What war in history interests you the most?

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts
Recent conflicts are always the most interesting to look at at first glance because of the development of weapons and the fact that they bear more relevance to the current times. So since I'm not much of a historian I'd probably say one of those. Though I don't deny that further back in England's, and the world's history there are a lot of very interesting conflicts which are just as, if not more intriguing once you get into them.
Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

World War II. All the sides seemed to be equally capable and the chances of defeat/victory the same. Plus it has D-day, which I can't even imagine organizing and trying to execute. I can read on it all day long and never lose fascination.

Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#53 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

Korea/Vietnam and WWI.

Avatar image for C2N2
C2N2

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 C2N2
Member since 2012 • 759 Posts

Vietnam and Korean, simply because it's amusing watching/reading about 'The world's superpower' not minding their own business, and then getting owned my China-men hiding in holes.Fightingfan

I don't think 58,000 American dead compared to 1.5 million + North Vietnam/Viet Cong dead constitutes "America getting owned"... The war was going fine, every major North Vietnamese offensive was repulsed prior to US leaving (including Tet Offensive), the US public simply didn't want us there (because didn't think it was justified, especially after secret invasions/bombings in neutral Laos were revealed)... Which is why Nixon took the "graceful" peaceful exit when he had a chance and then NV re-invaded SV AFTER the US withdrew completely from the country (apart from our consulate in Saigon).

Same situation in Korea... I hardly think hundreds of thousands of dead is comparable to tens of thousands when arguing you are the victor... North Korea beat South Korea... US led coalition comes in and saves South Korea, nearly destroys North Korea, China comes in with 1.5m + troops and saves them... Once again hardly a "beating" considering it was a few hundred thousand coalition troops (at its peak, much less than that in many cases), operating IN LAND against a force that at its peak was four times as large, still inflicting highly contrasted casualties on the enemy...

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#55 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

In chronological order, for your great studying pleasure:

The Eighty Years' War of the Dutch rebels against the Spanish Empire

World War 1

The Spanish Civil War between the National rebels and the Republican government

World War 2 (especially the Russian Campaign/Great Patriotic War)

The Soviet War in Afghanistan

The 2008 South Ossetia War between Russia and Georgia

Avatar image for C2N2
C2N2

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 C2N2
Member since 2012 • 759 Posts

Oh and on topic:

- Mexican American War

Highly overlooked in US history, which is silly lol... US war of aggression, which resulted in the invasion of Mexico and subsequent capture of Mexico City forcing Mexico to give the US what is now the entire southwest US (from Texas' early western border to top of California). I don't understand why this war is so overlooked... We went to Mexico, said "hey Mexico we will buy all that land" (because President Polk wanted west coast ports). Mexico was like "na that's a large part of our country" and Polk was like "kthxbye", put a few thousand troops on a disputed border with Texas/Mexico, Mexico responded by putting troops there as well, patrols fire on each other, Polk goes to congress and says "look what Mexico did, US dead on US soil" the rest is history.

- US Civil War

- WW1

- WW2

Avatar image for freek666
freek666

22312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 freek666
Member since 2007 • 22312 Posts

Easily the Boer Wars and the Crimean War

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

For me, it's WWII. I have read 59 books on it just in the past 6 years alone.

Avatar image for Spinnerweb
Spinnerweb

2995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#59 Spinnerweb
Member since 2009 • 2995 Posts
The 1965 war between Pakistan and India.
Avatar image for MAZ85
MAZ85

1094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 MAZ85
Member since 2007 • 1094 Posts
the crusades , ww2
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#61 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

World War 2. Simple as that. There will never be another conflict as large as WWII (and that's a good thing). Everything about it was so massive in scale it is unbelievable.

It's not just the size, but it was how it was fought. No WMDs, everything was conventional. Tactics shifted greatly. Civilians were now the targets of the major powers, not just soldiers. The war machine was so great in each nation that a pure military engagementwas impossible. You had to target the war machine, which meant targeting civilians.

Then there is the politics. It gets very complicated. Especially when you start looking at Eastern Europe and how pretty much everybody was killing everybody for their own reasons. It's an increadible look at humanity at our worst.

Other wars that are interesting are Vietnam and Korea, just becuase the dynamics of the superpowers and the whole cold war thing.

Avatar image for Postal_Guy
Postal_Guy

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Postal_Guy
Member since 2006 • 2643 Posts

WW2 for sure.

Avatar image for codymcclain14
codymcclain14

6017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#63 codymcclain14
Member since 2010 • 6017 Posts
World War 2, not sure why tho.
Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

For me, it's WWII. I have read 59 books on it just in the past 6 years alone.

WhiteKnight77
Holy crap.
Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts
No WMDsWasdie
Except for the two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#66 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]No WMDsgamerguru100
Except for the two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Well yeah. WMDs ended the fighting but they weren't present throughout the war.

The existant of WMDs changed war and international politics forever and have made everything very difficult to analyze.

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#67 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

World War 2. Simple as that. There will never be another conflict as large as WWII (and that's a good thing). Everything about it was so massive in scale it is unbelievable.

It's not just the size, but it was how it was fought. No WMDs, everything was conventional. Tactics shifted greatly. Civilians were now the targets of the major powers, not just soldiers. The war machine was so great in each nation that a pure military engagementwas impossible. You had to target the war machine, which meant targeting civilians.

Then there is the politics. It gets very complicated. Especially when you start looking at Eastern Europe and how pretty much everybody was killing everybody for their own reasons. It's an increadible look at humanity at our worst.

Other wars that are interesting are Vietnam and Korea, just becuase the dynamics of the superpowers and the whole cold war thing.

Wasdie
You seem to know your stuff. Cool. I accept you.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#68 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

the two world wars, the Mongol conquests , the Jewish-Roman wars

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#69 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

Oh and on topic:

- Mexican American War

Highly overlooked in US history, which is silly lol... US war of aggression, which resulted in the invasion of Mexico and subsequent capture of Mexico City forcing Mexico to give the US what is now the entire southwest US (from Texas' early western border to top of California). I don't understand why this war is so overlooked... We went to Mexico, said "hey Mexico we will buy all that land" (because President Polk wanted west coast ports). Mexico was like "na that's a large part of our country" and Polk was like "kthxbye", put a few thousand troops on a disputed border with Texas/Mexico, Mexico responded by putting troops there as well, patrols fire on each other, Polk goes to congress and says "look what Mexico did, US dead on US soil" the rest is history.

- US Civil War

- WW1

- WW2

C2N2
You are awesome.
Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

WWI

so much death and absolute devistation of the land in such a tight space. it also had so many firsts. planes were first being used. tanks. submarines. machine guns. etc...

plus the horrors of the mustard gas, the gas masks, the mountains of corpses being used as cover. man, im messed up huh?

Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

xbox vs playstation

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Vietnam and Korean, simply because it's amusing watching/reading about 'The world's superpower' not minding their own business, and then getting owned my China-men hiding in holes.C2N2

I don't think 58,000 American dead compared to 1.5 million + North Vietnam/Viet Cong dead constitutes "America getting owned"... The war was going fine, every major North Vietnamese offensive was repulsed prior to US leaving (including Tet Offensive), the US public simply didn't want us there (because didn't think it was justified, especially after secret invasions/bombings in neutral Laos were revealed)... Which is why Nixon took the "graceful" peaceful exit when he had a chance and then NV re-invaded SV AFTER the US withdrew completely from the country (apart from our consulate in Saigon).

Same situation in Korea... I hardly think hundreds of thousands of dead is comparable to tens of thousands when arguing you are the victor... North Korea beat South Korea... US led coalition comes in and saves South Korea, nearly destroys North Korea, China comes in with 1.5m + troops and saves them... Once again hardly a "beating" considering it was a few hundred thousand coalition troops (at its peak, much less than that in many cases), operating IN LAND against a force that at its peak was four times as large, still inflicting highly contrasted casualties on the enemy...

K/D doesn't matter in war, it's the objective that matters. Example, America could lose three million troops and Russia lose one-million, but if America prevents Russia from overtaking America, America won.

It's still interesting seeing an inferior culture(financially, education wise), and lacking 'muscle'(troop numbers) defeat/prevent America from accomplishing their purpose. There's no debating America lost both wars, if they won em, Communism wouldn't exist in Korea; and regarding Vietnam, America lost strategically there's no debating that.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

WW2 by a longshot

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

THe US civil war, WW2, Napoleonic wars,

Avatar image for lowkey254
lowkey254

6031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#75 lowkey254
Member since 2004 • 6031 Posts

The War on Christianity. :)

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#76 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

The War on Christianity. :)

lowkey254
 .
Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

The Cold War, it is a unique period in human history.

As Wasdie said, there has never been a conflict as large as WW2, yet we have never come as close to an unprescedented level of destruction as we did during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Avatar image for gameofthering
gameofthering

11286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 gameofthering
Member since 2004 • 11286 Posts

The wars of Scottish independence (Scotland V England)

&

World War II

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
WW2 then American Civil War
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

For me, it's WWII. I have read 59 books on it just in the past 6 years alone.

gamerguru100

Holy crap.

What can I say, I like to read and that is even working a job that often has 12 hour days.

Avatar image for Brosephus_Rex
Brosephus_Rex

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Brosephus_Rex
Member since 2012 • 467 Posts

WWII, considering the modernization of warfare, the global scale, the times leading to the war and the politics of it (esp. on the European side), the number of interesting arenas, and the impact on the future world.

Avatar image for AcidSoldner
AcidSoldner

7051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 AcidSoldner
Member since 2007 • 7051 Posts
World War II and Napoleonic Wars were the two I've always been interested in due to the sheer size of the conflicts and the number of parties involved. In recent years I've become more interested in World War I as well. This came about after I played The Darkness back in '07 and going through the extremely gritty (and heavily fictionalized) WWI scenes, reading the origin story for The Darkness and realizing I know little of the backdrop/setting that some of this stuff was taking place in.
Avatar image for jesuschristmonk
jesuschristmonk

3308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 jesuschristmonk
Member since 2009 • 3308 Posts

World War 2. Pretty much because of all the games about it.

Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

WW2

QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Vietnam and Korean, simply because it's amusing watching/reading about 'The world's superpower' not minding their own business, and then getting owned my China-men hiding in holes.

....

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

The most?

The Zulu Wars.

800px-Isandhlwana.jpg

Avatar image for AFBrat77
AFBrat77

26848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#87 AFBrat77
Member since 2004 • 26848 Posts

[QUOTE="jetpower3"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Vietnam and Korean, simply because it's amusing watching/reading about 'The world's superpower' not minding their own business, and then getting owned my China-men hiding in holes.Kevlar101

It doesn't sound like you have a very comprehensive understanding of either conflict, if you're going to say things as silly as that.

:lol: the Americans never even made it out of South Vietnam, they were getting their asses kicked so bad

Had we made a full-on attempt to win the war, rather than use it as a staging ground for our technology, we would have won the war easily. We could've eliminated North Korea and China (at that time) from the map, no question about it. But we had to consider the impact with U.S.S.R.

I'm sure the puny country you belong to would never even have had a chance to do that.

Back on topic....World War 2 (and I enjoy talking with the the remaining American vets on what they remember about it).

Also, the American Civil War has become increasing interesting to me, since I live close to Gettysburg, Pa.......where the turning point to the war happened in July 1863

What still fascinates me at Gettysburgh is Picket's Charge, whereby a mile wide row of Confederate soldiers (a freaking mile!) came charging at the outmanned Union Army and their cannons. Must of been a scary sight for the Union Army but they won, and turned the entire War around.

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#88 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

[QUOTE="Kevlar101"][QUOTE="jetpower3"]

It doesn't sound like you have a very comprehensive understanding of either conflict, if you're going to say things as silly as that.

AFBrat77

:lol: the Americans never even made it out of South Vietnam, they were getting their asses kicked so bad

I'm sure the puny country you belong to would never even have had a chance to do that.

I live in the U.S. :? lol i'm in no puny country my friend :lol:
Avatar image for Gorillanator
Gorillanator

867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Gorillanator
Member since 2009 • 867 Posts

The American Civil War is pretty interesting. First sinking of a ship by a submarine, first use of ironclad ships in battle, first use of Gatling guns, the fact that many of the locations it took place in are within driving distance, etc.

Also, WWII is interesting, simply because of how many theatres there were going on.

Avatar image for DecadesOfGaming
DecadesOfGaming

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#90 DecadesOfGaming
Member since 2007 • 3100 Posts

The 'War Of The Worlds'..

This planet needs a good kick up the backside for everyone to eventually work together as one!

Roll on an Alien Invasion!

Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts
French Revolutionary War Spanish Civil War Korean War RomanPersian Wars Vietnam War Battles involving French Foreign Legion
Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts

[QUOTE="jetpower3"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Vietnam and Korean, simply because it's amusing watching/reading about 'The world's superpower' not minding their own business, and then getting owned my China-men hiding in holes.Fightingfan

It doesn't sound like you have a very comprehensive understanding of either conflict, if you're going to say things as silly as that.

The whole point of the Korean War was due to the division of Korea, America wanted to rid Communism, barely made it to North Korea, and then lost(which is why North Korea is still under communistic rule).

The Vietnam war was total ass rape, Gorilla tactics AKA campers destroyed the American troops, tons of U.S troops died and they had to withdrawl, doesn't sound like a win to me.

If you're referring to my word choice, *Face palm* that's obviously satire.

*And technically the Korean war is still going on.

If by the campers you are referring to Viet Cong then you are wrong. The Viet Cong cease to be operational force after the Tet Offensive the VIet Cong were decimated during the Tet Offensive. In fact Giap used the Viet Cong as cannon folders at the first phase of the Tet Offensive. Why is this you ask? Some historians conclude this was so the North Vietnamese didn't have to share power with southerns after the war was over.
Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#93 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

Vietnam War

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#94 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

[QUOTE="jetpower3"]

It doesn't sound like you have a very comprehensive understanding of either conflict, if you're going to say things as silly as that.

Vader993

The whole point of the Korean War was due to the division of Korea, America wanted to rid Communism, barely made it to North Korea, and then lost(which is why North Korea is still under communistic rule).

The Vietnam war was total ass rape, Gorilla tactics AKA campers destroyed the American troops, tons of U.S troops died and they had to withdrawl, doesn't sound like a win to me.

If you're referring to my word choice, *Face palm* that's obviously satire.

*And technically the Korean war is still going on.

If by the campers you are referring to Viet Cong then you are wrong. The Viet Cong cease to be operational force after the Tet Offensive the VIet Cong were decimated during the Tet Offensive. In fact Giap used the Viet Cong as cannon folders at the first phase of the Tet Offensive. Why is this you ask? Some historians conclude this was so the North Vietnamese didn't have to share power with southerns after the war was over.

Its "Cannon Fodder"............... not "Cannon Folder"
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
Easily World War 2. The amount of people fighting, the different theaters, and the development of newer technology etc. I've read plenty of books on it and there always seems to be fresh material or insight into something I didn't know. It really was a WORLD WAR.
Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts
I'm sorry for the error?
Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#97 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts
Easily World War 2. The amount of people fighting, the different theaters, and the development of newer technology etc. I've read plenty of books on it and there always seems to be fresh material or insight into something I didn't know. It really was a WORLD WAR. HoolaHoopMan
It makes WW1 look not so much like a world war, but more like International Civil War 5, or the Great European War.
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#98 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21695 Posts
None...
Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#99 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts
America's wars. We will liberate you!
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

Easily World War 2. The amount of people fighting, the different theaters, and the development of newer technology etc. I've read plenty of books on it and there always seems to be fresh material or insight into something I didn't know. It really was a WORLD WAR. HoolaHoopMan

With the fall of the Soviet Union and the Iron Curtain, there is more material available to study and be able to write or rather, rewrite history as a more fuller story has emerged that can be told. This also goes for Cold War era.