This topic is locked from further discussion.
Which is worse for a yound child, exposing them to violence (in any form) or sex (in any form)?Slick_Rican
I say violence.
Why do they have to be exposed to either?LJS9502_basic
Let's say you're babysitting, but your friends come over and either want to see Good Luck Chuck (unrated) or play Gears of War, in the presence of the child. Which is the better alternative?
Which is worse for a yound child, exposing them to violence (in any form) or sex (in any form)?Slick_Rican
As long as the exposure to sex doesn't involve any coercion (either physical or psychological), I see no harm in it at all. It's surely far preferable to exposing a child to violence.
As they used to say in the Rene Guyon Society: "Sex before eight, or it's too late!" :lol:
My mom dosn't care if I see heads being blown off with a sniper rifle, but she does care if I see side-boob.buu96322But ya see. Womens nipples are HORRIBLE. But not mens. Ya see, the reason for that is because......................Oh wait, there's no reason for it.
In Ancient Greece 13 year olds would do it all the time. When they're ready they're ready I say. Sex is like shaking a hand. Nothing special. How is kissing someone on the cheek less hardcore than giving oral sex? It's not in my opinion.Violence, of course.
In a way, children should be exposed to sex. I'm not saying you should pop some hardcore pornography in the VCR and stick them in front of it, but children should know about their downstairs plumbing and all.
Faylette
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Why do they have to be exposed to either?Slick_Rican
Let's say you're babysitting, but your friends come over and either want to see Good Luck Chuck (unrated) or play Gears of War, in the presence of the child. Which is the better alternative?
I would say I'm babysitting so please at another time.I'd say they are both pretty bad...Cube_of_MooN
Since when the hell is a basic biological function a bad thing?
Sex is violent. So that, because it's like a double dose.quiglythegreatYes. It is like a siege, in which the battering ram is the penis and the gate is the vagina Violent in deed, and whilst watching coitus take place I will always think back to the Battle of Helms Deep.
[QUOTE="Faylette"]In Ancient Greece 13 year olds would do it all the time. When they're ready they're ready I say. Sex is like shaking a hand. Nothing special. How is kissing someone on the cheek less hardcore than giving oral sex? It's not in my opinion.Violence, of course.
In a way, children should be exposed to sex. I'm not saying you should pop some hardcore pornography in the VCR and stick them in front of it, but children should know about their downstairs plumbing and all.
wemhim
Imo it is.
[QUOTE="Cube_of_MooN"]I'd say they are both pretty bad...CaptHawkeye
Since when the hell is a basic biological function a bad thing?
We're talking about kids here... I wouldn't want an eight year old to watch porn.
[QUOTE="Faylette"]In Ancient Greece 13 year olds would do it all the time. When they're ready they're ready I say. Sex is like shaking a hand. Nothing special. How is kissing someone on the cheek less hardcore than giving oral sex? It's not in my opinion.Violence, of course.
In a way, children should be exposed to sex. I'm not saying you should pop some hardcore pornography in the VCR and stick them in front of it, but children should know about their downstairs plumbing and all.
wemhim
Yes, and it's also worth noting that even the Bible doesn't have the notion of an arbitrary "age of consent". In Biblical times, marriage was the only prerequisite for "morally acceptable sex", and there was no minimum age for marriage.
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]What kind of question is that? Violence... wemhimI'm assuming your joking, with the sig and the liberal view of drugs you have...
Violence. Sex is good in a way. It makes more beautiful people!JC346Assuming the parents are good looking.
[QUOTE="blackngold29"][QUOTE="JC346"]Violence. Sex is good in a way. It makes more beautiful people!EboyLOLAssuming the parents are good looking. Hideous people have produced 'beautiful people'. It's just a matter of which genes are chosen and which aren't I suppose. Yeah, I guess the Clinton's daughter falls into that catagory.
[QUOTE="_Classic_Gamer_"]Sex. Some kids are already somewhat violent anyway, but no kid should be getting involved with sex.wemhimBut biologically, what if they desire sex at 12...Wouldn't they NATURALLY be ready for sex?
I find it completely hypocritical that children can permissibly see people killing their fellow humans, but the second a breast pops out :o sound the alarm:o :roll: Since when did the act of producing new life become more taboo than the act of ending it?bman784
I find it completely hypocritical that children can permissibly see people killing their fellow humans, but the second a breast pops out :o sound the alarm:o :roll: Since when did the act of producing new life become more taboo than the act of ending it?bman784Because it's immoral and evil, and a womans breast shall NEVER be shown in public, they are inferior beings to us men and they must stay at home at night, and when in need to leave the house, must be accompanied by men. They must also serve their husbands in time of sex. However, it must be with the lights off because seeing a sex organ is immoral.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment