What is the worst city you've been to?

Europe - Paris, hands down

US - So many options. Buffalo, New Jersey (all cities), Detroit

Canada - Toronto

[QUOTE="22Toothpicks"][QUOTE="dreDREb13"]Oakland, California is a pretty awful city. Especially with the haven of San Francisco right across the bay.dreDREb13

Apparently Oakland is one of the most dangerous cities of the US (crime-wise)

New York City.

Ok, ok, it's the ONLY city I've been too but I didn't like it at all.

Crowded, rude people, SUICIDAL drivers. Bleck, no thanks.

Meulenberg.

Its not so far away from where I live,but the place is a dump.
Cops don't even go near that place.

Lowell, Massachusetts. Had to go there for a concert. Worst place on the planet. T_T

Glasgow...

[QUOTE="Deihjan"]Artekus

Did you happen to visit South Queensferry whilst you were at Edinburgh?

Not been too Edinburgh then?

Every single city in New Jersey. Really.

Dark_Knight6

Kingston.

Actually feared for my life the one night I was out there.

Gosh I'm not sure as I've done a lot of road traveling in the Western U.S. when I was young and I've seen many a questionable city whose names I soon forget. As far as the worst place I've lived I'm pretty sure it's Santa Barbara, California -- a corrupt, stinky pit of filth chock full of posers and narcissists whose only redeeming feature is that is has a damn good college.

I guess Philadelphia...or should I say Fillydelphia. -awesomeface.jpg-

Springfield, MA. It is so run down and crappy. Literally nothing to do their.

Dawq902

agreed, springfield is a complete crap-hole. just drugs and bums. i actually hate western mass, it should be annexed by vermont. also springfield hosts the basketball hall of fame...

Louisville, Kentucky

The city just has a lot of banks and There is nothing to do there.

Camden. NJ

[QUOTE="hippiesanta"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Rome was honestly the stinkiest, dirtiest, most annoying place I've ever been to. Rude smelly people that smoke everywhere, teeny tiny *meep meep* scooters that will literally bump into your car and not stop, crappy traffic and public transportation, tons of pickpockets and agressive homeless, the men will hit on your 14 year old daughter if she is cute...the list goes on

Plenty of places to go in Italy, only reason to go to Rome is to see the coliseum...and even that was underwhelming.

mrbojangles25

I am sorry to offend; my entire experience there was not all bad. It was just mostly bad. I guess a big city for me needs more than just a rich history to appeal (and Rome had plenty of history).

But it is still the worst city I've been to, and I've been to Berlin, Munich, Paris, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Saigon, Washington DC (a close second), and much, much, much more and Rome is the only one where the negatives > positives.

London and Toronto. Those places suck crusty a***ole.

Buffalo, New York was pretty ugly when I went there. :?Aquat1cF1sh

Nuevo Laredo - lots of violence, drug wars, police corruption, prison breaks, dirty & rude people, carjacking, robberies, etc. Plus, there isn't much to do there, entertainment-wise. Lots of artists/entertainers don't want to come to that place. I can't believe I made it out alive when I went there last year.

1. Gary, Indiana

2. Salinas, California

3. Memphis, Tennessee

4. Flagstaff, Arizona

5. IDK

Detroit

Chicago

LA

Hinesville, GA

Karachi, Pakistan. Most of you will read the bolded part and understand why.

I have a Pakistani background, and I didn't like it. I'm going there in September, and now that I'm older and understand a bit more, I'm a bit more cautious. The people of Pakistan, on the other hand, are the most hospitable, nice, helpful people I've ever met.

Melbourne. It pissed down the whole time we were there, not much to do either, all they had was fumbleball. Sydney>>>Melbourneleperphiliac

I live in Melbourne. You probably went during the wet season. Fumbleball is also a proper code of football, where you actually use your feet more than twice a game. Melbourne>>>>Sydney. And I've been to Sydney. It's OK, but not as good as Melbourne.

Any city in the Central Valley and I dont consider Sacramento to be in the central valley. But yes Im talking about Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Madera,Visalia, and Hanford. Ew! Clovis is the only kinda decent one, but not really.

Still pretty bad is Salinas, Ca.

The one I live in. Has no stores, no walmart, horrible roads, and trash everywhere.

London and Toronto. Those places suck crusty a***ole.

DaJuicyMan

[QUOTE="leperphiliac"]Melbourne. It pissed down the whole time we were there, not much to do either, all they had was fumbleball. Sydney>>>MelbourneDaanyal

I live in Melbourne. You probably went during the wet season. Fumbleball is also a proper code of football, where you actually use your feet more than twice a game. Melbourne>>>>Sydney. And I've been to Sydney. It's OK, but not as good as Melbourne.

[QUOTE="Daanyal"]

[QUOTE="leperphiliac"]Melbourne. It pissed down the whole time we were there, not much to do either, all they had was fumbleball. Sydney>>>Melbourneleperphiliac

I live in Melbourne. You probably went during the wet season. Fumbleball is also a proper code of football, where you actually use your feet more than twice a game. Melbourne>>>>Sydney. And I've been to Sydney. It's OK, but not as good as Melbourne.

No, it is a game of skill. Also, I do like rugby league.

Every single city in New Jersey. Really.

Dark_Knight6

I thought Jersey City was awesome...

I think the worst I've been to are Richmond VA, Atlanta Georgia, and the city I lived in the longest, Jacksonville Florida.