Whats worse, Fox News or MSNBC?

CNN

*starts making popcorn*

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"] Glad you seem to know more about the inner-workings of my mind than I do, assh*le. I don't agree with anyone on cable news about much of anything, so I care about being entertained by them because that's all they can offer me. O'Reilly is a loud, bombastic relic from a bygone age. It's quite entertaining to see him try to cope with the modern world. If you don't see that, fine. But don't tell me I secretly agree with him, which is why I'm saying he's entertaining. I don't think I agree with O'Reilly on anything, quite literally.Rhazakna

I'll tell you whatever I want, assh*le. If you really disagreed with him you'd realize the price of so many mindless drones hinging on every word he says is too high a price for any entertainment value he brings. No, I'm convinced you agree with him to some degree.

You chill out, too.

Jeez.

The most reliable news source is DrudgeReport and Infowars

hydr0_32

Absolutely. The only ones that aren't totally filtered and run by the 4 or 5 people that run most of the major media in the US. The same people who attend Bilderberg and consort with politicians.

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="theone86"]

I'll tell you whatever I want, assh*le. If you really disagreed with him you'd realize the price of so many mindless drones hinging on every word he says is too high a price for any entertainment value he brings. No, I'm convinced you agree with him to some degree.

THE_DRUGGIE

You chill out, too.

Jeez.

*starts making popcorn*GreySeal9

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"] So you actually do think you know my opinions better than I do. What an arrogant piece of sh*t you are. O'Reilly has never said anything I can think of that I agree with. Let's rundown a few things. The thinkers I most admire are people like Max Stirner, Benjamin Tucker, Josiah Warren, Emma Goldman, Renzo Novatore and Voltairine de Cleyre (amongst others). I am a mutualist, which would make me a libertarian-socialist. Now, I would be surprised if you're at all familiar with any of these people or concepts, but just do a bit of googling. Even someone with your reasoning skills should be able to see the difference between people that I mentioned and O'Reilly, or any conservative. Don't tell me what I think, you c*nt. I know what I think, you don't. Just because I can find entertainment in some old prick on TV spouting off his opinions doesn't mean I agree with them. "You can be entertained by this guy, therefore you must agree! No one can be entertained by a pundit unless they agree with him! Huuurrrrrr!"Rhazakna

You chill out, too.

Jeez.

Okay, I get it. You don't like people putting words in your mouth, I know that's pretty annoying.

Let's leave it at that and move on with our lives.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]*starts making popcorn*Zeviander

I can see why Rhazanka finds entertainment in watching Bill O'Reily, but I personally think he's too much of a douchebag to stomach for more than a minute or so. I can't stand his douchey condescending tone. It's like he's talking to old people who can't hear or special needs kids.

One episode of O'Reily was hilarious tho: he and this rightwing psuedo-psychologist guy were debating whether Psy's Gangham style was "dangerous". Bill O'Reily said something about the words being gibberish without realizing the song is in fvcking Korean.

Honestly, Bill O'Reily is so such an antiquated douche that I automatically think the very few young people that like him are weridos.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

*starts making popcorn*

meconate

Sure. Popcorn for all!

I can see why Rhazanka finds entertainment in watching Bill O'Reily, but I personally think he's too much of a douchebag to stomach for more than a minute or so. I can't stand his douchey condescending tone. It's like he's talking to old people who can't hear or special needs kids.

One episode of O'Reily was hilarious tho: he and this rightwing psuedo-psychologist guy were debating whether Psy's Gangham style was "dangerous". Bill O'Reily said something about the words being gibberish without realizing the song is in fvcking Korean.

Honestly, Bill O'Reily is so such an antiquated douche that I automatically think the very few young people that like him are weridos.

GreySeal9

Fox is definately much worse.

Just to give an example, this election, Fox was one of the WORST station in trying to "unskew" the public polls in favor of Mitt....We all knew what happened there....And then there was their Election Roadmap where they basically said OBama only will win Calif. And Illnois.....Fox is full of these.

MSNBC is bad, but compared to Fox, they might be as well be angels. Rachel Maddow for ex. Yeah, she's bombastic, but compared to Hannity or Bill?....Umm yeha, not even close.

And most of all, at least MSNBC has the galls to report stuff even when it's against its agenda. ie, 2010, MSNBC admited Dems has an ass kicking on the way. They did not dodge it. 2012, MSNBC election roadmap was only off by two States (Vir. and N. Car) Fox..................................

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I can see why Rhazanka finds entertainment in watching Bill O'Reily, but I personally think he's too much of a douchebag to stomach for more than a minute or so. I can't stand his douchey condescending tone. It's like he's talking to old people who can't hear or special needs kids.

One episode of O'Reily was hilarious tho: he and this rightwing psuedo-psychologist guy were debating whether Psy's Gangham style was "dangerous". Bill O'Reily said something about the words being gibberish without realizing the song is in fvcking Korean.

Honestly, Bill O'Reily is so such an antiquated douche that I automatically think the very few young people that like him are weridos.

Rhazakna

It's not even the stupid sh!t that he says that grates on me (because plenty of people say stupid sh!t). Just his tone and demeanor.

I agree that some of O'Reily's greatest hits are hilarious and entertaining tho. Another funny moment was his debate with rapper Cam'Ron.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I can see why Rhazanka finds entertainment in watching Bill O'Reily, but I personally think he's too much of a douchebag to stomach for more than a minute or so. I can't stand his douchey condescending tone. It's like he's talking to old people who can't hear or special needs kids.

One episode of O'Reily was hilarious tho: he and this rightwing psuedo-psychologist guy were debating whether Psy's Gangham style was "dangerous". Bill O'Reily said something about the words being gibberish without realizing the song is in fvcking Korean.

Honestly, Bill O'Reily is so such an antiquated douche that I automatically think the very few young people that like him are weridos.

meconate

Didn't watch it, but I heard about how bad O'Reily got curbstomped (maybe I'll watch the whole thing if I have trouble sleeping tonight). Why Stewart continues to entertain O'Reily is beyond me.

Has anybody checked out Al Sharpton's show on MSNBC? It's so ridiculously crappy. He might be good at some things, but being a TV pundit is not one of them.

I can see why Rhazanka finds entertainment in watching Bill O'Reily, but I personally think he's too much of a douchebag to stomach for more than a minute or so. I can't stand his douchey condescending tone. It's like he's talking to old people who can't hear or special needs kids.

One episode of O'Reily was hilarious tho: he and this rightwing psuedo-psychologist guy were debating whether Psy's Gangham style was "dangerous". Bill O'Reily said something about the words being gibberish without realizing the song is in fvcking Korean.

Honestly, Bill O'Reily is so such an antiquated douche that I automatically think the very few young people that like him are weridos.

GreySeal9

I lol'd.

Has anybody checked out Al Sharpton's show on MSNBC? It's so ridiculously crappy. He might be good at some things, but being a TV pundit is not one of them.

GreySeal9

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Has anybody checked out Al Sharpton's show on MSNBC? It's so ridiculously crappy. He might be good at some things, but being a TV pundit is not one of them.

Rhazakna

You shouldn't wish people dead like that.

ive had heard from internet radio that Fox is pretty bad, dont know anythong about this MSNBC

Fox News

At least some MSNBC personalities admit their liberal bias, FOX News presents as "fair and balanced" which is a complete crock.

If you want actual news, pick something like Reuters. If you want spin according to your political beliefs, pick one of the above.

MSNBC is worse than Fox. I don't particularly like either channel ,but I find MSNBC down right lies a fair majority of the time. Fox does its fair share of misrepresenting facts,but I think its less blantant than MSNBC. Regardless, both have come to serve as the media arm of the political party they support.

Yes they both lean to a far side and are passionate about their position. The difference between them is that MSNBC uses real facts and speaks the truth, while Fox makes it up. Qixote

MSNBC reporting a story http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKQJ4-N7LI

Unedited image:

you were saying?

