[QUOTE="Redgarl"] What the hell is that analogy? If you were in Russia(after WW2) and both Lenine and Staline were to make a campaign for presidency... who would won?
Close scores only means 2 imposive candidates, not that they sux because they can't get a significative majority. Unlike Clinton, Obama went from the bottom to the top while Clinton was having her husband as a back up. In my point of view Obamadid the impossible while Clinton failed a sure win.
LJS9502_basic
A strong candidate DOESN'T struggle in the primaries.:):lol:
So ironic you'd say that as McCain was dead in the water for months. He's run an incredibly weak campaign, by any measure, and is only the presumptive Republican nominee because everyone else they put out is so hopeless. They actually put the likes of Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney on the national stage.
Meanwhile, most thinking people have acknowledged that Obama has run an excellent campaign, particularly from an organizational standpoint, and that the only reason the Democratic primaries went on for so long is because Dems had two worthy candidates that split the party in half. Half of McCain's Republican base hates him.
Log in to comment