Western culture is successful because of Greek foundations, not Christianity.

  • 192 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

Ever been to the SW forums?...i'm sure people there argue just as heatedly about PS3 and X-box..

Favoring a religion..you mean like catering to them..?

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Yeah. Expressing a personal predisposition towards something.

Ok, so i guess...hmm...catering tomuslims in the USA as a means of placating them would be politically incorrect?..

Catering? Hmm, you have used that word several times. If I may know, how old are you? I would make give a guess that you were a student in 10th grade, but I may be well off.

If a politician said "Allah is the best of the Gods I've heard of", it would be politically incorrect. If he said "Little Big Planet is the best of the games I've heard of", no one would care.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] Yeah. Expressing a personal predisposition towards something.unholymight

Ok, so i guess...hmm...catering tomuslims in the USA as a means of placating them would be politically incorrect?..

Catering? Hmm, you have used that word several times. If I may know, how old are you? I would make give a guess that you were a student in 10th grade, but I may be well off.

If a politician said "Allah is the best of the Gods I've heard of", it would be politically incorrect. If he said "Little Big Planet is the best of the games I've heard of", no one would care.

So now we're getting..personal?..

I'm sure people would care in either case..it just wouldn't cause an uproar in media..

Avatar image for umalex
umalex

95

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 umalex
Member since 2003 • 95 Posts
Yeah, while Judaism used slavery and Christianity condoned it, it was less brutal and horrific back then if you obeyed the teachings. And yeah, the word slavery actually comes from the Slavs who got the bad end of the stick. Heck, almost every culture had slavery of some form if you think about it. Please correct me if my generalization is wrong.
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="VigilanteArtist"]

The movement to abolish slavery was largely based on Christian ideals. For example, the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists in the 1850s and used churches as networks to gain and influence voters. Slavery was considered a sin. Of course, there were hypocritical Christians in the 1800s too.

Xx_Hopeless_xX

The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.

Actually the original slaves were Polytheists (Slavs)...so really it has nothing to do with it forming under "Christianity's watch"..because they were enslaved by the Muslims in the East as well..

Correction: The word "Slave" comes from "Slav"..but Romans also had slaves and they weren't necessarily Christian..

I was referring to the case of America, specifically. I believe you were trying to show that Christianity was a leading cause for the abolishment of slavery. Showing that slavery occurred in other places where Christianity was absent does not lend real support to your argument. If I may be priviledged to ask, are you a junior in high school?
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

Ok, so i guess...hmm...catering tomuslims in the USA as a means of placating them would be politically incorrect?..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Catering? Hmm, you have used that word several times. If I may know, how old are you? I would make give a guess that you were a student in 10th grade, but I may be well off.

If a politician said "Allah is the best of the Gods I've heard of", it would be politically incorrect. If he said "Little Big Planet is the best of the games I've heard of", no one would care.

So now we're getting..personal?..

I'm sure people would care in either case..it just wouldn't cause an uproar in media..

No, I was just curious. Was I right, though?
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="VigilanteArtist"]

The movement to abolish slavery was largely based on Christian ideals. For example, the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists in the 1850s and used churches as networks to gain and influence voters. Slavery was considered a sin. Of course, there were hypocritical Christians in the 1800s too.

Democratik

The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.

Slavery has existed longer than christianity.

He was trying to show Christianity removed slavery. Demonstrating that slavery existed longer than Christianity does not support his argument, unless slavery was completely abolished forever right when Christianity came along.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.unholymight

Actually the original slaves were Polytheists (Slavs)...so really it has nothing to do with it forming under "Christianity's watch"..because they were enslaved by the Muslims in the East as well..

Correction: The word "Slave" comes from "Slav"..but Romans also had slaves and they weren't necessarily Christian..

I was referring to the case of America, specifically. I believe you were trying to show that Christianity was a leading cause for the abolishment of slavery. Showing that slavery occurred in other places where Christianity was absent does not lend real support to your argument. If I may be priviledged to ask, are you a junior in high school?

I was actually trying to show that it was NOT just under Christian rule that people were forced into slavery..

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] Catering? Hmm, you have used that word several times. If I may know, how old are you? I would make give a guess that you were a student in 10th grade, but I may be well off.

If a politician said "Allah is the best of the Gods I've heard of", it would be politically incorrect. If he said "Little Big Planet is the best of the games I've heard of", no one would care.

unholymight

So now we're getting..personal?..

I'm sure people would care in either case..it just wouldn't cause an uproar in media..

No, I was just curious. Was I right, though?

No you were wrong..

Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts

[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="unholymight"] The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.unholymight

Slavery has existed longer than christianity.

He was trying to show Christianity removed slavery. Demonstrating that slavery existed longer than Christianity does not support his argument, unless slavery was completely abolished forever right when Christianity came along.

oh, I was confused by "arosed" i thought you meant slavery started after christianity
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Democratik"] You like staying as far away from being specific as possible, dont you? I mean, theres a good we both understand each other in this case, but you dont like to use detail in my observations of you. I'd like to know why you make vague statements a lot. Democratik

There really was nothing vague. Belittle has a specific meaning dude.

I asked a question about your definition of belittle you said it means exactly belittle if you dont know that your statement could be taken in two different directions.... well i dont know. But lets not talk about the word belittle anymore

Fine. But my statement can only be taken in the direction as to the definition of the words I used. I fail to see why it was questioned. But moving on nonetheless...
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

So now we're getting..personal?..

I'm sure people would care in either case..it just wouldn't cause an uproar in media..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

No, I was just curious. Was I right, though?

No you were wrong..

Well, the YouTube profile in your sig was a 10th grader in high school, thought there might have been some connection. Was I at least close though?
Avatar image for VigilanteArtist
VigilanteArtist

699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 VigilanteArtist
Member since 2004 • 699 Posts

[QUOTE="VigilanteArtist"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] So, during the 1800s in America, Christianity didn't exist?unholymight

The movement to abolish slavery was largely based on Christian ideals. For example, the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists in the 1850s and used churches as networks to gain and influence voters. Slavery was considered a sin. Of course, there were hypocritical Christians in the 1800s too.

The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.

Christianity (and Christians) had a huge impact on the abolishment of slavery in the USA. And I'm saying that as an athiest! It's not my opinion, it's fact. Many important figures in the movement (such as Harriet Beecher Stowe and John Brown) were Christians who used their beliefs as a means to influence and oppose slavery. Abraham Lincoln, although religiously ambiguous, was a member of the Republican party which, as I stated above, used religion to progress the anti-slavery movement.

And I have to ask-- What is the extent of your education as far as this subject is concerned?

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

hmm, I disagree.. it' combination of many different factors. You can't really say it's this or that.. it's many different things.. and really.. who's to say western culture has been successful.. That remains to be seen.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] No, I was just curious. Was I right, though?unholymight

No you were wrong..

Well, the YouTube profile in your sig was a 10th grader in high school, thought there might have been some connection. Was I at least close though?

Those are just songs i like...no you were not close..

Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

Actually the original slaves were Polytheists (Slavs)...so really it has nothing to do with it forming under "Christianity's watch"..because they were enslaved by the Muslims in the East as well..

Correction: The word "Slave" comes from "Slav"..but Romans also had slaves and they weren't necessarily Christian..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

I was referring to the case of America, specifically. I believe you were trying to show that Christianity was a leading cause for the abolishment of slavery. Showing that slavery occurred in other places where Christianity was absent does not lend real support to your argument. If I may be priviledged to ask, are you a junior in high school?

I was actually trying to show that it was NOT just under Christian rule that people were forced into slavery..

That might actually further support my point, since then I can say that despite religious teachings telling people to treat each other as they would have others treat them, slavery still occurred.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"]

[QUOTE="Democratik"] Slavery has existed longer than christianity.Democratik

He was trying to show Christianity removed slavery. Demonstrating that slavery existed longer than Christianity does not support his argument, unless slavery was completely abolished forever right when Christianity came along.

oh, I was confused by "arosed" i thought you meant slavery started after christianity

He did.
Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts

hmm, I disagree.. it' combination of many different factors. You can't really say it's this or that.. it's many different things.. and really.. who's to say western culture has been successful.. That remains to be seen.

EMOEVOLUTION
I think the majority of people on this planet would say western civilization is successful.
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"]

[QUOTE="Democratik"] Slavery has existed longer than christianity.Democratik

He was trying to show Christianity removed slavery. Demonstrating that slavery existed longer than Christianity does not support his argument, unless slavery was completely abolished forever right when Christianity came along.

oh, I was confused by "arosed" i thought you meant slavery started after christianity

I meant it as in there are cases where slavery increased in an environment where Christianity was also present.
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] I was referring to the case of America, specifically. I believe you were trying to show that Christianity was a leading cause for the abolishment of slavery. Showing that slavery occurred in other places where Christianity was absent does not lend real support to your argument. If I may be priviledged to ask, are you a junior in high school?unholymight

I was actually trying to show that it was NOT just under Christian rule that people were forced into slavery..

That might actually further support my point, since then I can say that despite religious teachings telling people to treat each other as they would have others treat them, slavery still occurred.

But not your view that it was under Christian watch...also..slavery of the indigenous people of America was abolished by a Christian priest in the 1500's..

Avatar image for Penguinchow
Penguinchow

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 Penguinchow
Member since 2006 • 1629 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

I wonder why Christianity is hated by so many people and why people are always trying to belittle it..:|..why not pick on the Ottomans?..

Sajedene
It makes people feel better to belittle that that they do not agree with so as to assure themselves they made the right choice (hoping that they did). This goes for everyone.

... I find this to be an excellent explanation. Cookies for Sajadene for superior understanding of human nature!
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

i think it was a well known fact that I abolished savery. OT disapoints me

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts

[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="unholymight"]

He was trying to show Christianity removed slavery. Demonstrating that slavery existed longer than Christianity does not support his argument, unless slavery was completely abolished forever right when Christianity came along.

unholymight

oh, I was confused by "arosed" i thought you meant slavery started after christianity

I meant it as in there are cases where slavery increased in an environment where Christianity was also present.

These definitions are applicable to your use of the word arose....

to come into being, action, or notice; originate; appear; spring up: New problems arise daily.

to result or proceed; spring or issue (sometimes fol. by from):
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]

hmm, I disagree.. it' combination of many different factors. You can't really say it's this or that.. it's many different things.. and really.. who's to say western culture has been successful.. That remains to be seen.

Democratik

I think the majority of people on this planet would say western civilization is successful.

Well, that doesn't make it so. Majority of the people on the planet believe in God. Does that prove god exists? Nope. Again, there is no proof western society has been successful just because one believes it so.

Avatar image for caseypayne69
caseypayne69

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#74 caseypayne69
Member since 2002 • 5396 Posts

Christianity once said the Earth was flat, and kept anyone from proving this wrong (Galileo). This attitude towards science and observable evidence alone would say something about that.

unholymight
wrong the bible never says this, but keep on talking about what you hear.
Avatar image for CrimzonTide
CrimzonTide

12187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 CrimzonTide
Member since 2007 • 12187 Posts
If you are going to look at Greek science as a founding for Western Culture, then you are wrong. All those ideas the "dark ages" focused their religion around? They were based on scientific revelations of the Greeks. The ideas of Ptolemy (Which formed the basis for religious scientific understanding at the time) came around 400 years after Aristotle, who we believe was the first to officially claim that the Earth was the center of the universe. This scientifically handicapping lasted until Copernicus suggested it might not be true, nearly 1700 years later.

If you want to argue that Greek society formed the basis for democracy, of even theology or mathematics I may concede somewhat, but scientifically no. The Renaissance is accountable for that.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

I wonder why Christianity is hated by so many people and why people are always trying to belittle it..:|..why not pick on the Ottomans?..

Penguinchow

It makes people feel better to belittle that that they do not agree with so as to assure themselves they made the right choice (hoping that they did). This goes for everyone.

... I find this to be an excellent explanation. Cookies for Sajadene for superior understanding of human nature!

Cognitive dissonance as its called…….. if I recall correctly (its been a while)

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Democratik"] Whose belittling christianity? if anything, christianity seems to build it up. At least, very vocal members of christianity tend to do this. Proving that Western culture is successful not because of christianity isnt hating on it either.

The success of the western culture lies in the premise that the foundation of the western culture and its continued growth is due to its ability to learn and improve and assimilate the good (and sometimes the bad) from other cultures from the past and the present. Heck we can argue that all cultures are successful due to the contributions of the Chinese Culture.

learning comes with observation. observation is a major part of empiricism empiricism was formally started by aristotle. aristotle was greek. many cultures refuse to adapt.

You seem to be confusing the idea of philosophy and the idea that people can think for themselves. Just because Aristotle was the one shown on record to talk about something doesn't mean he is the be all end all of it as well. Cultures who refuse to adapt do not progressed. Society labels them as primitives. I admire your attempt in propping the Greek culture. I will not deny their contributions to society today. But they are not the one and only thing to make and break the western culture's success... especially if one has to question why for a culture or country which seems to be the sole reason as to why the western culture is successful - that the only thing people seem to think of when that country is mentioned is Mythology, Philosophers, Democracy (and that can easily be proven that it also existed outside of the walls of Athens), and Food (and maybe My Big Fat Greek Wedding.)
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

I was actually trying to show that it was NOT just under Christian rule that people were forced into slavery..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

That might actually further support my point, since then I can say that despite religious teachings telling people to treat each other as they would have others treat them, slavery still occurred.

But not your view that it was under Christian watch...also..slavery of the indigenous people of America was abolished by a Christian priest in the 1500's..

Well you showed that it can occur in areas that don't have Christianity. But showing that does not yet prove that it cannot exist in areas where there is also Christianity. Wikipedia says slavery lasted longer than that here; into the 1700s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_slavery Also, you have not established that it was indeed specifically Christianity that ended slavery, not the common sense of the people.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Slavery was Abolished by a Christian/Catholic Priest in Europe. The Pope declared that no more slaves shall be shipped to America and the Enslavement of the Native Populace should cease and desist. :D

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] That might actually further support my point, since then I can say that despite religious teachings telling people to treat each other as they would have others treat them, slavery still occurred.unholymight

But not your view that it was under Christian watch...also..slavery of the indigenous people of America was abolished by a Christian priest in the 1500's..

Well you showed that it can occur in areas that don't have Christianity. But showing that does not yet prove that it cannot exist in areas where there is also Christianity. Wikipedia says slavery lasted longer than that here; into the 1700s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_slavery Also, you have not established that it was indeed specifically Christianity that ended slavery, not the common sense of the people.

You haven't established that it was a Christian practice if we're keeping score.
Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts

[QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]

hmm, I disagree.. it' combination of many different factors. You can't really say it's this or that.. it's many different things.. and really.. who's to say western culture has been successful.. That remains to be seen.

EMOEVOLUTION

I think the majority of people on this planet would say western civilization is successful.

Well, that doesn't make it so. Majority of the people on the planet believe in God. Does that prove god exists? Nope. Again, there is no proof western society has been successful just because one believes it so.

Its true that the majority of people are not always right. But, we certainly prosper to greater extents than other nations. Thats why immigrants come to nations with western influence moreso. Prosperity is the state of flourishing, thriving, success, or good fortune. [1] Prosperity often encompasses wealth but also includes others factors which are independent of wealth to varying degrees, such as happiness and health.
Avatar image for deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
deactivated-60f8966fb59f5

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
Member since 2008 • 1719 Posts
Yes, the success of Western culture can be entirely attributed to one origin. Who needs history when you have simplifications?
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

I wonder why Christianity is hated by so many people and why people are always trying to belittle it..:|..why not pick on the Ottomans?..

Penguinchow
It makes people feel better to belittle that that they do not agree with so as to assure themselves they made the right choice (hoping that they did). This goes for everyone.

... I find this to be an excellent explanation. Cookies for Sajadene for superior understanding of human nature!

Hmmm.... what kind of cookies are we talking about?
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"]

Christianity once said the Earth was flat, and kept anyone from proving this wrong (Galileo). This attitude towards science and observable evidence alone would say something about that.

caseypayne69
wrong the bible never says this, but keep on talking about what you hear.

Yes, my bad. I meant to say Christianity said the Earth was the center of the universe, and defended this view strongly against someone with a different view like Galileo. Also, all I said was that Christianity advocated this view at some time, I don't need to say the Bible said it, since we were discussing Christianity as a whole, taking into account its history and previous actions of its supporters.
Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
Religion always holds everything back.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="caseypayne69"][QUOTE="unholymight"]

Christianity once said the Earth was flat, and kept anyone from proving this wrong (Galileo). This attitude towards science and observable evidence alone would say something about that.

unholymight
wrong the bible never says this, but keep on talking about what you hear.

Yes, my bad. I meant to say Christianity said the Earth was the center of the universe, and defended this view strongly against someone with a different view like Galileo. Also, all I said was that Christianity advocated this view at some time, I don't need to say the Bible said it, since we were discussing Christianity as a whole, taking into account its history and previous actions of its supporters.

And that would be what specifically?
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts
[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]

[QUOTE="Democratik"] I think the majority of people on this planet would say western civilization is successful.Democratik

Well, that doesn't make it so. Majority of the people on the planet believe in God. Does that prove god exists? Nope. Again, there is no proof western society has been successful just because one believes it so.

Its true that the majority of people are not always right. But, we certainly prosper to greater extents than other nations. Thats why immigrants come to nations with western influence moreso. Prosperity is the state of flourishing, thriving, success, or good fortune. [1] Prosperity often encompasses wealth but also includes others factors which are independent of wealth to varying degrees, such as happiness and health.

Prosperity? Well, I'm afraid.. prosperity is worthless if it leads to self destruction of the species ecosystems. And this is why the success of our culture remains to be seen.
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Penguinchow"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] It makes people feel better to belittle that that they do not agree with so as to assure themselves they made the right choice (hoping that they did). This goes for everyone.

... I find this to be an excellent explanation. Cookies for Sajadene for superior understanding of human nature!

Hmmm.... what kind of cookies are we talking about?

I knew it. I was right all along! Not that I should be surprised, for I am not.
Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Democratik"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] The success of the western culture lies in the premise that the foundation of the western culture and its continued growth is due to its ability to learn and improve and assimilate the good (and sometimes the bad) from other cultures from the past and the present. Heck we can argue that all cultures are successful due to the contributions of the Chinese Culture.

learning comes with observation. observation is a major part of empiricism empiricism was formally started by aristotle. aristotle was greek. many cultures refuse to adapt.

You seem to be confusing the idea of philosophy and the idea that people can think for themselves. Just because Aristotle was the one shown on record to talk about something doesn't mean he is the be all end all of it as well. Cultures who refuse to adapt do not progressed. Society labels them as primitives. I admire your attempt in propping the Greek culture. I will not deny their contributions to society today. But they are not the one and only thing to make and break the western culture's success... especially if one has to question why for a culture or country which seems to be the sole reason as to why the western culture is successful - that the only thing people seem to think of when that country is mentioned is Mythology, Philosophers, Democracy (and that can easily be proven that it also existed outside of the walls of Athens), and Food (and maybe My Big Fat Greek Wedding.)

Almost nobody thinks Aristotle is the be all end all. I'd like to meet someone who does. even in Empiricist camps, we rarely follow everything he believed. But we never deny his importance. You said observing is why western culture is so successful. Aristotle was the first person to formalize a philosophy based upon observation, and it became a cornerstone to western culture, that was surpressed in europe during the dark ages. Fortunately for humanity, it was continued in the middle east. It eventually came back to the west during the renaissance, and then we saw a lot of prosperity. especially in the realm of scientific advancement.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

In Theory it can be argued that Lincoln was a Christian. Some Believe he was a Deist, or wasn't any specific religion at all. During his Term as President he allegedly converted to Christianity. No One knows for sure because he never spoke of his religious beliefs.

So, Technically if he was Christian, the Emancipation Proclamation was created with Christian Influences.

Columbus was a Christian, he discovered America as well. Christians played a MAjor role in the West as we know it.

Heck, There were even Christians at the Signing of the Declaration of Independence.

Avatar image for VigilanteArtist
VigilanteArtist

699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 VigilanteArtist
Member since 2004 • 699 Posts

[QUOTE="VigilanteArtist"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] So, during the 1800s in America, Christianity didn't exist?unholymight

The movement to abolish slavery was largely based on Christian ideals. For example, the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists in the 1850s and used churches as networks to gain and influence voters. Slavery was considered a sin. Of course, there were hypocritical Christians in the 1800s too.

The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.

Christianity (and Christians) had a huge impact on the abolishment of slavery in the USA. And I'm saying that as an athiest! It's not my opinion, it's fact. Many important figures in the movement (such as Harriet Beecher Stowe and John Brown) were Christians who used their beliefs as a means to influence and oppose slavery. Abraham Lincoln, although religiously ambiguous, was a member of the Republican party which, as I stated above, used religion to progress the anti-slavery movement.

And I have to ask-- What is the extent of your education as far as this subject is concerned?

Posting this again because I'd still like a response.

Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="caseypayne69"] wrong the bible never says this, but keep on talking about what you hear.

Yes, my bad. I meant to say Christianity said the Earth was the center of the universe, and defended this view strongly against someone with a different view like Galileo. Also, all I said was that Christianity advocated this view at some time, I don't need to say the Bible said it, since we were discussing Christianity as a whole, taking into account its history and previous actions of its supporters.

And that would be what specifically?

I have answers to all your posts, but I fear for what will happen to me if I reply to them.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="unholymight"] Yes, my bad. I meant to say Christianity said the Earth was the center of the universe, and defended this view strongly against someone with a different view like Galileo. Also, all I said was that Christianity advocated this view at some time, I don't need to say the Bible said it, since we were discussing Christianity as a whole, taking into account its history and previous actions of its supporters.

And that would be what specifically?

I have answers to all your posts, but I fear for what will happen to me if I reply to them.

You fear?
Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts

In Theory it can be argued that Lincoln was a Christian. Some Believe he was a Deist, or wasn't any specific religion at all. During his Term as President he allegedly converted to Christianity. No One knows for sure because he never spoke of his religious beliefs.

So, Technically if he was Christian, the Emancipation Proclamation was created with Christian Influences.

Columbus was a Christian, he discovered America as well. Christians played a MAjor role in the West as we know it.

Heck, There were even Christians at the Signing of the Declaration of Independence.

Snipes_2

"Columbus was a Christian, he discovered America as well. Christians played a MAjor role in the West as we know it. actually, there were a ton of visitors to the Americas prior to him, and really..... Columbus had no real influence on a cultural level. Western culture is not JUST AMERICA. Its ALL Western nations(European thought....). America was founded AFTER the renaissance, by people of EMPIRICAL philosophy

Avatar image for deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
deactivated-60f8966fb59f5

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
Member since 2008 • 1719 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="unholymight"] Yes, my bad. I meant to say Christianity said the Earth was the center of the universe, and defended this view strongly against someone with a different view like Galileo. Also, all I said was that Christianity advocated this view at some time, I don't need to say the Bible said it, since we were discussing Christianity as a whole, taking into account its history and previous actions of its supporters.

And that would be what specifically?

I have answers to all your posts, but I fear for what will happen to me if I reply to them.

You'll get estranged on an internet forum. Oh my god.
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts

[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="VigilanteArtist"]

The movement to abolish slavery was largely based on Christian ideals. For example, the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists in the 1850s and used churches as networks to gain and influence voters. Slavery was considered a sin. Of course, there were hypocritical Christians in the 1800s too.

VigilanteArtist

The fact that slavery arose on Christianity's watch would show that Christianity provided little, if any, effective resistance against slavery.

Christianity (and Christians) had a huge impact on the abolishment of slavery in the USA. And I'm saying that as an athiest! It's not my opinion, it's fact. Many important figures in the movement (such as Harriet Beecher Stowe and John Brown) were Christians who used their beliefs as a means to influence and oppose slavery. Abraham Lincoln, although religiously ambiguous, was a member of the Republican party which, as I stated above, used religion to progress the anti-slavery movement.

And I have to ask-- What is the extent of your education as far as this subject is concerned?

Posting this again because I'd still like a response.

I have no education on this subject. But, I don't see how it would matter as long as my logic is sound. Actually, it wouldn't matter in a debate behind a podium.

Let me quote what the original poster said:

"It was only until Christianity's influence that slavery was abolished. You can talk about serfdom all you want, but it still isn't the same principal as slavery."

He said that Christianity was the only thing that contributed to the abolishment of slavery. I was challenging this view. Although you have named many Christians who opposed slavery, any other factor that is not specifically Christian in origin that contributed to the abolishment of slavery could be something I can use against your argument.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="unholymight"] That might actually further support my point, since then I can say that despite religious teachings telling people to treat each other as they would have others treat them, slavery still occurred.unholymight

But not your view that it was under Christian watch...also..slavery of the indigenous people of America was abolished by a Christian priest in the 1500's..

Well you showed that it can occur in areas that don't have Christianity. But showing that does not yet prove that it cannot exist in areas where there is also Christianity. Wikipedia says slavery lasted longer than that here; into the 1700s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_slavery Also, you have not established that it was indeed specifically Christianity that ended slavery, not the common sense of the people.

"New Laws of the Indies in 1542, in which Emperor Charles V declared free allNative American slaves," Wikipedia...

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Penguinchow"] ... I find this to be an excellent explanation. Cookies for Sajadene for superior understanding of human nature!

Hmmm.... what kind of cookies are we talking about?

I knew it. I was right all along! Not that I should be surprised, for I am not.

Actually, if you read through the whole thread you will see that I do take this whole thing seriously and my post was made with all seriousness. I personally chose to ignore your replies because clearly they have already been addressed. Feel free to go through all the pages again to see all my responses in this thread and I will stand by my original statement. I will be more than glad to explain it to you further if you can not comprehend it. Sometimes, the simplest explanations are the hardest to fathom.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts

I have no education on this subject. But, I don't see how it would matter as long as my logic is sound. Actually, it wouldn't matter in a debate behind a podium.

unholymight

Education on the subject doesn't matter? And it wouldn't matter in a debate? I'm curious...how does one successfully debate with no knowledge of a subject?

Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]And that would be what specifically?LJS9502_basic
I have answers to all your posts, but I fear for what will happen to me if I reply to them.

You fear?

Of course. Fear is interesting. It puts spice on food.