This topic is locked from further discussion.
The Chairman leads the board of directors, while the CEO is head of the management committee and reports to the board of the directors.
I think president and CEO are the same thing.
[QUOTE="kruesader"]I think they generally tend to depend on the organisational structure of the company in question.ATKisNeatChairman is someone who has a say on what goes on but is generally not in power. There are multiple chairmen but only one CEO. I think =D Isn't the "Chairman" the Chairman of the Board generally? Meaning he is the most powerful of the board/committee members?
a CEO is the highest
It actually matters what part of the world you are from.
BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]
a CEO is the highest
It actually matters what part of the world you are from.
carrot-cake
[QUOTE="carrot-cake"]
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]
a CEO is the highest
It actually matters what part of the world you are from.
BumFluff122
I make a point to usually look things up before I make a false post, such as I did with my first post lol. Look up CEO on wikipedia and President. In Europoean companies there are two seperate boards. One executive board and one supervisory board. The chairman heads one while the CEO heads the other. The president is who they report to. From what I got from the article in the US and Canada president and CEO are often used interchangably. In soem parts of the world there are multipple CEOs for companies, such as Asia.Are you sure? I thought the Chairman was always the highest because he leads the board, while the president and CEO are kind of the same.
carrot-cake
I make a point to usually look things up before I make a false post, such as I did with my first post lol. Look up CEO on wikipedia and President. In Europoean companies there are two seperate boards. One executive board and one supervisory board. The chairman heads one while the CEO heads the other. The president is who they report to. From what I got from the article in the US and Canada president and CEO are often used interchangably. In soem parts of the world there are multipple CEOs for companies, such as Asia.[QUOTE="carrot-cake"]
Are you sure? I thought the Chairman was always the highest because he leads the board, while the president and CEO are kind of the same.
BumFluff122
Ballmer makes day to day and most organizational decisions. Bill is there to oversee the work and head up the board of directors.duxupBut does Ballmer override Bill's authority or does Bill hold higher authority? (Ignoring who is founder). I mean who can fire who?
Does the Founder always hold the position of Chairman or President? th3warr1orNo, the board is voted in at the AGM though chairman/president/ceo is often held by the largest private shareholder
[QUOTE="duxup"]Ballmer makes day to day and most organizational decisions. Bill is there to oversee the work and head up the board of directors.th3warr1orBut does Ballmer override Bill's authority or does Bill hold higher authority? (Ignoring who is founder). I mean who can fire who? Bill is higher. Firing is done by the shareholders though, which includes Bill and Balmer.
[QUOTE="duxup"]Ballmer makes day to day and most organizational decisions. Bill is there to oversee the work and head up the board of directors.th3warr1orBut does Ballmer override Bill's authority or does Bill hold higher authority? (Ignoring who is founder). I mean who can fire who? Bill with support of the board could fire Ballmer if he wished. Having said that Ballmer and Bill have both been around the company for ages, both have lots of stock (that helps to determine the makeup of the board) and friends on the board.
Day to day decisions though are likely still Ballmer's call. It would be an awkward (and PR disaster) for Bill to fire off an e-mail saying "ignore what Steve said, do what I said" to folks who usually just report to Steve.
I don't doubt large strategic decisions are discussed by Steve, Bill, and others and they make the decision together.
But does Ballmer override Bill's authority or does Bill hold higher authority? (Ignoring who is founder). I mean who can fire who? Bill with support of the board could fire Ballmer if he wished. Having said that Ballmer and Bill have both been around the company for ages, both have lots of stock (that helps to determine the makeup of the board) and friends on the board.[QUOTE="th3warr1or"][QUOTE="duxup"]Ballmer makes day to day and most organizational decisions. Bill is there to oversee the work and head up the board of directors.duxup
Day to day decisions though are likely still Ballmer's call. It would be an awkward (and PR disaster) for Bill to fire off an e-mail saying "ignore what Steve said, do what I said" to folks who usually just report to Steve.
I don't doubt large strategic decisions are discussed by Steve, Bill, and others and they make the decision together.
Thank you.in terms of power, the chairmen along with the board can go above the CEO/pres and even get rid of him if they see fit and get a new one.
the CEO is like a figuarehead teh board picks to represent the company.
thats how it works, atleast in the american examples I have seen.
I think they generally tend to depend on the organisational structure of the company in question.kruesader
Yes it depends on the structure. CEO is the highest in my company and does not report to no board of directors because there is no board.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_executive_officer
The owner of the company or the majority share holder would be the highest position and maybe he could set himself up as CEO as well or president or chairman or whatever or get people to do those jobs.So the owner is the highest.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment