What do you think about ron paul?

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

I agree with a few of his issues but overall he is too extreme and if people think Obama is destroying the country honestly the risk of electing Ron Paul would be big

fueled-system
I fail to see how he's extreme. He advocates small government and sound money. Since when did that become extreme and deficit spending until the wheels fall off, massive regulation and huge federal government become the "norm"?
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#52 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
I think if I were a cannibal, he wouldnt be my top pick on the menu.
Avatar image for Flavorysoup
Flavorysoup

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 Flavorysoup
Member since 2011 • 593 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"] Ron Paul advocates sound money.-Sun_Tzu-

Which would be a disaster. Imagine if Ron Paul was elected president in 2008 and put us on the gold standard - deflation would be a very big problem right now. With deflation, there is very little reason to spend money if what you are going to buy is going to be cheaper in the future as prices go down and down. So it would exasperate our current economic problems from that perspective. But not only that, but the reason why there is such little consumption right now is because so many people are in debt. Deflation increases one's debt burden. With a gold standard people would be even more in debt and would have less money to spend. And these are only two problems out of many. It is not a coincidence that during the Great Depression that the moment that a country got off the gold standard, their economy started growing again. Which is another real problem with the gold standard in the first place. Which is another big problem with the gold standard. It can only work if the government had the credibility to convince people that it will stay on the gold standard. If it doesn't, that is a recipe for financial disaster of Grecian proportions. The Euro is a great example of how bad an idea the gold standard is.

I agree, but the euro is doing great. It's worked out great for the Eu, just not for the few countries that went broke and that wasn't the euro's fault. Overall the euro is pretty steady currency. .6 dollars to a euro and it's been like that for a while.

Avatar image for Belwar555
Belwar555

291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 Belwar555
Member since 2006 • 291 Posts
I don't mind the guy (hey, I'm not even American) - it is his supporters I can't stand. Seriously, those guys are so annoying and arrogant - you can't go on any political topic or videos without them flooding the comments and claiming that they have 'seen the light', so to speak.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

I think that he is genuine and sticks to his beliefs. My personal view is that he has a lot of good ideas, but many of his policies would never work in the real world. If he ever got elected, he would probably lose his re-election by a landslide when people caught on to the fact that his policies simply don't work as well in action as they do on paper.

Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

I have a good deal of respect for Ron Paul because he calls himself a small-government libertarian and for the most part he actually is, unlike many of his Republican and Tea Party colleagues.

That being said I still disagree with a good deal of his policies and some of the more biggoted remarks he's made in the past make me uncomfortable.

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

Homophobia is probably the biggest turn off for me.

I wont support any politician that doesnt support equal rights such as same-sex marriage.

Avatar image for Commander-Gree
Commander-Gree

4929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Commander-Gree
Member since 2009 • 4929 Posts
I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36094 Posts

I like him and yet he is unelectable.

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

At least he's not Rand Paul.

o

He raised him.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36094 Posts

At least he's not Rand Paul.

o

He raised him.

T_P_O
I always wonder how the hell that happened.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="T_P_O"]

At least he's not Rand Paul.

o

He raised him.

Serraph105
I always wonder how the hell that happened.

ron, like many libertarians of his era, was quite hawkish in his youth... like when he was raising rand. WTF do i know though.
Avatar image for Flavorysoup
Flavorysoup

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#63 Flavorysoup
Member since 2011 • 593 Posts

I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme. Commander-Gree

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7063 Posts

He is the western equivalent of the Taliban.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

[QUOTE="Commander-Gree"]I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme. Flavorysoup

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

Its not as outlandish as it sounds. The idea behind legalizing hardcore drugs is that it would be far cheaper and effective to simply fund rehabilitation centers and prevention programs than it would be to outlaw it.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36094 Posts

[QUOTE="Commander-Gree"]I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme. Flavorysoup

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

well he is for the state's right to do so. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJow2ALVirk&feature=related
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

He is my first pick. Perfect man for the times.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
put it this way, if you see centralized government as divine you will hat him, if you see decentralized government as good you will love him. he has many controversial views on many things but does not wish to force his view on anyone, he is all for states enacting policies he agrees with and disagrees his major problem is with uniform laws on a population that is not near uniform. that a law in new york may not fit the population of Wisconsin and that those people should collectively decided on their own what is best for them, and that it is wrong for states with high population to dictate what is right for states that dont have high populations. in short let the people have a direct impact as to how their lives are governed, because on the federal level they may not have any choice. but again WTF do i know.
Avatar image for catfishmoon23
catfishmoon23

5197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 catfishmoon23
Member since 2005 • 5197 Posts

I like him, but there is no way he will get elected.

Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

He is the only one I will be voting for. Probably the most influential person in my life. A true role model.

Avatar image for espoac
espoac

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#71 espoac
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

Being against gay marriage does not make you a homophobe. Ron Paul believes that the government ultimately should have no role in marriage. And I have to agree...government legislated marriage does more harm to society than good.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Being against gay marriage does not make you a homophobe. Ron Paul believes that the government ultimately should have no role in marriage. And I have to agree...government legislated marriage does more harm to society than good.

espoac
you have a problem with a behavior based tax break, whats next your going to tell me the corporate welfare state is bad...... damn extremist vies...........
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="Commander-Gree"]I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme. Flavorysoup

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

libertarians don't believe that because they think heroine is fine. Libertarians think the war on drugs is SPREADS drug use rather than getting rid of it. So legalizing heroine is even more important in my mind.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="Flavorysoup"]

[QUOTE="Commander-Gree"]I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme. dkdk999

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

libertarians don't believe that because they think heroine is fine. Libertarians think the war on drugs is SPREADS drug use rather than getting rid of it. So legalizing heroine is even more important in my mind.

and who told you this?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="Commander-Gree"]I like him and respect him because I think he is a pretty consistent libertarian and he is not nearly as hypocritical as most of the other Republican candidates. And I really like his foreign policy, but I don't think I'd ever vote for him since he has too much faith in the free market and his economic policies and some other libertarian policies (legalizing heroin for example) are too extreme. Flavorysoup

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

Yet oxycontin remains legal. Controlled yes, but legal nontheless.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#76 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="Flavorysoup"]

who the f*** came up with the idea of legalizing heroine? I do want pot to be legal because it's more healty then tobacco and shouldn't be illegal, but heroine? Thet s*** messes you up!

dkdk999

libertarians don't believe that because they think heroine is fine. Libertarians think the war on drugs is SPREADS drug use rather than getting rid of it. So legalizing heroine is even more important in my mind.

Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="dkdk999"] libertarians don't believe that because they think heroine is fine. Libertarians think the war on drugs is SPREADS drug use rather than getting rid of it. So legalizing heroine is even more important in my mind.

chessmaster1989

and who told you this?

Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] and who told you this?surrealnumber5

Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

Most libertarians, like myself, don't believe it should be criminalized. Drug addiction should be more of a medical issue than criminal one.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] and who told you this?surrealnumber5

Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

I think the war on drugs is immoral for sure. but I actually thought most libertarians were more on the side of practical reasons for legalizing drugs and so on. I could be wrong I guess.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.KC_Hokie

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

Most libertarians, like myself, don't believe it should be criminalized. Drug addiction should be more of a medical issue than criminal one.

that sounds like a moral line you just drew.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#81 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] and who told you this?surrealnumber5

Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

I didn't know libertarians supported it on moral grounds actually, thought it was entirely based on economic grounds (where there are very solid reasons for drug legalization, but not because it would reduce the use). Although when I think about it, it makes sense that libertarians support drug legalization for moral reasons.

I'd say your assessment of me is more or less right (not libertarian, some libertarian leanings, then those leanings are combined oddly with some Keynesian leanings to make an hilariously odd economic philosophy).

Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts
Complete idiot in my opinion.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Needs to be more far to the right if he wants to win the nomination.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.chessmaster1989

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

I didn't know libertarians supported it on moral grounds actually, thought it was entirely based on economic grounds (where there are very solid reasons for drug legalization, but not because it would reduce the use). Although when I think about it, it makes sense that libertarians support drug legalization for moral reasons.

I'd say your assessment of me is more or less right (not libertarian, some libertarian leanings, then those leanings are combined oddly with some Keynesian leanings to make an hilariously odd economic philosophy).

we all start somewhere and i spent a few years in your shoes, i was a hard core Keynesian in my early studies when i was a pure math major, i still love mathematical models but that does not mean i still find them applicable to real world situations. today in economics i prefer the non-mathematical approach to economics known as praxiology. i still appreciate the work done by those who try to quantify human action, and if there happens to be a model that works in the real world i will give it a good look, as good as the skeptic i am can. off topic: i just got my CFP, not that it has anything to do with my career or this topic but i did tell you i was going for it.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#85 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

surrealnumber5

I didn't know libertarians supported it on moral grounds actually, thought it was entirely based on economic grounds (where there are very solid reasons for drug legalization, but not because it would reduce the use). Although when I think about it, it makes sense that libertarians support drug legalization for moral reasons.

I'd say your assessment of me is more or less right (not libertarian, some libertarian leanings, then those leanings are combined oddly with some Keynesian leanings to make an hilariously odd economic philosophy).

we all start somewhere and i spent a few years in your shoes, i was a hard core Keynesian in my early studies when i was a pure math major, i still love mathematical models but that does not mean i still find them applicable to real world situations. today in economics i prefer the non-mathematical approach to economics known as praxiology. i still appreciate the work done by those who try to quantify human action, and if there happens to be a model that works in the real world i will give it a good look, as good as the skeptic i am can. off topic: i just got me CFP, not that it has anything to do with my career or this topic but i did tell you i was going for it.

Hah, I'm kind of the opposite of you in that regards in that I won't really give an economic theory much thought unless it can be modeled formally via mathematics and/or be given credibility econometrically (although often those two go hand-in-hand). :P
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Ron Paul would be president if 15-19 year old maleshad their say.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

I didn't know libertarians supported it on moral grounds actually, thought it was entirely based on economic grounds (where there are very solid reasons for drug legalization, but not because it would reduce the use). Although when I think about it, it makes sense that libertarians support drug legalization for moral reasons.

I'd say your assessment of me is more or less right (not libertarian, some libertarian leanings, then those leanings are combined oddly with some Keynesian leanings to make an hilariously odd economic philosophy).

chessmaster1989

we all start somewhere and i spent a few years in your shoes, i was a hard core Keynesian in my early studies when i was a pure math major, i still love mathematical models but that does not mean i still find them applicable to real world situations. today in economics i prefer the non-mathematical approach to economics known as praxiology. i still appreciate the work done by those who try to quantify human action, and if there happens to be a model that works in the real world i will give it a good look, as good as the skeptic i am can. off topic: i just got me CFP, not that it has anything to do with my career or this topic but i did tell you i was going for it.

Hah, I'm kind of the opposite of you in that regards in that I won't really give an economic theory much thought unless it can be modeled formally via mathematics and/or be given credibility econometrically (although often those two go hand-in-hand). :P

no congrats? now i feel as if i am drinking for no reason, this saddness means more drinks!!!!!!!!!!!!

also lack of a model does not mean a theory can not have mathematical evidence to back it.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] Most people (such as myself) who support legalizing hard drugs do so for economic reasons, not because we don't think it's harmful. Heroine is terrible for you, but I still think it should be legal.dkdk999

most libertarians i know dont want drugs legal because it would reduce the use(it may or may not), they want it on moral grounds. i doubt youre a libertarian, but i dont doubt you have some libertarian leanings.

I think the war on drugs is immoral for sure. but I actually thought most libertarians were more on the side of practical reasons for legalizing drugs and so on. I could be wrong I guess.

While I'm not a Libertarian it seems to me that most oppose the criminalization of drugs because what one choooses to put into his/her body should be of no concern of the state's. That there are practical reasons to be opposed only amplifies the argument.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#89 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] we all start somewhere and i spent a few years in your shoes, i was a hard core Keynesian in my early studies when i was a pure math major, i still love mathematical models but that does not mean i still find them applicable to real world situations. today in economics i prefer the non-mathematical approach to economics known as praxiology. i still appreciate the work done by those who try to quantify human action, and if there happens to be a model that works in the real world i will give it a good look, as good as the skeptic i am can. off topic: i just got me CFP, not that it has anything to do with my career or this topic but i did tell you i was going for it.

surrealnumber5

Hah, I'm kind of the opposite of you in that regards in that I won't really give an economic theory much thought unless it can be modeled formally via mathematics and/or be given credibility econometrically (although often those two go hand-in-hand). :P

no congrats? now i feel as if i am drinking for no reason, this saddness means more drinks!!!!!!!!!!!!

also lack of a model does not mean a theory can not have mathematical evidence to back it.

Congrats on the CFP. :P
Avatar image for MysteriousKori
MysteriousKori

559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#90 MysteriousKori
Member since 2006 • 559 Posts

Ron Paul is the only candidate that isn't a puppet in my opinion. The media is clearly afraid of him, they attempt to label him as a 'lunatic' or they just do not bother mentioning him. Look at the polls, the majority believe that Ron Paul won the last debate. Fox News even removed the poll from the front page of their site when they didn't like the results (Ron Paul was winning). It is a clear example of biased media.

If people would take the time to listen to him and do some research, they might reach the same epiphany that I did. I was in favor of Obama last race, but that was an enormous mistake. I initially believed that Ron Paul was crazy, just like the media portrayed him as. However, when I watched the debates, I realized how much sense he made and how much I agree with him. I did some research and he is truly the most honest and consistent candidate, which you cannot say about any of the others. He seems to truly care about Americans. The last debate cemented my vote for him. The other candidates are status quo.

Look at this link: http://www.topix.com/issue/gop-debate-aug11

If you look at it in state view, all of America is for Ron Paul.

Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

Needs to be more far to the right if he wants to win the nomination.

DroidPhysX

You are right when it comes to social issues. In some ways he is ultra conservative, in others he is ultra liberal.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36094 Posts

Ron Paul would be president if 15-19 year old maleshad their say.

sonicare

you know there may be some merit in that claim, and it also could explain why he doesn't do that well. Young people tend to vote democrat which would means that if his base is mostly young adults it will still be smaller than the democrats whose base lies in the younger crowds.

He's simply appealing to the wrong demographic of republican voters to ever do very well in a presidential race.

Avatar image for Flavorysoup
Flavorysoup

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#93 Flavorysoup
Member since 2011 • 593 Posts

[QUOTE="espoac"]

Being against gay marriage does not make you a homophobe. Ron Paul believes that the government ultimately should have no role in marriage. And I have to agree...government legislated marriage does more harm to society than good.

surrealnumber5

you have a problem with a behavior based tax break, whats next your going to tell me the corporate welfare state is bad...... damn extremist vies...........

I believe that if we're taking marriage out of the govornments hands is infair to the people who are of the same sex and want to get marries, because in most cases a state makes gay marriage illegal, and people aginst it HAVE to take it up to the supreme court to get it repealed. If ron pul had his way, this couldn't happen. If we are going to say that govornment has no role in marriage, then we have to say that state doesn't either. Niether the govornment NOR the state should have the right to tell you that you can't marry the person you want to.