[QUOTE="MFaraz_Hayat"][QUOTE="Serial-No_3404"][QUOTE="MFaraz_Hayat"][QUOTE="Serial-No_3404"][QUOTE="MissRiotmaker"][QUOTE="Serial-No_3404"][QUOTE="MissRiotmaker"][QUOTE="MFaraz_Hayat"][QUOTE="Serial-No_3404"][QUOTE="MissRiotmaker"][QUOTE="Serial-No_3404"][QUOTE="MissRiotmaker"][QUOTE="-theCHUD-"]When should a nation nuke another one?Serial-No_3404
Never. if the allies had a nuke at the start of WWII...would you have been ok with the nuke being used on nazi germany to force their surrender and prevent the holocaust and so forth? Nuclear escalation is never the answer. It should never come to that. Understand what "never" means before you reply to my post next time. sometimes the ends justify the meansBut, would it be justified to save a nation by destroying another? The effects of a nuclear bomb, would adversely affect future generations as well. What crime did they commit?
So in retrospect, having one nation nuke another, and having another nuke the first nation in retaliation would be justified. That's some screwed up logic. That's like saying one man killing another man for killing another is justified.do you understand what "the ends justify the means" at all?...ask if its worth it...is it worth getting nuked in return? if not then the ends does not justify...look at the context of the situation Is it worth getting nuked? NOTHING is worth getting nuked. Are you insane?im a realist...to see humans as innately good is insanitySO serial, lets imagine a scenario. You and your family are in a country,who due to it's screwed up policies is threatened to be nuked. You, donot accept the views of your government and are against them. The next day, your city is nuked and you see your child getting, burnt up in front of you (similarly all your other family members). Would you then come on such a forum, and say that what happened to your family was justified?
its out of my control....what about this...you are in a concentration camp and your family is murdered in front of you...and that all could have been prevented if a nuke was used against the wrongdoing nation? how would that fit into your anti nuke mindset...? it goes both waysAt the time I would be in a concentration camp, I would ofcourse like the wrong-doing nation to be nuked (EMOTIONS). Later, however, I would realize, that the people who I wished to be nuked were innocent. It was the fault of the crappy rulers, not the people! IF someone should have been destroyed, it should have been the authorities not the civilians.
take out the personal emotions and see it as a way to end conflict that would undeniable continue for years and years quicker and with less casualties....if total war occured again what would the difference be if a nuke was detonated over london than london being bombed for another 15-25 years? the end would be total destruction both ways...radiation would remain for a while as well but the 500 thousand or so killed from the nuke and its aftermath would be certainly less than that of a war that continued for years and yearsBut if a country would be nuked, what is nthe guarantee thatit and it's allies donot possess nuclear weapons. As is the case with London, if London would be nuked, the British authorities with their allies would nuke the opposing nation. The result, would be a nuclear showdown, and possibly a great threat to the survival of Human Race.
Log in to comment