Was d-day land assault necessary?

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Matts07
Matts07

385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Matts07
Member since 2007 • 385 Posts
[QUOTE="NicktehImperial"][QUOTE="imsomebody"][QUOTE="NicktehImperial"][QUOTE="imsomebody"][QUOTE="NicktehImperial"]

[QUOTE="imsomebody"]The only reason d-day happened was so the soviets wouldnt conquer europeimsomebody

True, but its not like the US and UK would jus sit back and say "Well, Russsia, just finish the war for us, and take even more gruesome casualties, while we sitback, just because we don't have as many troops."

See how logic works?

No not really, I don't see why they wouldn't have done it.

So I geuss the British and Canadians should've not sent any troops in D-day because America outnumbered them???

What I was trying to get at was that if it weren't for the USSR the allies would have used the same strategy against the Nazis as the one they used against the Japanese.

The Russians didn't win singlehandedly....

They could have "liberated" Europe on their own.

No they couldn't why do you think Russia is all powerful??? Is it because it's really really big...cause thats all im coming up with...

Avatar image for Matts07
Matts07

385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Matts07
Member since 2007 • 385 Posts
[QUOTE="NicktehImperial"][QUOTE="imsomebody"][QUOTE="NicktehImperial"][QUOTE="dealjobber"][QUOTE="NicktehImperial"][QUOTE="slicknet"]

So i'm watching band of brother, not a d-day section, but still brutal though. Well i dont know the number of land guys killed at d-day but it would make sense that Britian was pretty safe with the Yanks and Brits there thogether, so couldn't they have just bombed the Germans into defeat from thesea /air and saved the most gruesome battle ever know ?

It just seems as though they couldn't have picked a more difficult way of doing it.

thoughts!

mat_the_cat

Cowardice doesn't win wars.

It worked on Japan. (the bombs, obviously)

More Americans AND Japanese would've died if we hadn't done it.... The Japs were stubborn and wouldn't give up, so, we had to do it.

People die in war.

Other than the "People die in war." you are totally wrong. The Japanese were trying to negotiate a surrender. Obviously the US would accept nothing less than a complete surrender.

The Japanese wouldn't accept Surrender or any "defeatist" talk, until they saw the true destruction we could unleash.

no even if the japanese had tried to surrender, the americans would not let them because they wanted to test the bombs on people. that is not much higher than what hitler did to the jews

Wow and i thought i heard some dumb statements in this thread but this takes the cake.

Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts

No they couldn't why do you think Russia is all powerful??? Is it because it's really really big...cause thats all im coming up with...

Matts07

I don't know why people think that either. The Soviets and all of Western Europe would have been defeated had the Americas not helped in late 1939.

As for the topic, yes it was necessary.

Avatar image for double_decker
double_decker

146090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 double_decker
Member since 2006 • 146090 Posts
It's over and done with, even if they could have done it better doesn't make it any different
Avatar image for Matts07
Matts07

385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Matts07
Member since 2007 • 385 Posts

D-Day was necessary not only because the of the need to stop the USSR from taking over, but also because the USSR wanted it the Allies had originally agreed to an earlier D-day, but postponed it because they didn't want to take the heavy casualties, but the SOviets were getting pissed so they had to or the allies could have fallen apart.

As for the Issue of the bomb it was originally developed for use on the NAZI's it just wasn't done in time and they decided to go ahead and use it on the Jappaneese because it was the only way to make them surrender

LS07

The USSR WAS LOSING!!!! They would not have defeated Germany!!! Why don't people understand this. Its not the Cold War Germany was stronger than Russia!!!

Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts
[QUOTE="LS07"]

D-Day was necessary not only because the of the need to stop the USSR from taking over, but also because the USSR wanted it the Allies had originally agreed to an earlier D-day, but postponed it because they didn't want to take the heavy casualties, but the SOviets were getting pissed so they had to or the allies could have fallen apart.

As for the Issue of the bomb it was originally developed for use on the NAZI's it just wasn't done in time and they decided to go ahead and use it on the Jappaneese because it was the only way to make them surrender

Matts07

The USSR WAS LOSING!!!! They would not have defeated Germany!!! Why don't people understand this. Its not the Cold War Germany was stronger than Russia!!!

Germany had started losing after they lost the battle of stalingrad
Avatar image for Matts07
Matts07

385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Matts07
Member since 2007 • 385 Posts
[QUOTE="Matts07"][QUOTE="LS07"]

D-Day was necessary not only because the of the need to stop the USSR from taking over, but also because the USSR wanted it the Allies had originally agreed to an earlier D-day, but postponed it because they didn't want to take the heavy casualties, but the SOviets were getting pissed so they had to or the allies could have fallen apart.

As for the Issue of the bomb it was originally developed for use on the NAZI's it just wasn't done in time and they decided to go ahead and use it on the Jappaneese because it was the only way to make them surrender

mig_killer2

The USSR WAS LOSING!!!! They would not have defeated Germany!!! Why don't people understand this. Its not the Cold War Germany was stronger than Russia!!!

Germany had started losing after they lost the battle of stalingrad

Well Germany got scrwed by the Russian winter and started losing ground. A lot of it was because Hitlers generals acually listened to him, but still im pretty sure the uk and usa had already landed in germany by this time.

Avatar image for Funkyhamster
Funkyhamster

17366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Funkyhamster
Member since 2005 • 17366 Posts
They probably thought about these things beforehand... I mean, you've got a good point, but it's so obvious that if it was a real possibility, whoever was in charge during WWII must have been really messed up...
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
Well... Something like D-Day would have to be needed. Keep in mind, the US and Britian (and France to a lesser extent) were fighting in the deserts of North Africa/Italy. That gave the Soviet Union a good deal of breathing room (diverting of precious men/material from the Eastern Front to the Southern Front in essence) not to mention their string of victories after Germany got bogged down in Soviet Winter; numerous times infact.
Avatar image for Evilmaster101
Evilmaster101

2013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#60 Evilmaster101
Member since 2005 • 2013 Posts
[QUOTE="slicknet"]

So i'm watching band of brother, not a d-day section, but still brutal though. Well i dont know the number of land guys killed at d-day but it would make sense that Britian was pretty safe with the Yanks and Brits there thogether, so couldn't they have just bombed the Germans into defeat from thesea /air and saved the most gruesome battle ever know ?

It just seems as though they couldn't have picked a more difficult way of doing it.

thoughts!

NicktehImperial

Cowardice doesn't win wars.

Well said. Of course it was nessecary, we had to rid the world of the Nazi's, and this was the best plan of attack to take.

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#61 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts
yes it was, because for one if we would have flown in the troops and equipment it would take weeks instead of a couple of days, plus i bet the AA in normady was brutal
Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts
[QUOTE="mig_killer2"][QUOTE="Matts07"][QUOTE="LS07"]

D-Day was necessary not only because the of the need to stop the USSR from taking over, but also because the USSR wanted it the Allies had originally agreed to an earlier D-day, but postponed it because they didn't want to take the heavy casualties, but the SOviets were getting pissed so they had to or the allies could have fallen apart.

As for the Issue of the bomb it was originally developed for use on the NAZI's it just wasn't done in time and they decided to go ahead and use it on the Jappaneese because it was the only way to make them surrender

Matts07

The USSR WAS LOSING!!!! They would not have defeated Germany!!! Why don't people understand this. Its not the Cold War Germany was stronger than Russia!!!

Germany had started losing after they lost the battle of stalingrad

Well Germany got scrwed by the Russian winter and started losing ground. A lot of it was because Hitlers generals acually listened to him, but still im pretty sure the uk and usa had already landed in germany by this time.

the battle of stalingrad was lost in February 1943. The allies didn't land in Normandy until 1944
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts

yes it was, because for one if we would have flown in the troops and equipment it would take weeks instead of a couple of days, plus i bet the AA in normady was brutalmlbslugger86

They did fly in troops, lots of troops (over 12,000) were dropped in the night before.

Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts

[QUOTE="mlbslugger86"]yes it was, because for one if we would have flown in the troops and equipment it would take weeks instead of a couple of days, plus i bet the AA in normady was brutalLukeAF24

They did fly in troops, lots of troops (over 12,000) were dropped in the night before.

im pretty sure it was more like 24,000. however, the breakout of normandy involved over 800,000 troops, and the wholewestern front had over 3,000,000 troops
Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#65 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

[QUOTE="mlbslugger86"]yes it was, because for one if we would have flown in the troops and equipment it would take weeks instead of a couple of days, plus i bet the AA in normady was brutalLukeAF24

They did fly in troops, lots of troops (over 12,000) were dropped in the night before.

im not saying they didn't im just saying that what if they woukd have flown the whole attack force instead of just the airborne troops. it would have been alot harder

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="Matts07"][QUOTE="mig_killer2"][QUOTE="Matts07"][QUOTE="LS07"]

D-Day was necessary not only because the of the need to stop the USSR from taking over, but also because the USSR wanted it the Allies had originally agreed to an earlier D-day, but postponed it because they didn't want to take the heavy casualties, but the SOviets were getting pissed so they had to or the allies could have fallen apart.

As for the Issue of the bomb it was originally developed for use on the NAZI's it just wasn't done in time and they decided to go ahead and use it on the Jappaneese because it was the only way to make them surrender

mig_killer2

The USSR WAS LOSING!!!! They would not have defeated Germany!!! Why don't people understand this. Its not the Cold War Germany was stronger than Russia!!!

Germany had started losing after they lost the battle of stalingrad

Well Germany got scrwed by the Russian winter and started losing ground. A lot of it was because Hitlers generals acually listened to him, but still im pretty sure the uk and usa had already landed in germany by this time.

the battle of stalingrad was lost in February 1943. The allies didn't land in Normandy until 1944

Good we know our dates. So Hitler is losing tanks, men, aircraft like there is no tomorrow. What could possibly make it worse? Another front. We were already settled in Italy by this time so it would make sense that we might possibly launch an offensive there to drive upward, like running a knife under a hard shelled animal. Well, that's what happened, but we got bogged down somewhere in Central Italy (the name escapes me at the moment). So, instead of diverting men and tanks and everything from that Italian front, we get more soldiers from the United States (and whatever is in resever in Great Britian) and prepare for a naval assualt, but not before a massive disinformation campaign on the part of the Allies.
Avatar image for Serial-No_3404
Serial-No_3404

2876

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Serial-No_3404
Member since 2007 • 2876 Posts
yes....turned the tide and forced germany to pull back