I would argue that Fox is worse simply because they are more consistantly bad. During the non-election season MSNBC is more mellow, but once it went into full swing they just straight up lost their minds. Frankly I had to stop watching, and pretty much consistantly tuned into NPR.

Fox on the other hand never seems to let up. They are constantly biased towards republicans, and are out to get the "Mainstream Media" despite the fact that they have the largest viewing audience of any news channel, which makes them the most mainstream in my book.

Anyways Fox is the most consistantly biased, and that is why they earn the title of worst in my opinion.

part of the problem I suppose is that truth is biased and yet we have turned bias into a bad word. That being said bias is bad if you don't tell both sides of the story. The truth will reveal itself when you hear both sides, and people will take a side, but people deserve the shot to hear both sides.

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"] You don't know what entertainment is. theone86

I understand hating the guy's views, but does anyone actually think O'Reilly is unentertaining? The guy is probably the most fun to watch on cable news because he's such a bombastic assh*le. I hate his opinions, but it would suck if he got cancelled.

I never have and never will believe claims like this. If you really think he's so bad then entertainment would be further down on your list of priorities. You can get entertainment from watching a movie, you don't need mind-rotting pundits to get it. In my experience, these are just the claims made by people smart enough to know why people like O'Reily are vilified, yet not smart enough to disagree with them.

Fox News. Remember people. The truth has a Liberal Bias.

[QUOTE="Qixote"]Yes they both lean to a far side and are passionate about their position. The difference between them is that MSNBC uses real facts and speaks the truth, while Fox makes it up. UnknownSniper65

MSNBC reporting a story http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKQJ4-N7LI

Unedited imagine:

you were saying?

Fox News is a mess. Biased, stupid and slow to cut from suicides.

MSNBC is worse than Fox. I don't particularly like either channel ,but I find MSNBC down right lies a fair majority of the time. Fox does its fair share of misrepresenting facts,but I think its less blantant than MSNBC. Regardless, both have come to serve as the media arm of the political party they support.

UnknownSniper65

How the fvck is it less blatant after this last election.. In which Fox News basically took the "You didn't Build that" speech out of context pretty much creating one of the dumbest platform slogans out there from any party in recent memory? Fox News is so bad that Jon Stewart basically is making a living off of poking fun of Fox, so much so that they actually RESPOND to his pokes all the time.. It says something when they actually have to comment and have retorts for comments made by comedians towards their organization.. Are you really going to come here with a straight face and say these things when we look at things like Fox and Friends, or past people like Glen Beck. Remember this is the guy that compares pretty much anything he disagrees with, with Nazi Germany..

MSNBC is worse because Fox News is funnier.

Barbariser

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

MSNBC is worse than Fox. I don't particularly like either channel ,but I find MSNBC down right lies a fair majority of the time. Fox does its fair share of misrepresenting facts,but I think its less blantant than MSNBC. Regardless, both have come to serve as the media arm of the political party they support.

sSubZerOo

How the fvck is it less blatant after this last election.. In which Fox News basically took the "You didn't Build that" speech out of context pretty much creating one of the dumbest platform slogans out there from any party in recent memory? Fox News is so bad that Jon Stewart basically is making a living off of poking fun of Fox, so much so that they actually RESPOND to his pokes all the time.. It says something when they actually have to comment and have retorts for comments made by comedians towards their organization.. Are you really going to come here with a straight face and say these things when we look at things like Fox and Friends, or past people like Glen Beck. Remember this is the guy that compares pretty much anything he disagrees with, with Nazi Germany..

I voted MSNBC just to give a little more balance to the poll, but both are equally bad. Anyone who watches either of these networks is seriously misinformed and shouldn't be involved in politics or current events what so ever. They are brain washed.

The reason why a lot of people on here ignore MSNBC but bash FOX is because OT has a very far left wing fringe community, so it's no surprise as to why they only bash FOX.