By far. This thing has caused so much change in the last 60 years it cannot be overstated.
Verge_6
The AK killed many people yes, but was it that infulential?
Also is that per chance your own AK in that pic?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I can think of one, the Renault FT-17 tank. Every tank built to this day still follows this design (with a rotating turret on top and engine in the back.)GeForce2187
Simply not true.
[QUOTE="Verge_6"]
By far. This thing has caused so much change in the last 60 years it cannot be overstated.
_Matt_
The AK killed many people yes, but was it that infulential?
Also is that per chance your own AK in that pic?
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="Verge_6"]
By far. This thing has caused so much change in the last 60 years it cannot be overstated.
Verge_6
The AK killed many people yes, but was it that infulential?
Also is that per chance your own AK in that pic?
Killing is quite influential. To say nothing of the countless wills it has enforced and influence it has had on weaponry as a whole. And no, I could only dream of owning a fully-automatic capable AK. I would argue that if it hadn't been the AK, it would have been another, possibly less accomplished, assault rifle. But that wasn't the case, so it's rather null and void. I'm not saying the AK platform was inherently destined to make such shockwaves around the world, but as luck would have it, it did.[QUOTE="Verge_6"]
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
The AK killed many people yes, but was it that infulential?
Also is that per chance your own AK in that pic?
grape_of_wrath
I would argue that if it hadn't been the AK, it would have been another, possibly less accomplished, assault rifle. But that wasn't the case, so it's rather null and void. I'm not saying the AK platform was inherently destined to make such shockwaves around the world, but as luck would have it, it did. Look at it from this perpective- I believe that if the Ak hadn't been invented- the world wouldn't have been much different.[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]
[QUOTE="Verge_6"] Killing is quite influential. To say nothing of the countless wills it has enforced and influence it has had on weaponry as a whole. And no, I could only dream of owning a fully-automatic capable AK.
Verge_6
But that wasn't the case, so it's rather null and void. I'm not saying the AK platform was inherently destined to make such shockwaves around the world, but as luck would have it, it did. Look at it from this perpective- I believe that if the Ak hadn't been invented- the world wouldn't have been much different. And I believe dozens of nations wouldn't have been able to enact their policies or wills as they actually did. C'est la vie.[QUOTE="Verge_6"]
[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"] I would argue that if it hadn't been the AK, it would have been another, possibly less accomplished, assault rifle.
grape_of_wrath
[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]Look at it from this perpective- I believe that if the Ak hadn't been invented- the world wouldn't have been much different. And I believe dozens of nations wouldn't have been able to enact their policies or wills as they actually did. C'est la vie.[QUOTE="Verge_6"] But that wasn't the case, so it's rather null and void. I'm not saying the AK platform was inherently destined to make such shockwaves around the world, but as luck would have it, it did.
Verge_6
Another weapon would have taken its place, or a new one would have been developed to fill the niche of the ak-47.
Its just a gun model.
Looking at other weapon innovations, it is hardly as influential
And I believe dozens of nations wouldn't have been able to enact their policies or wills as they actually did. C'est la vie.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"] Look at it from this perpective- I believe that if the Ak hadn't been invented- the world wouldn't have been much different.
redwolf22
Another weapon would have taken its place, or a new one would have been developed to fill the niche of the ak-47.
Its just a gun model.
Looking at other weapon innovations, it is hardly as influential
Like what? Why are people overlooking what it actually accomplished in favor of what some other mystery weapon MIGHT have accomplished? You show me another assault rifle that was inherently able to be mass-produce in such vast quantities as the AK with matched durability. It is impossible to deny the influence it had on weapon manufacturing and operational mechanisms. Regardless of what would have happened if the AK hadn't existed, it doesn't matter. That DIDN'T happen, and the AK managed to cause drastic changes throughout the world. Playing a "what if" game doesn't change that.[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]Look at it from this perpective- I believe that if the Ak hadn't been invented- the world wouldn't have been much different. And I believe dozens of nations wouldn't have been able to enact their policies or wills as they actually did. C'est la vie. yeah, guess so. Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir.[QUOTE="Verge_6"] But that wasn't the case, so it's rather null and void. I'm not saying the AK platform was inherently destined to make such shockwaves around the world, but as luck would have it, it did.
Verge_6
[QUOTE="redwolf22"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] And I believe dozens of nations wouldn't have been able to enact their policies or wills as they actually did. C'est la vie. Verge_6
Another weapon would have taken its place, or a new one would have been developed to fill the niche of the ak-47.
Its just a gun model.
Looking at other weapon innovations, it is hardly as influential
Like what? Why are people overlooking what it actually accomplished in favor of what some other mystery weapon MIGHT have accomplished? You show me another assault rifle that was inherently able to be mass-produce in such vast quantities as the AK with matched durability. It is impossible to deny the influence it had on weapon manufacturing and operational mechanisms. If you take the influence of the ak-47, and compare it to other military technology (like rifling, percussion caps, automatic firing mechanisms etc) you will see it is a weapon model; a composite of numerous parts - each with hundreds of years of technological advancements behind them.Another weapon would have taken its place, or a new one would have been developed to fill the niche of the ak-47.
Its just a gun model.
Looking at other weapon innovations, it is hardly as influential
redwolf22
Niche of the assault rifle? Are you implying that the assault rifle isn't the main battle implement of the modern age?
Tanks, planes, ships, hell even satellites computers can't fight a guerrilla army using AK-47s effectively. Vietnam - the current war in the Middle East has shown us time and time again a conventional army cannot fight the guerrillas using such a simple weapon.
