War on drugs a failure, suggestion of legalising cannabis and other drugs.

  • 78 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for m25105
m25105

3135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 m25105
Member since 2010 • 3135 Posts

Source

So what do you guys think? If we look at the Netherlands for example, it appears to have helped a lot against crime. Crime is actually so low that jobs have been cut and prisons closed down. Legalising it can also boost any countrys economy through taxation and new jobs. Though since you can grow your own pot at your own place, I imagine it can be hard to regulate it.

I don't smoke cannibis (used to) but I know a lot of people that smoke. Some have good jobs and are married. Others not, but they also smoke a lot and take other and harder drugs too. I'm too torn on this one. On paper it sounds like a good idea, but seeing young potheads waste their oppertunity away, smoking and getting high instead of studying hard. I guess it's all about personal responsibility.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
Honestly, the war on drugs is just there to help big pharmaceutical corporations.
Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
more easily accessible drugs of everykind makes everything better....
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Honestly, the war on drugs is just there to help big pharmaceutical corporations. DroidPhysX
This. Most naturally-sourced drugs and all psychoactives are many times safer than some things big-pharma puts out for $100's per pill.
Avatar image for Sandulf29
Sandulf29

14330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Sandulf29
Member since 2010 • 14330 Posts

what???

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60826 Posts

yeah I never really understood the "War on Drugs". It is a complete failure.

As far as legalizing stuff, I dont want to see it in stores, but if someone wants to grow pot or shrooms or coca plants then let them. Dispensaries would be ok too I guess.

Legalize and tax it.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

protectionist law that hurts society...... yea i am against the war on forcing people to imbued only what political interest group A or political figure head B deems acceptable.

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

I hate it when governments declare war on "things." War on Drugs..... it's not like the drugs will surrender. War on Terror......terrorism is a tactic.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

I hate it when governments declare war on "things." War on Drugs..... it's not like the drugs will surrender. War on Terror......terrorism is a tactic.

YellowOneKinobi

cant wait for the declaration of " war on wars"

Avatar image for drochnathair
drochnathair

412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 drochnathair
Member since 2008 • 412 Posts

In my opinion, the War on Drugs benefits big pharmaceutical corporations (as mentioned above) and the Mafia more than it benefits the common people. Just imagine how much time and money would be saved if the prohibition on marijuana was ended. Such a huge amount of law enforcement time and resources could be redirected toward real criminals.

Note: I'm not a pot smoker and never have been. I actually dislike mind altering substances of all kinds.

Avatar image for arbitor365
arbitor365

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 arbitor365
Member since 2009 • 2726 Posts

I think we should legalize all drugs except for meth (because that one actually does pose a direct thread to people around you).

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

more easily accessible drugs of everykind makes everything better....Omni-Slash
the only way to make weed easier to get is if drug dealers started giving it away for free.

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

I think we should legalize all drugs except for meth (because that one actually does pose a direct thread to people around you).

arbitor365

I'm not so sure about all drugs. I can see decriminalizing pot, because it's basically a plant. But when you start getting into coke and the like, it's getting manufactured and for whatever reason I feel like there is a difference there.

Yeah, I know, there are very poinsous plants out there and stuff.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#14 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

It's a little over board to call the war on drugs a "failure". Of course we cannot totally eliminate drugs, but we can reduce them.

I would say that the war on drugs is a defensive war: we are defending our citizens against drugs and reducing the number of people exposed to them.

In a defensive war, we don't take enemy territory, but that doesn't mean we are losing.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

There's an enormous difference between marijuana and other drugs. Cannabis is relatively harmless and one can certainly make an argument for its legalization. Drugs like heroin, however, are very dangerous to people. Opium nearly destroyed China. I'd rather it not be readily available.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

It's a little over board to call the war on drugs a "failure". Of course we cannot totally eliminate drugs, but we can reduce them.

I would say that the war on drugs is a defensive war: we are defending our citizens against drugs and reducing the number of people exposed to them.

In a defensive war, we don't take enemy territory, but that doesn't mean we are losing.

whipassmt

i don't know about the amount of drugs that were on the street 10 years ago, but as of right now, there are still PLENTY of drugs on the street, even where i live in a nice suburb area. i assume there's even more in not so nice areas.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
But when you start getting into coke and the like, it's getting manufactured and for whatever reason I feel like there is a difference there.YellowOneKinobi
Coke and heroin are naturally-sourced from plants readily growing in many parts of the world (poppy flowers are the source of opium). Doctors in the 19th century used heroin as a painkiller and anesthetic. It was extremely effective for something sourced from a plant. But incredibly addictive. Much like the legal morphine, vicodin, methadone and countless other opiates that the big pharmaceutical companies manufacture and distribute for astronomical prices, just to relieve someone's pain. I am for legalizing everything. From meth, to MDMA to LSD to anything, naturally- or artificially-sourced. What we need to do is educate people about these drugs effects, and show them how using them isn't in their best interest. Telling them it is "wrong" and putting them in jail for doing it is counterproductive. And who knows... one day there might be something in low doses of meth that actually has medicinal benefits when administered in a controlled fashion (which is no the case for street drugs). LSD, MDMA, psilocybin and many other psychoactive drugs have very bright futures in the treatment of mental illness... but they are all Schedule I drugs in the US. They are defined as WORSE than heroin, coke and meth. And they aren't even physically addictive and nearly impossible to overdose on. It shows you just how much the US government really doesn't care about the health of its citizens... but filling their pockets with big-pharma money.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Legalize all drugs, make it a public health issue rather than a criminal issue. Biggest problem solved.
Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts

You could have said the same thing 10 years ago, 20 years ago etc. The 18th Amendment showed prohibition is a disaster.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#20 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

It's a little over board to call the war on drugs a "failure". Of course we cannot totally eliminate drugs, but we can reduce them.

I would say that the war on drugs is a defensive war: we are defending our citizens against drugs and reducing the number of people exposed to them.

In a defensive war, we don't take enemy territory, but that doesn't mean we are losing.

needled24-7

i don't know about the amount of drugs that were on the street 10 years ago, but as of right now, there are still PLENTY of drugs on the street, even where i live in a nice suburb area. i assume there's even more in not so nice areas.

I think the number of drug users (or the percentage of the population that use them) has indeed gone down in recent decades.

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
If only the goverment would have a War on Nudity.....
Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] foxhound_fox
It shows you just how much the US government really doesn't care about the health of its citizens... but filling their pockets .

To justify your point, I believe you have to look no further than cigarettes. If they wanted to "save" people from smoking they would outlaw them. But they don't. They just keep adding to the cost via taxes. For all their PSA advertisements, they wouldn't know what to do if everyone in NYC quit smoking tomorrow and all that cash disappeared.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I don't see a problem with decriminalizing marijuana nationwide. People can choose for themselves what they want to put into their bodies.

Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts
If only the goverment would have a War on Nudity.....Omni-Slash
We have religious fundamentalist already taking care of this:).
Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"]If only the goverment would have a War on Nudity.....EasyStreet
We have religious fundamentalist already taking care of this:).

missed the point....the point is that if government took that war on they would fail.....
Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts
[QUOTE="EasyStreet"][QUOTE="Omni-Slash"]If only the goverment would have a War on Nudity.....Omni-Slash
We have religious fundamentalist already taking care of this:).

missed the point....the point is that if government took that war on they would fail.....

Just like religious fundamentalist have failed, it is best to let individuals decide.
Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="EasyStreet"][QUOTE="Omni-Slash"]If only the goverment would have a War on Nudity.....Omni-Slash
We have religious fundamentalist already taking care of this:).

missed the point....the point is that if government took that war on they would fail.....

Be careful what you wish for. A few years back we had our dog on the beach when a state trooper told us no dogs allowed on that particular beach but we could go over towards Robert Moses beach (I think that was the name). Anyway, what the trooper didn't tell us was that it was a nude beach.....and filled with all sorts of people. Unfortunately, none of them were as frequently depicted in the movies.Glancing over and seeinga 60 year old couple play frisbee in the buff was not something you can easily recover from. That I can assure you.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"][QUOTE="EasyStreet"]We have religious fundamentalist already taking care of this:). EasyStreet
missed the point....the point is that if government took that war on they would fail.....

Just like religious fundamentalist have failed, it is best to let individuals decide.

i think you are still missing it :P government war against nudity=more nudity

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#29 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
Just like religious fundamentalist have failed, it is best to let individuals decide. EasyStreet
what are you even droning on about?...
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#30 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

I say legalize all drugs. Let people finally account for themselves, and allow their communities to help recoup them if they become addicts. Think of all the wonders this would do for Mexico if all drugs were legalized..

Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts
Ricky Ross is still mad.
Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts
[QUOTE="EasyStreet"]Just like religious fundamentalist have failed, it is best to let individuals decide. Omni-Slash
what are you even droning on about?...

Prohibition of any kind does not work, let the individuals decide. As long as the said individual is held responsible for their actions.
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#33 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"][QUOTE="EasyStreet"]Just like religious fundamentalist have failed, it is best to let individuals decide. EasyStreet
what are you even droning on about?...

Prohibition of any kind does not work, let the individuals decide. As long as the said individual is held responsible for their actions.

For some reason though, personal responsibility is no longer important, and we should just bar anything that could potentially cause harm... Drugs, guns, knives, hell, even cars....

Avatar image for m0zart
m0zart

11580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#34 m0zart
Member since 2003 • 11580 Posts

And who knows... one day there might be something in low doses of meth that actually has medicinal benefits when administered in a controlled fashion (which is no the case for street drugs).foxhound_fox

There are already "blessed" medical purposes for it. Desoxyn is the name under which it is prescribed. It is used to treat obesity, severe ADD, and sleep disorders such as narcolepsy.

Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]And who knows... one day there might be something in low doses of meth that actually has medicinal benefits when administered in a controlled fashion (which is no the case for street drugs).m0zart

There are already "blessed" medical purposes for it. Desoxyn is the name under which it is prescribed. It is used to treat obesity, severe ADD, and sleep disorders such as narcolepsy.

You are completly right, the vast majority of drugs originated from the medical world.

Avatar image for pis3rch
pis3rch

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 pis3rch
Member since 2006 • 1695 Posts

Source

So what do you guys think? If we look at the Netherlands for example, it appears to have helped a lot against crime. Crime is actually so low that jobs have been cut and prisons closed down. Legalising it can also boost any countrys economy through taxation and new jobs. Though since you can grow your own pot at your own place, I imagine it can be hard to regulate it.

I don't smoke cannibis (used to) but I know a lot of people that smoke. Some have good jobs and are married. Others not, but they also smoke a lot and take other and harder drugs too. I'm too torn on this one. On paper it sounds like a good idea, but seeing young potheads waste their oppertunity away, smoking and getting high instead of studying hard. I guess it's all about personal responsibility.

m25105

if it were legal i don't think young smokers would be able to get it as easily unless they know growers or actually grow it themselves, which i doubt parents would be too okay with. My friends and i are all around 18-19, and under the current laws we could hypothetically get bud at any time of day from a number of different sources. For alcohol, we actually have to call someone and hope they feel like going to the liquor store for us and yadda yaddda ya....its honestly harder for us to get booze than weed, which is why for my entire high school career i didn't drink. Now, obviously this doesnt hold true for everyone cause some stores just dont card, but thats something that really cant be helped.

basically, a legal store might not card you. A drug dealer will NEVER card you.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

all i can say to add to this is that the entire time i was young the only difficult drugs to get were alcohol and tobacco.

everything else was readily available to kids because the source was controlled by criminals.

war on drugs = fail.

Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts
they can have as many laws and wars as they want. if i wanted to smoke weed or snort cocaine i would. but i dont want to.
Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

they can have as many laws and wars as they want. if i wanted to smoke weed or snort cocaine i would. but i dont want to.lloveLamp
I used to smoke pot in high school but gave it up years ago. Honestly, if it were legal I'd probably have a joint once every blue moon. But the fact is, I have too much going for me to allow myself to get arrested. So in that sense, I guess the "war" is doing something.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
The government has no business telling people what they can or cannot put into their bodies. Our own history with alcohol provides many reasons why prohibition in general is a stupid idea.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="lloveLamp"]they can have as many laws and wars as they want. if i wanted to smoke weed or snort cocaine i would. but i dont want to.YellowOneKinobi

I used to smoke pot in high school but gave it up years ago. Honestly, if it were legal I'd probably have a joint once every blue moon. But the fact is, I have too much going for me to allow myself to get arrested. So in that sense, I guess the "war" is doing something.

preventing you from doing something you might want to, and making you pay money not to do it(TAX)?

