What kind of idiots writes unconstitutional bills like SOPA, NDAA, & CISPA?

And what idiots would be all for those bills? Can anyone answer me that? Do they really want this country to go under? Ugh.

say hello to Hollywood. also the idiots in the government who don't understand how the internet works, yet endorse them all the same.

old people

Corporations that want more power and money by stomping out the competition in the form of indie developers and musicians so that the indie developers and musicians would be forced to go into a brick and mortar publisher and lose their IP rights as well as granting corporations a big fat pay check if the IP does well.

Stop whining this will prevent that nasty stuff on the internet I am for it.TrashBoat

Get off the internet.

[QUOTE="TrashBoat"]Stop whining this will prevent that nasty stuff on the internet I am for it.Shinobi120

Get off the internet.

[QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

[QUOTE="TrashBoat"]Stop whining this will prevent that nasty stuff on the internet I am for it.TrashBoat

Get off the internet.

Ten bucks says this is Banjo's alt trolling as a Conservative for the LOL factor.

Corporations that want more power and money by stomping out the competition in the form of indie developers and musicians so that the indie developers and musicians would be forced to go into a brick and mortar publisher and lose their IP rights as well as granting corporations a big fat pay check if the IP does well.

Vesica_Prime

Explain how indies would be forced to go the brick and mortor route.

Who could say no to something titled Stop Online Piracy Act? That'd be like saying no to something titled The Stop Killing Baby Seals Act.

...or The JOBS Act.

The TSA is pretty sick. Why would anyone be against the second amendment? All of these wars are popping up and the people are too focused in cable, movies, and video games. War against transportation, food, Internet, guns, drugs, the Supreme Court allows strip searching for minor offenses. But people are too plugged in. They can't care because they don't know. The mainstream media is no help. Did they say anything about the NDAA? No they didn't. President Obama signed the NDAA. Removing the second amendment is 4 to 5 in the Supreme Court. Guns protect you from the government. If it's gone and people know you have a gun. You are automatically deemed a terrorist and will be infinitely detained. ::pukes::LOXO7

What? Second Amendment rights have actually strengthened under Obama.

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]The TSA is pretty sick. Why would anyone be against the second amendment? All of these wars are popping up and the people are too focused in cable, movies, and video games. War against transportation, food, Internet, guns, drugs, the Supreme Court allows strip searching for minor offenses. But people are too plugged in. They can't care because they don't know. The mainstream media is no help. Did they say anything about the NDAA? No they didn't. President Obama signed the NDAA. Removing the second amendment is 4 to 5 in the Supreme Court. Guns protect you from the government. If it's gone and people know you have a gun. You are automatically deemed a terrorist and will be infinitely detained. ::pukes::worlock77

What? Second Amendment rights have actually strengthened under Obama.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]The TSA is pretty sick. Why would anyone be against the second amendment? All of these wars are popping up and the people are too focused in cable, movies, and video games. War against transportation, food, Internet, guns, drugs, the Supreme Court allows strip searching for minor offenses. But people are too plugged in. They can't care because they don't know. The mainstream media is no help. Did they say anything about the NDAA? No they didn't. President Obama signed the NDAA. Removing the second amendment is 4 to 5 in the Supreme Court. Guns protect you from the government. If it's gone and people know you have a gun. You are automatically deemed a terrorist and will be infinitely detained. ::pukes::LOXO7

What? Second Amendment rights have actually strengthened under Obama.

And he signed into law a bill that permits conceal carry in national parks. But far be it from me to deprive you of mindless talking points.

[QUOTE="TrashBoat"][QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

Get off the internet.

ad1x2

Ten bucks says this is Banjo's alt trolling as a Conservative for the LOL factor.

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]

[QUOTE="TrashBoat"] I will once the SOPA NDDA and CISPA all pass because they are epic.TrashBoat

Ten bucks says this is Banjo's alt trolling as a Conservative for the LOL factor.

Large and powerful corporations draft these bills (because the bills give them business advantages), and then they pay politicians (senators and members of the House of Representitives) to vote for these bills. Our government officials are bought off.

The kind of idiot that needs to fund his campaign.

baby-boomers surrealnumber5

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

What? Second Amendment rights have actually strengthened under Obama.

worlock77

And he signed into law a bill that permits conceal carry in national parks. But far be it from me to deprive you of mindless talking points.

Idiots, that's it.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="LOXO7"] Obama appointed Sonia Sotomayor who voted against McDonald v. Chicago. Not toward the best direction to strengthen.LOXO7

And he signed into law a bill that permits conceal carry in national parks. But far be it from me to deprive you of mindless talking points.

NDAA doesn't have anything to do with the 2nd Amendment. It's mindless because it's the same goddamn talking point that I've heard directed at any and every Democrat for the last 30 years. Your guns rights are safe, rest assured.

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]

[QUOTE="TrashBoat"] I will once the SOPA NDDA and CISPA all pass because they are epic.TrashBoat

Ten bucks says this is Banjo's alt trolling as a Conservative for the LOL factor.

I'm not a liberal and I used to worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster until I got hungry and ate him. You lose.

And what idiots would be all for those bills? Can anyone answer me that? Do they really want this country to go under? Ugh.

Shinobi120

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

And he signed into law a bill that permits conceal carry in national parks. But far be it from me to deprive you of mindless talking points.

worlock77

NDAA doesn't have anything to do with the 2nd Amendment. It's mindless because it's the same goddamn talking point that I've heard directed at any and every Democrat for the last 30 years. Your guns rights are safe, rest assured.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="LOXO7"] Isn't my point bigger than yours? He also signed the NDAA. Do you know about that? But rest assured in a statement he said he won't use it on American citizens while he's in office. But he says a lot of things. Btw what so mindless?LOXO7

NDAA doesn't have anything to do with the 2nd Amendment. It's mindless because it's the same goddamn talking point that I've heard directed at any and every Democrat for the last 30 years. Your guns rights are safe, rest assured.

Actually you didn't ask what I thought about it. I'm not a fan of it personally, but it doesn't have a damned thing to do with what I've been talking about ether.

They aren't idiots. They are highly intelligent, corruptible politicians; bought out officials in the House and Senate doing the bidding of their corporate sponsors.RandPaul

This.

[QUOTE="RandPaul"]They aren't idiots. They are highly intelligent, corruptible politicians; bought out officials in the House and Senate doing the bidding of their corporate sponsors.worlock77

This.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="RandPaul"]They aren't idiots. They are highly intelligent, corruptible politicians; bought out officials in the House and Senate doing the bidding of their corporate sponsors.LOXO7

This.

Yeah, that's totally what we said. With that kind of leap maybe you should try out for the Olympics.

Politicians who work with big corporations to make sure that the corporation makes money and the politician stays in power.

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

NDAA doesn't have anything to do with the 2nd Amendment. It's mindless because it's the same goddamn talking point that I've heard directed at any and every Democrat for the last 30 years. Your guns rights are safe, rest assured.

worlock77

Actually you didn't ask what I thought about it. I'm not a fan of it personally, but it doesn't have a damned thing to do with what I've been talking about ether.

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

This.

worlock77

Yeah, that's totally what we said. With that kind of leap maybe you should try out for the Olympics.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]I know that. I was asking what do you think about it. I listed other idiotic war on our liberties as well. I'm just so passionate against the "(guns, drugs, food, transportation) kill people" argument "so we have to outlaw them." And the sentences may get jumbled together. My belief is guns protect us from the government. That's the NDAA. Martial law. War against terror. Foreign and domestic. Idiocy. Obama's rhetoric in his campaign was peace. So was Bush Jr.'s before him. Now it's not like that. I guess I have to be an idiot to figure that one out.

LOXO7

Actually you didn't ask what I thought about it. I'm not a fan of it personally, but it doesn't have a damned thing to do with what I've been talking about ether.

Yeah, I'm relating to your post by telling you that NDAA had not a thing to do with my point.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="RandPaul"]They aren't idiots. They are highly intelligent, corruptible politicians; bought out officials in the House and Senate doing the bidding of their corporate sponsors.LOXO7

This.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="LOXO7"] And you two think you can do nothing about it. Keep reelecting the same corrupt politicians. How does that quote from Einstein go? Repeating the same action to expect different results is insane?LOXO7

Yeah, that's totally what we said. With that kind of leap maybe you should try out for the Olympics.

Yep, that's totally what I said. With that kind of leap you should try out for the Olympics.

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Actually you didn't ask what I thought about it. I'm not a fan of it personally, but it doesn't have a damned thing to do with what I've been talking about ether.

worlock77

Yeah, I'm relating to your post by telling you that NDAA had not a thing to do with my point.

Money talks

old people

TheFallenDemon

Old politicians

Who could say no to something titled Stop Online Piracy Act? That'd be like saying no to something titled The Stop Killing Baby Seals Act.

...or The JOBS Act.

cybrcatter

It is like saying no the PATRIOT Act, I mean, what you don't support the bill? You must want the terroists to win!

I know Netflix is in favor of these crappy bills. But then again, they're well-known for stupid **** lately. Remember their plan to put DVDs and streaming on separate services?The-Apostle

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]I know Netflix is in favor of these crappy bills. But then again, they're well-known for stupid **** lately. Remember their plan to put DVDs and streaming on separate services?sSubZerOo