All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
Oh really? I thought they were just a means to establish order...
pretty much you can just pick any random African country whos name ends with an oh so original "ia" and I could not possibly care less what happened to it.
All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
Because a world government would be soooooooo efficient.
All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
Quite true. Where did people get the idea that patriotism was a virtue? It's just a tool to convince people to kill others.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.Darth_Tyrev
All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
This statement is so far out in left field that i dont even know how to respond in words.
All of them. They are all just arbitrary boundaries set up by power hungry nationalists who think it gives them superiority over other humans.foxhound_fox
Yes but without countries there would be no semblance of order. I mean you cant expect people to follow the orders of someone else that lives on the other side of the planet, theres a reason the British, Spanish, and French empires fell. The only ay to establish a world government would be to have have governors who share a common culture with the province they rule, though even then the countries in away still exist. That and one governor would always think he had more power than another and here comes war. But if you are an anarchist explain to me the benefits of such a society, with no order, or control There would always be some person who believed themselves better, and had the ability to convince the masses of his or her leadership, and walla an anarchist society fails, and it dissolves into war, and eventually the reestablishment of countries. Oh, and ignore my sig, and the bottom half of this comment. I also quoted the wrong post sorry.
Yes but without countries there would be no semblance of order. I mean you cant expect people to follow the orders of someone else that lives on the other side of the planet, theres a reason the British, Spanish, and French empires fell. The only ay to establish a world government would be to have have governors who share a common culture with the province they rule, though even then the countries in away still exist. That and one governor would always think he had more power than another and here comes war. But if you are an anarchist explain to me the benefits of such a society, with no order, or control There would always be some person who believed themselves better, and had the ability to convince the masses of his or her leadership, and walla an anarchist society fails, and it dissolves into war, and eventually the reestablishment of countries. Oh, and ignore my sig, and the bottom half of this comment. I also quoted the wrong post sorry.tb254
Borders don't make order (teh rhyme lol). Laws make order. Democracy makes order. You don't need lines on paper to make laws and have democracy. You need intelligent people who are elected into government by their community to represent them among all the communities. All countries give rise to is national pride... which leads to ignorance of other peoples and cultures due to a superiority complex... which leads to disagreements based upon that ignorance... which leads to war.
[QUOTE="tb254"]Yes but without countries there would be no semblance of order. I mean you cant expect people to follow the orders of someone else that lives on the other side of the planet, theres a reason the British, Spanish, and French empires fell. The only ay to establish a world government would be to have have governors who share a common culture with the province they rule, though even then the countries in away still exist. That and one governor would always think he had more power than another and here comes war. But if you are an anarchist explain to me the benefits of such a society, with no order, or control There would always be some person who believed themselves better, and had the ability to convince the masses of his or her leadership, and walla an anarchist society fails, and it dissolves into war, and eventually the reestablishment of countries. Oh, and ignore my sig, and the bottom half of this comment. I also quoted the wrong post sorry.foxhound_fox
Borders don't make order (teh rhyme lol). Laws make order. Democracy makes order. You don't need lines on paper to make laws and have democracy. You need intelligent people who are elected into government by their community to represent them among all the communities. All countries give rise to is national pride... which leads to ignorance of other peoples and cultures due to a superiority complex... which leads to disagreements based upon that ignorance... which leads to war.
Okay I see were your coming from, but I don't think the world i ready for a world government, not until we expand into space.
[QUOTE="tb254"]Okay I see were your coming from, but I don't think the world i ready for a world government, not until we expand into space.foxhound_fox
Log in to comment