I meant that no matter how much evidence I post that is supported by certain scientists, you won't believe it because of what the majority of other scientists say.nuclear_cookout
You're right. As long as I'm not doing research on the subject myself, I am going to believe what the majority of scientists say, at least if it is an overwhelming majority. I'm going to believe mainstream scientific publications (for example, Scientific American) over "news" outlets that are known to be far right-wing and in some cases have even been caught acknowledging that they slant things to the right. Why should I selectively believe a minority of scientists (who probably aren't even all actual climate scientists) just to fit in with a particular world view?
It has already been proven. I want you to try and disprove it. My fascination with weapons has NOTHING to do with this, either. That was a needless personal attack.
nuclear_cookout
It has already been proven that there is a non-chemotherapy cure for cancer... Okay, why aren't you busy getting rich off of it instead of posting about it on here? :lol: And your apparent obsession with war clearly is tied to your rather...odd...political views.
Cancer IS an infection. Here is a link to information from the World Health Organization retired doctors on cancer, etc . Please do not reject it just because it was posted in an Invision site. Think of that place as a middleman.
nuclear_cookout
Well, folks. We have it finally. The official cure for cancer. Just remember you heard it here first. :roll:
[QUOTE="SpaceMoose"][QUOTE="nuclear_cookout"]I had bad allergies once. I underwent a health program and now my allergies are nearly nonexistent.
nuclear_cookout
And what health program would that be? And how do you know your allergies would not have gone away otherwise?
Because they went away during the program, just like they were supposed to...
LinkYou totally didn't answer my question. I didn't ask how you know it works. I made sure not to ask it that way; I asked how you know that they WOULD NOT HAVE GONE AWAY AT THAT TIME IF YOU WERE NOT ON THE PROGRAM, and the obvious answer is that you don't. You're not going to wrap your mind around that, however, so nevermind. You think personal anecdotes amount to scientific evidence. You basically admit that. It's like when some guy says, "Cigarettes don't kill people because I knew some guy who smoked a pack a day and lived to be 95." You're using the same exact kind of flawed logic.
Also, that link doesn't even mention allergies anyway...
Frequently. I am aware that children can"outgrow" certain allergies, but that doesn't mean they are incurable. Whether short term or long term, they are curable.
nuclear_cookout
I have a question: What is it that you were allergic to specifically? And if you can't answer that, you can't even know that you were "cured."
...I'm just trying to make a point that herbs aren't useless.
nuclear_cookout
Too bad that wasn't the topic being debated. Not by me anyway.
And, please, when you are making a long post, please answer different people seperately. It took me enough effort to keep all of these quotes within quotes from turning into a jumbled nightmare.
Log in to comment