just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
This topic is locked from further discussion.
just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
I'd hate to be "that guy" but...
There's no such thing as global warming. Chuck Norris was cold, so he turned the sun up.
just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
DoobieDoobster2
Which movie?
[QUOTE="DoobieDoobster2"]just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
MarineJcksn
Which movie?
It's a pretty safe bet to assume he's talking about An Incovenient Turth.
It is more political than anything. It has become a frenzy among people, buying hybrids and cutting down on energy.just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
DoobieDoobster2
I do not believe in it and will continue driving my low gas mileage vehicles until I can no longer afford to. That might be quite a while consider my father owns major oil royalties in Texas.
I find it pathetic that people can actually buy into something like this. I know this is a major point and it has been said, but our time on earth as humans is only a blink of an eye in the total existance of earth, not to mention our time here on earth with combustion engines and other related machines. The idea that the earth is being affected by such a short amount of time is without reason and logic.
Propaganda. The earth goes through temperature changes independent from CO2 levels. Ice age shifts and solar activity are the largest factors. If anyone takes the time to look, we've actually been cooling since 1998. 1998 was the hottest year on record.SmashBrosLegendYou've got the right ideas man!
I'm not going to pretend to know enough about climate change to say that humans are causing it or not, but I will say that we're definitely not helping. Anything we can do to help the environment it a good thing from my point of view.Ryeferd
How is this not everyone's answer?
I think Newt Gingrich said it best.
"The word "conservative" includes "conservation" as its root. And conservatives should be cautious. Therefore, I am willing to look for methods of lowering carbon that do not destroy the economy or give the government increased power."
[QUOTE="Ryeferd"]I'm not going to pretend to know enough about climate change to say that humans are causing it or not, but I will say that we're definitely not helping. Anything we can do to help the environment it a good thing from my point of view.gobo212
How is this not everyone's answer?
I wholeheartedly agree that we should be doing more to stop pollution, but I'd rather not be lied to about it. Scare politics are never a good thing.[QUOTE="MarineJcksn"][QUOTE="DoobieDoobster2"]just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
MetroidPrimePwn
Which movie?
It's a pretty safe bet to assume he's talking about An Incovenient Turth.
Ohh. THAT movie. :roll:
[QUOTE="gobo212"][QUOTE="Ryeferd"]I'm not going to pretend to know enough about climate change to say that humans are causing it or not, but I will say that we're definitely not helping. Anything we can do to help the environment it a good thing from my point of view.SmashBrosLegend
How is this not everyone's answer?
I wholeheartedly agree that we should be doing more to stop pollution, but I'd rather not be lied to about it. Scare politics are never a good thing.That's my big problem with all the coverage of global warming. It pushes all the attention about environmental conservation onto a controversial issue whose effects are far off (if they exist at all), so it attracts attention away from the more immediate issues of pollution like acid-rain and the effects that pollution has on poeple with asthma. All in all, I think the global warming frenzy really hurts the environmentalist cause more than it helps it...
It's getting hot in here,
so take off all yo' clothes...wallymartin
One of the few OT posts to actually make me laugh.
I believe we need to do everything we can to not pollute, but Al Gore took various facts and blew it all outta proportion to fool people. That part with the polar bears was complete BS. A healthy polar bear can swim 60 miles, they're not going to drown. And the numbers he used of polar bears dying was skewed. The polar bear population that he was speaking of has grown 400% since 1971. If global warming is killing off polar bears, why are their numbers skyrocketting?
BTW, anyone see Ted Turner's comments that in 30 years global warming will make all surviving humans become cannibals?:lol:
[QUOTE="wallymartin"]It's getting hot in here,
so take off all yo' clothes...VanHelsingBoA64
One of the few OT posts to actually make me laugh.
One person laughed, my job is complete. :D
just watched that movie in science today
pretty interestingeven thoughit sounds more political than anything
DoobieDoobster2
of course it political. it advises big government which eventually leads to socialism with all the regulations it would take
anyway why didnt al gore mention that the sun is heating up? i mean its a proven fact... but i guess he may not like facts.. just theories
The global hysteria over it right now is bull****. It is a concern but it is nothing like everyone is making it out to be like. We are contributing to it but it still is a perfectly natural process that coincidentally has lined up since the start of the industrial revolution.foxhound_foxI disagree that we are contributing to it. We are contributing to the overall poor state of our planet, but I don't think the Greenhouse effect has anything to do with the current temperatures. I would cite three basic facts: 1. 1998 was the hottest month ever recorded, and we have been cooling since then. 2. CO2 emissions across the globe have vastly increased since 1998. 3. Deforestation is more prevalent now than in 1998. If there is more CO2, less trees to consume said CO2, and lower temperatures, one can assume that there is no correlation between CO2 emissions and temperature.
I disagree that we are contributing to it. We are contributing to the overall poor state of our planet, but I don't think the Greenhouse effect has anything to do with the current temperatures. I would cite three basic facts:
1. 1998 was the hottest month ever recorded, and we have been cooling since then.
2. CO2 emissions across the globe have vastly increased since 1998.
3. Deforestation is more prevalent now than in 1998.
If there is more CO2, less trees to consume said CO2, and lower temperatures, one can assume that there is no correlation between CO2 emissions and temperature.SmashBrosLegend
Actually now it's called Global Climate Change. I think it's gettin to be a pretty big issue and for a lot of good reasons. The sooner we switch to Ethanol, the better. We got word that John Deere is gonna come modify our tractors to run off of Ethanol. The only problem is the closest Ethanol gas station is 200 miles away. So they're gonna give us a huge tank of it.1stCommando
Apparently the Ethanol way of fuel is only worse of a pollutant in the end than gasoline.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment