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#95 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

[QUOTE="gamerguru100"][QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

Lol political correctness.

N30F3N1X

I find political correctness lame, but this doesn't really bother me. The boys will still go to the boys section and the girls to the girls section. The girls section is nothing but pink anyway, so it's easy for everyone to distinguish what's what. :P

\

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if someone came up with the idea that books are homophobic because they're black and white and have no color inbetween or racist because they represent black invading a formerly all white area.

LOL