This topic is locked from further discussion.
"The term "fair use" does not appear anywhere in the report" Its starting to be clear on exactly who is writing this law,especially when it doesnt include fair use. Many music and movie companies dont want fair use, since it doesnt help them make even more moneyJd1680awe just need to not vote for anyone who is for this, get them out of power.
[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"][QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"]pure win here.... yet more proof we need LESS government.kayoticdreamzNo, it's proof we need less private industries influencing the government. the problem here is a law that if passed would make 95% of the internet illegal. the key word is LAW private business cant create laws no matter how much it tries. congress still does that.
The businesses are the ones pushing for it :|, hope your for net neutrality..
the problem here is a law that if passed would make 95% of the internet illegal. the key word is LAW private business cant create laws no matter how much it tries. congress still does that.[QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"][QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"] No, it's proof we need less private industries influencing the government.sSubZerOo
The businesses are the ones pushing for it :|, hope your for net neutrality..
current net is neutral the "net neutrality" proposed law is anything but and has nothing to do with yet another proposed law that does nothing but hurts we the people[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
[QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"] the problem here is a law that if passed would make 95% of the internet illegal. the key word is LAW private business cant create laws no matter how much it tries. congress still does that.surrealnumber5
The businesses are the ones pushing for it :|, hope your for net neutrality..
current net is neutral the "net neutrality" proposed law is anything but and has nothing to do with yet another proposed law that does nothing but hurts we the people.. No Net Neutrality is about internet providers or major companies not controlling what the customers see or can not see.. They can only provide acess and that is it.. The only thing that has been proposed as of late is the ending of that, where internet providers and big business can control it like they do for cable tv.. In what you can and can not look at or do.
Yes, I realize politicians are the only ones who can propose legislation, but that doesn't mean they're not being pushed by other groups. It's what happens.[QUOTE="Danm_999"]
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] no business can propose a law, only politicians can do thatsurrealnumber5
Where do politicians get their campaign funding and support for example? Special interest groups. Why is the job of a lobbyist so important and lucrative? It's honestly a plague on all of Washington.
Because it's not the Federal government who really cares if you violate intellectual property by viewing a video on YouTube; broadcasting corporations will be lobbying the Federal government and individual Senators and Congressmen to push for this bill to protect their revenue.
so you want to punish the group that looks out for its own interests but not the corrupt person who actually has the power to implement that groups interests.it makes perfect since for people to try to get special treatment, it however is not a healthy practice for those with power to grant special treatment
What I want is campaign finance reform, for politicians to not be so beholden to special interest groups and lobbyists. And FYI, that technically isn't corruption. Taking contributions is legal, as is proposing legislation because of suggestions from constituents.I do blame the individual politicians, but I also blame the system that makes them beholden to political donations and lobbying. Blaming the individuals alone would be fighting the symptoms and not the disease.
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]so you want to punish the group that looks out for its own interests but not the corrupt person who actually has the power to implement that groups interests.[QUOTE="Danm_999"] Yes, I realize politicians are the only ones who can propose legislation, but that doesn't mean they're not being pushed by other groups. It's what happens.
Where do politicians get their campaign funding and support for example? Special interest groups. Why is the job of a lobbyist so important and lucrative? It's honestly a plague on all of Washington.
Because it's not the Federal government who really cares if you violate intellectual property by viewing a video on YouTube; broadcasting corporations will be lobbying the Federal government and individual Senators and Congressmen to push for this bill to protect their revenue.
Danm_999
it makes perfect since for people to try to get special treatment, it however is not a healthy practice for those with power to grant special treatment
What I want is campaign finance reform, for politicians to not be so beholden to special interest groups and lobbyists. And FYI, that technically isn't corruption. Taking contributions is legal, as is proposing legislation because of suggestions from constituents. M&W says corrupt means a : to change from good to bad in morals, manners, or actions; also : bribe b : to degrade with unsound principles or moral values sounds like corruption to me, the people who vote the guys in are the same people these laws harmso you want to punish the group that looks out for its own interests but not the corrupt person who actually has the power to implement that groups interests.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]
[QUOTE="Danm_999"] Yes, I realize politicians are the only ones who can propose legislation, but that doesn't mean they're not being pushed by other groups. It's what happens.
Where do politicians get their campaign funding and support for example? Special interest groups. Why is the job of a lobbyist so important and lucrative? It's honestly a plague on all of Washington.