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]

[QUOTE="lloveLamp"]they can have as many laws and wars as they want. if i wanted to smoke weed or snort cocaine i would. but i dont want to.surrealnumber5

I used to smoke pot in high school but gave it up years ago. Honestly, if it were legal I'd probably have a joint once every blue moon. But the fact is, I have too much going for me to allow myself to get arrested. So in that sense, I guess the "war" is doing something.

preventing you from doing something you might want to, and making you pay money not to do it(TAX)?

Sounds about right. Land of the Free.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
God it took them how long to figure this out? I'm not saying treat all drugs the same, but keeping them all illegal and locking people up for something such as drug use is sooooo moronic I don't even know where to start. We need to rethink and rewrite the vast majority of our drug laws ASAP.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Yes, marijuana should be legalized, along with prostitution (two things that take up way too many resources for their intended societal 'benefit' of keeping them illegal). Not that I'd partake in either though.
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

It's been brought up on ballots in California, but the majority of people in that state are still voting against legalization. And if California can't get it passed, it certainly won't pass anywhere else.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

God it took them how long to figure this out? I'm not saying treat all drugs the same, but keeping them all illegal and locking people up for something such as drug use is sooooo moronic I don't even know where to start. We need to rethink and rewrite the vast majority of our drug laws ASAP. HoolaHoopMan
laws in general IMO, but drug laws would be a good start. i dont like protectionist laws at all, i dont see how people can justify, with few exceptions, punishing someone who has yet to cause any damage. the primary exception is attempted murder.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]God it took them how long to figure this out? I'm not saying treat all drugs the same, but keeping them all illegal and locking people up for something such as drug use is sooooo moronic I don't even know where to start. We need to rethink and rewrite the vast majority of our drug laws ASAP. surrealnumber5

laws in general IMO, but drug laws would be a good start. i dont like protectionist laws at all, i dont see how people can justify, with few exceptions, punishing someone who has yet to cause any damage. the primary exception is attempted murder.

I would think some drug laws are necessary such as an age limit on use. I wouldn't say ALL protectionist laws are terrible.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
It's been brought up on ballots in California, but the majority of people in that state are still voting against legalization. And if California can't get it passed, it certainly won't pass anywhere else.Netherscourge
Colorado has a shot. Weed is already decriminalized here, so simple possession of less than an ounce is just a fine. Plus there are more medical marijuana dispensaries here than there are Starbucks (literally), and it's insanely easy for most people to get their license.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]God it took them how long to figure this out? I'm not saying treat all drugs the same, but keeping them all illegal and locking people up for something such as drug use is sooooo moronic I don't even know where to start. We need to rethink and rewrite the vast majority of our drug laws ASAP. HoolaHoopMan

laws in general IMO, but drug laws would be a good start. i dont like protectionist laws at all, i dont see how people can justify, with few exceptions, punishing someone who has yet to cause any damage. the primary exception is attempted murder.

I would think some drug laws are necessary such as an age limit on use. I wouldn't say ALL protectionist laws are terrible.

that is more of a regulation than a law :P, and i am sure we disagree to the level of terrible we are at, but i do think this is the most pratical political area for mixing up the norms and trying something new.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] laws in general IMO, but drug laws would be a good start. i dont like protectionist laws at all, i dont see how people can justify, with few exceptions, punishing someone who has yet to cause any damage. the primary exception is attempted murder.

surrealnumber5

I would think some drug laws are necessary such as an age limit on use. I wouldn't say ALL protectionist laws are terrible.

that is more of a regulation than a law :P, and i am sure we disagree to the level of terrible we are at, but i do think this is the most pratical political area for mixing up the norms and trying something new.

Ah regulations then ;)

I know where you're coming from. I think we can agree on most things pertaining to drug laws here.