What do you think about the g@y agenda that the media is pushing

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#351 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts
[QUOTE="thebest31406"][QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="thebest31406"] And I'm telling you that this "privilege" extends to all groups; Blacks, Whites, Christians, Muslims, Heteros and Gays. When the law bars denial of goods and services simply for belonging to a group, it becomes less of a privilege and more of a right guaranteed by statute.

Again, you are completely missing my point. It doesn't matter which other groups have this same privilege as the gays - they all infringe upon the businessman's right to choose who he does business with. He is being forced to provide his goods/services to someone he does not want to provide them to. Nobody has a right to another man's business. Nobody has a right to another man's property. Nobody has a right to another man's labour.

No one was robbing him of his business, property or labour. The bakery is part of an institution that provides goods and services to the general public. If he doesn't want to be bothered with gays then don't provide goods and services. PS: are you even American? Why do you spell labour with a u?

You still have no idea what I'm saying. I'm not saying the businessman was robbed of business, I'm saying he was forced into doing business with someone he didn't want to do business with. And clearly that bakery was not intended to provide his services to anyone for any occasion because the guy explicitly stated that he was against making wedding cakes for gays. Are you American? You sound like a socialist.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#352 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Are you American? You sound like a socialist.

Thank you jesus that you can't vote for yourself as most intelligent user because this was not an intelligent post.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#353 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Oh god I'd immigrate to Switzerland if Laihendi was Canadian.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#354 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Oh god I'd immigrate to Switzerland if Laihendi was Canadian.

Aljosa23

:lol:

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#355 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

[QUOTE="thebest31406"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Again, you are completely missing my point. It doesn't matter which other groups have this same privilege as the gays - they all infringe upon the businessman's right to choose who he does business with. He is being forced to provide his goods/services to someone he does not want to provide them to. Nobody has a right to another man's business. Nobody has a right to another man's property. Nobody has a right to another man's labour.Laihendi
No one was robbing him of his business, property or labour. The bakery is part of an institution that provides goods and services to the general public. If he doesn't want to be bothered with gays then don't provide goods and services. PS: are you even American? Why do you spell labour with a u?

You still have no idea what I'm saying. I'm not saying the businessman was robbed of business, I'm saying he was forced into doing business with someone he didn't want to do business with. And clearly that bakery was not intended to provide his services to anyone for any occasion because the guy explicitly stated that he was against making wedding cakes for gays. Are you American? You sound like a socialist.

Correction; He wasn't denying service to someone, he was denying service to a gay person because he was gay which says that he'd deny service to all gays if he could. If he was denying services to the individual because of something unique to the individual, that would be another story. As a business who serves the general public, he doesn't have the luxury or the right to serve everyone except gays or blacks or jews etc.

I see you didn't answer my question.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#356 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45433 Posts
What the hell is the " gay agenda" people speak of, make it sound like a conspiracy theory stemming from Trilateral Commission / New World Order / Bilderberg Group or whomever in their plot to kill off 90% of the population or whatever those conspiracy theories declare but at least those conspiracy theories point to an agenda, so what's the sinister plot of the " gay agenda" I might ask?