This isn't a niche, it's the real deal.
Other things have been important of course, but they all led up to the AK-47.
Just like how the Atari and pong really pushed gaming to a larger audience, nobody considers it the most important game ever made.
[QUOTE="redwolf22"]
Another weapon would have taken its place, or a new one would have been developed to fill the niche of the ak-47.
Its just a gun model.
Looking at other weapon innovations, it is hardly as influential
Wasdie
Niche of the assault rifle? Are you implying that the assault rifle isn't the main battle implement of the modern age?
Tanks, planes, ships, hell even satellites computers can't fight a guerrilla army using AK-47s effectively. Vietnam - the current war in the Middle East has shown us time and time again a conventional army cannot fight the guerillas using such a simple weapon.
This isn't a niche, it's the real deal.
The ak-47 is a cheap, mass producible, powerful and reliable weapon. It has its niche in the arms market.[QUOTE="Wasdie"][QUOTE="redwolf22"]
Another weapon would have taken its place, or a new one would have been developed to fill the niche of the ak-47.
Its just a gun model.
Looking at other weapon innovations, it is hardly as influential
redwolf22
Niche of the assault rifle? Are you implying that the assault rifle isn't the main battle implement of the modern age?
Tanks, planes, ships, hell even satellites computers can't fight a guerrilla army using AK-47s effectively. Vietnam - the current war in the Middle East has shown us time and time again a conventional army cannot fight the guerillas using such a simple weapon.
This isn't a niche, it's the real deal.
The ak-47 is a cheap, mass producible, powerful and reliable weapon. It has its niche in the arms market.Then you don't understand the battlefield or how weapons can influence it.
It's never been the biggest, most badass, hard to produce weapon that influences it, it's always been the cheap and easy to maintain that win.
The ak-47 is a cheap, mass producible, powerful and reliable weapon. It has its niche in the arms market.[QUOTE="redwolf22"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]
Niche of the assault rifle? Are you implying that the assault rifle isn't the main battle implement of the modern age?
Tanks, planes, ships, hell even satellites computers can't fight a guerrilla army using AK-47s effectively. Vietnam - the current war in the Middle East has shown us time and time again a conventional army cannot fight the guerillas using such a simple weapon.
This isn't a niche, it's the real deal.
Wasdie
Then you don't understand the modern battlefield or how weapons can influence it.
You didn't understand my point. In a world without the ak-47, a similar weapon would take its place. That was a broad assumption.I don't get why people say the AK47. It's one of many ARs, and could have easily been replaced by others.
If you want an influential AR then it would be the father of ARs
And the development of ARs is nothing compared to the development of:muskets, rifling, cartridges, nukes, and so on.
[QUOTE="Wasdie"][QUOTE="redwolf22"] The ak-47 is a cheap, mass producible, powerful and reliable weapon. It has its niche in the arms market.redwolf22
Then you don't understand the modern battlefield or how weapons can influence it.
You didn't understand my point. In a world without the ak-47, a similar weapon would take its place. That was a broad assumption. It's about as broad as assuming there's nothing unique or remarkable about the AK-47 and that any old weapon could have done what it did. Your entire point rides on broad assumption.I don't get why people say the AK47. It's one of many ARs, and could have easily been replaced by others. If you want an influential AR then it would be the father of ARsdercooWhat weapon would have replaced it? No one seems to have an answer. And call me when the STG-44 is showing up all around the world and shaking the very foundations of civilization.
Propoganda.
It can be deployed anywhere, people affected by it either don't know or are in denial, and a government or aristocracy can use it on their fellow countrymen to produce a desired result as long as they can control the information the public receives.
[QUOTE="dercoo"]I don't get why people say the AK47. It's one of many ARs, and could have easily been replaced by others. If you want an influential AR then it would be the father of ARsVerge_6What weapon would have replaced it? No one seems to have an answer. And call me when the STG-44 is showing up all around the world and shaking the very foundations of civilization.
Pick one from the left side
What weapon would have replaced it? No one seems to have an answer. And call me when the STG-44 is showing up all around the world and shaking the very foundations of civilization.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="dercoo"]I don't get why people say the AK47. It's one of many ARs, and could have easily been replaced by others. If you want an influential AR then it would be the father of ARsdercoo
Pick one from the left side
Awesome, so all assault rifles are inherently able to be mass produced on massive scales, have legendary durability, be easy enough to use that countless millions of inhabitants in Africa can wield it, and be from countries with the unique agendas and means that enable them to be shipped to every facet of the world? What, is Austria gonna make 10,000,000 Steyr AUGs to be shipped to the entire Asian continent? And again, this is STILL completelu belying the fact that some mystery weapon DIDN'T do what the AK did. Again, "what ifs"....not cool.The basic club. It allowed primitive man to live long enough to eventually develop into something more.
SUD123456
I like the reasoning behind picking ancient weapons over modern ones.
It's thought that at one stage humanity was reduced to somewhere between just 1000 and 10,000 breeding pairs!
If we're all descended from so few people, then it follows that the outcome of even the smallest skirmishes during that period (the Pleistocene) could have altered the course of history very dramatically.
Entire races of people may owe their existences to the advantages that a few clubs or sharpened flints gave to their distant ancestors! :shock:
Man.Dylan_11Absolutely. You equip the man, don't man the equipment. Look at Naval Special Warfare. They don't have such a great reputation because they are gear queers. You don't give some goofy mall ninja the worlds finest rifle. You give it to an SOF operator because they apply it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment