Whats the difference from a $10 pair of jeans and a $30-$50 pair of jeans?

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

$50 buck for a quality pair of jeans you don't have to be embarrassed to be seen in is a little more. There's a reason the other two brands are almost free.

airshocker

I bought like four pais of Express jeans when they were on sale during the holidays. Spent around 150 bucks and they're probably the best jeans I've ever owned.

not being able to pay for food later in the day.

[QUOTE="EasyStreet"]for $50 I can get couple pairs of good jeans like Gap or Tommy PullMyFinger. I wish Levis would become cheaper I no longer own any Jeans from this company:(.Engrish_Major

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

What pair of jeans costs $10?

slipknot0129

You get what you pay for up to a certain point. Beyond that you're paying for someone's ego. A $10 pair of jeans probably isn't going to last long, but a $30 or $40 pair will. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule however.

Unless you're a frugal penny pincher scavenging the thrift stores;you're not going to find a quality pair of jeans at $10.

cheap jeans, rips, tear, loses color, button falls off and shrink in the wash. A good pair can last you years.

There really isn't a huge difference, but I have to admit that the $35 Old Navy jeans I bought a few months ago are significantly more comfortable than most of my $15-$20 Nevada jeans.

I bet those were on sale though, right? And that's still a lot more than $10/pair. :P

Pirate700

Yeah. But like I said, they're the best jeans I've ever owned. Didn't shrink, fit perfectly, look good with everything I wear. I don't expect I'll be buying anymore for at least a couple of years.

$50 to $100 jeans have holes and be-dazzle on it.

$10 jeans don't have holes and a little girl didn't be-dazzle them.

The jeans I wear cost at least 200 and there's a huge difference not only in the way they look but the way they fit. After I took the plunge and bought my first pair I realized I will never go back to cheap jeans again. There is generally little difference in jeans under 100 dollars. You mostly pay for the brand not quality at that price. junglist101

Aren't you afraid to step outside in jeans so expensive?

$50 to $100 jeans have holes and be-dazzle on it.

$10 jeans don't have holes and a little girl didn't be-dazzle them.

ristactionjakso

Don't know what stores you're shopping at, but mine cost around 50 dollars a pop normally and don't have any such things on them.

[QUOTE="junglist101"]The jeans I wear cost at least 200 and there's a huge difference not only in the way they look but the way they fit. After I took the plunge and bought my first pair I realized I will never go back to cheap jeans again. There is generally little difference in jeans under 100 dollars. You mostly pay for the brand not quality at that price. redstorm72

Aren't you afraid to step outside in jeans so expensive?

The brand, that is it.

The jeans I wear cost at least 200 and there's a huge difference not only in the way they look but the way they fit. After I took the plunge and bought my first pair I realized I will never go back to cheap jeans again. There is generally little difference in jeans under 100 dollars. You mostly pay for the brand not quality at that price. junglist101

Post from Bizzaro World?

The 50 dollar jeans have more rips in them. Rips are cool....joking, but more expensive jeans (Levis) are usually tougher and last longer.

[QUOTE="junglist101"]The jeans I wear cost at least 200 and there's a huge difference not only in the way they look but the way they fit. After I took the plunge and bought my first pair I realized I will never go back to cheap jeans again. There is generally little difference in jeans under 100 dollars. You mostly pay for the brand not quality at that price. worlock77

Post from Bizzaro World?

The jeans I wear cost at least 200 and there's a huge difference not only in the way they look but the way they fit. After I took the plunge and bought my first pair I realized I will never go back to cheap jeans again. There is generally little difference in jeans under 100 dollars. You mostly pay for the brand not quality at that price. junglist101

Quality, any higher than that and you're probably paying more so for brand name and possibly decoration (e.g., vintage).

Quality of the material, usually. I'd recommend buying $30-40 jeans over $10, but don't bother with the $100+ ones.chessmaster1989

I usually pay $30 to $40 and I wear different brands of jeans

The jeans I buy are only $40 and they last me a while. I do tend to buy new ones when the old ones fade though but only because ever since i've started growing a beard, when my clothes look old and raggedy everyone says I look like a bum :lol:.

Nothing much except for the name and trendy things like the worn out look and permanent wrinkles (how stupid is THAT?). Personally, there's a difference between $50 and $20 jeans as per quality, but after that, there is just name recognition to infer status. My friend has a $150 pair of RichAhole brand (You heard of em? They're the newest, trendiest in style you know.) that has permanent wrinkles that he says fit better, but I'll take my $40 pair that's comfy as sh** any day.

Many people will give you some spiel about how they're SOOOOO much better and blah blah blah, but my friend and I got into a huge argument about it because he's a firm believer in buying name brand stuff at full value from a nice place to make him feel better about it while I'm a Burlington Coat Factory, Plato's Closet type of guy. The latter is a place that sells name brand stuff, but it's used. They dry clean it so it's sterile and in good shape. No underwear, just jeans and shirts and the like.

After going back and reading through the first 2 pages of comments, I was looking for ONE person to claim that $100 jeans were superior to $40 jeans, I was glad that it looks like everyone is at least a reasonable person and not ridiculous thinking that somehow wearing $100 jeans makes them superior, better with women, or better in any way really. Good job, OT. High five to you.

They're just generally better quality: tighter stitching, higher quality fabric ect.markop2003

fit, construction quality and material quality. That said I rarely pay more than $20 for a pair of jeans because I always buy stuff on sale. Just go to TJ Max or a similar discount store and get a good quality pair of jeans on the cheap.

After going back and reading through the first 2 pages of comments, I was looking for ONE person to claim that $100 jeans were superior to $40 jeans, I was glad that it looks like everyone is at least a reasonable person and not ridiculous thinking that somehow wearing $100 jeans makes them superior, better with women, or better in any way really. Good job, OT. High five to you.

Sunfyre7896

hahahaha I'd only buy cheap ass jeans, and because I look amazing no matter what it doesn't matter at allz. I'd rather use the saved money to buy leet stuff, insteada waste it on noob stuff like clothes or watches. I'd go for the 10$ jeans.

hahahaha I'd only buy cheap ass jeans, and because I look amazing no matter what it doesn't matter at allz. I'd rather use the saved money to buy leet stuff, insteada waste it on noob stuff like clothes or watches. I'd go for the 10$ jeans.

JigglyWiggly_

They are of higher quality but to me it's not worth the difference

Uglier. And looser.

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

hahahaha I'd only buy cheap ass jeans, and because I look amazing no matter what it doesn't matter at allz. I'd rather use the saved money to buy leet stuff, insteada waste it on noob stuff like clothes or watches. I'd go for the 10$ jeans.

chilly-chill

[QUOTE="chilly-chill"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

hahahaha I'd only buy cheap ass jeans, and because I look amazing no matter what it doesn't matter at allz. I'd rather use the saved money to buy leet stuff, insteada waste it on noob stuff like clothes or watches. I'd go for the 10$ jeans.

JigglyWiggly_

More expensive ones fit better. The cheap ones are more "one size fits all", instead of fitting in all the right places; same goes for shirts too.

The quality of the jeans...obviously.

Quality, even though i only wear wranglers. The super cheap ones, always ripped for me