We have four months to live!!!!

Quick..everyone get in my pants for safety!........:oops:Omni-Slash

Thanks for the offer

Mwhahahahah!!! Mwhahahahaha!! haha! I WIN... :twisted:

See my evil laugh here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=C65oaIHsdYM (Just for jokes)

I knew the world was going to end like this... HUMANS ARE SO DUMB!

lol don't flame me :oops:

Great. Now it's 4 months. What the hell happened to 2012? A few weeks ago someone said the world would end on June 12. Come on people, let's settle on a date here. I can't keep rescheduling my big, end-of-the-world uber party like this. elblanquito_81

what is it a gay pile up? Like south park :) lol jk so where is this part anyways? I feel like destorying things

[QUOTE="elblanquito_81"]Great. Now it's 4 months. What the hell happened to 2012? A few weeks ago someone said the world would end on June 12. Come on people, let's settle on a date here. I can't keep rescheduling my big, end-of-the-world uber party like this. DarkAlucard666

PARTY*

what is it a gay pile up? Like south park :) lol jk so where is this part anyways? I feel like destorying things

[QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"]the entire human species has become the boy who cried wolf. a prediction of the end of existance should be much more exiting than this. Aradae2357

What could be more exciting than getting instantly sucked into a quantum singularity? What could be more exciting than scientifically plausible?

you see, it SHOULD be exciting. but there are so many end of the world claims going around that this one just doesnt strike me like it would if it were the only one.

2012

I dont think anything Man Made could destroy the universe...Matt-4542

Maybe not...but it could still destroy YOU.

Wow. I'm saw a lady who made a Jesus waffle on the news today, but nothing about this in the past...ever.

Shouldn't this whole discovering anti-matter end-of-the-world junk be bigger news?

I had a good run :|

if it wasn't the Large Hadron Collider then it would just end up being a crazy aztec prophecy!

Quick..everyone get in my pants for safety!........:oops:Omni-Slash

I'm already there.:oops:

I still say it's not worth the risk.Dracargen

What risk? There is no risk. The biggest force it can create is equal to the forces being exerted in our atmosphere every second, right now, as we speak.

I want the world to end in my lifetime. Then I know I won't be missing out of anything.

TristanShand

You selfish bastard. :P

That thing's just a hoax to draw our attention away from the CIA crashing planes into the World Trade Centre to kill the Roswell aliens.

TheLordRagnarok

I say we call in Scully and Mulder.MissRiotmaker

haha im so pumped to see this thing in actionR-Dot-Yung

Glad I'm seeing Nails in August! :)

[QUOTE="Dracargen"]I still say it's not worth the risk.Ninja-Hippo

What risk? There is no risk. The biggest force it can create is equal to the forces being exerted in our atmosphere every second, right now, as we speak.

If it occured every second naturally in the atmosphere then we wouldn't need a supercollider to observe the higgs boson now would we? This thing is supposed to "recreate the Big Bang." I hardly think we have a big bang every second in our our own atmosphere.

Okay, what is this and why is it going to kill us:question:ElectronicMagic

The Large Hadron Collider is an $8 billion dollar particle accelrator designed to recreate the conditions of the big bang in order to observe the higgs boson, a sub atomic particle theorized to give the property of mass.

The Large Hadron Collider will be starting up this August with the first collisions scehduled to take place in October. That only gives us 4 months to live!!!!Aradae2357

aww, me birthdays in august

Can someone mathematically show that there's any risk?
MrGeezer

I'd love to, but I'm not that educated in Grand Unified Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and relativity.

Oookay crazy...

*backs aways slowly*

[QUOTE="ElectronicMagic"]Okay, what is this and why is it going to kill us:question:Aradae2357

The Large Hadron Collider is an $8 billion dollar particle accelrator designed to recreate the conditions of the big bang in order to observe the higgs boson, a sub atomic particle theorized to give the property of mass.

but it was proven that if it forms black holes (which is highly unlikely), they will instantly evaporate, but come on, WHY DID THEY APPROVE THIS MACHINE!!???!!!megahaloman64

Satan is working with the physicists to open a wormhole that leads straight to hell.

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]Can someone mathematically show that there's any risk?
Aradae2357

I'd love to, but I'm not that educated in Grand Unified Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and relativity.

So...do you have ANY evidence that there's any risk?

but it was proven that if it forms black holes (which is highly unlikely), they will instantly evaporate, but come on, WHY DID THEY APPROVE THIS MACHINE!!???!!!megahaloman64

I don't know. Why did we send men to the moon or build the Hubble telescope?

[QUOTE="Kuhu"]

and to think I almost walked into this trap.

Omni-Slash

Dude I'm sold. :D

[QUOTE="Aradae2357"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]Can someone mathematically show that there's any risk?
MrGeezer

I'd love to, but I'm not that educated in Grand Unified Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and relativity.

So...do you have ANY evidence that there's any risk?

Some people who are educated in such matters give us the calculations. Plus I do know with my somewhat limited knowledge that hit two particles colliding at high enough speeds and energy have the possibility of causing a singularity. (Gravity at close range overcoming Pauli's Exclusion principle as already mentioned)

so if all you people know that it can (A): destroy the world (B):Create a black hole(doom the solar system), why dont the creators of it just stop right now. Its not even for a good reasonAndrovinus

Finding the Higgs Boson.

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Aradae2357"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]Can someone mathematically show that there's any risk?
Aradae2357

I'd love to, but I'm not that educated in Grand Unified Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and relativity.

So...do you have ANY evidence that there's any risk?

Some people who are educated in such matters give us the calculations. Plus I do know with my somewhat limited knowledge that hit two particles colliding at high enough speeds and energy have the possibility of causing a singularity. (Gravity at close range overcoming Pauli's Exclusion principle as already mentioned)

Are you educated enough in physics and mathematics to UNDERSTAND the calculations?

[QUOTE="Aradae2357"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Aradae2357"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]Can someone mathematically show that there's any risk?
MrGeezer

I'd love to, but I'm not that educated in Grand Unified Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and relativity.

So...do you have ANY evidence that there's any risk?

Some people who are educated in such matters give us the calculations. Plus I do know with my somewhat limited knowledge that hit two particles colliding at high enough speeds and energy have the possibility of causing a singularity. (Gravity at close range overcoming Pauli's Exclusion principle as already mentioned)

Are you educated enough in physics and mathematics to UNDERSTAND the calculations?

Probably

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Aradae2357"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Aradae2357"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]Can someone mathematically show that there's any risk?
Aradae2357

I'd love to, but I'm not that educated in Grand Unified Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and relativity.

So...do you have ANY evidence that there's any risk?

Some people who are educated in such matters give us the calculations. Plus I do know with my somewhat limited knowledge that hit two particles colliding at high enough speeds and energy have the possibility of causing a singularity. (Gravity at close range overcoming Pauli's Exclusion principle as already mentioned)

Are you educated enough in physics and mathematics to UNDERSTAND the calculations?

Probably

Is that to say that you haven't even LOOKED at calculations which may indicate that there's some risk?

Y2K.

NEVER FORGET.

Okay, so if this is going to kill everyone, why are we doing this to see "Higgs bosom" or whatever? Also, what exactly is the Higgs bosom?TheHimura

Boson with an "n"

It's what is theorized to give mass to certain particles.

No I haven't. But there are plenty of confirmations by several theorists that there is risk. However as mentioned earliar, black holes will probably evaporate very quickly due to hawking radiation.

Aradae2357

And the VAST majority of the scientific community says that there's no risk. This thing didn't pop up overnight. It's a HUGE project that's been in the construction phase for well over a decade, and it WASN'T done in secret. In all that time, where is the public outcry over the "doomsday machine" being built under our noses?

Of course, maybe it IS a doomsday machine. Let me also add though that there were scientists who thought that detonating an atomic bomb would cause a chain reaction that would destroy the entire Earth's atmosphere. However, they couldn't provide any compelling evidence of this, so the damn thing was detonated anyway.

If scientists really think that there's a risk of the Large Hadron Collider destroying the entire world, then they should have done a better job at convincing people that their calculations are right.

funny, how when i read this on yahoo, it said one of the people trying to stop it (with lawsuits) is not only a "scientist" but a lawyer.

:lol:

Upon looking at the basis of the theory I can say that I would not be able to understand the calculations that would lead to said risk however I can tell you why they would make the claim that the LHC could be a mini black hole factory. Apparently the fundamental force of gravity is theorized to be weak because much of it is lost to a hidden dimension about 10 ^ -17 cm thick and that at high energy levels the force of gravity will be higher allowing particles to more easily overcome the exclusion principle.Aradae2357

Stephen Hawking said this thing would not end the world. He is smarter than all of us. I'll put my money on Stephen Hawking.