What does an irish and a hispanic have in common?

  • 151 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="thegerg"] No, I am not changing the topic. You said discrimination is illegal in the US. In most cases, though, discrimination is not illegal. You went on to say that discrimination based on ethnicity is illegal in the US, but I gave you an example to show that that is not as simple as you seem to think it is. In no way am I creating a straw man.

Well then I guess it's up to you to show that discrimination is legal in the US. Who you chose to be friends with is not pertinent to this discussion.

Who one may choose to be friends with shows that discrimination is legal.

The friends aspect is your argument. Not mine. Mine was based on US laws. Since the topic is about the US. So show me where it's stated discrimination is legal in the US. That was your initial point.
Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Well then I guess it's up to you to show that discrimination is legal in the US. Who you chose to be friends with is not pertinent to this discussion. LJS9502_basic
Who one may choose to be friends with shows that discrimination is legal.

The friends aspect is your argument. Not mine. Mine was based on US laws. Since the topic is about the US. So show me where it's stated discrimination is legal in the US. That was your initial point.

uhhh i can you right now you're not gonna get anywhere. it'd probably just be better to accept that you two are arguing two different points.

thegerg, you should admit you kind of went off topic.LJS9502_basic should acknowledgethegerg's argument even if it's off topic for the sake of your own sanity.

sorry i just realized that was really bossy, im still gonna send this post though, lol.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
Just saw this last page after the OP ...to clear things up: Certain forms of discrimination by businesses are not allowed and some are (hooters hiring girls that look a certain way or only girls to serve tables). So one cannot say that discrimination is illegal. But one can state that certain types of discrimination by certain parties are not allowed (but nothing more than that)
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Who one may choose to be friends with shows that discrimination is legal. thegerg
The friends aspect is your argument. Not mine. Mine was based on US laws. Since the topic is about the US. So show me where it's stated discrimination is legal in the US. That was your initial point.

If your argument (discrimination is illegal in the US) is based on US laws, then you are clearly ignorant of US law. Nowhere in the law is it " stated discrimination is illegal in the US" in the same way that it is not state in law that wearing a blue shirt on Wednesday is legal. That's simply not how law works.

Fixed it for ya. IT read wrong originally.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Who one may choose to be friends with shows that discrimination is legal. Phaze-Two

The friends aspect is your argument. Not mine. Mine was based on US laws. Since the topic is about the US. So show me where it's stated discrimination is legal in the US. That was your initial point.

uhhh i can you right now you're not gonna get anywhere. it'd probably just be better to accept that you two are arguing two different points.

thegerg, you should admit you kind of went off topic.LJS9502_basic should acknowledgethegerg's argument even if it's off topic for the sake of your own sanity.

sorry i just realized that was really bossy, im still gonna send this post though, lol.

I suppose. Prior experience leads me to believe I shall just leave this. The thread topic was about the US as a country not the individuals and that is how I responded.
Avatar image for DiIIasDonuts
DiIIasDonuts

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 DiIIasDonuts
Member since 2010 • 1078 Posts

Actually the hispanics were here before America existed, topic failed.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]Just saw this last page after the OP ...to clear things up: Certain forms of discrimination by businesses are not allowed and some are (hooters hiring girls that look a certain way or only girls to serve tables). So one cannot say that discrimination is illegal. But one can state that certain types of discrimination by certain parties are not allowed (but nothing more than that)

I think hooters has to do with themes or some such. And at that it's only the one position...plus they can't discriminate based on race and ethnicity.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="rawsavon"]Just saw this last page after the OP ...to clear things up: Certain forms of discrimination by businesses are not allowed and some are (hooters hiring girls that look a certain way or only girls to serve tables). So one cannot say that discrimination is illegal. But one can state that certain types of discrimination by certain parties are not allowed (but nothing more than that)

I think hooters has to do with themes or some such. And at that it's only the one position...plus they can't discriminate based on race and ethnicity.

I never said they could (based on race). But they are a business following the laws of the US. -they are allowed to discriminate based on both appearance and sex As such, discrimination is allowed under some conditions and not allowed under others. So one cannot say that discrimination is not allowed (as a blanket statement)
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="rawsavon"]Just saw this last page after the OP ...to clear things up: Certain forms of discrimination by businesses are not allowed and some are (hooters hiring girls that look a certain way or only girls to serve tables). So one cannot say that discrimination is illegal. But one can state that certain types of discrimination by certain parties are not allowed (but nothing more than that)

I think hooters has to do with themes or some such. And at that it's only the one position...plus they can't discriminate based on race and ethnicity.

I never said they could (based on race). But they are a business following the laws of the US. -they are allowed to discriminate based on both appearance and sex As such, discrimination is allowed under some conditions and not allowed under others. So one cannot say that discrimination is not allowed (as a blanket statement)

Actually I said it was illegal. And since discrimination is illegal...that statement was correct on the surface. While there are exceptions to every rule.....you cannot say that my statement was incorrect.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] If your argument (discrimination is illegal in the US) is based on US laws, then you are clearly ignorant of US law. Nowhere in the law is it " stated discrimination is illegal in the US" in the same way that it is not state in law that wearing a blue shirt on Wednesday is legal. That's simply not how law works. thegerg

Fixed it for ya. IT read wrong originally.

I appreciate it, but it doesn't read wrong. Go back and read it again and the post leading up to it.

I have been following this thread intently and read everything (I am of Irish descent so it drew me to it, especially in light of what I posted last night). It looked like you were saying that there is a law stating that discrimination is legal. Anyhow, we both agree that discrimination is illegal in certain circumstances as I already noted, but for individuals and private groups, there certainly is nothing stopping any sort of discrimination.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts

(I am of Irish descent so it drew me to it, WhiteKnight77
I'm of Irish descent.....on one side of my family.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Maybe discrimination was not the best word but there are a lot of ways to discriminate in a subtle way. Anyways the article clearly shows racial profiling and prejudice against the irish guy back then a thing that I think is very common in the US against other races like hispanics and blacks. That was basically my point.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts

Maybe discrimination was not the best word but there are a lot of ways to discriminate in a subtle way. Anyways the article clearly shows racial profiling and prejudice against the irish guy back then a thing that I think is very common in the US against other races like hispanics and blacks. That was basically my point. kuraimen
Well there is no denying that some people are prejudiced....but that works both ways. Some of the Hispanics are as well....you can't make everyone love each other. Best you can do is ask for civility....though this is hardly unique to the US.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] I think hooters has to do with themes or some such. And at that it's only the one position...plus they can't discriminate based on race and ethnicity.

I never said they could (based on race). But they are a business following the laws of the US. -they are allowed to discriminate based on both appearance and sex As such, discrimination is allowed under some conditions and not allowed under others. So one cannot say that discrimination is not allowed (as a blanket statement)

Actually I said it was illegal. And since discrimination is illegal...that statement was correct on the surface. While there are exceptions to every rule.....you cannot say that my statement was incorrect.

I just proved that was not correct :? Discrimination is not illegal...certain forms by certain parties is illegal, but that is all All you need is one negative to negate to the rule LJ Example, all these numbers are odd: 3, 5, 7, 9, 2 Is that true? no...2 is even The rule is false even though most of the numbers are odd So your statement was, in fact, not accurate
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] I never said they could (based on race). But they are a business following the laws of the US. -they are allowed to discriminate based on both appearance and sex As such, discrimination is allowed under some conditions and not allowed under others. So one cannot say that discrimination is not allowed (as a blanket statement)

Actually I said it was illegal. And since discrimination is illegal...that statement was correct on the surface. While there are exceptions to every rule.....you cannot say that my statement was incorrect.

I just proved that was not correct :? Discrimination is not illegal...certain forms by certain parties is illegal, but that is all All you need is one negative to negate to the rule LJ Example, all these numbers are odd: 3, 5, 7, 9, 2 Is that true? no...2 is even The rule is false even though most of the numbers are odd So your statement was, in fact, not accurate

For your statement to be correct....discrimination has to be legal. Since we know it's not always legal to discriminate...your statement is false.
Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts
Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.F1_2004
Generalizations....they just aren't true.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.F1_2004

There is a big difference between going through the proper channels to immigrate to the US and another to sneak across the border. That is where the rub is. My ancestors came here legally. I have Hispanic friends who came here legally and have their green cards (not actually green either) and dislike what illegals are doing. There are those here on Gamespot who came to the US legally and dislike illegal immigrants too.

Avatar image for Omega-316
Omega-316

981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Omega-316
Member since 2011 • 981 Posts
i predict once the Hispanics become the majority race we are going to discriminate Canadians crossing the borderplaymynutz
we canadians dont bother our selves with that. we live in the best country in the world. last time i checked it was the americans crossing our boarder looking for jobs because their economy went to hell. ;)
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Actually I said it was illegal. And since discrimination is illegal...that statement was correct on the surface. While there are exceptions to every rule.....you cannot say that my statement was incorrect.LJS9502_basic
I just proved that was not correct :? Discrimination is not illegal...certain forms by certain parties is illegal, but that is all All you need is one negative to negate to the rule LJ Example, all these numbers are odd: 3, 5, 7, 9, 2 Is that true? no...2 is even The rule is false even though most of the numbers are odd So your statement was, in fact, not accurate

For your statement to be correct....discrimination has to be legal. Since we know it's not always legal to discriminate...your statement is false.

That is not at all accurate LJ. I would have had to say 'discrimination is legal' (and nothing more, a blanket statement)...the opposite of what you said I said no such thing You said 'discrimination is illegal' This statement is not correct as I have shown cases where it is allowed You were not correct, I am sorry :( Discrimination is neither legal or illegal (as a blanket statement). The legality depends on the type and parties involved
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="playmynutz"]i predict once the Hispanics become the majority race we are going to discriminate Canadians crossing the borderOmega-316
we canadians dont bother our selves with that. we live in the best country in the world. last time i checked it was the americans crossing our boarder looking for jobs because their economy went to hell. ;)

Ah Canadians do come here for work....we get plenty of doctors.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.LJS9502_basic
Generalizations....they just aren't true.

...same as your generalization about discrimination being illegal...was 'just not true' ROFL
Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.WhiteKnight77

There is a big difference between going through the proper channels to immigrate to the US and another to sneak across the border. That is where the rub is. My ancestors came here legally. I have Hispanic friends who came here legally and have their green cards (not actually green either) and dislike what illegals are doing. There are those here on Gamespot who came to the US legally and dislike illegal immigrants too.

lol what channels? The old immigrants from Europe, whom the majority of white Americans are descended from, just waltzed into America.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] I just proved that was not correct :? Discrimination is not illegal...certain forms by certain parties is illegal, but that is all All you need is one negative to negate to the rule LJ Example, all these numbers are odd: 3, 5, 7, 9, 2 Is that true? no...2 is even The rule is false even though most of the numbers are odd So your statement was, in fact, not accuraterawsavon
For your statement to be correct....discrimination has to be legal. Since we know it's not always legal to discriminate...your statement is false.

That is not at all accurate LJ. I would have had to say 'discrimination is legal' (and nothing more, a blanket statement)...the opposite of what you said I said no such thing You said 'discrimination is illegal' This statement is not correct as I have shown cases where it is allowed You were not correct, I am sorry :( Discrimination is neither legal or illegal (as a blanket statement). The legality depends on the type and parties involved

No. Context is key. And in the US it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, age, ethnicity and religion. And this is the context I was speaking of when I made my statement. You can argue it all you want...but the government says you'd be wrong.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="F1_2004"]Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.rawsavon
Generalizations....they just aren't true.

...same as your generalization about discrimination being illegal...was 'just not true' ROFL

Wrong. I was speaking of a specific definition. You can roll on the floor all you want....but my context is correct.;)
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]For your statement to be correct....discrimination has to be legal. Since we know it's not always legal to discriminate...your statement is false.LJS9502_basic

That is not at all accurate LJ. I would have had to say 'discrimination is legal' (and nothing more, a blanket statement)...the opposite of what you said I said no such thing You said 'discrimination is illegal' This statement is not correct as I have shown cases where it is allowed You were not correct, I am sorry :( Discrimination is neither legal or illegal (as a blanket statement). The legality depends on the type and parties involved

No. Context is key. And in the US it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, age, ethnicity and religion. And this is the context I was speaking of when I made my statement. You can argue it all you want...but the government says you'd be wrong.

rofl I just showed you where sex based discrimination is allowed under US law ...your statement was wrong
Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="F1_2004"]Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.rawsavon
Generalizations....they just aren't true.

...same as your generalization about discrimination being illegal...was 'just not true' ROFL

oh please good sir, spare us another 10 pages of argument cause you know that's where this is gonna go
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"] That is not at all accurate LJ. I would have had to say 'discrimination is legal' (and nothing more, a blanket statement)...the opposite of what you said I said no such thing You said 'discrimination is illegal' This statement is not correct as I have shown cases where it is allowed You were not correct, I am sorry :( Discrimination is neither legal or illegal (as a blanket statement). The legality depends on the type and parties involvedrawsavon

No. Context is key. And in the US it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, age, ethnicity and religion. And this is the context I was speaking of when I made my statement. You can argue it all you want...but the government says you'd be wrong.

rofl I just showed you where sex based discrimination is allowed under US law ...your statement was wrong

I just gave you US law....trumps your opinion. And again...context is key. You are making straw man arguments dude.
Avatar image for Baconbits2004
Baconbits2004

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Baconbits2004
Member since 2009 • 12602 Posts

Hmm, this thread seems active, I wonder what's going on in it. =]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

LJS9502_basic

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No. Context is key. And in the US it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, age, ethnicity and religion. And this is the context I was speaking of when I made my statement. You can argue it all you want...but the government says you'd be wrong.

LJS9502_basic

rofl I just showed you where sex based discrimination is allowed under US law ...your statement was wrong

I just gave you US law....trumps your opinion. And again...context is key. You are making straw man arguments dude.

What are you talking about LJ :lol:
I also used US law. Hooters has been taken to court and won...setting a precedent that discrimination based on sex is allowed (depends on the circumstances).
So you cannot say that discrimination based on sex is illegal (it is neither legal or illegal...depends).
I have proven your statement to be false by negating your assertion.

ROFL LJ
I love you dude. I really do. :)

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="F1_2004"] oh please good sir, spare us another 10 pages of argument cause you know that's where this is gonna go

You are right. I should not have said anything. Normally though...when I correct someone (when they are disseminating false information), they will just say that they misspoke or were mistaken Which is what I did with this statement:
Way to generalize. Discrimination is illegal in the US by the way.LJS9502_basic
...it is both a generalization and false But the user did not do that (they persisted in defending it). You are correct though. I should have known the outcome and let the false information stand
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180241 Posts

...it is both a generalization and false But the user did not do that (they persisted in defending it). You are correct though. I should have known the outcome and let the false information standrawsavon
:roll: As I said...proper context. And I gave you the link to exactly what I was talking about. It supported my statement. On the other hand...you continue to give an opinion. So with nothing substantial to respond to in this thread...I'm out. But you didn't prove what you think your did either.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]...it is both a generalization and false But the user did not do that (they persisted in defending it). You are correct though. I should have known the outcome and let the false information standLJS9502_basic

:roll: As I said...proper context. And I gave you the link to exactly what I was talking about. It supported my statement. On the other hand...you continue to give an opinion. So with nothing substantial to respond to in this thread...I'm out. But you didn't prove what you think your did either.

US law (as proven by the hooters' court case) = my opinion LJ? Really??? My opinion must carry a ton of weight then...well, tbh, I always knew it did. And you did no such thing with your OP
Way to generalize. Discrimination is illegal in the US by the way.LJS9502_basic
You accused someone of making a generalization and made (an incorrect) one in the processes Oh well...either way See you later dude :)
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Yup, one of the biggest hypocrisies in North America. The old immigrants feel themselves to be the natural residents of the land and hate the new immigrants.F1_2004

There is a big difference between going through the proper channels to immigrate to the US and another to sneak across the border. That is where the rub is. My ancestors came here legally. I have Hispanic friends who came here legally and have their green cards (not actually green either) and dislike what illegals are doing. There are those here on Gamespot who came to the US legally and dislike illegal immigrants too.

lol what channels? The old immigrants from Europe, whom the majority of white Americans are descended from, just waltzed into America.

Have you not heard of Ellis Island? That was the port of call for most immigrants and they had to fill out paperwork before they were allowed into the US and were asked questions relating to names, occupations and if they could support themselves. They were also required to have X amount of money on them. Those that were sick or diseased were sent back to where they came from. Unskilled workers were denied entry due to the possibility of becoming a drain on government services (entering England you are asked if you have money and a place to stay, even if you are just there on vacation for that same reason, who would have thought it could happen in a European country too?) and others were sent back due to being criminals.

Illegal immigrants just swim the river or jump the fence or cross the desert or get packed into trucks like sardines (there is a pic of a girl hiding in the dashboard of a truck on the net). They are not going through the proper channels as my ancestors did (they actually came in through Maine and the Port of Chicago and yes, had to fill out forms and show that they could fend for themselves).

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

The trouble with that line of thinking is that your just reinforcing it. Once you start labelling people as irish, hispanic, etc. you are encouraging others to do the same.This in turn causes people to create differences and so forth. Why play that game? Why not just say that discrimination is wrong? There really isnt one group of people that is somehow more just or noble than another. It's just the situations vary.

Avatar image for danjammer69
danjammer69

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 danjammer69
Member since 2004 • 4331 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"]Saint Patricks Battalion - A unit that fought as part of the Mexican army and was made up of Irishmen and Mexicans as well as other nationalities What do i win?kuraimen
A Guiness beer or an enchilada. You choose.

Both give me the runs.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]For your statement to be correct....discrimination has to be legal. Since we know it's not always legal to discriminate...your statement is false.LJS9502_basic

That is not at all accurate LJ. I would have had to say 'discrimination is legal' (and nothing more, a blanket statement)...the opposite of what you said I said no such thing You said 'discrimination is illegal' This statement is not correct as I have shown cases where it is allowed You were not correct, I am sorry :( Discrimination is neither legal or illegal (as a blanket statement). The legality depends on the type and parties involved

No. Context is key. And in the US it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, age, ethnicity and religion. And this is the context I was speaking of when I made my statement. You can argue it all you want...but the government says you'd be wrong.

LJ, you did show what I stated earlier:

Federal law, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, prohibits employment discrimination based on any one of those characteristics. Other federal statutes, supplemented by court decisions, prohibit discrimination in voting rights, housing, credit extension, public education, and access to public facilities. State laws also provide further protection against discrimination.Your link

Again, this does not include private citizens or private groups or in Rawsavon's instance, Hooter's not hiring a man as a server in their restaurants (though Hooters cannot discriminate against anyone for any other job including managers, cooks and others who seek employment). The Mason's (private orginization) have the right to exclude anyone they wish based on sex, religion or race if they so desire.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#91 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

This almost sounded like the start of a bad joke.

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

But my Irish ancestors came here legally. I have no problem with hispanics, that would be silly. What I do have a problem with is those who are here illegally.

Avatar image for jerk-o-tron2000
jerk-o-tron2000

10036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 jerk-o-tron2000
Member since 2007 • 10036 Posts

I was expeting a Joke......

Quick someone tell an offensive joke!

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts

[QUOTE="F1_2004"][QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

There is a big difference between going through the proper channels to immigrate to the US and another to sneak across the border. That is where the rub is. My ancestors came here legally. I have Hispanic friends who came here legally and have their green cards (not actually green either) and dislike what illegals are doing. There are those here on Gamespot who came to the US legally and dislike illegal immigrants too.

WhiteKnight77

lol what channels? The old immigrants from Europe, whom the majority of white Americans are descended from, just waltzed into America.

Have you not heard of Ellis Island? That was the port of call for most immigrants and they had to fill out paperwork before they were allowed into the US and were asked questions relating to names, occupations and if they could support themselves. They were also required to have X amount of money on them. Those that were sick or diseased were sent back to where they came from. Unskilled workers were denied entry due to the possibility of becoming a drain on government services (entering England you are asked if you have money and a place to stay, even if you are just there on vacation for that same reason, who would have thought it could happen in a European country too?) and others were sent back due to being criminals.

Illegal immigrants just swim the river or jump the fence or cross the desert or get packed into trucks like sardines (there is a pic of a girl hiding in the dashboard of a truck on the net). They are not going through the proper channels as my ancestors did (they actually came in through Maine and the Port of Chicago and yes, had to fill out forms and show that they could fend for themselves).

They might have filled out some sort of paperwork with their name and occupation, but it's nothing like what it takes to immigrate to US now. Hell during the potato famine, almost a million Irish escaped famine and poverty by immigrating to the US. Tons snuck into the country "illegally". To compare immigration back then to now is just silly. You think any of these Mexicans escaping famine and poverty would have any chance of making it into the US today? Back then (before the late 1800's) if you could afford the ticket, you could immigrate.
Avatar image for atony12
atony12

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#95 atony12
Member since 2007 • 960 Posts

Didn't really think about it until you mentioned it but the Irish made up the majority of immigrants but they definately weren't the only ones.

Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

Is it the Irish or more that the working class in general scapegoate minority groups in times of economic strife?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

They both were not originally from the US, they migrated to the US and they got discriminated and mistreated in the US for being immigrants. The only difference is that many of those irish descendants are the ones doing the last thing to the hispanics right now. History truly repeats itself.

Irish immigrant hanged in 1845 receives Rhode Island pardon

kuraimen

Being Irish I could potentially be insulted by this post. Luckily enough it's so badly written that it is impossible to figure out.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts
lol people getting offended by OP, the only reason that joke offends me is because it's so bad. A bit late to pardon the guy dont'cha think? He's been dead for 150 years.
Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
yes both immigrant groups have suffered discrimination and worse
Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

But my Irish ancestors came here legally. I have no problem with hispanics, that would be silly. What I do have a problem with is those who are here illegally.

ImaPirate0202
But see, the supporters of illigal immigration (mostly hispanic supporters) try to convince people that it has do do with race and that anyone who is against illigal immigration is, in fact, a racist.