What has caused more harm Religion or Science?

  • 145 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="shoeman12"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Guns, nukes, swords, bombs. Tools of death.

would we be better in a world with no scientific advancement, way back in time, or in the current world with weapons? you live your life comfortably because of science, obviously weapons haven't killed you yet.

Science created TV and people watch tv rather than read or study. Is that not a detriment. And what make you think people did not live confortably before? Hell many tribes work less hours than a human does to survive and spend more time relaxing. You also ignore that religion brings spiritualism, unity and morals. So would you like to live in a world where its always ones best interest and with no sense or meaning of life?

Ehm, "science" pretty much created what these people are studying, in the first place.
Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="shoeman12"] would we be better in a world with no scientific advancement, way back in time, or in the current world with weapons? you live your life comfortably because of science, obviously weapons haven't killed you yet.

Science created TV and people watch tv rather than read or study. Is that not a detriment. And what make you think people did not live confortably before? Hell many tribes work less hours than a human does to survive and spend more time relaxing. You also ignore that religion brings spiritualism, unity and morals. So would you like to live in a world where its always ones best interest and with no sense or meaning of life?

Ehm, "science" pretty much created what these people are studying, in the first place.

But my point is that science is also a detriment to itself. And that people can live confortably without it. Look at some ancient writtings and you will see that there is not much difference between them and us. Hell I think people back then were more articulate than we are today. Many letters from the 1900's seem more like poetry than "lmao". And also religion brings its share of good on the table too.
Avatar image for Darth-Caedus
Darth-Caedus

20756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Darth-Caedus
Member since 2008 • 20756 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"]"Religion changed the face of man thou shalt not kill we all are gone" (Even managing to through Nevermore into religious discussions now......:lol: ) .....I'g going with religion on this...science did make the weapons that killed millions of people...but I'd say far more people have died in religious wars throughout history...

WW2 alone cause 60 million deaths. Name one religious war that has cause that many deaths.

I said through out warS, plural...yes...more people died because of technology in single wars...but if you add up all the wars in history, religion has the higher body count...
Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts
[QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"]"Religion changed the face of man thou shalt not kill we all are gone" (Even managing to through Nevermore into religious discussions now......:lol: ) .....I'g going with religion on this...science did make the weapons that killed millions of people...but I'd say far more people have died in religious wars throughout history...

WW2 alone cause 60 million deaths. Name one religious war that has cause that many deaths.

I said through out warS, plural...yes...more people died because of technology in single wars...but if you add up all the wars in history, religion has the higher body count...

Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c
deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c

6504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c
Member since 2005 • 6504 Posts

Well, science has certainly SAVED more lives than religion... but both are pretty applicable when it comes to war. Religion is a strong motive that has existed since the beginning of civilization, but technology is the tool of destruction.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Science created TV and people watch tv rather than read or study. Is that not a detriment. And what make you think people did not live confortably before? Hell many tribes work less hours than a human does to survive and spend more time relaxing. You also ignore that religion brings spiritualism, unity and morals. So would you like to live in a world where its always ones best interest and with no sense or meaning of life?

Ehm, "science" pretty much created what these people are studying, in the first place.

But my point is that science is also a detriment to itself. And that people can live confortably without it. Look at some ancient writtings and you will see that there is not much difference between them and us. Hell I think people back then were more articulate than we are today. Many letters from the 1900's seem more like poetry than "lmao". And also religion brings its share of good on the table too.

What? Literacy amongst the mass was extremely low before the 20th century and most people spoke in unrecognizable slang. Life before the industrial revolution was crap, period. You had to worry about diseases and extremely poor living standards.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.illegalimigrant
Why does everyone say wars are fought primarily for land? All wars, ever war that ever was, was fought for power. The vast majority of why people feel the way they do and do what they do is due to a need for power within oneself and their environment.

Avatar image for Darth-Caedus
Darth-Caedus

20756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Darth-Caedus
Member since 2008 • 20756 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] WW2 alone cause 60 million deaths. Name one religious war that has cause that many deaths.

I said through out warS, plural...yes...more people died because of technology in single wars...but if you add up all the wars in history, religion has the higher body count...

Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.

809 million...linky
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#109 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
The mis-interpretation of religions.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"]I said through out warS, plural...yes...more people died because of technology in single wars...but if you add up all the wars in history, religion has the higher body count... Darth-Caedus
Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.

809 million...linky

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26275921&page=0
Gotta love Dracargen.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"]I said through out warS, plural...yes...more people died because of technology in single wars...but if you add up all the wars in history, religion has the higher body count... Darth-Caedus
Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.

809 million...http://bookrate.wordpress.com/2006/07/22/deaths-over-history-religious-vs-nonreligous/" title="http://bookrate.wordpress.com/2006/07/22/deaths-over-history-religious-vs-nonreligous/">linky

I like the extensive list of sources he uses, the way he acknowledges that it was not only Hitler and Communism that caused the only secular conflicts in all of history, and so and so forth.

Avatar image for Darth-Caedus
Darth-Caedus

20756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Darth-Caedus
Member since 2008 • 20756 Posts

[QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.jaydough
809 million...linky

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26275921&page=0
Gotta love Dracargen.

Yes...I realize that the majority of wars were not over religion...but it still has a higher body count then science (I'm assuming by "science' the TC means modern weapons, guns, nukes, etc.) since it hasn't been used untill fairly recently, while religion has been causing wars a LOOOONG time ago...:P

Avatar image for Darth-Caedus
Darth-Caedus

20756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 Darth-Caedus
Member since 2008 • 20756 Posts

[QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.Theokhoth

809 million...http://bookrate.wordpress.com/2006/07/22/deaths-over-history-religious-vs-nonreligous/" title="http://bookrate.wordpress.com/2006/07/22/deaths-over-history-religious-vs-nonreligous/">linky

I like the extensive list of sources he uses, the way he acknowledges that it was not only Hitler and Communism that caused the only secular conflicts in all of history, and so and so forth.

Yeah yeah yeah, I was only looking for a source on the death cause by reigion...:P
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#114 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts
People. If you have said "what has caused more harm, religious people or Scientist?", then I think this thread would have more useful....
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#115 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"] 809 million...linkyDarth-Caedus
http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26275921&page=0
Gotta love Dracargen.

Yes...I realize that the majority of wars were not over religion...but it still has a higher body count then science (I'm assuming by "science' the TC means modern weapons, guns, nukes, etc.) since it hasn't been used untill fairly recently, while religion has been causing wars a LOOOONG time ago...:P

Well, I wasn't really talking about the actual topic, I was just backing up the claim of religious wars being a small portion of all the wars. And really, I have no idea what the TC means about science causing harm. :lol:
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.jaydough
809 million...linky

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26275921&page=0
Gotta love Dracargen.

I found five events on that list that weren't even religious. :lol:

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I found five events on that list that weren't even religious. :lol:

Theokhoth

Just because a war isn't base don religion doesn't automatically mean science is to blame for it.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

Darth, wordpress.com isn't a source

Avatar image for tomo90
tomo90

2245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#119 tomo90
Member since 2005 • 2245 Posts

Both have killed their fair share. What does it matter if ones killed a billion and another a million. Still massive numbers.

Avatar image for -TheSecondSign-
-TheSecondSign-

9303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#120 -TheSecondSign-
Member since 2007 • 9303 Posts

Who. The. Hell. Cares.

Avatar image for deathwish124
deathwish124

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 deathwish124
Member since 2009 • 248 Posts
Well, doesn't science technically lead to deaths from car accidents, gunshots, bombings, etc.?
Avatar image for Darth-Caedus
Darth-Caedus

20756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Darth-Caedus
Member since 2008 • 20756 Posts

Darth, wordpress.com isn't a source

danwallacefan
I didn't feel like doing much searching just to prove some random guy on the interwebs wrong >________________> :P
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#123 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts
Well, doesn't science technically lead to deaths from car accidents, gunshots, bombings, etc.?deathwish124
Science is not the one driving the car, shooting the gun, dropping the bombs, etc. Science has made a effort to make things safer like making car safer with air bags, bullet-proof vests, bomb shelters, etc. So in harm what science do unintentionally, it tries to make up for by saving lives....
Avatar image for zombiefruit
zombiefruit

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 zombiefruit
Member since 2006 • 2491 Posts
Religion. Nothing I hate more in this world than religion, save racism.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="deathwish124"]Well, doesn't science technically lead to deaths from car accidents, gunshots, bombings, etc.?tocool340
Science is not the one driving the car, shooting the gun, dropping the bombs, etc. Science has made a effort to make things safer like making car safer with air bags, bullet-proof vests, bomb shelters, etc. So in harm what science do unintentionally, it tries to make up for by saving lives....

Wait; one sentence you say science doesn't do these things, but the next you not only say it does but anthropomorphize it by saying it "tries." :?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#126 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Religion. People don't kill in the name of science.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

Religion. People don't kill in the name of science.

foxhound_fox

I must have imagined the existence of Eugenics, embryonic stem cell research and the inhuman experiments committed by the Japanese on Chinese citizens during WWII.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#128 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I must have imagined the existence of Eugenics, embryonic stem cell research and the inhuman experiments committed by the Japanese on Chinese citizens during WWII.Theokhoth

That is killing in the name of racial superiority... and as far as too many people are concerned, embryos aren't "human."

People don't kill in the name of biology, or gravitation, or the theory of relativity.