Because it's not the Federal government who really cares if you violate intellectual property by viewing a video on YouTube; broadcasting corporations will be lobbying the Federal government and individual Senators and Congressmen to push for this bill to protect their revenue.
Danm_999
it makes perfect since for people to try to get special treatment, it however is not a healthy practice for those with power to grant special treatment
What I want is campaign finance reform, for politicians to not be so beholden to special interest groups and lobbyists. And FYI, that technically isn't corruption. Taking contributions is legal, as is proposing legislation because of suggestions from constituents.I do blame the individual politicians, but I also blame the system that makes them beholden to political donations and lobbying. Blaming the individuals alone would be fighting the symptoms and not the disease.
Lobbyists are a key part in running the government.. The problem here is we have quite few people in government who thinks privatizing everything is everything.
current net is neutral the "net neutrality" proposed law is anything but and has nothing to do with yet another proposed law that does nothing but hurts we the people[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
The businesses are the ones pushing for it :|, hope your for net neutrality..
sSubZerOo
.. No Net Neutrality is about internet providers or major companies not controlling what the customers see or can not see.. They can only provide acess and that is it.. The only thing that has been proposed as of late is the ending of that, where internet providers and big business can control it like they do for cable tv.. In what you can and can not look at or do.
you do not need new laws to keep things the same, the net IS neutral now, the proposed law is anything but.M&W says corrupt means a : to change from good to bad in morals, manners, or actions; also : bribe b : to degrade with unsound principles or moral values sounds like corruption to me, the people who vote the guys in are the same people these laws harmYeah but taking campaign contributions and conceding to lobbyists isn't really a question of morality. It's barely a question of ethics. It's pretty common practice in Washington. I don't like it, but I'm not going to call any politician corrupt for lobbying on the behalf of constituents of special interest groups that help in their campaign.surrealnumber5
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] current net is neutral the "net neutrality" proposed law is anything but and has nothing to do with yet another proposed law that does nothing but hurts we the people
surrealnumber5
.. No Net Neutrality is about internet providers or major companies not controlling what the customers see or can not see.. They can only provide acess and that is it.. The only thing that has been proposed as of late is the ending of that, where internet providers and big business can control it like they do for cable tv.. In what you can and can not look at or do.
you do not need new laws to keep things the same, the net IS neutral now, the proposed law is anything but. Well, I think it would be nice if the Federal Government enshrined the current situation (ie; net neutrality) as law. That would stop providers from doing what they liked in the future.I agree though, the proposed changes made by the government in December last year are rubbish, and are an obvious sign of influence from the telecommunications lobby.
Yeah but taking campaign contributions and conceding to lobbyists isn't really a question of morality. It's barely a question of ethics. It's pretty common practice in Washington. I don't like it, but I'm not going to call any politician corrupt for lobbying on the behalf of constituents of special interest groups that help in their campaign. i am not against campaign reform, donations could be limited per family company or completely anonymous. those are the two ways that just popped in my head that would help deter these kinds of actions. i just like to keep the blame on the one taking the action and not the reason for his action, and i think that is where we differ. if a company(lobby) offered me(politician)a million to kill my mother(the people), that is wrong as hell, but unless i take the money and kill her(protectionist law)no harm is done.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]M&W says corrupt means a : to change from good to bad in morals, manners, or actions; also : bribe b : to degrade with unsound principles or moral values sounds like corruption to me, the people who vote the guys in are the same people these laws harm
Danm_999
[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"][QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"]pure win here.... yet more proof we need LESS government.surrealnumber5No, it's proof we need less private industries influencing the government. yes, get rid of all private industries! only rational move to prevent corrupt politicians from interacting with the market and messing with peoples lives. That's not what I said at all. :|I just said we need less private industries buying politicians and their vote.
i am not against campaign reform, donations could be limited per family company or completely anonymous. those are the two ways that just popped in my head that would help deter these kinds of actions. i just like to keep the blame on the one taking the action and not the reason for his action, and i think that is where we differ. if a company(lobby) offered me a million to kill my mother(the people), that is wrong as hell, but unless i take the money and kill her(protectionist law)no harm is done.Crucial difference: it's illegal for you to kill. It is not illegal for a politician to propose laws.surrealnumber5
It's all well and good to punish someone for doing something wrong, but if you don't ever attempt to stem the cause of why they acted wrongly, you're always just be reacting to evil and illegality.
Crucial difference: it's illegal for you to kill. It is not illegal for a politician to propose laws.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]i am not against campaign reform, donations could be limited per family company or completely anonymous. those are the two ways that just popped in my head that would help deter these kinds of actions. i just like to keep the blame on the one taking the action and not the reason for his action, and i think that is where we differ. if a company(lobby) offered me a million to kill my mother(the people), that is wrong as hell, but unless i take the money and kill her(protectionist law)no harm is done.
Danm_999
It's all well and good to punish someone for doing something wrong, but if you don't ever attempt to stem the cause of why they acted wrongly, you're always just be reacting to evil and illegality.
bad laws kill freedoms, am i not allowed to be poetic? again i am not against cutting ties between business and government, i advocate a free market and that means no political involvement. the mixing of governing powers and special interest groups on all sides of the political spectrum cause all of the societalwoes i can think of. i am not against social programs per se but when they dictate economic conditions they harm the society. i would not mind a big government as long as the two factors that create a society do not mix and those are the laws that govern the people and the economy that provides the people all things good in life.So... Who will build the new prisons you guys gonna need? horgen123They won't need a new prison if they turn the USA into one.
Anti-piracy legislation doesn't really ever have a hard time passing. Just look at the DMCA and ACTA.Bills get proppsed all the time. Most never get out of the starting gate. Fewer still actually become law. Let's not go into panic mode just yet.
worlock77
[QUOTE="worlock77"]Anti-piracy legislation doesn't really ever have a hard time passing. Just look at the DMCA and ACTA.Bills get proppsed all the time. Most never get out of the starting gate. Fewer still actually become law. Let's not go into panic mode just yet.
gameguy6700
This is being proposed by the Obama administration however, so the Republicans will fight it tooth and nail, simply because it's Obama, and the Democras will abandon it or water it down out of compromise (not that I'd have a problem with any of that in this case).
keep your government out of my businessThis is why it should be illegal for lobbies or corporations to give money to politicians.
Keep your big business out of my government! :x
genfactor
As much as I disagree with republicans at least they wont vote for this bill to pass
This is to far, I agree uploading a illegal video should be a felony but THIS....THIS...
The democratic party should not be this way...
Wait, is this making it illegal/a felony to set up the stream, or to view the stream? If it's the latter, I am very much opposed to this.chessmaster1989makes it illegal to view the video, so you could theoretically have a friend of your lie to you say hey check out this cool youtube vid, then have them link you to a music video not uploaded by the music companies and then have someone else looking at your internet use and say "oh this person viewed this music video, thats a felony" and have said person call the police or fbi and have you get in a lot of trouble, that is what this law is proposing.
Lobbyists are just a symptom of too much government. If we were to shrink the federal government back to its constitutionally enumerated duties, most lobbyists would go out of business.This is why it should be illegal for lobbies or corporations to give money to politicians.
Keep your big business out of my government! :x
genfactor
[QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"]pure win here.... yet more proof we need LESS government.Ring_of_fireNo, it's proof we need less private industries influencing the government. This man speaks the truth. Also this will never, ever get passed.
As much as I disagree with republicans at least they wont vote for this bill to pass
This is to far, I agree uploading a illegal video should be a felony but THIS....THIS...
The democratic party should not be this way...
fueled-system
Don't blame the "democratic party" unless the actual democratic party is in favor of it, not one federal employee appointed by the Obama administration.
Lobbyists are just a symptom of too much government. If we were to shrink the federal government back to its constitutionally enumerated duties, most lobbyists would go out of business. yup, but da gov iz gud.[QUOTE="genfactor"]
This is why it should be illegal for lobbies or corporations to give money to politicians.
Keep your big business out of my government! :x
aransom
And people complain how harmless drug users are filling up prisons when they don't belong there. This is so stupid, if they actually enforced this, the prisons would all be full in hours.
Im surprised that the entertainment industry hasnt learned yet:
More ineffective copyright protection materials = the software is pirated more.
Lobbyists are just a symptom of too much government. If we were to shrink the federal government back to its constitutionally enumerated duties, most lobbyists would go out of business.[QUOTE="genfactor"]
This is why it should be illegal for lobbies or corporations to give money to politicians.
Keep your big business out of my government! :x
aransom
I disagree.
You should see "Inside Job".
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment