[QUOTE="Vanadium2k8"]No language should be mandatory in schools. If you aren't interested in the language, it's near-impossible to learn it. It's the golden rule of language-learning.foxhound_fox
Yes, there should be mandatory language courses. Language is how you communicate and how you learn. If you don't understand English or the basics of Latin, you will fail all of your writing assignments and science. English is slowly becoming an international and official "world" language and Latin is the standard in the field of science, an important part of any students curriculum. The study of linguistics should be integrated into "English" cIasses because it helps students understand the origin of English and many other languages from Europe.
That should be the case, at least in the English speaking West.Why would you want to waste their time and ruin their potential interest? IMO, a lot of grown up people would be learning language voluntarily if it weren't for schools. All those textbooks, assignments, forced output, clearly didn't get me anywhere in my mandatory 8 years of French. Am I fluent as an 8 year old? Hell no, I'm hardly as fluent as a 2 year old.
Yet, in my 3 months of voluntary Japanese, I probably matched the 8 years of French in my first month. All by watching J-Dramas, listening to J-Pop, playing butt loads of video games. I've probably learnt 2,000 words in 3 months, as opposed to the 500 I learned in French for 8 years. My daughter is already half-fluent in Korean after 5 months of study. All voluntary. You will learn next to nothing in a forced 2 years of Latin.
If 2 years of Latin was enforced, no one would grow up to learn languages. It would be seen as a difficult, boring task. Why force them to learn languages when they can grow up to learn 4 or 5 voluntarily? Same thing goes for being forced to read books in school. How many of us actually grow up to write book reports about every chapter?
Log in to comment