Avatar image for Anti-Venom
Anti-Venom

5646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Anti-Venom
Member since 2008 • 5646 Posts
I say science
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]I must have imagined the existence of Eugenics, embryonic stem cell research and the inhuman experiments committed by the Japanese on Chinese citizens during WWII.foxhound_fox


That is killing in the name of racial superiority... and as far as too many people are concerned, embryos aren't "human."

People don't kill in the name of biology, or gravitation, or the theory of relativity.

Eugenics is killing anybody (race, economic status, fertility, health concerns, etc) in favor of benefiting the human race by intervening with natural selection; it is for all intents and purposes killing in the name of biology.

As for embryos, what too many people consider is irrelevant to me.

Finally, the Japanese experiments were done solely for scientific findings; and in terms of science, what they found was extremely helpful. We still use the information they found.

Avatar image for RazerBlade13
RazerBlade13

3822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#131 RazerBlade13
Member since 2008 • 3822 Posts

Religion. The most harm science has ever done is possibly turn a man into something else. Wars have been started over religion.

Avatar image for -TheSecondSign-
-TheSecondSign-

9303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#132 -TheSecondSign-
Member since 2007 • 9303 Posts

[QUOTE="deathwish124"]Well, doesn't science technically lead to deaths from car accidents, gunshots, bombings, etc.?tocool340
Science is not the one driving the car, shooting the gun, dropping the bombs, etc. Science has made a effort to make things safer like making car safer with air bags, bullet-proof vests, bomb shelters, etc. So in harm what science do unintentionally, it tries to make up for by saving lives....

Unintentionally? I didn't know we made guns for some reason other than killing people. We made guns and bombs to kill people.

But guns and bombs don't kill people. Scientists with research grants do. Ask any soldier or marine or mercenary what they can make, and they probably can't make anything more than a blade or a bow. Its the researchers who are geniuses and masters of knowledge that create all the things we use to kill each other.

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#133 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="deathwish124"]Well, doesn't science technically lead to deaths from car accidents, gunshots, bombings, etc.?Theokhoth

Science is not the one driving the car, shooting the gun, dropping the bombs, etc. Science has made a effort to make things safer like making car safer with air bags, bullet-proof vests, bomb shelters, etc. So in harm what science do unintentionally, it tries to make up for by saving lives....

Wait; one sentence you say science doesn't do these things, but the next you not only say it does but anthropomorphize it by saying it "tries." :?

lol I did screwed up in my post alittle....:P I meant to say there are people that use science in a harmful way, people try to come up with solutions using science to make things better. Science don't kill people. It's only a tool that people use to become more advance than other people. Scratch my last post because there was a part in it that i forgot to delete...:P

EDIT: After reading my post, it still feels like I'm missing something though....:?

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#134 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="deathwish124"]Well, doesn't science technically lead to deaths from car accidents, gunshots, bombings, etc.?-TheSecondSign-

Science is not the one driving the car, shooting the gun, dropping the bombs, etc. Science has made a effort to make things safer like making car safer with air bags, bullet-proof vests, bomb shelters, etc. So in harm what science do unintentionally, it tries to make up for by saving lives....

Unintentionally? I didn't know we made guns for some reason other than killing people. We made guns and bombs to kill people.

But guns and bombs don't kill people. Scientists with research grants do. Ask any soldier or marine or mercenary what they can make, and they probably can't make anything more than a blade or a bow. Its the researchers who are geniuses and masters of knowledge that create all the things we use to kill each other.

Already aware of this. I thought we made guns in order to protect ourselves, not to go and kill people for joy. Which was my point. People are responsible when it comes to using science in a violent way.....
Avatar image for motorstormhater
motorstormhater

789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 motorstormhater
Member since 2007 • 789 Posts

well during the time of christ the jews tortured him to the brink of death and then killed him in the most painful way they could think of. then last century hitler massacered millions of jews for what people they will never meet did thousands of years ago to christ. soin my opinion religion has killed more people than any atom bomb has so far. sure bombs kill alot of people but most wars are either about land, money or religion

Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.BumFluff122

Why does everyone say wars are fought primarily for land? All wars, ever war that ever was, was fought for power. The vast majority of why people feel the way they do and do what they do is due to a need for power within oneself and their environment.

And what gives you power? Land....
Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"]

[QUOTE="tocool340"]

Unintentionally? I didn't know we made guns for some reason other than killing people. We made guns and bombs to kill people.

But guns and bombs don't kill people. Scientists with research grants do. Ask any soldier or marine or mercenary what they can make, and they probably can't make anything more than a blade or a bow. Its the researchers who are geniuses and masters of knowledge that create all the things we use to kill each other.

tocool340
Already aware of this. I thought we made guns in order to protect ourselves, not to go and kill people for joy. Which was my point. People are responsible when it comes to using science in a violent way.....

well during the time of christ the jews tortured him to the brink of death and then killed him in the most painful way they could think of. then last century hitler massacered millions of jews for what people they will never meet did thousands of years ago to christ. soin my opinion religion has killed more people than any atom bomb has so far. sure bombs kill alot of people but most wars are either about land, money or religion

motorstormhater
So is it religion that kills people or intolorance.
Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts
[QUOTE="Darth-Caedus"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]I said through out warS, plural...yes...more people died because of technology in single wars...but if you add up all the wars in history, religion has the higher body count... jaydough
Ok please add them up cause combining just WW1 and 2 you have about 100 million dead. And religious wars are the minority. Wars are fought primarily for land and greed. Religious wars are the few.

809 million...linky

Funny that this claim has nothing to back it up. Just someone saying so.
Avatar image for raynimrod
raynimrod

6862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#139 raynimrod
Member since 2005 • 6862 Posts

[QUOTE="raynimrod"]

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] I could also say that the crusades were not caused by religion. Since they were cause by politics and land. The crusades were caused by the Byzantine emperor asking for a hand to fight off the invading Turks. Most of the causes were politics and self improvement as there were lands to be conquered. Although its obvious that faith also gave reasons for these men to fight. Just like technology gave reason for Germany to take over Europe in WW2. If you want to get to the root the cause of harm is not Technology or Religion instead its individuals wills. However its interesting to see how many people will throw all the worlds problems on religion.

illegalimigrant



While I appreciate your persistence, I've given up arguing my point. You are still blinded by your lack of understanding of both history and the meaning of cause and means. Enjoy the rest of the thread.

And I could argue you are blinded by hate towards religion. Religion can be used as a tool for harm just like science can. If you can't argue don't just say you are blinded cause it works both ways.



I'm sorry but I still find it amusing that you consider cause and means to be the same thing.

Again:

Science is a means to kill someone, i.e. using tools. It isn't the root cause of why the killing took place.
Religion is a root cause for why many killings take place. It isn't an actual means to inflict harm i.e. it isn't physical.

As many people said at the outset of this thread - your question makes no sense.

Avatar image for shoot-first
shoot-first

9788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#140 shoot-first
Member since 2004 • 9788 Posts

where is the "this thread" option?

Avatar image for Ownage_Delivery
Ownage_Delivery

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Ownage_Delivery
Member since 2009 • 134 Posts
It's not about the wars. The harm religion does comes from the vast numbers of minds it seals off from reality. All religions are cults. It turns people against each other, that would have otherwise felt neutrality (by default) towards one another. Religions encourage their followers to place all others beneath them in their own minds. This of course leads to the shameful battles that occur when people of different mindstates cross paths, and neither one wants to budge, or be the peacemaker, since they've been convinced by their leaders (and apparently their God too) that they are the ones in the right. And since pleasing thier imaginary superhero is something that people take seriously, the battles will continue until only one religion is left standing... or until they wipe out the entire planet. Religion is obviously causing lots of unnecessary friction on the planet Earth.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]I must have imagined the existence of Eugenics, embryonic stem cell research and the inhuman experiments committed by the Japanese on Chinese citizens during WWII.foxhound_fox


That is killing in the name of racial superiority... and as far as too many people are concerned, embryos aren't "human."

People don't kill in the name of biology, or gravitation, or the theory of relativity.

Uh dude.....science defined race did it not? ;)

Plus, what about the scientific experiments carried out in the Concentration Camps? I'd say bad acts have indeed been done in the name of science.

Avatar image for -Montauk-
-Montauk-

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 -Montauk-
Member since 2007 • 880 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]I must have imagined the existence of Eugenics, embryonic stem cell research and the inhuman experiments committed by the Japanese on Chinese citizens during WWII.LJS9502_basic


That is killing in the name of racial superiority... and as far as too many people are concerned, embryos aren't "human."

People don't kill in the name of biology, or gravitation, or the theory of relativity.

Uh dude.....science defined race did it not? ;)

Plus, what about the scientific experiments carried out in the Concentration Camps? I'd say bad acts have indeed been done in the name of science.

I think more in the name of "racial purity" ... or something along those lines. And arguably, they did in the name of... maybe not religion but I would say something similar.
Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#144 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

I wouldn't say religion itself causes harm, but rather some of the beliefs and motives that are associated with it. People can be quite decieving with their religion. Some people will try to achieve their own gain, while hiding behind a facade of faith.

Science, on the other hand, isn't really capable of harm.Understanding the world we live in doesn't harm anyone :)

Avatar image for axia_777
axia_777

756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#145 axia_777
Member since 2006 • 756 Posts

Neither. Ignorance and fear filled people are at fault. Like a gun neither Science nor Religion kill people. People kill people.